Home

Mission

Contents

News

Links

Authors

About Us

Publications

Harmony Forum

Peace from Harmony
Paul Craig Roberts. Why WWIII Is On The Horizon. Ruin is our Future. Insanity Grips The Western World. Washington is the enemy of all humanity

Paul Craig Roberts

 


Chairman, Institute for Political Economy:
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Is The Trump Administration Already Over? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBl0E0RKo9s

 

Gen. Mattis: Can Trump Leash His Pentagon 'Mad Dog'?

www.youtube.com

President-elect Trump's choice of Gen. James Mattis to be Defense Secretary has raised more than a few eyebrows. Not o­nly as a military officer in a traditionally ...

http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2017/02/06/1013970-is-the-trump-administration-already-over-paul-craig-roberts/

 

by Paul Craig Roberts

 

Trumps military chief, Gen. Mattis, is turning out to be true to his mad dog nickname.

He has just declared that Iran is the single biggest state sponsor of terrorism in the world. https://sputniknews.com/politics/201702041050338034-mattis-iran-terrorism/

 

He has declared Russia to be the number o­ne threat to the US.

He has threatened intervention in Chinas territorial affairs.

I was wrong. I thought Gen. Mattis was a reasonable choice as he rejects the efficacy of torture, and, according to Trump, convinced Trump that torture doesnt work. Apparently Mattis cannot reach beyond this realization to higher geo-political realizations. Trump needs to fire Mattis who has placed the Pentagon in the way of normal relations with Russia.

There is no evidence in the behavior of Iran, Russia, and China to support Gen.Mattis views. His definition of threat is the neoconservative o­nea country capable of resisting US hegemony. This is a convenient threat for the military/security complex as it justifies an unlimited budget in order to prevail over such threats. It is this hegemonic impulse that is the source of terrorism.

If truth can be spoken, there are o­nly two countries in the world with hegemonic aspirationsIsrael and the USand they are the sources of terrorism. Israel terrorizes Palestinians and has done so for about 70 years. The US terrorizes the rest of the world.

All known Muslim terrorists are creations of the US government. Al Qaeda was created by the Carter administration in order to confront the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan with jihadism. ISIS was created by the Obama/Hillary regime in order to overthrow Gaddafi in Libya and then was sent by the Obama/Hillary regime to overthrow Assad in Syria, as Trumps national security advisor, Gen. Flynn, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency revealed o­n TV. The Ukrainian neo-nazis assaulting the republics of Donetsk and Luhansk were also unleashed by the Obama/Hillary overthrow of the democratically elected government of Ukraine. All terror is associated with Washington and Israel.

 

The fact of Washingtons overthrow of Ukraines government is incontestable; yet large numbers of brainwashed Americansthink Russia invaded Ukraine, just as they believe the fake news that Iran is a terrorist state.

The last time Iran initiated a war of aggression was in the last decade of the 18th century when Iran reconquered the Caucasus and Georgia, which Iran soon lost to Russia.

Iran in our time has done no offense except to refuse to submit to being a Washington vassal state.

 

Additionally, Iran, and Syria rescued by the Russians, are the o­nly states in the Muslim world that are not US puppet states and mere vassals that are nothing in themselves, no independent foreign policy, no independent economic policy. o­nly Iran and Syria have independent policies.

Iran is a large country endowed with substantial energy resources. Iran has a long history going back to ancient times of independence and military prowess. Today Iran is essential to Russia as a buffer to the US created jihadism that neoconservatives plan to export to the Muslim areas of the Russian Federation. Consequently, Iran is the most inopportune of targets for Trump if he wishes to restore normal, non-threatening relations with Russia. Yet his mad dog Pentagon chief recklessly makes threatening statements alleging Iran to be a terrorist state.

 

Do we see Israels hand at work in the threats against Iran? Iran and Syria are the o­nly countries in the Middle East that are not American puppet states. Syrias army has been hardened by combat, which is what Syrias army needs in order to stand up to US-backed Israel. Both Syria and Iran are in the way of Israels Zionist policy of Greater Israelfrom the Nile to the Euphrates. For the Zionists, Palestine and Southern Lebanon are merely the beginning.

Israel has successfully used the corrupt British and now the corrupt Americans to reestablish themselves o­n lands from which God evicted them. This doesnt speak well of the intelligence and morality of the British and US governments. But what does?

Rex Tillerson, Secretary of state.

We are also hearing from Mattis and from Tillerson threats to intervene in Chinas sphere of influence. Trumps appointees appear to be unable to understand that there can be no improvement in relations with Russia if the Trump regime has Iran and China in its crosshairs.

 

Is there any prospect that the Trump administration can develop geo-political awareness? Is the tough-talking Trump administration tough enough to overthrow the power that Zionist Israel exercises over US foreign policy and the votes of the US Congress?

If not, more war is inevitable.

For twenty-four yearseight years of the criminal Clinton regime, eight years of the criminal Bush regime, eight years of the criminal Obama regimethe world has heard threats from Washington that have resulted in the death and destruction of millions of peoples and entire countries. The Trump administration needs to present a different Washington to the world.

08/02/17

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Resurrection of Armageddon Paul Craig Roberts

The Resurrection of Armageddon

Paul Craig Roberts

The U.S. intelligence communitys extraordinary campaign of leaks claiming improper ties between President Trumps team and Russia seeks to ensure a lucrative New Cold War by blocking detente. Gareth Porter

It o­nly required 24 days for the Deep State to castrate President Donald Trump and terminate the promise that the high tensions with Russia created during the Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama regimes would be terminated by Trumps presidency.
As Gareth Porter shows conclusively (http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/46546.htm), the case against General Flynn, Trumps 24-day National Security Adviser, and by implication against Trump himself, is a fake news creation.

Obamas CIA director, John Brennan, planted fake reports, none of which contained any evidence whatsoever, o­n the CIA-compliant media whores known as presstitutes. The CIAs media whores knew that the reports were a CIA response to the threat to the $1,000 billion annual budget of the military/security complex that desperately needs the Russian threat for its justification. But the media whores-principally the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC-and all the rest as well are more dedicated to serving their CIA master than they are to serving peace between nuclear powers. Interesting, isnt it, that the US and Western media are more committed to conflict with Russia than they are to peace, despite the brutal fact that 10 percent of the nuclear arsenal of either the US or Russia is sufficient to terminate all life o­n earth.

As Patrick Lawrence says: The lights upon us are dimming. We have been more or less abandoned by a press that proves incapable of informing us in anything approaching a disinterested fashion. As suggested, either the media are Clintonian liberals before they are newspapers and broadcasters, or they are servants of power before they serve us. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/46532.htm

All we have left, says Lawrence, is the alternative media. To put this simply and briefly, they and we must learn that they are not alternative to anything. In the end there is no such thing as alternative media, as I often argue. There are o­nly media, and most of ours have turned irretrievably bad.

The alternative media is the Internet media, websites such as this o­ne, RT, the Intercept, USAWatchdog, Alex Jones, Information Clearing House, Global Research, Unz Review, etc. These independent news sites are under attack. Remember the list of 200 Russian agents/dupes? Every source of information that does not subscribe to the Deep States Matrix creation of the Russian Threat, which is the Deep States replacement for the orchestrated Soviet Threat, has been selected for shutdown. Apparently, Alex Jones is already having problems with Google. Several websites managed to get off the 200 List, and those that have seem to have collapsed as members of the opposition.

As the Nazis said, all it takes is fear, and the people collapse.

Trumps presidency is effectively over. Even if he is permitted to remain in office,
he will be a figurehead for the Deep States presidency. President Trump has already fallen into line with the military/security complex. He has said Russia has to return Crimea to Ukraine, whereas in fact Crimea returned itself to Russia. He has rejected a new strategic arms limitations treaty (START) with Russia, stating that he wants supremacy in nuclear armaments, not equality. http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2017/02/27/president-trump-decries-new-start-treaty.html Obamas o­ne trillion dollar upgrade of the US nuclear arsenal is likely to get a boost from Trump.

After o­ne month in office the goal has changed from reduced tensions with Russia to greater tensions. Greater tensions might soon be upon us. There are plans to occupy part of Syria with US troops in order to prevent Syria with Russias help from reuniting the country. http://www.globalresearch.ca/rand-corporations-plan-for-dicing-up-syria/5577009 Part of Syria is to go to Turkey, part to the Kurds, and Washington will keep a chunk. This way Washington can keep the turmoil going forever. The Russians brought this problem o­n themselves. Ever hopeful for Washingtons cooperation against ISIS, Russia dallied in cleaning out ISIS. The prospect that Trump would work with Russia as part of better relations assumed that Trump would actually be in charge, which has turned out to be delusional.

It is difficult to know if the new Trump regime is more Iranophobic than Russophobic. The Trump regimes inclination to jettison the Iran agreement and reopen the conflict means more conflict with Russia. Washingtons continued provocations of both Russia and China will dispel any lingering Russian expectations of better relations with Washington.

It is bizarre to see the liberal-progressive-left allied with the warmongers against Trump. As the neoconservatives pull nuclear Armageddon out of the grave that Reagan and Gorbachev put it in, the American left demands the impeachment of the president whose goal was better relations with Russia. o­nce the champion of the working class, the left now champions Identity Politics. Trumps goal of jobs for the working class leaves the leftwing cold. The left wants to destroy the Trump deplorables, which the left describes as racist, misogynist, homophobic, gun nuts. In Identity Politics, every identity is a victim except the oppressor identitywhite heterosexual males.

Where then is the opposition to the neoconservative ideology that is driving US foreign policy toward world hegemony? There are a few of us, but we are being cast as Putin agents. In other words, those who have sufficient intelligence to understand that Washington is not going to achieve hegemony over Russia and China or even Iran, but is likely to provoke nuclear war by trying, are relegated to the traitor class.

The reason that there is still life o­n earth after more than a half century of nuclear weapons is that American presidents and Soviet leaders worked together to reduce tensions. During these decades, there were numerous false alarms of incoming ICBMs. However, because the leadership of both countries were working together to avoid nuclear conflict, the warnings were disbelieved both by the Soviets and Americans.

Today the situation is vastly different. The last three US presidents, and now apparently Trump also, worked overtime to increase tensions between the two nuclear powers. Moreover, it was done in ways that convinced the Russian government that Washington is completely untrustworthy. The o­ngoing vicious lies about the Russian connections of Trump and his associates are so obviously false as to be laughable, but the Russians are seeing that the falsity of the charges notwithstanding, Trumps National Security Adviser has fallen and Trump himself might be next.

In other words, the Russians are observing that in America facts are not relevant to outcomes. The Russians have already experienced this with regard to themselves with the lies about Putin, the Ukraine, Georgia, and Russian intentions toward Europe. Putin is routinely called a thug, murderer, the new Hitler by US politicians, presstitutes, and the Democratic Partys candidate in the recent presidential election. Ranking US generals describe Russia as the principal threat to the US. NATO commanders assert that the Russian Army could occupy the Baltics and/or Poland at any moment. These nonsensical accusations and predictions suggest to the Russians that the West is preparing its populations for an attack o­n Russia.

In such a tense state of affairs, how will false alarms be interpreted? Will Americans convinced that Putin and Russia are evil incarnate believe the false alarms this time? Will Russians convinced that they have been set up for attack believe them this time?

This is the extreme risk to which the insane neoconservatives, the idiot liberal-progressive-left, the greedy military/security complex, and the aggressive generals have exposed life o­n earth.

And the few voices warning of the risk are dismissed as Russian agents.


Original: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/02/27/resurrection-armageddon-paul-craig-roberts/
06-03-17
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Will Russia Reject Neoliberalism?

BRICS, 15 August 2016

Paul Craig Roberts and Michael Hudson CounterPunch

Russian President Vladimir Putin
Ververidis Vasilis | Shutterstock.com

11 Aug 2016 According to various reports, the Russian government is reconsidering the neoliberal policy that has served Russia so badly since the collapse of the Soviet Union.  If Russia had adopted an intelligent economic policy, its economy would be far ahead of where it stands today.  It would have avoided most of the capital flight to the West by relying o­n self-finance.

Washington took advantage of a demoralized Russian government, which looked to Washington for guidance in the post-Soviet era.  Thinking that the rivalry between the two countries had ended with the Soviet collapse, Russians trusted American advice to modernize its economy with best-practice Western ideas. Instead, Washington abused this trust, and saddled Russia with an economic policy designed to carve up Russian economic assets and transfer ownership into foreign hands.  By tricking Russia into accepting foreign capital and exposing the ruble to currency speculation, Washington made sure that the US could destabilize Russia with capital outflows and assaults o­n the rubles exchange value.  o­nly a government unfamiliar with the neoconservative aim of US world hegemony would have exposed its economic system to such foreign manipulation.

The sanctions that Washington imposed and forced Europe to impose o­n Russia show how neoliberal economics works against Russia. Its call for high interest rates and austerity sank the Russian economy needlessly.  The ruble was knocked down by capital outflows, resulting in the neoliberal central bank squandering Russias foreign reserves in an effort to support the ruble but actually supported capital flight.

Even Vladimir Putin finds attractive the romantic notion of a global economy to which every country has equal access. But the problems resulting from neoliberal policy forced him to turn to import substitution in order to make the Russian economy less dependent o­n imports.  It also made Putin realize that if Russia were to have o­ne foot in the Western economic order, it needed to have the other foot in the new economic order being constructed with China, India, and former central Asian Soviet republics.

Neoliberal economics prescribes a dependency policy that relies o­n foreign loans and foreign investment.  This policy creates foreign currency debt and foreign ownership of Russian profits.  These are dangerous vulnerabilities for a nation declared by Washington to be an existential threat to the US.

The economic establishment that Washington set up for Russia is neoliberal. Most notably, the head of the central bank Elvira Nabiullina, minister of economic development Alexei Ulyukayev, and the current and former finance ministers, Anton Siluanov and Alexei Kudrin, are doctrinaire neoliberals.  This crowd wanted to deal with Russias budget deficit by selling public assets to foreigners. If actually carried through, that policy would give Washington more control over Russias economy.

Opposed to this collection of junk economists, stands Sergey Glaziev.  Boris Titov and Andrei Klepach are reported to be his allies.

This group understands that neoliberal policies make Russias economy susceptible to destabilization by Washington if the US wants to punish the Russian government for not following Washingtons foreign policy.  Their aim is to promote a more self-sufficient Russia in order to protect the nations sovereignty and the governments ability to act in Russias national interests rather than subjugate these interests to those of Washington. The neoliberal model is not a development model, but is purely extractive. Americans have characterized it as making Russia or other dependencies hewers of wood and drawers of water or in Russias case, oil, gas, platinum and diamonds.

Self-sufficiency means not being import dependent or dependent o­n foreign capital for investment that could be financed by Russias central bank.  It also means keeping strategic parts of the economy in public, not private, hands. Basic infrastructure services should be provided to the economy at cost, o­n a subsidized basis or freely, not turned over to foreign owners to extract monopoly rent.  Glaziev also wants the rubles exchange value to be set by the central bank, not by speculators in the currency market.

Neoliberal economists do not acknowledge that the economic development of a nation with natural resource endowments such as Russia has can be financed by the central bank creating the money required to undertake the projects.  They pretend that this would be inflationary.  Neoliberals deny the long-recognized fact that, in terms of the quantity of money, it makes no difference whether the money comes from the central bank or from private banks creating money by making loans or from abroad.  The difference is that if money comes from private banks or from abroad, interest must be paid to the banks, and profits have to be shared with foreign investors, who end up with some control over the economy.

Apparently, Russias neoliberals are insensitive to the threat that Washington and its European vassals pose to the Russian state. o­n the basis of lies Washington has imposed economic sanctions o­n Russia. This political demonization is as fictitious as is the neoliberal economic propaganda.  On the basis of such lies, Washington is building up military forces and missile bases o­n Russias borders and in Russian waters.  Washington seeks to overthrow former Russian or Soviet provinces and install regimes hostile to Russia, as in Ukraine and Georgia.  Russia is continually demonized by Washington and NATO.  Washington even politicized the Olympic games and prevented the participation of many Russian athletes.

Despite these overt hostile moves against Russia, Russian neoliberals still believe that the economic policies that Washington urges o­n Russia are in Russias interest, not intended to gain control of its economy. Hooking Russias fate to Western hegemony under these conditions would doom Russian sovereignty.

_____________________________________

Paul Craig Roberts is a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. Roberts How the Economy Was Lost is now available from CounterPunch in electronic format. His latest book is The Neoconservative Threat to World Order.

Michael Hudsons new book, Killing the Host is published in e-format by CounterPunch Books and in print by Islet. He can be reached via his website, mh@michael-hudson.com

Go to Original counterpunch.org




Dear Leo and John,

This article (below) is quite worrisome for those of us seeking peaceful cooperation and sharing.I've highlighted in yellow some of the key points made by the author (Dr. Paul Craig Roberts) who has excellent credentials having been a Cabinet member when Ronald Reagan was President. He's obviously quite upset about the direction the county has taken.

For peace and humanity,

Dr. Roger Kotila, USA: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=680

25/05/16

 

Americans: A Conquered People: The New Serfs. Russia and China stand between Washington and Washingtons Goal of Hegemony over the Entire World

By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

Global Research, May 23, 2016

 

As readers know, I have seen some optimism in voters support for Trump and Sanders as neither are members of the corrupt Republican and Democratic political establishments. Members of both political establishments enrich themselves by betraying the American people and serving o­nly the interest of the o­ne Percent. The American people are being driven into the ground purely for the sake of more mega-billions for a handful of super-rich people.

 

Neither political party is capable of doing anything whatsoever about it, and neither will.

 

The optimism that I see is that the publics support of outsiders is an indication that the insouciant public is waking up. But Americans will have to do more than wake up, as they cannot rescue themselves via the voting booth. In my opinion, the American people will remain serfs until they wake up to Revolution.

 

Today Americans exist as a conquered people. They have lost the Bill of Rights, the amendments to the Constitution that protect their liberty. Anyone, other than the o­ne Percent and their political and legal servants, can be picked up without charges and detained indefinitely as during the Dark Ages, when government was unaccountable and no o­ne had any rights.

 

Only those with power were safe. In America today anyone not politically protected can be declared associated with terrorism and taken out by a Hellfire missile from a drone o­n the basis of a list of human targets drawn up by the presidents advisers. Due process, guaranteed by the US Constitution, no longer exists in the United States of America. Neither does the constitutional prohibition against the government spying o­n citizens without just cause and a court warrant.

 

The First Amendment itself, whose importance was emphasized by our Founding Fathers by making it the First Amendment, is no longer protected by the corrupt Supreme Court. The Nine who comprise the Supreme Court, like the rest of the bought-and-paid-for-government, serve o­nly the o­ne Percent.

 

Truth-tellers have become an enemy of the state. Whistleblowers are imprisoned despite their legal protection in US law.

 

The United States government has unaccountable power. Its power is not accountable to US statutory law, to international law, to the Congress, to the judiciary, to the American people, or to moral conscience. In the 21st century the war criminal US government has murdered, maimed, and dislocated millions of people based o­n lies and propaganda. Washington has destroyed seven countries in whole or part in order to enrich the American elite and comply with the neoconservative drive for US world hegemony.

 

Americans live in a propaganda-fabricated world in which a brutal police state is cloaked in nice words like freedom and democracy. Freedom and democracy is what Washingtons war machine brings with sanctions, bombs, no-fly zones, troops, and drones to countries that dare to cling to their independence from Washingtons hegemony.

 

Only two countries armed with strong military capability and nuclear weaponsRussia and Chinastand between Washington and Washingtons goal of hegemony over the entire world.

 

If Russia or China falter, the evil ensconced in Washington will rule the world. America will be the Anti-Christ. The predictions of the Christian Evangelicals preaching end times will take o­n new meaning.

 

Russia is vulnerable to becoming a vassal state of Washington. Despite a legion of betrayals by Washington, the Russian government has just proposed a joint US/Russia cooperation against terrorists.

 

One wonders if the Russian government will ever learn from experience. Has Washington cooperated with the agreement concerning Ukraine? Of course not. Has Washington cooperated in the investigation of MH-17? Of course not. Has Washington ceased its propaganda about a Russian invasion of Crimea and Ukraine? Of course not. Has Washington kept any agreement previous US governments made with Russia? Of course not.

So why does the Russian government think Washington would keep any agreement about a joint effort against terrorism?

 

The Russian government and the Russian people are so unaware of the danger that they face from Washington that they let foreigners control 20 percent of their media! Is Russia unaware that Washington has Russia slated for vassalage or destruction?

 

China is even more absurd. According to the Chinese government itself, China has 7,000 foreign-financed NGOs operating in China! Foreign financed NGOs are what Washington used to destabilize Ukraine and overthrow the elected government.

 

What does the Chinese government think these NGOs are doing other than destabilizing China?

Both Russia and China are infected with Western worship that creates a vulnerability that Washington can exploit. Delusions can result in inadequate response to threat.

 

All of Europe, both western, eastern and southern, the British Pacific such as Australia and New Zealand, Japan and other parts of Asia are vassal states of Washingtons Empire. None of these allegedly sovereign countries have an independent voice or an independent foreign or economic policy.

 

All of Latin America is subject to Washingtons control. No reformist government in Latin America has ever survived Washingtons disapproval of putting the interests of the domestic populations ahead of American corporate and financial profits. Already this year

 

Washington has overthrown the female presidents of Argentina and Brazil. Washington is currently in the process of overthrowing the government in Venezuela, with Ecuador and Bolivia waiting in the wings. In 2009 Killary Clinton and Obama overthrew the government of Honduras, an old Washington habit.

 

As Washington pays the UNs bills, the UN is compliant. No hand is ever raised against Washington. So why does anyone o­n the face of the earth think that an American election can change anything or mean anything?

We know that Killary is a liar, a crook, an agent for the o­ne Percent, and a warmonger. Lets now look at Trump.

Are there grounds for optimism about Trump? In the West news reporting is propaganda, so it is difficult to know. Moreover, we do know that, at least initially, the response of the Republican Establishment to Trump is to demonize him, so we do not know the veracity of the news reports about Trump.

 

Without belaboring the issue, two news reports struck me. o­ne is the Washington Post report that the Zionist multi-billionaire US casino owner Sheldon Adelson has endorsed Donald Trump for President.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/sheldon-adelson-i-endorse-donald-trump-for-president/2016/05/12/ea89d7f0-17a0-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html

 

Other reports say that Adelson has mentioned as much as $100 million as his political campaign contribution to Trump. Anyone who gives a political campaign $100 million dollars expect something in exchange, and the recipient is obligated to provide whatever is desired.

 

So are we witnessing the purchase of Donald Trump?

 

The initial Republican response to Trump, encouraged by the crazed neoconservatives, was to abandon the Republican candidate and to vote for Killary.

 

Is Adelsons endorsement a signal that Trump can be bought and brought into the establishment?

 

Additional evidence that Trump has sold out his naive supporters is his latest statement that Wall Street should be deregulated: https://ourfuture.org/20160519/populist-trump-wants-to-deregulate-wall-street

 

It is extraordinary that Trumps advisers have not told him that Wall Street was deregulated back in the 20th century during the Clinton regime. The repeal of Glass-Steagall deregulated Wall Street. o­ne source of the 2008 financial crisis is the deregulated derivative market. When Brooksly Born attempted to fulfill the responsibility of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and regulate over-the-counter derivatives, she was blocked by the Federal Reserve, the US Treasury, the SEC, and the US Congress.

 

Nothing has been done to correct the massive mistake of financial deregulation. The Dodd-Frank legislation did not correct the massive financial concentration that produced banks too big to fail, and the legislation did not stop Wall Streets reckless casino gambling with the US economy. Yet Trump says he will dismantle even the weak Dodd-Frank restrictions.

 

The American print and TV media are so corrupt that these reports could be false stories, the purpose of which is to demoralize Trumps supporters. o­n the other hand, should we be surprised if a billionaire aligns with the o­ne Percent?

 

Elections are an unlikely means of restoring government that is accountable to the people rather than to the o­ne Percent. Even if Trump is legitimate, he does not have the experience in foreign and economic affairs to know who to appoint to his government in order to implement change. Moreover, even if he knew, unless Trump candidates also replace the Senate, Trump could not get his choices confirmed by a Senate accountable o­nly to the o­ne Percent.

 

Americans are a conquered people. We see this in the appeal from RootsAction to the rest of the world to come to the aid of the American people. Unable to stop the lawlessness of their own democratic government, Americans plea for help from abroad:

http://act.rootsaction.org/p/dia/action3/common/public/?action_KEY=12247

 

The plea from RootsAction indicates that committed activists now acknowledge that change in America cannot be produced by elections or be achieved internally through peaceful means.

 

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Global Research, 2016

 

http://www.globalresearch.ca/americans-a-conquered-people-the-new-serfs-russia-and-china-stand-between-washington-and-washingtons-goal-of-hegemony-over-the-entire-world/5526755

 


Paul Craig Roberts. Why WWIII Is o­n The Horizon. (28/12/15) [1].

 

The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 gave birth to a dangerous American ideology called neoconservativism. The Soviet Union had served as a constraint o­n US unilateral action. With the removal of this constraint o­n Washington, neoconservatives declared their agenda of US world hegemony. America was now the sole superpower, the unipower, that could act without restraint anywhere in the world.

The Washington Post neoconservative journalist Charles Krauthammer summed up the new reality as follows:

We have overwhelming global power. We are historys designated custodians of the international system. When the Soviet Union fell, something new was born, something utterly newa unipolar world dominated by a single superpower unchecked by any rival and with decisive reach in every corner of the globe. This is a staggering new development in history, not seen since the fall of Rome. Even Rome was no model for what America is today.

The staggering unipolar power that history has given to Washington has to be protected at all costs. In 1992 top Pentagon official Undersecretary Paul Wolfowitz penned the Wolfowitz Doctrine, which became the basis for Washingtons foreign policy.

The Wolfowitz Doctrine states that the first objective of American foreign and military policy is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either o­n the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere that poses a threat [to US unilateral action] o­n the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power. (A hostile power is a country sufficiently strong to have a foreign policy independent from Washingtons.)

The unilateral assertion of American power begin in ernest during the Clinton regime with the interventions in Yugoslavia, Serbia, Kosovo, and the no-fly zone imposed o­n Iraq. In 1997 the neoconservatives penned their Project for a New American Century. In 1998, three years prior to 9/11, the neoconservatives sent a letter to President Clinton calling for regime change in Iraq and the removal of Saddam Hussein from power. Neoconservatives set out their program for removing seven governments in five years. http://www.globalresearch.ca/we-re-going-to-take-out-7-countries-in-5-years-iraq-syria-lebanon-libya-somalia-sudan-iran/5166

The events of September 11, 2001, are regarded by informed people as the new Pearl harbor that the neoconservatives said was necessary in order to begin their wars of conquest in the Middle East. Paul ONeil, President George W. Bushs first Treasury Secretary, has stated pubicly that the agenda of President Bushs first meeting with his cabinet was the invasion of Iraq. This invasion was planned prior to 9/11. Since 9/11 Washington has destroyed in whole or part eight countries and now confronts Russia both in Syria and Ukraine.

Russia cannot allow a jihadist Caliphate to be established in an area comprising Syria/Iraq, because it would be a base for exporting destabilization into Muslim parts of the Russian Federation. Henry Kissinger himself has stated this fact, and it is clear enough to any person with a brain. However, the power-crazed fanatical neoconservatives, who have controlled the Clinton, Bush, and Obama regimes, are so absorbed in their own hubris and arrogance that they are prepared to push Russia to the point of having their Turkish puppet shoot down a Russian airplane and to overthrow the democratically-elected government in Ukraine that was o­n good terms with Russia, substituting in its place an American puppet government.

With this background, we can understand that the dangerous situation facing the world is the product of the neoconservatives arrogant policy of US world hegemony. The failures of judgment and the dangers in the Syrian and Ukrainian conflicts are themselves the consequences of the neoconservative ideology.

To perpetuate American hegemony, the neoconservatives threw away the guarantees that Washington gave Gorbachev that NATO would not move o­ne inch to the East. The neoconservatives pulled the US out of the ABM Treaty, which specified that neither the US nor Russia would develop and deploy anti-ballistic missiles. The neoconservatives re-wrote US war doctrine and elevated nuclear weapons from their role as a retaliatory force to a pre-emptive first strike force. The neoconservatives began putting ABM bases o­n Russias borders, claiming that the bases were for the purpose of protecting Europe from non-existent Iranian nuclear ICBMs.

Russia and Russias president, Vladimir Putin, have been demonized by neoconservatives and their puppets in the US government and media. For example, Hillary Clinton, a candidate for the Democratic nomination for president, declared Putin to be the new Hitler. A former CIA official called for Putins assassination. Presidential candidates in both parties are competing in terms of who can be the most aggressive toward Russia and the most insulting toward Russias president.

The effect has been to destroy the trust between nuclear powers. The Russian government has learned that Washington does not respect Washingtons own laws, much less international law, and that Washington cannot be trusted to keep any agreement. This lack of trust, together with the aggression toward Russia spewing from Washington and the prostitute media and echoing in the idiotic European capitals, has established the ground for nuclear war. As NATO (essentially the US) has no prospect of defeating Russia in conventional war, much less defeating an alliance of Russia and China, war will be nuclear.

To avoid war, Putin is non-provocative and low-key in his responses to Western provocations. Putins responsible behavior, however, is misinterpreted by neoconervatives as a sign of weakness and fear. The neoconservatives tell President Obama to keep the pressure o­n Russia, and Russia will give in. However, Putin has made it clear that Russia will not give in. Putin has sent this message o­n many occasions. For example, o­n September 28, 2015, at the 70th anniversary of the United Nations, Putin said that Russia can no longer tolerate the state of affairs in the world. Two days later Putin took command of the war against ISIS in Syria.

The European governments, especially Germany and the UK, are complicit in the move toward nuclear war. These two American vassal states enable Washingtons reckless aggression toward Russia by repeating Washingtons propaganda and supporting Washingtons sanctions and interventions against other countries. As long as Europe remains nothing but an extension of Washington, the prospect of Armegeddon will continue to rise.

At this point in time, nuclear war can o­nly be avoided in two ways. o­ne way is for Russia and China to surrender and accept Washingtons hegemony. The other way is for an independent leader in Germany, the UK, or France to rise to office and withdraw from NATO. That would begin a stampede to leave NATO, which is Washingtons prime tool for causing conflict with Russia and, thereby, is the most dangerous force o­n earth to every European country and to the entire world. If NATO continues to exist, NATO together with the neoconservative ideology of American hegemony will make nuclear war inevitable.

 

 

Paul C. Roberts. Ruin is our Future.[2]

 

       Neoconservatives arrayed in their Washington offices are congratulating themselves o­n their success in using the Charlie Hebdo affair to reunite Europe with Washingtons foreign policy. No more French votes with the Palestinians against the Washington-Israeli position. No more growing European sympathy with the Palestinians. No more growing European opposition to launching new wars in the Middle East. No more calls from the French president to end the sanctions against Russia. Do the neoconservatives also understand that they have united Europeans with the right-wing anti-immigration political parties? The wave of support for the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists is the wave of Marine Le Pens National Front, Nigel Farages UK Independence Party, and Germanys PEGIDA sweeping over Europe. These parties are empowered by the anti-immigration fervor that was orchestrated in order to reunite Europeans with Washington and Israel.

        o­nce again the arrogant and insolent neoconservatives have blundered. Charlie Hebdos empowerment of the anti-immigration parties has the potential to revolutionize European politics and destroy Washingtons empire. See my weekend interview with King World News for my thoughts o­n this potential game-changer. http://kingworldnews.com/paul-craig-roberts-new-crisis-worse-russia-unleashing-black-swans-west/

The reports from the UK Daily Mail and from Zero Hedge that Russia has cut off natural gas deliveries to six European countries must be incorrect. These sources are credible and well-informed, but such a cut-off would have instantly produced political and financial turmoil of which there is no sign. Therefore, unless there is a news blackout, Russias action has been misunderstood. We know something real has happened. Otherwise, EU energy official Maros Sefcovic would not be expressing such consternation. Although I am without any definite information, I believe I know what the real story is. Russia, tired of Ukraines theft of the natural gas that passes through the country o­n its way to delivery to Europe, has made a decision to route the gas to Turkey, thus bypassing Ukraine. The Russian energy minister has confirmed this decision and added that if European countries wish to avail themselves of this gas supply, they must put in place the infrastructure or pipeline to bring the gas into their countries. In other words, there is a potential for a cutoff in the future, but no cutoff at the present.

        These two eventsCharlie Hebdo and the Russian decision to cease delivering gas to Europe via Ukraineshould remind us that the potential for black swans, and unintended consequences of official decisions that can produce black swans, always exist. Not even the American superpower is immune from black swans. There is as much circumstantial evidence that the CIA and French Intelligence are responsible for the Charlie Hebdo shootings as there is that the shootings were carried out by the two brothers whose ID was conveniently found in the alleged get-away car. As the French made certain that the brothers were killed before they could talk, we will never know what they had to say about the plot. The o­nly evidence we have that the brothers are guilty is the claim by the security forces. Every time I hear government claims without real evidence, I remember Saddam Husseins weapons of mass destruction, Assads use of chemical weapons, and Irans nuclear weapons program. If a US National Security Advisor can conjure up out of thin air mushroom clouds over an American city, Cherif and Said Kouachi can be turned into killers. After all, they are dead and cannot protest

        The consternation caused by Russias decision to relocate its gas delivery to Europe is proof that Russia holds many cards that Russia could play that would bring down the political and financial structures of the Western World. China holds similar cards. The two countries are not playing their cards, because they do not think that they need them. Instead, the two powers are withdrawing from the Western financial system that serves Western hegemony over the world. They are creating all of the economic institutions that they need in order to be completely independent of the West. Therefore, the Russian and Chinese governments reason, Why be provocative and slap down the Western fools. They might resort to their nuclear weapons, and the entire world would be lost. Lets just walk away while they encourage us to depart with their provocations. We can be thankful that Vladimir Putin and the leaders of the Chinese government are both intelligent and humane, unlike Western leaders.

        Imagine, for example, the dire consequences for the West if Putin were to become personally involved as a result of the numerous affronts to both Russia and Putin himself. Putin can destroy NATO and the entire Western financial system whenever he wants. All he has to do is to announce that as NATO has declared economic war against Russia, Russia no longer sells energy to NATO members. The NATO alliance would dissolve as Europe cannot survive without Russian energy supplies. Washingtons empire would end. Putin realizes that the insolent neoconservatives would have to push the nuclear button in order to save face. Unlike Putin, their egos are o­n the line. Thus, Putin saves the world from nuclear war by not being provocative.

        Now, imagine if the Chinese government were to lose its patience with Washington. To confront the exceptional, indispensable, unipower with the reality of its impotence, all China needs to do is to dump its massive dollar-denominated financial assets o­n the market, all at o­nce, just as the Federal Reserves bullion bank agents dump massive uncovered gold contracts o­n the futures market. In order to avoid US financial collapse, the Federal Reserve would have to print massive amounts of new dollars with which to purchase the dumped Chinese holdings. As the Federal Reserve would protect US financial markets by purchasing the dumped Chinese holdings, the Chinese would lose nothing from the sale. It is the next step that is decisive. The Chinese government then dumps the massive holdings of dollars it has received from its selloff of dollar-dominated financial instruments.

         Now what happens? The Fed can print dollars with which to purchase the dumped Chinese holdings, but the Fed cannot print foreign currencies with which to buy up the dumped dollars. The massive supply of dollars dumped in the exchange market by China would have no takers. The dollars value would collapse. Washington could no longer pay its bills by printing money. Americans living in an import-dependent country, thanks to jobs offshoring, would be faced with high prices that would seriously erode their living standard. The United States would experience economic, social, and political instability.

          Putting aside their brainwashing, their defensiveness and patriotic support of the regime in Washington, Americans need to ask themselves: How is it possible that the government of the United States, an alleged Superpower, is so unaware of its true vulnerabilities that Washington is capable of pushing two real powers until they have had enough and play the cards that they hold? Americans need to understand that the o­nly thing exceptional about the US is the ignorance of the population and the stupidity of the government. What other country would let a handful of Wall Street crooks control its economic and foreign policy, run its central bank and Treasury, and subordinate citizens interests to the interests of the o­ne percents pocketbook?

          A population this insouciant is at the total mercy of Russia and China. Yesterday there was a black swan event, an event that could yet unleash other black swan events: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-01-16/largest-retail-fx-broker-stock-crashes-90-swiss-contagion-spreads The Swiss central bank announced an end to its pegging of the Swiss franc to the euro and US dollar. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-01-15/its-tsunami-swiss-franc-soars-most-ever-after-snb-abandons-eurchf-floor-macro-hedge- Three years ago flight from euros and dollars into Swiss francs pushed the exchange value of the franc so high that it threatened the existence of the Swiss export industries. Switzerland announced that any further inflows of foreign currencies into francs would be met by creating new francs to absorb the inflows so as not to drive up the exchange rate further. In other words, the Swiss pegged the franc. Yesterday the Swiss central bank announced that the peg was off. The franc instantly rose in value. Stocks of Swiss export companies fell, and hedge funds wrongly positioned incurred major hits to their solvency. Why did the Swiss remove the peg? It was not a costless action. It cost the central bank and Swiss export industries substantially

          The money printing policy of the US, Japan, and apparently now the EU has forced other countries to inflate their own currencies in order to prevent the rise in the exchange value of their currencies that would curtail their ability to export and earn foreign currencies with which to pay for their imports. Thus Washington has forced the world into printing money. The Swiss have backed out of this system. Will others follow, or will the rest of the world follow the Russians and Chinese governments into new monetary arrangements and simply turn their backs o­n the corrupt and irredeemable West? The level of corruption and manipulation that characterizes US economic and foreign policy today was impossible in earlier times when Washingtons ambition was constrained by the Soviet Union. The greed for hegemonic power has made Washington the most corrupt government o­n earth. The consequence of this corruption is ruin. Leadership passes into empire. Empire begets insolence. Insolence brings ruin. Ruin is Americas future.

 

Paul C. Roberts. Insanity Grips The Western World. [3;4]

 

          Just as Karl Marx claimed that History had chosen the proletariat, neoconservatives claim that History has chosen America. Just as the Nazis proclaimed Deutschland uber alles, neoconservatives proclaim America uber alles. In September 2013 President Obama actually stood before the United Nations and declared, I believe America is exceptional.

         Germanys political leaders and those in Great Britain, France, and throughout Europe, Canada, Australia, and Japan also believe that America is exceptional, which means better than they are. Thats why these countries are Washingtons vassals. They accept their inferiority to the Exceptional Country  the USA  and follow its leadership.

         It is unlikely that the Chinese think that a handful of White People are exceptional in anything except their diminutive numbers. The populations of Asia, Africa, and South America dwarf those that comprise Washingtons Empire. Neither do the Russians believe that the US is exceptional. Putins response to Obamas claim of American superiority was: God created us equal. Putin added: It is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional, whatever the motivation.

         If all countries are exceptional, the word loses its meaning. If America is exceptional, it means others are inferior for lacking this designation. Inferiors have less rights and can be bullied into submission or bombed into oblivion. The Exceptional Country is above all the others and, therefore, doesnt have to be concerned about how it treats them. Obviously, Americans and their vassals think America is exceptional as the millions of people murdered, maimed, and dislocated by Washingtons wars in eight countries in the 21st century has not resulted in condemnation of Washington. Merkel, Hollande, Cameron and the puppets in Canada, Australia, and Japan still suck up, holding tight to Washington.

          Instead, Russia and Iran, countries that, unlike the US, are not militarily aggressive, are portrayed in the White Peoples Media as threats and are condemned. The White Media claims, and has claimed since February 2014, that there are Russian tanks and troops in Ukraine. Putin has pointed out that if this indeed was the case, Kiev and Western Ukraine would have fallen to the Russian invasion early last year. Kiev has been unable to defeat the small breakaway republics in eastern and southern Ukraine and would stand no chance against the Russian military.

Recently a brave news organization made fun of the White Medias claim that Russian tanks have been pouring into Ukraine for 14 months. The parody pictured Ukraine at a standstill. All traffic o­n all roads and residential streets is blocked by Russian tanks. All parking places, including sidewalks and peoples front and rear gardens have tanks piled upon tanks. The entire country is immobilized in gridlock. Although a few have fun making fun of the gullible people who believe the White Media, the situation is nevertheless serious as it concerns life o­n planet Earth.

          There is little sign that Washington and its vassals care about life o­n Earth. Recently, the largest political group in the European Parliamentthe European Peoples Partyexpressed a cavalier opinion about life o­n Earth. We know this, because, if we can trust Euractive, an o­nline EU news source, the majority EU party believes that declaring the EUs readiness for nuclear war is o­ne of the best steps to deter Russia from further aggression: http://www.unian.info/politics/1070675-meps-believe-eu-should-be-ready-for-nuclear-war.html. The aggression to be stopped by Europes declaration of its readiness for Armageddon is the alleged Russian invasion of Ukraine, and the further aggression is Putins alleged intention of reestablishing the Soviet Empire. It must be disappointing to the Russian government to see that leaders of the European Union prefer to endorse nuclear war than to challenge Washingtons propaganda.

          When I read that the governing party in the European Parliament thought non-existent aggression had to be stopped by a declaration of readiness for nuclear war, I realized that money could buy any and everything, even the life of the planet. The European Peoples Party was speaking in behalf of Washingtons propaganda, not in behalf of Europe. Europes nuclear war with Russia would end instantly with the destruction of every European capital. The crazed vice-president of the European Peoples Party, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski revealed who the real aggressor is when he declared: Time of talk and persuasion with Russia is over. Now its time for a tough policy.

           Clearly, the European Parliament is a great danger to life o­n the planet. Is it realistic to think that Russia will allow herself to become a concubine of Washington?



Paul C. Roberts. How America Was Lost.[5]

 

No legal issue arises when the United States responds to a challenge to its power, position, and prestige. Dean Acheson, 1962, speaking to the American Society of International Law. Dean Acheson declared 51 years ago that power, position, and prestige are the ingredients of national security and that national security trumps law. In the United States democracy takes a back seat to national security, a prerogative of the executive branch of government. National security is where the executive branch hides its crimes against law, both domestic and international, its crimes against the Constitution, its crimes against innocent citizens both at home and abroad, and its secret agendas that it knows that the American public would never support. National security is the cloak that the executive branch uses to make certain that the US government is unaccountable. Without accountable government there is no civil liberty and no democracy except for the sham voting that existed in the Soviet Union and now exists in the US.

There have been periods in US history, such as President Lincolns war to prevent secession, World War I, and World War II, when accountable government was impaired. These were short episodes of the Constitutions violation, and the Constitution was reinstated in the aftermath of the wars. However, since the Clinton regime, the accountability of government has been declining for more than two decades, longer than the three wars combined.

In law there is the concept of adverse possession, popularly known as squatters rights. A non-owner who succeeds in occupying a piece of property or some o­ne elses right for a certain time without being evicted enjoys the ownership title conveyed to him. The reasoning is that by not defending his rights, the owner showed his disinterest and in effect gave his rights away.

Americans have not defended their rights conveyed by the US Constitution for the duration of the terms of three presidents. The Clinton regime was not held accountable for its illegal attack o­n Serbia. The Bush regime was not held accountable for its illegal invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. The Obama regime was not held accountable for its renewed attack o­n Afghanistan and its illegal attacks o­n Libya, Pakistan, and Yemen, and by its proxies o­n Syria. We also have other strictly illegal and unconstitutional acts of government for which the government has not been held accountable. The Bush regimes acts of torture, indefinite detention, and warrantless spying, and the Obama regimes acts of indefinite detention, warrantless spying, and murder of US citizens without due process. As the Obama regime lies through its teeth, we have no way of knowing whether torture is still practiced.

If these numerous criminal acts of the US government spread over the terms of three presidents pass into history as unchallenged events, the US government will have acquired squatters rights in lawlessness. The US Constitution will be, as President George W. Bush is reported to have declared, a scrap of paper. Lawlessness is the hallmark of tyranny enforced by the police state. In a police state law is not a protector of rights but a weapon in the hands of government. [see Roberts & Stratton, The Tyranny of Good Intentions] The accused has no recourse to the accusation, which does not require evidence presented to a court. The accused is guilty by accusation alone and can be shot in the back of the head, as under Stalin, or blown up by a drone missile, as under Obama. As a person aware of the long struggle against the tyrannical state, I have been amazed and disheartened by the acceptance not o­nly by the insouciant American public, but also by law schools, bar associations, media, Congress and the Supreme Court of the executive branchs claim to be above both law and the US Constitution.

As Lawrence Stratton and I show in our book about how the law was lost, liberals and conservatives chasing after their favorite devils, such as child abusers and drug pushers, and prosecutors, judges, and police devoted to conviction and not to justice, have gradually eroded over time the concept of law as a protection of the innocent, With the atmosphere of threat created by 9/11, the final destruction of the protective features of law was quickly achieved in the name of making us safe from terrorists. The fact that we are no longer safe from our own government did not register. This is how liberty was lost, and America with it.

Can liberty be regained? Probably not, but there is a chance if Americans have the necessary strength of character. The chance comes from the now known fact that the neoconservative Bush/Cheney regime took America and its puppet states to war in Afghanistan and Iraq entirely o­n the basis of lies. As all evidence proves, these wars were not the results of mistaken intelligence. They were the products of intentional lies.

The weapons inspectors told the Bush regime that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Despite this known fact, the Bush regime sent Secretary of State Colin Powell to the UN with fabricated evidence to convince the world that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and was a threat to the world. Even if such weapons had existed in Iraq, many countries have them, including the US and Israel, and the presence of weapons does not under the Nuremberg Laws justify unprovoked aggression against the possessor. Under the Nuremberg Laws, unprovoked military aggression is a war crime, not the possession of weapons that many countries have. The war crime was committed by the US and its coalition of the willing, not by Saddam Hussein.

As for the invasion of Afghanistan, we know from the last video of Osama bin Laden in October 2001, attested by experts to be the last appearance of a man dying of renal failure and other diseases, that he declared that he had no responsibility for 9/11 and that Americans should look to their own government. We know as a reported fact that the Afghan Taliban offered to turn over Osama bin Laden to Washington if the Bush regime would provide the evidence that indicated bin Laden was responsible. The Bush regime refused to hand over the (non-existent) evidence and, with support of the corrupt and cowardly Congress and the presstitute media, attacked Afghanistan without any legal justification. Remember, the FBI has stated publicly that it has no evidence that Osama bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 and that that is why the crimes for which the FBI wanted bin Laden did not include responsibility for the 9/11 attack.

The war propaganda campaign was well prepared. Yellow ribbon decals were handed out for cars proclaiming support the troops. In other words, anyone who raises the obvious questions is not supporting the troops. Still today insouciant Americans sport these decals o­n their cars unaware that what they are supporting are the murder of foreign women, children and village elders, the death and physical and mental maiming of American soldiers, and the worldwide destruction of the reputation of the United States, with Americas main rival, China, now calling for a de-Americanized world. A country with a population as insouciant as Americans is a country in which the government can do as it pleases.

Now that we have complete proof that the criminal Bush regime took our country to wars in Afghanistan and Iraq solely o­n the basis of intentional lies, how can the legal institutions, the courts, the American people possibly tolerate the Obama regimes ignoring of the obvious crimes? How can America simply accept Obamas statement that we mustnt look back, o­nly move ahead? If the US government, which has committed the worst crimes of our generation, cannot be held accountable and punished, how can federal, state, and local courts fill up American prisons with people who smoked pot and with people who did not sufficiently grovel before the police state.

Doubtless, the Obama regime, should it obey the law and prosecute the Bush regimes crimes, would have to worry about being prosecuted for its own crimes, which are just as terrible. Nevertheless, I believe that the Obama regime could survive if it put all the blame o­n the Bush regime, prosecuted the Bush criminals, and desisted from the illegal actions that it currently supports. This would save the Constitution and US civil liberty, but it would require the White House to take the risk that by enforcing US law, US law might be enforced against its own illegal and unconstitutional acts by a succeeding regime. The Bush/Cheney/John Yoo neoconservative regime having got rid of US law, no doubt the Obama regime thinks it is best to leave the situation as it is, rid of law.

Without accountability, America is finished. Not o­nly will Americans live in a police state with no civil liberties, but the rest of the world is already looking at America with a jaundiced eye. The US is being reconstituted as an authoritarian state. All it takes is o­ne failure of accountability for the police state to become entrenched, and we have had numerous failures of accountability. Does anyone really believe that some future government is going to make restitution to persecuted truth-tellers, such as Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, and Edward Snowdon, as was done for Japanese Americans? Now that we know for a certain fact that the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq were based o­n propaganda and lies, Congress and the world media should demand to know what was the real secret agenda. What are the real reasons for which Afghanistan and Iraq were invaded?

No truthful explanation for these wars exists.

Paul ONeill, the Bush regimes first Treasury Secretary, is o­n public record stating that at the very first cabinet meeting, long prior to 9/11, the agenda was a US attack o­n Iraq. In other words, the Bush regimes attack o­n Iraq had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11. What was the Bush regimes secret agenda, kept secret by the Obama regime, that required an illegal, war criminal, attack o­n a sovereign country, an action for which officials of Hitlers government were executed? What is the real purpose of Washingtons wars?

It is totally and completely obvious that the wars have nothing to do with protecting Americans from terrorism. If anything, the wars stir up and create terrorists. The wars create hatred of America that never previously existed. Despite this, America is free of terrorists attacks except for the o­nes orchestrated by the FBI. What the fabricated terror threat has done is to create a thorough-going domestic police state that is unaccountable.

Americans need to understand that they have lost their country. The rest of the world needs to recognize that Washington is not merely the most complete police state since Stalinism, but also a threat to the entire world. The hubris and arrogance of Washington, combined with Washingtons huge supply of weapons of mass destruction, make Washington the greatest threat that has ever existed to all life o­n the planet. Washington is the enemy of all humanity.


           (The underlined is our Leo Semashko)

 

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts' latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West, How America Was Lost: From 9/11 to the Police/Warfare State, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order. Read more: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/pages/about-paul-craig-roberts/ 


 

1. Roberts, Paul C. (2015). Why WWIII Is o­n The Horizon: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/12/28/why-wwiii-is-on-the-horizon-paul-craig-roberts/

2. Roberts, Paul C. (2015) Ruin Is Our Future:
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/01/16/ruin-future-paul-craig-roberts

3. Roberts, Paul C. (2015) Insanity Grips The Western World: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/04/27/insanity-grips-western-world-paul-craig-roberts/

4. Roberts, Paul C. (2014) How America Was Lost: From 9/11 to the Police/Warfare State: http://forfreepdfbooks.blogspot.ru/2012/08/free-pdf-how-america-was-lost-from-911.html

5. Roberts, Paul C. (2013)How America Was Lost: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2013/11/07/america-lost-paul-craig-roberts/

 




Up
© Website author: Leo Semashko, 2005; © designed by Roman Snitko, 2005