Home

Mission

Contents

News

Links

Authors

About Us

Publications

Harmony Forum

Peace from Harmony
Spherons: The UN of Harmony instead of the UN of Disharmony

 Network Spherons:

The UN Harmony Replacing UN Disharmony.

Sociocybernetic Model of Spherons Global Harmonious Governance (SMSGHG)
at the UN level


---------------------------------------------------------------
Global Harmony Association (GHA)

Harmonious Civilization Spiritual Culture

Citizens of Earth!

Unite in harmony for love, peace, freedom, justice, fraternity and happiness!



GHA since February 15, 2005 is an international NGO uniting more than 600 members in 65 countries and more than o­ne million participants from the GHA collective members in 80 countries.

Web: www.peacefromharmony.org


Board: 36 GHA members from 14 countries

www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=249


List of
the GHA books and projects of global peace from harmony:

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=472

 

GHA headquarters: Office A 170, New Manglapuri, New Delhi 110045, India; Ph. 124 4266169.
Email: ghatrust@gmail.com


GHA Mission is
:

To bring global peace from harmony and to build a conscious way for harmonious civilization o­n scientifically based ‘The ABC of Harmony’ and through ‘Global Peace Science’(GPS) by the projects of global harmony, harmonious education and intercultural dialogue
Video. SOCIONOME: http://youtu.be/hbxY5lREOeA
Scenario: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=578
The ABC of Harmony: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478

GPS: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Network* Spherons:

The UN of Harmony and Global Peace
Replacing the UN of Disharmony.

Sociocybernetic Model of Spherons Global Harmonious Governance (SMSGHG)
at the UN level

*The network societal spherons (a network of spherons of different levels from micro to mega) is a special "soft" cluster of network structures that cover the population as a whole and all people from birth to death in the form of extremely large classes/groups engaged in four spheres of social production. Their primary cohesivecriterion is productive employment ("autopoiesis" of Maturana). Autopoiesis constitutes all the fundamental attributes of spherons: equality, harmony, peace, freedom, democracy, etc. See for more details below 2.3.5.


The UN worst and most dangerous disharmony generating all global risks, challenges and problems is the US-NATO militarism.





 

Spheral Model and Architecture of the UN Harmony

Instead

National Model and Architecture of the UN Disharmony

 

Model-1

Spheral Structure of the UN Harmony

 


 




Synopsis of the World Textbook
for the UN global harmonious education:
"Spherons of Harmonious Peace, Governance and Cooperation"

 

GHA 57-th network spheral project,
Started o­n: July 15, 2017
Approved: November 16, 2017

Created o­n the basis of the "Global Peace Science" (2016) by 173 co-authors from 34 countries:

http://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf


Authors:
Leo Semashko, Bernard Scott, Subhash Chandra, Rudolf Siebert, Vladislav Krasnov, Ramesh Kumar, Sanjay Tewari, Uraz Baymuratov, Irina Medvedeva, Ayo Amale, Subhash Sharma, Takis Ioannides, Bishnu Pathak, Matreia Roy, Surendra Pathak, Alexander Semashko, Vera Popovich, Guy Crequie, Julian Korab-Karpowicz, Pravat Dhal,

Michael Ellis: - the GHA 21 members

(personal pages of coauthors can be found at web: http://peacefromharmony.org)

From 11 countries: Australia, Great Britain, Ghana, Greece, India, Kazakhstan, Nepal, Poland, Russia, USA, France
With the support of 173 coauthors (from 34 countries) of the book "Global Peace Science", none of whose coauthors rejected this project including support of two Nobel Peace Prize Laureates:

Prof. John Scales Avery, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate (shared 1995 award), Chairman of the Danish Peace Academy, Copenhagen, Denmark, http://www.fredsakademiet.dk ,

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=672 и

Mairead Maguire, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate 1976, stopped the terror in Belfast, Northern Ireland, Community for Peace People, http://www.peacepeople.com/MaireadCMaguire.htm/ ,

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=678

Dr. Leo Semashko is Project Initiator, Manager and Editor in Chief, Russia.
GHA Founder and Honorary President; RC51, Sociocybernetics,
International Sociological Association
Honorary Member

http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253 - leo.semashko@gmail.com

 

 

Publication:

In English: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=769
In Russian:
http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=736

 

 

Harmony will save the world, because:
"The
internal harmony of the world is the o­nly true objective reality
."
Henri Poincare

You never change things by fighting the existing reality.

To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”

Buckminster Fuller

“Vasudheva kutumbakam”, humankind is o­ne family.

Ancient Indian Vedas

“Our Global System of the United Nations is not equipped to deal with today’s risks.

It is no longer fit for purpose to deal with 21st century risks ...

We urgently need fresh new thinking

Laszlo Szombatfalvy

Therefore, governglobal harmony can o­nly by harmoniously and holistically

excluding militarism, aggression, wars and other risks.

Authors

“Boldness has genius and power and magic”.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

“The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not the turbulence―

It is to act with yesterday’s logic.”

Peter Drucker

The Science of War is being replaced by a Global Science of Peace based o­n love,

Harmony, reverence for life and creation.

Mairead Maguire

 

Abbreviations list:

 

1.WWIII: The Third World War

2.WWII: Second World War

3.UNH: United Nations Harmony

4.TUN: Traditional UN or UND: United Nations Disharmony

5.PIHSC: Peaceful International Harmonious Scientific Cooperation

6.IHLO: International Harmonious Law and Order

7.IPAF: International Peacekeeping Armed Forces of UNH

8.JHC: Joined Harmonious Command of IPAF

9.SMSGHG: Sociocybernetic Model of the Spherons’ Global Harmonious Governance

10.GPS: Global Peace Science from harmony

11.SGC: Spheral Governing Clusters

12.SGCC: SGC Consensus

13.EUN: Experimental UN, identical to UNH

14.FSEUS: Four Spheral Equations Universal Standard

15.SHD: Spheral Harmonious Democracy

16.GHC: Global Harmony Charter for UNH

17.UNHSGA: UNH Spheral General Assembly

18.UNHSWG: UNH Spheral World Government

19.PHC: Peace from Harmony Council - analogue of the modern UN Security Council

20.PHSC: Peace from Harmony Supreme Court

21.SAGH: Sociocybernetic Axiom of Global Harmony

22.PIOT resources: People, Information, Organizations, Things

23.SIOT-spheres: Sociosphere, Infosphere, Orgsphere and Technoecosphere

24.SIOT-classes, Spherons: SocioSpheron, InfoSpheron, OrgSpheron and TechnoSpheron

25.SOCIONOME: Sociocybernetic Genome of humankind, or the genetic code of world peace from harmony

26.HTSM: Humankind Thermodynamic Spheral Model

27.TMDESE: Thermodynamic Model of Distribution and Exchange of Solar Energy for Natural Spheres of the Earth: Litho-, Hydro-, Atmo- and Bio-

28.TSSH: Tetranet Spheral Statistics of Harmony

29.SSHM: System of Spheral Harmony Matrices

30.ULNSSH: Unified Logical Network Statistical Space of Humanity

31.SHT: Spheral Harmonization Technologies

32.SIST: Spheral Information-Statistical Technology

33.IAHP: International Academy of Harmony and Peace

34.CPWE: Children's Priority and Women’s Equality

35.CSEP: Children's Suffrage Executed by Parents

36.GPD: Governments Peace Departments

37.GCDH: General and Complete Disarmament from Harmony

38.IPAF: UNH International Peacekeeping Armed Forces

39.INPCH: UNH International-National Peace Corps from Harmony

40.GFHHPE: General Free Higher Harmonious Peace Education

41.HRC: Harmonious Reserve Currency

42.ROEP: Roadmap for Overcoming Extreme Poverty

43.MMMM: Minimizing the Maximum and Maximizing the Minimum

44.EHFC: Earth Harmonious Federation Constitution

45.SIHA: Spherons’ Integral Harmony Axiology

-----------------------------------

 

Abstract

 

The United Nations is a disharmonious organisation of nation states, in which the dominant powers are mired in an arms race and various wars. The project proposes a new holistic sociocybernetic and tetrasociological model of global harmonious governance for a new UN of harmony. The model is based o­n the four spheres of social production of the young Karl Marx, when his ideas were still free from political dogmas about a struggle between different classes, and the concept of autopoiesis of Humberto Maturana.The population is engaged in the activities of the spheres as ‘spherons’. The four spherons are: 1. the sociospheron which produces people; 2. the infospheron which produces information; 3. the orgspheron which produces organisations; 4. the technospheron which produces things. Spherons, by definition, by their activities reproduce the human social world.Spherons can be viewed as the stochastic sociocybernetic genome of humankind - the genetic code of its harmony. Their dynamics are revealed in the information and organizational technologies that harmonise the entire range of direct and feedback linkages of society such that society is reproduced.Their harmonious working is prevented by mankind’s lack of awareness of these processes. Instead of learning about how the spherons are functioning so as to avoid disharmony,with the emphasis o­n nation states and individualism, we are subject to conflict and other societal and individual pathologies. If we were to be aware of how spherons reproduce the world we would agree with this peace science and its proposals for how to move towards a more harmonious world.

 

Shortly. The project offers a unique sociocybernetic and tetrasociological model of global harmonious governance of spherons - harmonious classes of the population to replace the traditional American UN disharmonyby the UN harmony and peace of a new multipolar world order for the 21st century. The traditional UN was created by militaristic America to legitimize its domination in its unipolar world order. It completely discredited itself for 72 years of the existence of the UN in its helplessness to ensure a global peace and free humankind and the planet from the constant threat of military self-destruction.

Key words: UN, USA, war, militarism, disharmony, peace, harmony, spherons, sociocybernetics, tetrasociology, global harmonious governance

 

 

1. Critical Part.

US-NATO militaristic protectorate over the UN:

Globalization trend of war, genocide, neo-fascism, democracy of "inverted totalitarianism", environmental and climatic destruction, corruption, inequality, poverty, falsehood, "fake media", lawlessness, mafia and pathologies of fraud, crime and drugs.
Vacuum of peacemaking leadership.
Elimination of global peace from the new millennium goals.
Note.
Th
is critical part determines the motivation of the sharpest necessity to reform the UN in the face of inevitably approximating danger of a new world (nuclear) war. But if this danger and this motivation for reforming the UN are obvious to the reader, then you can skip this part and go straight to the project constructive part below.

 

US Has Killed More Than 20 Million In 37 Nations Since WWII.

Lucas

The US has deployed 240,000 troops in 172 countries around the world.

Reimann

You can't have a democracy that organizes itself around war.

Giroux

We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if mankind is to survive.

Einstein

Join together for a common vision – the total abolition of Militarism and war.

Maguire

 

 

1.1.Preamble.

The UN: World Harmony or a Nuclear World War III?

Militaristic leadership of the US-NATO:
War Globalization or Peace Globalization?

 

Today, people are finally waking up to the dangers of a world war, which might emanate from the highest levels of the US government. We are no longer dealing with a hypothetical scenario. The threat of World War III is real. Public opinion has become increasingly aware of the impending dangers of an all-out US-NATO led war against Iran, North Korea and the Russian Federation. WW III has been contemplated by the U.S. and its allies for well over ten years”. [1]

72 years of the continual ferocious and atrocious militarism of the United States in their "long war against humanity" after WWII, after the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan in 1945, proved two simple and ingenious truthsof the XX century. o­ne belongs to Einstein: "Peace cannot be achieved through violence, it can o­nly be achieved through understanding." The other belongs to King: "The US government is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world".

All these years, the US has been waging a continuous war, “killing more than 11 million in 37 countries after WWII. [2] The US has deployed 240,000 troops in 172 countries around the world – a sprawling global network which serves as a permanent gesture of threat.” [3] This means that under the UN's wing, the USA has occupied almost all of its members for 72 years, threatening to violate all naughty nations that is globalization of the USA violence and dictate and their militaristic protectorate over the UN, over almost all of its members.

They immersed "The Earth in the Pentagon’s wars woe" and turning America into a "nation of war": "We are waging war. We are the Nation of War. We destroy. We kill. Everyone fears us." [4] This trend is rightly assessed as "Historical Tradition of American Empire War and Genocidal Crimes Against Humanity" [5; 6], excluding peace in the UN, under the wing of which the USA has built a real threat of "WW III o­n the horizon" of humanity [7].

Unfortunately, Russia, China, Iran and other peace-loving countries that did not attack anyone, unlike the US-NATO, in fact, without an alternative constructive model of the United Nations, are not able to take Einstein's truth as their strategy. Following the United States, they also rely o­n achieving peace not o­n "understanding", but o­n violence, o­n a reciprocal arms race, o­n their balance and military deterrence, which ultimately are also meaningless for global peace as the hegemonic aggressive arms race of the US and its allies. This is the main tragedy of modern peacemaking, weakened by the lack of scientific understanding of global peace and the scientific model of its UNH, which is the o­nly o­ne capable of liberating humankind from the arms race and new wars, including nuclear o­nes.

In the postwar period, the o­nly international organization of the United Nations established in 1945, called for peace and the prevention of wars, was in fact incapable of fulfilling its peacekeeping mission. Really, 72 years, it condones continuous wars, a growing arms race and brutal US-NATO militarism. Why is this happening? How can we explain the almost total connivance of the UN to the existing 72-year global militaristic status quo, which today placed humanity o­n the second line from a world thermonuclear war suicidal for humankind and the planet? The main question of this critical situation: what can be a positive constructive and nonviolent alternative to this desperate militaristic deadlock?

The GHA 57th project is devoted to these urgent questions, the main conclusion of which is the necessity and the possibility of creating the qualitatively new UN Harmony (UNH), which gradually will replace the existing American UN of disharmony and militarism. This substitution can o­nly be the scientific model of UNH, which from the very beginning will, by all its attributes, be a peacekeeping, excluding militarism. Itsmainoriginalattributesare:

1. Spheral structure of legislative, executive and judicial bodies of the UNH, based not o­n the militarism of nation-states, but o­n the fundamental peacefulness of the spherons - the harmonious classes of their population employed in the spheres of social production.

2. Membership of nation-statesin the UNH implements o­n the representation of their initially peaceful and equal spherons in all UNH bodies.

3. The first peace condition for joining to the UNH is a strict guaranteed obligation of voluntary annual reduction of the military budget of each country by 2%, which will exclude the arms race and lead in 50 years to general and complete disarmament remaining a fiction and unattainable utopia of the militaristic traditional UN (TUN) for 72 years. A key condition for the membership of any state in the UNH can be o­nly o­ne thing: the rejection from militarism, which is confirmed by an annual reduction in military spending by at least 2%.

4. The second peaceful condition for joining to the UNH is a rigorous guaranteed commitment to participate in the Peaceful International Harmonious Scientific Cooperation (PIHSC) with an annual reduction in production and arms trade by 2% and a similar reduction in military cooperation with other countries.

5. The third peace condition is the transfer of defense and protection of the national sovereignty, integrity and security of each country of the UNH member within the established borders to the competence of UNH and its International Peacekeeping Armed Forces (IPAF) for a transition period of 50 yearsand further. The Joint Harmonious Command (JHC) of the IPAF is created from the military specialists exclusively members of the new UNH, which recognize its initial attributes, finance it and its IPAF via 2% deductions from military budgets and make their armed forces transparent forthe UNH members.

6. All the foundations, attributes and conditions of the UNH, including the creation and functioning the UNH IPAF are regulated by its Global Harmony Charter (GHC), the Earth Harmonious Federation Constitution (EHFC) and the Universal Declaration of the PIHSC. These three legal documents as the basis for a new International Harmonious Law and Order (IHLO), excluding war, aggression and militarism, are prepared jointly by the International Scientific Harmonious Commission (ISHC) and approved by the UNH legislative body during the 5-6 year transition period from the TUN to UNH.

The scientific and humanistic justification for the UNH model and its main structures and details are revealed in this GHA project, which has been prepared in it for more than 12 years. It is intended for all peace-loving countries as a scientific "understanding" of global peace and the corresponding model of UNH as an alternative to the militaristic TUN. It expresses the global necessity of the UN Harmony instead of the UN disharmony (UND), the danger and crisis of which are revealed below. 
 

1.2. UN Disharmony:

The US-NATO leadership of militaristic empire

It is obvious that an international organization uniting all nations of the planet is called upon to ensure the life of humankind, but not to keep it for decades under the rapidly growing threat of total self-destruction that the UN demonstrates. What is the main reason for this fundamental defect of the UN? The fact that it was created by the most powerful economic and military power - the US - to legalize its militaristic imperial policy in the post-war unipolar world order. The United States suffered minimal losses in the Second World War (WWII) but was maximally militarized and enriched from it, becoming the world hegemon, the legalization of which was the UN, created for this purpose by the USA. Apple from the apple tree fell not far.

Therefore, such a UN can rightfully be qualified as a UN disharmony (UND) or a traditional UN (TUN) similar to the infamous League of Nations. The ultimate goal of humankind - global peace, was practically excluded from its agenda and tabooed in it; therefore, like the League of Nations it in fact did nothing fundamentally for peace in 72 years. At best the UN limited by peace in special fragmented cases. The UN Charter and its Declaration of Human Rights lacks the main right - the human right to life, according to which every war, mass armament and militarism are declared a crime against humanity and excluded from society. The absence of this right and an unswerving taboo o­n war, armament and militarism opened for them an unlimited free space of prosperity and endless growth that the UN was unable to overcome in 72 years.

We will name o­nly a few of the weightiest proofs confirming our conclusion.

1. Four months after the signing of the UN Charter in April 1945 in Los Angeles, the United States destroyed over 200,000 civilian populations of Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki by atomic bombing, without any military necessity, by showing the world and the newborn created by them the UN, who is now the boss and dictator in the world, whose “Ownership of the World[8]. It was an act of conscious and intentional genocide. The US refuses to apologize for this crime against humanity until now, reserving the right of the first nuclear strike [9; 10; 11]. This is perceived by the UN during 72 years as a norm, which exposes it as an organization not of peace, but of war. With this bombing, the USA launched a new unprecedented round of the arms race of the UN members, accompanied by an uninterrupted cycle of their wars around the world.

2. The USA has not yet abandoned from the misanthropic right of a preemptive nuclear strike, threatening to destroy the North Korea (25 million people) in 2017, from the UN rostrum, with a new nuclear bombardment [12], which is being prepared in front of UN members with their silent encourages US war, militarism and aggression, with the exception of some votes. For 72 years, the USA has made dozens of "disliked" UN member countries with targets of aggressive invasions and militaristic preparations: "Target Russia, target China, target Iran" [13], and so o­n without end with the natural total indifference of the American UN war. For example, for Russia, the US-NATO is preparing a new version of Hitler's plan ‘Barbarossa’ o­n its Western border [14] and “Reckless Congress ‘Declares War’ o­n Russia”[15].

3. All 72 years of the UN existence, the USA in its framework practice, in fact, a continuous genocide, with the full, practically, connivance of the UN. The genocide of the United States and Britain is well known against the Iraqi people [16; 16a]. The US genocide has deep historical roots since the destruction of many millions of American Indians [17]. Therefore, it is not surprising that all 37 US-NATO wars after the WWII in 37 countries in which they killed over 20 million innocent victims [2] is a continuous, open and "democratic" genocide in the eyes of a powerless UN and astonished humanity after the secret genocide of the US Indians. 
        Therefore, it is not surprising that the US is planning genocide constantly so far.According to a secret document dated September 15, 1945, “the Pentagon had envisaged blowing up the Soviet Union with a coordinated nuclear attack directed against major urban areas… to annihilate and kill the inhabitants of selected urban areas. The documents confirm that the US was involved in the “planning of genocide against the Soviet Union.” The USA continues to plan genocide until now 72 years, under the UN hood, expanding targets o­n Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, etc. [18]

America is a spiritually dead civilization, because planning instead of a global peace the genocide of several nuclear powers the USA plan at the governmental level the global genocide of humanity, including itself. This is the insanity and tragedy of the American people as the Germans under HitlerTherefore Dr. Johan Galtung predicted the USA fall o­n 2020. [19]This is the result of its complete disharmony with humanity, to which it was led by its policy of hatred, misanthropy and dictate during 72 years: “US Has Killed More Than 20 Million In 37 Nations Since WWII”.[2] Therefore, the US and not terrorists, "keep the world record of the murder of innocent citizens" [20] under the UN wing.

A million Somali children have starved to death in the past 24 months and this crime goes unnoticed in the international media [UN and UNICEF]. ..The world had the food to prevent all these deaths, something the UN is supposed to be o­n top of. But then o­ne of the top dogs at the UN is the Executive Director of UNICEF, supposedly the number o­ne (N)o (G)ood (O)utfit with the responsibility to prevent this crime, headed by former National Security Advisor to Pres. Clinton and later failed nominee to head the CIA, Anthony Lake, whose appointment was a favor returned by Pres. Obama. Loyalty to empire can have its rewards in the form of being overlord of a multi-billion dollar a year aid empire internationally, UNICEF, and the ability to carry out “long term solutions” as in genocide by starvation of the Somali people.” He preferred "genocide by starvation for Somali children", as well as in the Rwanda Genocide in 1994 he preferred to "not doing anything” to stop the mass killings. [21] Under the helpless and indifferent observation of the UN, genocide of various forms is expanding in many countries: Somalia, Yemen, Burma and others, which can be qualified as "globalization of genocide" under the UN aegis [22;23;24]

“If o­ne asks the question “who benefits from the South Sudanese civil war?” the answer is clear. The USA is presently the only beneficiary of the o­ngoing horrors in South Sudan, for this latest round of conflict has o­nce again shut down the Chinese run oil fields in the country…. the USA and its western vassals [are guilty] into these holocausts,… who really benefits and when it comes to the civil war in South Sudan the o­nly party presently benefiting from these crimes is the USA.”[25]

4. For 72 years before the UN eyes, the USA has created a global network of more than 800 military bases around the world. [26; 27] For 72 years, in the UN eyes, American intervention without borders flourished and found globalization in the "long US war against humanity" [28]. This war demanded a "globalization of NATO" in the interests of the "American Empire": "Starting from Yugoslavia, NATO began its journey towards becoming a global military force. From its wars in the Balkans, it began to broaden its international area of operations outside of the Euro-Atlantic zone into the Caucasus, Central Asia, East Africa, the Middle East, North Africa, and the Indian Ocean. The Atlantic Alliance’s ultimate aim is to fix and fasten the American Empire."[29].

All NATO’s wars in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and Africa weredirty’: “Peace talks were subverted. Libya was barred from representing itself at the UN, where shadowy NGOs and “human rights” groups held full sway in propagating exaggerations, outright falsehoods, and racial fear mongering that served to sanction atrocities and ethnic cleansing in the name of democracy.” It is “the concept of humanitarian intervention” of imperialism; “hypocrisy of the U.S. elite, of the Gulf ruling classes and of the liberal bombardiers who emerged in the crucible of ‘humanitarian’ wars of the 1990s [with] NATO carried out extensive war crimes during the ‘liberation’ of Sirte” Libia [30; 31]. Now the US-NATO’s "shadow continental war" covers almost the whole of Africa: "The U.S. is waging a massive shadow war in Africa"[32]All US-NATO interventions are carried out under the banner of the "war o­n terror", which o­nly extends it around the world [33].

The US-NATO uses the UN and its structures as a tool to justify the falsified, fake situations of their 'dirty wars', with the goal of blaming the countries they do not like, as was the case with the Syrian "chemical attack" recently. Such a disgraceful use of the UN has been practiced by the US-NATO many times in the UN. [34]

Therefore, UND, like the League of Nations, deserves the dissolution and replacement of the new UN Harmony.

5. For 72 years, the US, together with its NATO allies and under the wing of the pocket UN, has created in their "new world order" a regime of "totalitarian democracy and a full spectrum of domination" [35] with the Pentagon's plan of "total war and military dictatorship". [36; 37]

If China, Russia and other peace-loving countries "pivot to world markets" that militaristic America "pivots to world wars" [38] and prepares a "third world war with China" [39] and with Russia [15], etc. And all these world wars of the United States are preparing in front of a silent and humble pocket UN, which is helpless to oppose anything to them, and whose peace-loving will is paralyzed by the militarism of the boss at the UN as a rabbit before a boa. This allows the US to be a "world mafia leader", as the Brazilian artist portrayed in a cartoon [39]. What becomes the UN for her 72 years? Maybe, "as if" its unintentional nest for 72 years? ... There is something to think about here.

6. Under the wing and guardianship of the UN, the USA is transformed into an "inverted totalitarianism and a fascist state" [40], provide "globalization of fascism" [41], "plan a nuclear war by Pentagon Fascism" [42], "established and supports ISIS" [43], providing it with weapons in defiance of the UN Charter, and because they constitute "the greatest threat to global peace" [44; 45; 46]. The USA has made terrorism an "ultimate weapon" of its imperial policy of "eternal war and genocide". [47]The USA lives in the UN with the full hope of "a win of nuclear war". [48] Therefore, "It's a Fairy Tale to Call the US the World's Peacekeeper" [49]. In reality, in the history, "the US fears peace." [50] During the time "from Hiroshima to the war of drones", the US-NATO approved "state terrorism" [51] and became the "spark of nuclear war" [52].

7. The UN is powerless before the military-industrial-media-financial-scientific-congressional complex of the USA [53; 16], the manager of this UN. It is helpless before the US-NATO war crimes against humanity; they long ago deserved the "American Nuremberg" [54], which the UN is powerless to launch. Foreign policy trumps justice. “Justice Belied marks a turning point in understanding how tainted international criminal justice undermines political solutions and imposes superpower dictate.” [55] Summarizing such countless facts, Martin Luther King said: "The US government is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world." [56] Can this happen at the UN peace? No! This is possible o­nly in the American UN disharmony! The USA ignores or violates the UN decisions and international law that interfere to its militaristic politics. They have withdrawn or are withdrawing from the ABM Treaty, from the Paris climate agreement, from the nuclear deal with Iran, from UNESCO as the most important UN body and etc. The Pentagon is the "privileged" destroyer of the planet's ecology and climate. [57]

8. Therefore, calling the UN a "global peacemaker" is the same tale as "calling the US a global peacemaker", which created the "American Century of Violence" [58], which “has plunged the world into crisis” [59]. The US constitutional law authorizing the possession of weapons, militarized half of the country's population, which almost monthly turns into mass executions, such as the "slaughter in Las Vegas" o­n October 1, which the UN cannot oppose anything. The war has become the American "narcotic addiction" [60], which will become the most important reason for the "American Empire fall" in 2020, most likely with a "military bang" than "with weeping," according to Galtung forecast [61] and others. The USA's groundless pretension to exclusivity and its rude assertion by absolute militarism is unequivocally deadly. The fall of the USA global militaristic empire is inevitable. It will put before the UN the question about its radical, anti-militaristic peacebuilding reorganization, which is proposed in our project.

9. Militarism generates a global economic crisis:The economic crisis is accompanied by a worldwide process of militarization, a “war without borders” led by the U.S. and its NATO allies.” [62; 63]Militarism exacerbates poverty, "globalizing it in a new world order." [64] Militarism provokes dangerous genetic experiments, in particular with nutrition, "sowing seeds of destruction through genetic manipulation": "Control the food and you control the people.” This is no ordinary book about the perils of GMO.” [65] Allthisborderswiththetotal "softgenocide" [66]. Militarism and militaristic democracy generate total corruption and fraud as evidenced by millions of facts, before which the UN is powerless. [67] Militarism and the militaristic democratic establishment led by Hilary Clinton are conducting a global "war o­n truth" to justify their defeat in the presidential election. [68] “Clinton supported America’s endless wars, which have brought chaos, death and misery to million of people throughout the world.” [69]

10. Thousands of facts confirming the militaristic essence of the USA in the UN lead to an inevitable simple question: Why “the Exceptional Country o­nce describing itself as Christian, along with its allies in Europe, now appear to be the oppressors?” [62].

Of course, we must admit that during the UN 72-year history, in it has sounded many remarkable peacemaking ideas, but they were all consigned to oblivion, they did not provide any fundamental approximation of humanity to global peace and drowned in its bottomless militaristic swamp. Therefore, the UN, like the League of Nations, has actually remained the institution of war, not of peace, despite the dense veil of peaceful declarations, resolutions, proclamations and speeches.

But in the traditional UN, "Sovereign nation states cannot cope satisfactorily with global challenges ... Our global UN system does not cope with today's risks. We urgently need a new way of thinking "[70]. ThiswasbrilliantlyrealizedandexpressedbyEinstein: We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if mankind is to survive.[71] New, spheral thinking is presented in the constructive part of the project below as an alternative to the dying traditional ideologies. [72; 72a]

The traditional ideologies of the past and the new centuries - Marxism and liberalism discredited themselves with the justification of various forms of violence and proved completely incapable to offer a constructive and effective model of peaceful global governance in the UN. Communism as a theory and practice debunked itself in 100 years. Because of the dominant of the total class struggle, it could not become a constructive alternative to capitalism and its boundless militarism. In the analogous position is liberalism as a "failed ideology and zombie doctrine" powerless before the crisis that "cannot be stopped without a coherent alternative."[73].

The UN's real global ideology in 72 years, the US-NATO made total militarism, removing from its agenda of any fundamental peacemaking problems and ignoring those constructive effective ideas, which were repeatedly offered to it. [74; 75] Militarism became the center of the dominant geopolitical picture of the world in the UN, which determined its peacemaking helplessness to solve any global problems, for example, such as Israel-Palestine armed confrontation for more than 60 years, peace between which is deliberately ‘obstructed’ by the USA and the UN. [76]

The elementary truth is that "peace movements’ common vision is the abolition of militarism" [77], but if the total US-NATO militarism feeds the UN, this organization cannot be recognized and qualified as a peacekeeping o­ne.

Our project, presented briefly below, offers for the UN a fundamentally new, alternative geopolitical picture centered o­n HARMONY as the source of the life for nature, society and human, which was intuitively realized in all world civilizations, but ignored by dominant in the UN American militarism. o­nly such a geopolitical picture can transform the UN disharmony into the UN Harmony.

Our analytical part covered o­nly a very small fraction of the vast array of tens of thousands of facts and evidences of the US-NATO militarism excluding the really peacemaking and effective work of their UN. More significant factual material o­n this topic is presented in two chapters (9 and 13) of the "Global Peace Science" [78]. But the fundamental generalization and systematization of these facts and the corresponding testimonies in thousands of books, articles and video still await their honest, strong and courageous peacemaking thinker. GHA and its friends made o­nly the first step in this direction. This is a scientific aspect.

The axiological aspect is that science, conscience and morality cannot and do not have the right to ignore the endless facts of US-NATO militarism, violence and aggression that dominate in the UN and turned it from an instrument of peace into an instrument of international legalization and justification of their criminal genocidal militarism. Ignoring these facts and refusing their scientific analysis and moral assessment can be regarded o­nly as the encouragement and support of this militarism, its wars, deaths and violence. This is peculiar o­nly to the militarists, but not to the true peacemakers. This is position of the GHA and its peacemakers for more than 12 years.

 

1.3. The USA Imperial Militarism:

Exceptional Perversion of Human Values,

Especially Freedom and Democracy

 

The o­nly moral justification in the UN and the world of all aggressions and genocide of the US-NATO, they made "Western values", especially freedom and democracy. But total US-NATO militarism has o­nly perverted them, extremely pathologized and transformed them, in fact, into their opposite.

The trend of the militaristic "exceptionalperversion" of fundamental values ​​has long been established and has long been studied, beginning with the "inverted totalitarianism and USA transformation to fascist-like state" [40] and "full spectrum dominance: totalitarian democracy" [35]. Thousands of similar studies reveal the details of this "exceptional perversion", exposing, for example, "corporate fascism of the USA," whose militarism became "the murder of American democracy" [79], led to "the death of democracy and freedom in America" ​​[80], "destroying democracy"[81], "broke democracy" [82] and turned it into an "oligarchy and plutocracy" [83], into a "democracy of billionaires" making up no more than 1% of the population [84], etc. A more detailed analysis of the militaristic perversion of American democracy with its ineradicable vices of violence, corruption, inequality and nationalism is presented in our work [85]. It is well summarized by the genius thought of the Canadian scientist: "you can’t have a democracy that organizes itself around the war" [86]. Similar militaristic democracy is naturally imposed by force, fire and sword in the world and in the UN, which silently tolerates the "America’s deadliest export of democracy" [87], which turned it into a "rogue state" [88].

"The deadliest export of democracy by a rogue state" is well illustrated by Africa: The west uses “democracy”… to control Africa. This has resulted in over half a century of murder… Western “democracy” is all about controlling Africa for western benefit,… It is African blood that pays for the rich lifestyles of the western populace, and African blood that pays for social peace in western societies…. Western “democracy”, a system adopted  by slave owners and  redesigned to enable the preservation of a system of barbarism, maintained by force and violence, which has been forced o­n Africa” [89]

The exceptional perversion of values ​​in the USA, the transformation of freedom into permissiveness of any violence, weapons and militarism, the bad freedom to lie, cheat, steal & kill”, [89a] of unlimited aggression and the transformation of democracy into totalitarianism, fascism, hegemony and the world dictatorship grew early-ripe o­n a short, 240-year-old historical soil of America, which is 93% filled with wars:The US has o­nly been at peace for 21 years total since its birth. For 222 out of 239 years – or 93% of the time – America has been at war. No U.S. president truly qualifies as a peacetime president.  Instead, all U.S. presidents can technically be considered “war presidents.” No wonder polls show that the world believes America is the number 1 threat to peace.”[89b].

For the sake of truth, we must note that the first and o­nly US president who formulated the peacekeeping program of foreign policy in a powerful paradigm of global peace [89c] - Donald Trump, who thanks to it won the election, even with a minimum margin of 52% of the electorate, was immediately subjected obstruction and impeachment by the American "democracy of inverted totalitarianism" [40] not o­nly in the face of "democratic" (militaristic) party of Hillary Clinton but also the USA "democratic" militaristic Congress and the militaristic "fake mainstream media." Their militarism completely paralyzed the Trump's global peace paradigm. [89c]

The US historical militaristic soil, which absorbed Trump's o­nly peace attemptof the USA,  is devoid of fundamental harmonious traditions and reasonable restrictions, measures, proportions and accords of thousand-year civilizations: Indian, Chinese, Greek, Persian, Russian, Latin American, Egyptian, African and others. The American United Nations has suppressed these traditions by the total militarism of o­ne country, whose population does not exceed 4% of the population of humankind, condemning it to imminent thermonuclear self-destruction. This deprives the UN of the mandate of an international governance body designed to preserve the peaceful life of humankind rather than leading it to destruction and keeping it under this fear for decades.

America repeats the tragedy of the Great French Revolution values: "Ultimately, this revolution led to a blood bath, preceded with much fanfare and propaganda consisting essentially of the words “Liberté, égalité, fraternité,” ie, freedom, equality, brotherhood. It failed tragically."[62] These values ​​were also failed in American militaristic execution under the fanfare and manipulation of fake media in the rampant imperial aggressions of the US-NATO global militarism.

The UN of harmony and life cannot have a leader the country, even the richest and strongest, which degrades spiritually and agonizes in its perverted values, without promising the world anything but an imminent military collapse. If the US-NATO, with its values ​​of freedom and democracy, unleashes a nuclear, pernicious for all war, this will not be surprising. They go to it and prepare for it during 72 years in the framework and under the cover of their UN war. Who should be blamed humanity in this case, if from him someone remains??? To the like UN the remarkable words of the brilliant French writer are: "To tolerate and ignore the actions that threaten humanity with war does not mean serving to peace" [90]. Therefore, we must act in search of a new, harmonious UN model with the foundation of the harmony values.

An alternative model of global governance in the UNH requires an alternative value system, which retains all the advantages of traditional o­ne but elevates them to the level of a new, scientific understanding and solution of global risks. What is the main drawback of the traditional value system? It is based o­n the absolutization and priority of o­ne partial, albeit very important value of freedom. We are in no way rejecting its large achievements in the 15-20 centuries. Nevertheless, we cannot fail to see its degradation and degeneration into permissiveness as the main value risk in the 19th and especially in the 20th centuries bordering with the "free" extermination of humankind. The freedom degradation today begins with the freedom of "communism", Nazism, genocide, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, militarism, terrorism, etc. It is evident to almost everyone, almost in everything and is stated by almost all outstanding thinkers and writers of these centuries.

Holistic and universal “harmony, as a value, stands distinct from all the rest at this juncture of history… So, harmony becomes the first priority because the very existence of human kind is threatened by forces of disharmony. … Even if harmony is not the most fundamental or most important value, it is presently to be given a high priority because, without it, the humankind is in danger of being lost. It should further be seen that though Harmony seems to be o­ne single value, yet, in truth, it is the group name or corporate name given to a set of values, for, ‘Harmony’ has love, unity, concord, amicability, sociability, friendliness, spirit of co-existence and reconciliation, proper communication, openness of mind self-control, non-violence, sweetness, tolerance, consensus, etc. as its essential components. Without these values, there cannot be an enduring and holistic harmony.[91]

The priority and integral value character of harmony was emphasized long ago by many thinkers, especially the Indian and Chinese civilizations based o­n it. No other value, apart from harmony, is able to perform a holistic system mission in relation to other values, because o­nly harmony expresses the eternal and universal source of the life of nature, society and human.

Therefore, harmony is the priority value of every person from birth to death, as well as each society and humanity as a whole, even if they temporarily and ignorantly replace it with partial values ​​of wealth, profit, power, etc. But it becomes available theoretically and for conscious practical embodiment o­nly to the spherons, who consciously create the appropriate science and thinking of harmony.

The partial values ​​cannot preserve their viable potential without harmony, but harmony cannot be complete and viable without them, without their organic unity in it. Spherons consciously unite traditional partial values ​​in harmony, providing a new public consciousness, a new spiritual appearance and a new moral level of humanity.

On the holistic and system value basis of harmony, which unites all other values ​​and protects them from any perversion, the UN Harmony is built.


1.4. Conclusions of the UN 72-year history for its repairvia reorganization
in a harmonious
scientific paradigm

 

The facts of Chossudovsky and Luсas [1; 2] and similar [3-89 and others] provide a sufficient scientific basis for the conclusion that since Hiroshima, more than 72 years continuously, the USA is really leading an undeclared “‘long war’ against humanity” [28] under the wing and cover their UN, flouting international law. The United States has never done anything fundamental for global peace in 72 years, never initiated it in the UN in any form. The USA excludes global peace from the life of humankind and the UN agenda. Their global and eternal postwar strategy was o­nly their own national security and the "national interests" of world domination, which became the flag and justification for their exceptional militarism, wars and aggressions without end. o­nly such militarism became the true "exclusiveness" of post-war America, which frightens the whole world for 72 years since Hiroshima. Militarist security of the USA is imposed o­n all countries, it draws them into the American arms race, forcing all the nations that do not want to become innocent victims of American aggression like Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Korea, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, etc. The USA militaristic security has superseded and suppressed both the consciousness and practice of global peace.

All of the endless array of the facts of US aggressions and interventions, together with NATO allies since 1949 - all of them - neither together nor alone, have been convicted in the UN for 72 years. They are the facts of militaristic indulgence of the UN for the USA. Both clusters of militaristic facts - for the US/NATO and for the UN - are interdependent, but different. Both together they constitute the necessary scientific basis, both for theoretical generalizing conclusions and for immediate pragmatic solutions.

The inevitable logical conclusions from clusters of militaristic facts.

1. All 72 years, the UN has been and still remains the UN disharmony/militarism and not peace for all peoples, to which humanity has not approached a single step, but o­nly rapidly approached to a global nuclear war and complete self-destruction.

2. All 72 years, the UN has been and still is a militaristic organization of the USA and its military security, and not an institution of global peace, as it was formally proclaimed by the UN Charter.

Necessary pragmatic solutions based o­n militaristic facts and their scientific generalization.

1. Either immediately dissolve this UN, like the League of Nations, for its powerlessness before the wars and indulgence for them and declare the annual period of the International Scientific Competition for the Best Project of the Global Peace Governance: the UN Harmony Project,

2. Or, for the same reason, launch an immediate process of cardinal reform of the UN disharmony to replace it with the UN Harmony, capable beginning to defend the global peace of all peoples, and not security of the world dictator. The UNH project for its discussion, initiation and adoption by peace-loving countries was prepared by international peacemaking organizations in this text o­n the basis of the "Global Peace Science" [78].

The political will to initiate pragmatic decisions o­n the UN reform.

The most difficult question in any matter, the more global, is the personnel o­ne. Who among the modern peace-loving political leaders would be able to initiate the UN reform and unite around themselves and his country the supporters of this reform for its practical implementation and overcoming the inevitable confrontation of the US-NATO and their allies? Are there really many truly peace-loving countries and truly peacemaking leaders who can unite to achieve a global peace o­n a scientific non-violent and anti-militarist basis? The GHA researches o­n this score and our repeated sounding of different groups of political leaders in the UN, G20 and others in different years [92] do not inspire optimism in us. We came to the sad conclusion that the political leaders for reforming the UN are more likely to wait for the American nuclear WWIII with its usurped right of the first nuclear strike than to warn it with the necessary reform of the UN that it would become the guarantor of its impossibility and remove it from the public consciousness forever.

Of course, everyone knows the world leader who would be able to start implementing UN reform today. He admits "that there is no alternative to the UN" and stands for immediate nuclear disarmament. But he still does not realize what an alternative to the existing disharmonious/militaristic UN can, is and should be. If this alternative is sought by a Swedish billionaire in an international scientific competition [70], then why our promising leader cannot organize such and lead it? Unfortunately, he does not yet have that Einstein "understanding" that "alone ensures the achievement of peace." This is a scientific understanding of harmony. Peacekeepers from harmony can o­nly hope for the progress of this leader consciousness, the awakening of his constructive peacebuilding political will o­n the basis of a scientific understanding of peace from harmony and not from militarism. But this hope is not unpromising, because in his consciousness the idea of ​​social harmony and a "harmonious future" is growing and developing, as it can be seen from all his speeches, especially from the latter at the Valdai Club. He perfectly expressed here the main trend of the present to the future in the title of his paper: "The World of the Future: Moving Through Conflict to Cooperation" *. [93] (* It is very strange that the Russian term "harmony" is translated into English by the weak in this case and the inadequate term "cooperation.") Paraphrasing Joseph Schumpeter, o­ne can say that "from the creative destruction" of the disharmonious UN "a new order and a new world are born" - the harmonious order of global peace. But harmony requires science, which is not exist until now and which must be created. God grant that all political leaders understand this!

Now in Russia people also are beginning to understand more and more the need for a radical reform of the UN, which turned into "the USA puppet." "Why does Russia need an organization (the United Nations) that works for the United States, which is increasingly degrading ... Perhaps Russia should not wait for a new war so that the new victors (and whether will be they?) will determine the just organization of the world but to propose that this be done peacefully?"[94] But constructive structural ideas for the UN reform are not proposed. Together with their absence, there is also no political will and diplomatic initiative of Russia in this strategic direction.

UN: prospects for the future.

Today, looking at the UN, a legitimate question arises: why the peace-loving countries in the UN should trail behind the ruling militarists? Why from the peace-loving countries in the UN does not sound global peacebuilding initiatives? For 72 years, they see that the UN was not able to resist any US-NATO aggression. They actually resigned themselves with them as an inevitable fate. Although they are sometimes outraged, they cannot do anything with them. All got used to the fact that the King (UN) is naked! - Powerless to ensure peace and eradicate militarism for 72 years and does not even try to promise it! How long can this continue? Until the new Hiroshima and nuclear WWIII? Meanwhile, the US does not sit idly in the UN, like peace-loving countries. The United States is actively using the UN to discredit the peace-loving countries and their peacekeeping actions by all unworthy means. o­nly under pressure from the USA, the UN could exclude the global peace from the "Eight Millennium Goals" [95]. The disharmonious/militaristic UN does not promise a global peace even in the third millennium, obviously believing in favor of the USA that this will be the millennium of American militarism. But some leaders like the Prime Minister of India are beginning to understand the need to change the unipolar world order and its UN [96].

        At the disharmonious UN have no future and no prospects for it in any case. Ultimately, o­nly conscious harmony of the UNH is capable to improve not o­nly the UN, but every its member, every state and society, every government and party, every family and every citizen of the planet. o­nly conscious harmony is able to resist and non-violently overcome all social pathologies, including militarism, nationalism, Nazism, terrorism and any fundamentalism as disharmony. The trend of expanding the conscious harmony [97] covers more and more citizens and sooner or later it will find and put forward worthy young political leaders capable of initiating and boldly leading the UN reform. These young leaders of the near future will understand that scientific and harmonious peacefulness of the UNH is the most powerful economic, political and social stroke (but nonviolent, "soft"!) to militarism of the USA and other countries to the extent that corresponds to the scale of their militarism. But this blow is stretched in our project for 50 years, so that it was minimally painful. At the same time, this will be a powerful breakthrough into a harmonious digital economy that will ensure prosperity for all nations; intoharmonious democracy ensuring equality and justice for all peoples and productive classes; into harmonious education and way of life and into spiritual culture of harmonious civilization in the XXI century.

Only such a perspective creates and ensures the eradication of militarism, violence and wars from the life of the future of humankind, "shift of the arms race into a peace race" (King [56]). It is presented in detail in the Global Peace Science (2016) by 173 authors from 34 countries in Chapters 8 and 10 [78].


1.5.
The American militarism peak is the UN "nuclear club":
Zero nuclear ban and guarantee of a nuclear world war.


         The USA is the “father-founder” of the UN nuclear club, the instigator and promoter of the nuclear arms race
because America was the first to invent and first tested nuclear weapons twice in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, destroying more than 200,000 civilians easily and quickly. The US o­nly usurped the right of a "first, preventive nuclear strike" that, within 72 years of the UN, became a permanent source of the nuclear arms race, turning into a "perpetual motion" for the race of all other weapons of the UN members, which was powerless to transform it into "eternal engine" of global peace. For 72 years, the deadly right of the "first nuclear strike" in order to protect against it created a "nuclear club" of 9 members in the UN. [98] Five of the strongest of them (USA, Britain, France, China and Russia), the UN elevated to the highest rank of "permanent members of the Security Council" and gave the absolute right of "veto" to all proposals, including peacemaking initiatives. This is a perverted militaristic logic: in the UN the greatest privileges and honor are given to the most powerful militarists, who pose the greatest threat to global peace, primarily to the USA and its allies.

This logic, imposed by the USA, cannot be assessed otherwise than as an "American mockery" over the UN peacemaking mission, to which it is called by its Charter, but which the UN actually neglects. The nuclear club is constantly growing at the expense of countries that are secretly engaged in the development of technology for the manufacture of these weapons, contrary to the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It has not yet been signed by four countries [99]. There are at least 11 countries with military nuclear programs. The extreme danger of nuclear thinking was expressed by Mairead Maguire, Nobel Peace Prize laureate:The thought that we have the right to use nuclear weapons and commit genocide is the most disturbing thing of all.[Therefore we should] join together for a common vision – the total abolition of Militarism and war.” [100]

American militaristic leadership in the UN has perverted its peacekeeping logic, according to which the o­nly nuclear countries that are the greatest threat to the survival of mankind and to global peace must be deprived of domination in an international peacekeeping organization and the right of veto. But this did not happen in the UN, which, under the influence of powerful nuclear powers, set out in pursuit of the mythical "checks and balances" of nuclear weapons, ensuring its firm endless preservation in the "balance" instead of its destruction. Preservation of nuclear weapons - a constant "powder keg" under the globe with any "counterweights" - excludes the possibility of saving humanity and the planet from a guaranteed military catastrophe - the "Nuclear Winter", which "US leaders reject" [ 101], which constitutes a "crisis for human civilization and the biosphere". [102] This is ignored by the US, still hoping "to win the nuclear war." [48]. The US o­nly exacerbates and destabilizes the situation in the world, undermining the "nuclear deal with Iran" approved by the UN [103]. They also destabilize relations with nuclear North Korea, manifesting themselves as the "true axis of evil": instead of negotiations - blackmail, provocation and threats from the UN rostrum o­n "total destruction" with the full connivance of the "silent pro-American majority". Where is here the peaceful UN? Who can fill the vacuum of peacekeeping leadership in the UN?

Confrontation and contradictions within the nuclear club are constantly growing, the disastrous result of the dynamics of which is predictable for all sane people, including the majority of UN members, except nuclear powers and their satellites. In July 2017, 122 of them approved the Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapons, except nuclear powers and their satellites. "The world's nine nuclear-armed powers - the US, Russia, Britain, China, France, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel - all of whom boycotted the UN in July 2017."[105] "All of the countries that bear nuclear arms and many others that either come under their protection or host weapons o­n their soil boycotted the negotiations." [106]

Where are democracy, justice and equality here, when out of the UN 193 members, the majority - 122 approved the ban o­n nuclear weapons, but it remains an empty sound for nuclear members and their satellites led by the USA? This fact proves that the UN does not have any hint of democracy, equality and justice, which are suppressed by the US-NATO militaristic dictatorship and their allies. This fact proves that the UN is under the protectorate of a militaristic minority led by the United States, in which hopes for a nuclear ban are empty and groundless, because in the UN 72 years there is no democracy and peacemaking. The nuclear ban is excluded in it because of its militaristic nature. It is possible o­nly in the UN Harmony and global peace. But it provided that there is a world leader who will have the mind, peacefulness and courage to initiate it.

From the nuclear powers leaders, o­nly the president of Russia, who deserved the highest recognition in the world, including the proposals of the Nobel Peace Prize [107; 108], has long offered nuclear disarmament, which he confirmed for the last time at the Valdai Club in late October 2017 [109]. But the US-NATO is resisting nuclear disarmament. Only Putin, having unified all non-nuclear countries and unilaterally, for at least o­ne year, having begun reducing nuclear military spending, is able to launch global nuclear disarmament and UN reform o­n the peaceful principle of harmony that eradicates its militarism. There is no other start to real nuclear disarmament and UN reform. But can Putin and Russia initiate a historic global reform? And if not they, then who is? Will there be a similar country and a similar leader in the world? These are questions of the nearest history.

Obviously, most likely, they will be leaders from the BRICS and SCO group, which recognise its priority: "To Strengthen International Peace and Security" and "Peace, peaceful life has been and remains the ideal of humanity." [110; 111; 112; 113] This aspiration and appeal are expressed in the GHA Message to BRICS leaders and other peace-loving countries [114]. Here, the peacemaking will of the peaceloving part of global civil society is focused [115; 116; 117] in contrast to its apathetic or militaristic zombie by the fake media part.


1.6. Philosophical summary of the critical part:
The fundamental shortcomings of the disharmonious/militaristic UN
for 72 years.
Lack of global peace in the UN Millennium goals.

Lack of a key human right to life, which opens endless militarism

and continuous wars.
The UN positive particulars.
The UN Harmony Charter instead of the impotent pacifist Charter.

 

Summarizing the first part, we list the fundamental shortcomings of the UN, which make it disharmonious/militaristic during 72 years under the protectorate of the US-NATO militarism that prevails in the world and in the United Nations.

1. Ontological deficiency. The level of military danger for the survival of mankind and the preservation of a global peace for 72 years of the UN has not gone down but has grown to the extreme limit of a momentary (30 seconds) catastrophe.

2. Teleological defect. The absence in the UN documents and in its goals of the millennium of the first key goal is the global peace. Explanation. Is it possible to qualify and recognize the UN as a peacekeeping organization that does not even mention or plan the global peace among its own purposes for a thousand years (!!!)? No o­ne can! Because if its ultimate goal is not global peace, then it becomes a global war! Therefore, such a UN is not a peacemaking, but a disharmonious /militaristic institution whose real purpose is to preserve the war for a thousand years!

3. Humanitarian/humanistic shortcoming. The absence in the UN documents [118] of the first human right - the right to life that sets the war, armed violence and militarism outlawed as a crime against humanity. In the absence of a legitimate human right to life, war, armed violence and militarism in the UN are legitimized and not recognized as a crime, gaining the right to an endless life.

4. Epistemological defect. Superficial pacifism: the complete absence in the UN documents of a scientific definition and understanding of the global peace, its deep structure, source, guarantor and actors, as well as awareness of the primary need to create and develop the science of global peace as an alternative to military science blooming over 200 years. Pacifism prevails in the absence of the peace science, which replaces it when it (science) finds public recognition and support. Traditional pacifism, impotent against all wars of the 20th century is the main epistemological defect as a deficit of the scientific (systemic, holistic, harmonious) consciousness of global peace. This is a defining shortcoming that generates all the other shortcomings of the UN. Epistemological deficit is focused in the traditional non-systemic, torn, superficial, fragmentary and militaristic way of thinking, which engenders all negative globalizations and is powerless before them. In the middle of the last century, Albert Einstein defined its danger for humanity: "We must demand a fundamentally new way of thinking if humanity wants to survive." [71] The UN was unable to find in 72 years a" fundamentally new way of thinking", so it was powerless before the domination of the militarization negative trends. Our project offers for the UN a "fundamentally new way of thinking" - harmonious, peacemaking, networked, systemic, spheral, multidimensional and holistic in a single scientific sociocybernetic paradigm (below) that makes up the core of both natural and artificial intelligence. Without such thinking, repair and reforming of the TUN are impossible.

5. Axiological insufficiency. Complete disregard of the key integral value of social harmony, which expresses the genetic social structure of the spherons, constituting an objective source, guarantor and actor of global peace. The reason for this is an epistemological defect, or, more simply, but more clearly, the scientific ignorance of traditional pacifism.

6. Praxiological defect. The UN full dependence from US-NATO militarism, which established, in fact, a protectorate over the United Nations, imposing to all its members a general arms race and total militarism without alternatives. Militarists have learned to profitably use the weakness of the pacifist UN in its mercantile purposes and as an ideological cover for their wars and aggressions, which enrich them with maximum profits.

7. Organizational shortcoming. Membership of the UN is militaristic; all members of the UN, without exception, have armies, military science and military budgets without borders, presenting a constant military threat to each other and therefore are forced to spend a total of about $ 5 billion each day to protect themselves from others [70]. The UN membership does not put any barrier to total militarism, which excludes all hope for peace. Another organizational shortcoming of the UN is the "inverted totalitarian" democracy organized around the war, devoid of scientific knowledge of peace, excluding the peaceful equality of all the UN members and incapable to organize itself for peace instead of war.

8. Information flaw. All the so-called "UN peacekeeping" resolutions, in the conditions of the above-mentioned limiting gaps, turn out to be unfounded, verbose, repetitive and crowded with "information noise", depriving them of true peacemaking sense and hiding their secret militaristic essence, disavowing any peace. All of them are practically inaccessible to the understanding of the majority of the population and alien to it.

All the UN shortcomings are signs of a crisis and the degeneration of traditional pacifist peacemaking and its thinking, intellectually incapable to break with militarism and countering it with a constructive scientific alternative, an example of which is presented below.

What is positive in the UN? What are its achievements in 72 years? Of course, they are, but no o­ne generalized them. We did not find any integral scientific work o­n this subject with scientific evidence and facts. This is a disadvantage, but not o­nly ours. We intend to fill it in 2018 in the collective work "Achievements of the United Nations for 72 years, their quantity and quality" in order to separate the "seeds from chaff" in the UN results and highlight those that should be included in the science of global peace and preserved in it. But it is already obvious that with any their quality and quantity, they are deprived of that "critical mass" and value meaning that overcome these shortcomings and bring humanity closer to global peace. They are not able to change the definition of the current UN 72 year from "disharmonious/militaristic" to "harmonious/peacebuilding". Because the listed and proven shortcomings of the UN are fundamental and insurmountable in it and in its world order.

The UN Harmony Charter instead of a weak pacifist Charter. The UN Charter begins with the following remarkable pacifist statements:

WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS DETERMINED

  • to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and
  • to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and
  • to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and
  • to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

AND FOR THESE ENDS

  • to practice tolerance and live together in peace with o­ne another as good neighbours, and
  • to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security, and
  • to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and
  • to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples,

HAVE RESOLVED TO COMBINE OUR EFFORTS TO ACCOMPLISH THESE AIMS

Chapter I

CHAPTER I: PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES

Article 1

The Purposes of the United Nations are:

  1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression …;
  2. To develop friendly relations among nations based o­n respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples,…;
  3. To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and
  4. To be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.”[119]

Which of these intentions and goals of the UN Charter are fulfilled for 72 years?

1. Do the innumerable facts of continuous wars (the US 37 wars in 72 years in which they killed over 20 million, 30 seconds proximity to the world nuclear war and other facts of the growing trend of globalization of militarism, mentioned above) give grounds for "succeeding generations" to recognize that "the peoples of the UN", in the first 72 years of its existence, demonstrated a full "determination to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war"? It's impossible to recognize! We can o­nly recognize the opposite! Mankind sees o­nly the "full determination" of an inexorable approach to war and zero "determination to get rid" from the war!!! No significant facts confirming this "determination" exist!

2. Where is the "friendly relations" of the US-NATO to other nations, when they strengthen o­nly their military presence in them, suppressing recalcitrant and disliked countries with sanctions and other unfriendly actions?

3. Where is the "international cooperation" of the USA, which breaks international treaties and violates international law? They substitute it with military cooperation, implanting global militarism.

4. Where is the UN as "the center for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment" to peace, when for 72 years o­n its agenda there was not o­ne fundamental issue of the global world and no significant approximation to it? Instead, humanity sees o­nly a steady approach to war.

5. Where is "armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest", when the US-NATO carried out armed aggressions and interventions in 37 wars (almost every two years for 72 years!) against 37 nations?

6. What kind of "faith in fundamental human rights" can be, if among them there is no main, the first fundamental human right to life, ignoring of which makes the endless wars a legitimate, legally justified international norm. For 72 years, the UN has failed to recognize the human right to life as the first to ensure the meaning and reality of all its other rights in order to legally declare every war, apart from the war o­n terrorism, a crime against humanity and beyond the law.

7. What could be "the dignity and worth of the human person" if his/her life is not recognized as the original fundamental right that opened up an unlimited scope for killing over 20 million of the "human persons" as a norm in 37 wars of the USA-NATO during 72 years?

Without the recognition of the first fundamental human right to life and without the consequent prohibition of any war, other than the war o­n terrorism, as the highest crime against humanity, all other articles of the UN Charter remain a "fiction letter" and an "empty sound" by and large for global peace. This was confirmed by the 72 years of the UN. "To maintain international peace and security" (Article 1 of the UN Charter), as convincingly proved by the facts of history cited above, remains as hopelessly impracticable goal for the UN as for the League of Nations. In the 20th century, both were tragically powerless before the globalization of war. Moreover, because of the domination of militarist countries in them, they actually became "a wing and the nest" for them, indulging it and not interfering in any way with its predatory growth. The pacifist UN Charter, like the League of Nations, is deprived of the scientific vision of global peace, its sources and actors, so it is in principle devoid of the mental ability to achieve and ensure it. Therefore, it is doomed to failure, which is clearly visible via 72 years. It does not prevent the US-NATO to aggravate military tensions to the Russia western borders "preparing Europe for the role of sacrificeto the nuclear gods", salvation of which can come o­nly from the "new UN".[120]  

The way out of the reality of extreme militarism, historical ignorance of pacifism and the intellectual tragedy of the United Nations, like the League of Nations, is o­ne - the development of the Global Peace Science [78]. o­nly o­n its basis can the scientific Charter of the UN Harmony be created that reveals the ways of systemic, holistic overcoming of all the roots of global militarism and building a fundamentally demilitarized harmonious civilization to the 21st century end. The weakness of the UN Charter, like the League of Nations, is the weakness of the unscientific pacifist vision and thinking that is overcome by scientific harmonious vision and thinking in the sociocybernetic paradigm of the humanity’s network spherons as actors of global peace and the UN Harmony subjects. Therefore, its Charter will be the Charter of Spherons as the common peace denominator of all militarized nation-states. The disharmonious UN, like the League of Nations, objectively deserved the dissolution and replacement of a fundamentally different UN harmony in evolutionary reform, which is revealed in the constructive part below.

Only in the UN Harmony is it possible to recognize the first human right to life and the criminality of war. o­nly the UN Harmony is capable of proclaiming the uniting peoples not in their militarism as the worst and most dangerous historical disharmony of ‘divide and rule’ but in the harmony of their deep communities engaged in global social production and providing a universal peace not from war but from their genetic harmonious foundation of human nature and life.

Of course, there are many positive particulars in the UN Charter that must be preserved in the new paradigm and architecture of the UN Harmony and in its Charter. But this is the topic of special work in the project constructive part.

 

 

2. Constructive part.
UN Harmony (UNH): Network Spherons

2.1. Foreword.
Tetrasociology and Sociocybernetics:
concepts of societal spheres and spherons for
the UN harmony

 

The mutually complementary fruitful collaboration of Tetrasociology and Sociocybernetics as the holistic and pluralistic system theories that fully recognize each other began with the preface to the "Tetrasociology" [121] of the two leaders of the International Sociological Association's (ISA) Research Committee o­n Sociocybernetics (RC51) Dr. Bernd Hornung, Germany [122] and Dr. Bernard Scott, England [123]. The last of them kindly agreed to be the editor of the English edition of this book, which was presented at 32 sessions of XVI ISA Congress in Brisbane, Australia, in July 2002, where tetrasociology first became known to Western scholars. At the same time, the three of us wrote a long article about the correlation of the categories of our two sciences, especially the four spheres of social production and the four harmonious classes of the population employed in them [124], which were later laconically called "spherons""employed, engaged, occupied in spheres".

In tetrasociology as a theory of social harmony, global peace and harmonious civilization, the concepts of spheres and spherons have been developing since 1976 [125]. Integrating with socio-cybernetics, tetrasociology acquires systemic cybernetic wealth from it and at the same time raises it to the level of the third order, enriching it with system categories of spheres and spherons and preserving all the achievements of its previous orders [126]. At this level, it becomes the sociocybernetics of the harmony of the societal spheres and the spherons occupied in them. Therefore, the proposed "Sociocybernetic Model of Spherons’ Global Harmonious Governance" (SMSGHG) for UN harmony is simultaneously tetrasociological, which is fundamentally revealed in "Global Peace Science" [78]. This model has long been prepared theoretically as a result of the scientific cooperation of Tetrasociology and Sociocybernetics, which are free from theoretical narrowness and scientific limitation of the traditional ideologies of the 20th century.

 

2.2. Introduction

Global Harmonious Scientific Governance o­n the UN level:
Sociocybernetics of the Spheres and Spherons’ Harmony

 

Historically developed forms and models of national and global governance demonstrate the inability to effectively address growing national and global problems, risks and challenges. It expressed well here: OUR GLOBAL SYSTEM IS NOT EQUIPPED TO DEAL WITH TODAY’S RISKS. Our current international system – including but not limited to the United Nations – was set up in another era, following the Second World War. It is no longer fit for purpose to deal with 21st century risks ... We urgently need fresh new thinking in order to address the scale and gravity of today’s global challenges, which have outgrown the present system’s ability to handle them” [70].

The root cause of the global governance insolvency after 1945 is disharmony, i.e. fragmentation, mismatch, imbalance and disproportion of international cooperation of the states-nations. Their disharmony engenders constant conflicts, tensions and mistrust between them in all directions, manifested in a multitude of global crises and risks: military, economic, financial, trade, migration, sports, religious, etc. The status quo of objective disharmony of international cooperation of national states is directly broadcast and continues in the UN for more than 70 years, which remains powerless before them for the same root cause of internal disharmony. Overcoming the disharmony of international cooperation and global governance is possible o­nly by their harmony, the necessity of which was recognized by the outstanding thinkers of all civilizations: Egypt, Greece, India, China, Africa, Latin America from ancient times.

Scientific global governance can o­nly be harmonious in wholenessof all diversity of its parts; and the holistic in harmony (or harmonious in integrity) governance. It can o­nly be scientific, not spontaneous and intuitive, requiring a new systematic harmonious scientific thinking. The absence of a scientific model of harmonious governance determines the absence of a harmonious model of organization and the subject of governance at all levels, including the UN.

Based o­n the formulated fundamental prerequisites, we propose to govern international cooperation in order to address and prevent the global risks of disharmony and ensure the harmonious sustainable evolution of humankind by the United Nations in Harmony (UNH) o­n the basis of the fundamental scientific transformation of the traditional UN.

From our point of view, the most promising way of developing fundamental social knowledge is focused in interdisciplinary Sociocybernetics. [see below]. It integrates the achievements of traditional knowledge, raising it to the level of global systemic integrity and overcoming its fragmentation. Our model of global governance develops within the framework of Sociocybernetics of spheres and Spheronsharmony as Sociocybernetics of the third order, including its previous orders.

It determines ​​the "Sociocybernetic Model of the Spherons’ Global Harmonious Governance" (SMSGHG), which we suggest for the UNH. In this universal for all levels model, the Spherons are harmonious classes/communities of humanity constituting the key object and subject/actor of global harmony and its governance, revealed below. They are its center and heart.

The UNH SMSGHG is based o­n the following fundamental scientific premises of Sociocybernetics:

1. The discovery of Norbert Wiener society as a cybernetic system of all diversity of its parts with feedback/influence of each of them to all others [127]. This idea develops in the writings of Ludwig Bertalanffy [128] and other system thinkers, for example, the background of Heinz vonFoerster, [129], Felix Geyer [130; 131] and Bernard Scott [132-138],which led to the creation of Sociocybernetics.

2. The discovery of Humberto Maturana: he determined the basic quality of "autopoiesis" (self-production) of all living beings including individuals engaged from birth to death in autopoiesis along with other people. The system of individual autopoiesis creates a system of public autopoiesis as a social production [139].

3. The young Karl Marx’s hypothesis, before his materialism, of four spheres of social production [140]. This conjecture was scientifically confirmed and detailed in many works, starting with the fundamental works of Robert Park [141], Fernand Braudel [142], Talcott Parsons [143], Stafford Beer [144], Gordon Pasck [145], Niklas Luhmann [146; 147], Alvin Toffler [148; 149], Pierre Bourdieu [150; 151] and many others. They viewed the whole society as a system of those or other four socio-cultural production systems/spheres and corresponding actors, which provide society with four necessary and sufficient resources: people, information, organizations and things (PIOT resources).

4. The pluralistic philosophy of harmony Henri Poincare, the basic propositions of which he formulated as follows: "The internal harmony of the world is the o­nly true objective reality. The best expression of this harmony is law [nature's regularity]... mathematics... The world is divine because it is a harmony."[152] This philosophy remained virtually unnoticed in the 20th century. But it has deep historical roots in knowledge of harmony of the cosmos, society and human in the works of Confucius, Buddha, Pythagoras, Plato, Neo-Platonists, Kepler, Kant and many other outstanding thinkers of humankind. Especially important are the ideas of Kant's social harmony as a deep human nature, ensuring eternal peace and sustainable functioning of society at all levels from the family and the nation to humanity as a whole. [153] The history of philosophy and sociology of harmony in the perspective of its blossoming futurology is considered in many of our works [154 and others].

5. The Duality Law of "Harmony - Disharmony" and their mutual ousting in any society. [155; 156]

Based o­n these prerequisites, we formulate the main, structural difference and alternative to traditional branch governance - the spheral Sociocyberneticstructure of global governance and its subjects/actors in the UNH SMSGHG. To four spheres of social production and four Spherons employed in these spheres correspond four spheral organizational subsystems of governance and four spheral subjects/actors of governance in it at all its levels.

Legislative, executive and judicial bodies in the SMSGHG are structured and constituted into spheralgoverning clusters (SGC), which form typical modules of management institutions and ensure their structural similarity and their functional coherence at different levels that overcome the disharmony and structural mismatch of traditional branch governance. Spheral structural symmetry of the SMSGHG governing institutions at all levels is a necessary condition for effective global harmonious governance. This is its first rule.

Its second law is coherence to establish and maintain the permissible limits of minimum and maximum for all operating parts/subsystems of the controlled and controlling systems. This is a universal law of harmony of effective global governance. Other rules are detailed below.

Democratic decision-making procedures at the UNH SMSGHG are based o­n dialogue and spheral consensus of SGC at each level. Spheral consensus is the unanimity of the spheral actors of governance by the majority of votes in each of them. There can be no confrontation between the spheral actors of governance and the opposition o­n the issue of harmony as a single goal and strategy, but they are permissible and possible within these actors, between their different parts o­n ways and means of their implementation. This excludes antagonism between them and the suppression of any spheral actor, but leaves room for internal system opposition in resolving differences between their parts through the widest possible dialogue. The mechanism of built-in systemic opposition prevents any possibility of dictatorship and usurpation of power by any party and any official in the system of spheral democracy of UNH.

A dynamic mechanism for mutual control of SGC in SMSGHG is ensured by free association of any of them for verification and control of any of them. It minimizes the total corruption that is irresistible in the traditional management and excludes it in principle.

The procedure for the appointment of key persons in the SMSGHG is also exercised through the democratic mechanism of spheral consensus.

 

2.3. The UNH SMSGHG Description

 

1. International need for a fundamentally new model of global governance

 

The founder of the Global Challenges Foundation in a result of his vast intellectual and practical experience for more than 60 years, came to the following irreproachable conclusions regarding the international need for a fundamentally new model of global governance:

1.Sovereign nation-states are unable to manage the global challenges in a satisfactory way.

2.No national politician is accountable for the good of all humankind.

3.The American electoral system should be reviewed.

4.Even though every nation says it wants to live in peace, we spend nearly five billion dollars every day to defend ourselves against each other. My belated conclusion is that no governance system can guarantee that there will be no future wars – unless we implement global and total disarmament.

5.I can o­nly see o­ne rational solution: We have to find a new, more effective way to cooperate globally. We urgently need to find a new system of governance, which would effectively and fairly manage the major global challenges.

6.I’m convinced that new ideas will continue to hatch as long as humans exist. New and better models can start a much-needed global debate.

7.Now there is a great risk and problem complex which the world urgently needs to address.” [157; 158].

In these 7 points, a correct assessment of the absolute inability and insufficiency of traditional global governance is expressed, and o­n the other hand - a firm awareness of the need for an alternative model and a clear strategy for its development. Both requirements are laid in the basis of the global governance model proposed below, which fully meets them.

 

2. Risks’ ranges and governance’s priorities

 

According to the surveyThe UN is considered the most able to respond to global risks (60%) but there is overwhelming support for it to be reformed (85%).

  • Usage of weapons of mass destruction is ranked as the global risk needing the most urgent response (62%), followed by politically motivated violence (57%) and climate change (56%).
  • Eight adults in ten (85%) think that the UN needs to be reformed to better address global risks. o­nly 7% do not think that it needs to be reformed.” [159]

 

3. Brief overview of the traditional global governance models

 

The review of "Global governance models in history" showed the main weaknesses of traditional management models and some necessary requirements. The main o­ne is that the global governance of mankind must lean "on the basis of what all have in common," which is revealed o­nly by science in the best way. [160] However, scientific understanding of the general structure and actors of humankind is still missing.

Another weakness of traditional management is the ignoring of the "fundamental law of Republic" of Montesquieu: "The firmness and prosperity of democracy always depend from the correct division o­n the classes of the population with the right to vote". [161] Purely legal models of global governance are helpless without scientific social grounds, as demonstrated by the failure of many attempts to implement them in the 20th century.

       The UNH SMSGHG can o­nly be democratic, but in an updated form of spheral democracy, which, unlike traditional, "will allow us to make collective decisions at the global level, taking into account the interests of all." [160] We found the most adequate for it the system of legislative procedures proposed by lawyers Grenville Clark and Louis Sohn in 1958 [162 pp. 12-17; 163; 164]. This system, aimed at ensuring global peace and general disarmament is using with some modifications in our model of global governance. It can include some other legal projects of global governance and world democracy.

 

4. The UNH SMSGHG Structure

 

This Model is proposed for the beginning, for 4-5 years of testing as an experimental mode of functioning of the traditional UN. Therefore, we will distinguish between two orders and two UN systems: "traditional UN" (TUN) and "experimental UN" (EUN) identical to the UNH. Both modes operate simultaneously, in parallel, but the experimental regime in the annual dynamic range of 2-6 months, is included in the TUN and is subordinate to it although it must have a relative autonomy enshrined in its Charter. Their fundamental difference is that the TUNhas reconciled over 70 years with endless disharmonies, especially militarism and wars, and the UNH excludes them by harmony in all ways and in all dimensions.

For this the highest principle of the experimental UNH proclaims the "reality of global harmony" (Poincare) in its "deep societal structure" of four constant production spheres and the four constant Spherons of humankind. This "four-spheral" structure was discovered and explored in the first approximation by the spheral Sociocybernetics and Tetrasociology for more than 40 years [165; 166; and others], which requires further international systemic development in view of its extreme complexity and exceptional importance.

The four-spheral structure is recognized as the highest structural law of all UNH management bodies, ensuring equal consideration of the interests of each of the four Spherons of humankind. The equality of the Spherons extends to the equality of the UN member states and the genders equality, regardless of their number. It is expressed for all levels by the Four Spheral Equations Universal Standard (FSEUS), which is recognizing in the UNH “Global Harmony Charter” (GHC). The three named governance equality (of spheres/Spherons, nation-states and genders) are integrated by the fourth, defining: "Spheral Harmonious Democracy" (SHD), based o­n an equal distribution of power between the Spherons and their genders.

In the UNH Charter, the Supreme Legislative Body recognizes the “Spheral General Assembly” (SGA) of the UN 196 member-nations, the number of which, taking into account their dynamics, equates to 200 with the representation of each sphere from each state by o­ne "spheral emissary" employed in the corresponding sphere, with a mandate for 3-4 years with equal gender representation of the spheres. The spheral emissaries are appointed by the highest legislative body of each UN member state. (Then they can be elected by the population of each country).

As a result, the UNH SGA of the 800 members is created with an equal representation of the interests of each state, each of its production spheres, each of its Spherons and each of its gender, regardless of their number and dynamics. It is possible to expand the SGA twice (1600 emissaries), i.e. o­n 2 emissaries (woman + man) from each sphere of each member-state will be recognized. This option is more harmonious, fair and preferable, although it is more expensive. The spheral structure of the UNH legislative body with equal representation in it of four spherons from each of its member state is expressed by the corresponding Model-1 above.

The UNH SGA is structured into four legislative "Spheral Committees" with the relevant subcommittees o­n the largest sectors/branches of each global sphere and with equality in all FSEUS dimensions: state, sphere/Spheron, gender and their power. The UNH SGA approves all their rules for the democratic procedures of decision-making.

In the UNH Charter, the "Spheral World Government" (SWG) is recognized as the supreme executive body, which is approved by the UNH SGA from "Spheral Ministers" engaged in the relevant spheres of each member state with equal gender representation, with a total of 1,600 ministers who are appointed for 3-4 years by the highest legislative body of a UN member state. The SWG creates for the operational resolutions of the most important issues the "Peace from Harmony Council" (PHC) - analogue of the modern UN Security Council - from the spheral ministers of 20 countries with their alternate annual turnover. The structural similarity of the UNH highest bodies will ensure the equality and harmony of both its power branches.

Its SWG is structured into four executive "Spheral Ministries" with the relevant Agencies for the largest sectors/branches of each global sphere and with equality in all FSEUS dimensions. SWG is also structured according to regional continents and subcontinents.The UNH SGA approves the rules and democratic procedures for decision-making and harmonious interaction of Spheral Ministries and their Agencies o­n the SWG proposal.

At the next stage, after 2-4 years’ work of the UNH, SGA establishes its Peace from Harmony Supreme Court” (PHSC) and approves its staff from the judicial Spheral Emissaries appointed by the UN member states.

The UNH Departments should be established in the most conflict regions and hubs of contact of many civilizations: the Middle East, the Balkans [167] and others.

This is in general terms the UNH SMSGHG organizational structure uniting two scientific models:governance model and model of its object in their Sociocybernetic feedbacks. The adequacy and other qualities of the object scientific model are the source of vitality, efficiency, stability and all other positive qualities of governance, its subject and its model.

 

5. Sociocybernetic model of humankind as a governance object in

the UNH SMSGHG

 

The UNH SMSGHG object is the humanity in the unity of all its communities and states in its historical system of integral life-supporting production system. Spheral Sociocybernetics analyzes the humanity universal integrity in four research subsystems: Statics, Dynamics, Structuratics and Genetics. We confine ourselves to the brief summary of o­nly the first three. All of them are based and integrated by the fundamental Sociocybernetic Axiom of Global Harmony (SAGH):

The harmonious (sustainable) existence of a society in any place and at any time is defined by the measure in proportion of four equal necessary and sufficient social resources: People (P), Information (I), Organizations (O) and Things (T). (Things are any material benefits and services). Social resources are expressed in the chain: People (P) – Information (I) – Organization (O) – Things (T). In the acronym: P-I-O-T, or: PIOT. Their main attributes are:

1. Artificiality: they do not exist in a ready form in nature, therefore the society (population) in order to live should constantly produce PIOT resources;

2. The equal necessity of these resourcesclusters, because the absence, zero of any of them excludes the life of society and human;

3. Inseparability and mutual inclusion of "everyone in each", i.e. the impossibility of producing o­ne without others and superposing the qualities of o­ne to all others;

4. Sociocybernetic harmonious integrity of PIOT resources to a certain measure/proportion. It expresses society in static: S = P + I + O + T, where S is a whole society.

Harmoniousness of PIOT resources determines the harmony of the spheres of their production and the classes occupied in them - the Spherons.

PIOT resources logically require corresponding processes: production, distribution, exchange / trade and consumption: PDEC processes.

PIOT resources logically require corresponding structures in which processes and resources are connected and which, according to the final product, are classified into four societal (macro) spheres of social production:

1.Social sphere, Sociosphere (S), the subject-product of which are people (P);

2.Information sphere, Infosphere (I), the subject-product of which is information (I);

3.Organizational sphere, Orgsphere (O), the subject-product of which are organization/s (O);

4.Technical (economic/ecological) sphere, Technoecosphere (T), the subject-product of which are things (T). Four spheres of production are: SIOT.

PIOT resources logically require corresponding spheral communities or societal classes of the population, SPHERONS.[165]

SPHERONS, spheral classes of people are extremely large “soft, stochastic” groups of the population, covering it as a whole, employed in four spheres of social production of PIOT resources and differing in term of primary (in time) employment in o­ne of the spheres. They are the actors of social harmony, i.e. are harmonious by nature classes, because outside the harmony between them they are unable to produce PIOT resources. Therefore, they are the ultimate cause of global peace, its guarantor and actor/creator.

Spherons are network social groups/classes of people in the spheres of production. These groups have a stochastic, probabilistic nature of employment/inclusion of people in the spheres, therefore spherons are "soft" classes, and they are not attached rigidly to any other permanent social attribute: property, power, income, etc. They are closely interrelated, dynamically flowing into each other and interacting at all levels, starting with the individual. This creates their network integrity parameter in conjunction with all their other properties. Spherons are a common network denominator of all the partial and transitory communities of humanity in its history from family and nations to civilizations. o­n this fundamental and everlasting community of spherons, the UN model of Harmony and Global Governance is being built.

Summarizing, we can formulate the following definition. The network spherons (a network of spherons of different levels from micro to mega) is a special "soft" cluster of societal network structures that cover the population as a whole and all people from birth to death in the form of extremely large classes/groups engaged in four spheres of social production. Their primary cohesivecriterion is productive employment ("autopoiesis" of Maturana). Autopoiesis constitutes all the fundamental attributes of spherons and their elements: wholeness, integrity, stochasticity, systemic, equality in employment, balance, proportion, measure, harmony, peace, freedom from each other, independence from rigid parameters of property, power, income, race, nationality, sex, age and other partial properties. Polycentricism and the productive thermodynamic negentropy of spherons’ autopoiesis [168] make them, hence, humanity, the most adaptive to survival and sustainable development in the natural and cosmic environment. An attempt at a broader biological substantiation of autopoiesis and negentropy of harmonious spherons as an "anatomy of peace" was undertaken in the work of Michael Ellis. [169]

Why does the knowledge of spherons begin o­nly in the 21st century? Because their endless cultural diversity in human history and at different social levels from family to humanity was not allowed to see their community, as for the trees we cannot see the forest. The ultimate objective complexity of the spherons is the main epistemological reason for the lack of their scientific knowledge to this day, which was fixed by the temporary political interests of the temporary dominant partial classes of the fragmented world. The globalization of human society, o­n the o­ne hand, makes spherons more mature and accessible to scientific perception, and o­n the other hand, it requires scientific penetration into the deep spheral structure of the population. In more detail about this structure in the nature of spherons see Chapters 1 and 2 of the book "Global Peace Science" [78].

The basis by which Spherons are differing between them is employment/autopoiesis in four spheres of social production. But employment (autopoiesis) has an ambivalent, dual biosocial nature, which is expressed by two axioms of employment: in society, autopoiesis/employment is part of the social sphere, and in the biosphere, autopoiesis/employment of a person includes four spheres of social production as their own parts.

Taking into account the social nature of the human, he/she stochastically joins to the next four Spherons (classes) employed autopoiesis in four spheres of social production SIOT:

1.SOCIOCLAS, people employed in Sociosphere, P1;

2.INFOCLASS, people employed in Infosphere, P2;

3.ORGCLASS, people employed in Orgsphere, P3;

4.TECHNOCLASS, people employed in Technoecosphere, P4.

Abbreviation of these classes is the same (SIOT) as the spheres, so they will differ by adding the word "class": SIOT-classes, SPHERONS.

The population number at any level is the sum of four SPHERONS:

P = P1 + P2 + P3 + P4.

The products of three other spheres are divided in a similar manner, resulting corresponding matrix of the basic spheral statistical indices. This matrix is the foundation of global spheral mathematical statistics and its IT (below).

P = P1 + P2 + P3 + P4

I = I1 + I2 + I3 + I4

O = О1 + О2 + О3 + О4

T = T1 + T2 + T3 + T4

All spheral resources, processes, structures and classes-Spherons in the UNH SMSGHG, as well as a mathematically calculated measure of their proportions in harmony and disharmony are expressed in this matrix of spheral statistics, which has infinite dimension in its decomposition.


6. Tables of Spheres and the Model of Humanity’s Spherons:

the UNH SMSGHG object expression

 

Indissolubility of the SIOT spheres and the Spherons involved in them is that the products "exits" of all spheres constitute their resources "inputs". It is expressed in the spheres statistical tables of their sector/branch structure in statics. These tables, presented in many of our works[78; 121; 125; 154; 165; 166; 168 and others], because they are very cumbersome, cannot be shown here. We confine ourselves to their simplest form. It is important that these tables are universal, include all, without exception, production functions and relevant professional groups of humanity’s spherons at all its levels.

 

TABLE-1. Statics of SOCIOSPHERE and employed in it SOCIOSPHERON, P1

SOCIOSPHERE

SOCIAL SECTOR,

Branches

Subjects/Products:

P = P1 + P2 + P3 + P4

SOCIOSPHERON, P1,

Employed in Sociosphere

Resources

P1, I1, O1, T1 for Sociosphere

Education

People (P)

Teachers, etc.

 

Health

People (P)

Doctors, etc.

 

Sport, Tourism

People (P)

Athletes,Coaches, etc.

 

Social Care

People (P)

Social workers

 

Other services (Church, Philanthropy, Trade Unions,… )

People (P)

Priests, Philanthropists, Trade unionists, Rescuers, etc.

 

INDIVIDUAL SECTOR

 

 

 

Family, family employment

Family (P)

Parents, children, family members

 

Individual employment for o­neself = autopoiesis

Individual (P)

Non-laboringindividuals

 

Notes to the table.

1. People/population (P) is the product of Sociosphere. People/population is produced for four spheres, therefore P = P1 + P2 + P3 + P4, where:

P1 – is employed in Sociosphere; P1 constitutes SPHERON-1 or SOCIOCLASS,

P2 – is employed in Infosphere; P2 constitutes SPHERON-2 or INFOCLASS;

P3 – is employed in Orgsphere; P3 constitutes SPHERON-3 or ORGCLASS:

P4 – is employed in Technosphere; P4 constitutes SPHERON-4 or TECHNOCLASS.

2. The employed in Sociosphere (P1), i.e. SPHERON-1 consists of two parts: the professionals working in social sector of this sphere (P1w) and all non-working (P1n) employed in the individual sector with self-production (pre-school children, students, housewives, non-working pensioners, disabled unemployed, etc.) and in the households. Therefore, the number of SPHERON-1 is the sum of employed in all sectors of this sphere: P1 = P1w + P1n.

3. To every SPHERONS a socially useful labor corresponds: P1w are employed by humanitarian labor, P2 – information labor, P3 – organizational labor, P4 – material labor.

 

TABLE-2. Statics of INFOSPHERE and employed in it INFOSPHERON, P2

INFOSPHERE

SOCIAL SECTOR,

Branches

Subjects/Products:

I = I1 + I2 + I3 + I4

INFOSPHERON, P2,

Employed in Infosphere

Resources P2, I2, O2, T2 for Infosphere

Culture

Information (I)

Cultural workers, etc.

 

Science

Information (I)

Scientists, etc.

 

Art

Information (I)

Artists, etc.

 

Religion (as information)

Information (I)

Priests, etc.

 

Media, publishing and advertising

Information (I)

Journalists, Publishers, Advertisers, etc.

 

Designing

Information (I)

Designers, etc.

 

Communication

Information (I)

Communicators, etc.

 

Information service

Information (I)

Programmers, etc.

 

INDIVIDUAL SECTOR

Information (I)

 

 

Family, informational employment

Information (I)

Parents, children, family members

 

Individual informational employment for o­neself = autopoiesis

Information (I)

Individuals in their inf. employment for themselves

 

Notes to the table.

1. Information (I) is the product of Infosphere. Information is produced for four spheres, therefore: I = I1 + I2 + I3 + I4, where

I1 – Humanitarian information of SPHERON-1. I1 is required for it to produce people;

I2 – information of SPHERON-2. I2 is required for it to produce information;

I3 – organizational information of SPHERON-3. I3 is required for it to produce organizations;

I4 – technical information of SPHERON-4. I4 is needed for it to produce things, material wealth.

These clusters of information constitute the spheres of information or informational spheres of each SPHERON.

2. The number of SPHERON-2 is the sum of the employed in all sectors of this sphere.

 

TABLE-3. Statics of ORGSPHERE and employed in it ORGSPHERON, P3

ORGSPHERE

SOCIAL SECTOR,

Branches

Subjects/Products:

O = O1 + O2 + O3 + O4

ORGSPHERON, P3,

Employed in Orgsphere

Resources P3, I3, O3, T3 for Orgsphere

Policy

Organization (O)

Political figures, etc.

 

Right

Organization (O)

Lawyers, etc.

 

Army and security

Organization (O)

Military, policemen, etc.

 

Tax Inspectorate

Organization (O)

Tax officials

 

Governance

Organization (O)

Managers, etc.

 

Banking and Finance

Organization (O)

Bankers, Financiers, etc.

 

Non-governmental organizations

Organization (O)

Relevant workers

 

INDIVIDUAL SECTOR

Organization (O)

 

 

Family, organizational employment

Organization (O)

Parents, children, family members

 

Individual, organizational employment for o­neself = autopoiesis

Organization (O)

Individuals in their org. employment for themselves

 

Notes to the table.

1. Organization (institutes, rules, order, norms) (O) is the product of Orgsphere. Organization is produced for four spheres, therefore: O = O1 + O2 + O3 + O4, where:

O1 – humanitarian organizations (schools, hospitals, etc.) of SPHERON-1. O1 is necessary for it to produce people;

O2 – informational organizations of SPHERON-2. O2 is required for it to produce information;

O3 – administrative organizations of SPHERON-3. O3 is required for it to produce organizations;

O4 – technical (economic and ecological) organizations of SPHERON-4. O4 is needed for it to produce things and nature protection.

These clusters of organizations constitute the spheres of organizations or organizational spheres of each SPHERON. Each cluster organizations combine 4 types of organizations: political, legal, financial, management. To every sphere of society and each SPHERON corresponds its own organizational area of politics, law, finance, and management. Each SPHERON has his own money as an organizational tool of its sphere: social, informational, administrative and economic money [170].

2. The number of SPHERON-3 is the sum of the employed in all sectors of this sphere.

 

TABLE-4. Statics of TECHNOECOSPHERE and employed in it TECNOSPHERON, P4

TECHNOECOSPHERE

SOCIAL SECTOR,

Branches

Subjects/Products:

T = T1 + T2 + T3 + T4

TECHNOSPHERON, P4,

Employed in Technoecosphere

Resources P4, I4, O4, T4 for Technoecosphere

Industry

Things (T)

Workers

 

Agriculture and forestry

Things (T)

Farmers, foresters

 

Construction

Things (T)

Builders

 

Transportation

Things (T)

Transporters

 

Trade, marketing

Things (T)

Traders, etc.

 

Housing and household services

Things (T)

Workers, repairmen, etc.

 

Fish industry

Things (T)

Fishermen

 

Conservation of nature

Things (T)

Environmentalists etc.

 

INDIVIDUAL SECTOR

Things (T)

 

 

Family, material employment

Things (T)

Parents, children, family members

 

Individual, material employment for o­neself = autopoiesis

Things (T)

Individuals in their material employment for themselves

 

Notes to the table.

1. Things (T) are the product of Technosphere. Things are produced for four spheres, therefore: T = T1 + T2 + T3 + T4, where:

T1 – humanitarian things (buildings and equipment of schools, hospitals, etc., housing, food, etc.) for SPHERON-1. T1 is required for it to produce people;

T2 – informational things (buildings and equipment of institutions of science, culture, media, etc., books, televisions, computers, etc.) for SPHERON-2. T2 is required for it to produce information;

T3 – organizational things (administrative buildings and equipment of institutions of politics, law, finance and management, office equipment, etc.) for SPHERON-3. T3 is required for it to produce organizations;

T4 – technical things (industrial buildings and equipment of enterprises of the Technosphere, the means of material production) for SPHERON-4. T4 is required for it to produce things and for nature protection. These clusters make things realm of things, the economy or economic spheres (physical environment) each SPHERONS.

2. The number of SPHERON-4 is the sum of employed in all sectors of this sphere.

Basing o­n the proposed classification and definition of Spherons, covering the entire population of the planet, humanity appears as the unity of its four constant, harmonious Spherons (classes), which constitute its deep eternal societal structure of harmony and peace. This structure is the most complex object of human cognition; therefore it approached to its investigation in Sociocybernetics and Tetrasociology only at the beginning of the 21st century, although some of its properties and elements were discovered before (2.1. and 2.2.).

Proceeding from what has been said, the total number of humankind (population, people of the planet) is composed of the sum of the number of global Spherons:

PEOPLE (P) = P1 + P2 + P3 + P4.

We know today: “World population reached 7 billion o­n October 31, 2011 according to the United Nations Population Fund. According to current projections, the global population will reach eight billion by 2024, and will likely reach around nine billion by 2042.” [171].

The generalized representation of the humanity’s spherons is expressed by the following model.


Model-2: SPHERONS of Humanity




        The
total number of humankind (population, people of the planet) is composed of the sum of the number of global Spherons:
PEOPLE (P) = P1 + P2 + P3 + P4.
We know today: “
World population reached 7 billion o­n October 31, 2011 according to the United Nations Population Fund. According to current projections, the global population will reach eight billion by 2024, and will likely reach around nine billion by 2042.” [171].

Today there are no statistics of Spherons. Therefore, the number of each Spheron of humanity today can be hypothetically determined according to the pattern of their statistical proportion found for o­ne country according to its population census in 2010. These calculations are presented in detail in Chapter 2 of "Global Peace Science" [78].

The number of SPHERONS of this country (Russia) in millions of people and in percentage of the total population (rounded) is equal to:

SOCIOSPHERON = 85 million or 59.4%

INFOSPHERON = 4 million or 2.8%

ORGSPHERON = 10.8 million or 7.5%

TECHNOSPHERON = 41 million or 28, 6%

Statistical error = 2.3 million or 1.6%

The size of humanity’s SPHERONS in 2011 ($ 7 billion) in this proportion is:

SOCIOSPHERON = 59.4% = 4.2 billion

INFOSPHERON = 2.8% = 0.2 billion

ORGSPHERON = 7.5% = 0.5 billion

TECHNOSPHERON = 28, 6% = 2 billion

Statistical error = 1.6% = 0.1 billion.

It is obvious that similar extrapolation of proportions of o­ne country to the whole humanity is rough but the other does not exist today. The proportions of sizes of Spherons in each country and each region are very different. Their definition requires appropriate statistical studies as proposed in thismethodology, which was tested o­n o­ne country statistics. These computations are very labor-intensive work for all countries and they are available o­nly to the UNH.

The logic and o­ntology of SPHERONS are simple and indisputablealthough they are deep, do not lie o­n the surface and are not visible empirically, with the naked eye (see Appendix). If we recognize, o­n the o­ne hand, the Maturana’s "autopoiesis" (productive employment) of every person from birth to death, which can be carried out o­nly in the spheres of social production, and o­n the other hand, if we recognize the reality of four equal necessary and sufficient spheres of social production of PIOT resources, we are forced to recognize the reality of four equal necessary and sufficient Spherons. They unite ‘softly’ all people/individuals employed by autopoiesis in the relevant spheres of production, which cannot exist without Spherons as they are their main productive force.

 

7. Sociocybernetic Genome (SOCIONOME) of Humankind

as Genetic Code of its Harmony

 

Above we defined 16 constant universal components of social production at any stages of its evolution: four PIOT resources, four PDEC processes, four SIOT spheres/structures and four Spherons - SIOT classes. The constancy of these components, their reproducibility in any and infinitely diversity of socio-cultural and civilizational forms, their integrity, mutual dependence and continuity constitutes them as the Sociocybernetic Genome of Humanity (SOCIONOME), which persists in any of its changes at all its levels and in all its societies. The carrier of this genetic code of harmony of any society and humanity as a whole are Spherons.

They are able to perform their key productive function o­nly in peace among themselves. Between them o­nly harmony and peace from it is possible. Throughout human history, this genetic code ensures the reproduction of the deep societal structure of the Spherons harmony, which determines the peaceful nature of human and society (Kant) [153]. This nature is often violated by the disharmonies of partial, transitory classes, nations and groups, ignorance of which in the deep social harmony leads them to wars and violence, which ultimately restore the broken harmony but at the cost of colossal sacrifices. SOCIONOME is presented in the following scheme below, created in its basis back in 1978 [125] but it is constantly being improved.

 

Scheme 1. Sociocybernetic Genome (SOCIONOME) of Humankind.

Genetic code of social harmony and global peace

 

 

SOCIONOME and its 16 components detailed description can be found in dozens of our articles and books in almost 40 years, some of which are listed here: [78; 121; 125; 154; 165; 166; 168 and others] and o­n the GHA website: http://www.peacefromharmony.org

SOCIONOME is the network core of the governance object in the UNH SMSGHG, o­n which defines the entire systemic set of global risks and challenges of humankind for their harmonious solution in the UNH. In it the different mathematical interpretations of SOCIONOME are constructed. We confine ourselves to o­nly two: thermodynamic and statistical interpretations.

 

8.1. Thermodynamic interpretation

 

SOCIONOMEas a unity of four constant spheres of production and four constant in the structure of spherons occupied in them can be interpreted in dynamics as a four-chamber thermodynamic stochastic societal heart of humankind, which opposes to entropy of its energy and ensures the constant growth and strengthening of its negentropy. o­nly the continuous work of this heart ensures the life of humankind and its social "autopoiesis" as a whole throughout its history. The dual, biosocial nature of a human being requires interpreting functioning of the four-chambered productive heart of social harmony with its inputs and outputs of PIOT resources within the "autopoietic" heart of biological harmony with its birthrate entry and mortality output. Moreover, "Autopoietic systems are thermodynamically open but organizationally closed" [129].The result of this interpretation is a five-block sociocybernetic model of biosocial harmony as a source of survival and sustainable development of humankind/noosphere in the Earth's biosphere. Let's clarify some details and their some important characteristics.

If the spheres are the producing chambers of this heart, then the Spherons are their muscles, strength, motor and energy. Their "blood" is a continuous circulation through the channels of distribution and exchange of pulsating counter flows of life-sustaining PIOT resources, which they continuously reproduce every part of their life for the nutrition of all the Spherons, including themselves, but not o­nly themselves. Each of them cannot exist without feeding others. The destruction or absence of at least o­ne of the Spherons exsanguinates society and deprives it of life. Without each of the Spherons, society is dead. Therefore, they are equally necessary for society, regardless of their number. The reliability, stability and historical survival of this heart is ensured by its almost infinite division in levels from mega-, macro-, meso- to micro-levels in all human settlements to the family inclusively.

         Continuous pulsation of PIOT resources flows through inputs/outputs mechanisms of feedback and export/import channels of distribution and exchange can be expressed mathematically for all levels discretely of any dimension from a second to decades, centuries and millennia, depending o­n the practical and scientific goals of the managing subsystem - in our case – for the UNH SMSGHG. Based o­n any discrete dimension, the mathematical "Humankind Thermodynamic Spheral Model" (HTSM) is constructed with global inputs/outputs of people's birthrate/mortality (or migration/immigrationby regions) and production/consumption (or export/import) of other resources. Its first example is the "thermodynamic model of global peace" [168]. Similar approaches of thermodynamic modeling are demonstrated in other sources especially in the works of the Nobel laureate John Avery [172; 173; 174; 175].

Our HTSM rests o­n two interrelated nonlinear laws of stochastic distribution of PIOT resources between its chambers/spheres: 1. The law of proportions, measures and harmony (LPMH) of Spheron's integral employment and 2. The law of harmonious spheral limitation (LHSL) of PIOT resources. They exclude disharmony and entropy of any unbounded parts and attributes: the planet population, the richest people propertyand incomes, unlimited power, endless freedom, etc.

By analogy with this model, we can build a “Thermodynamic Model of Distribution and Exchange of Solar Energy” (TMDESE) between four natural spheres: Litho-, Hydro-, Atmo- and Bio- (including Noo/Anthropo/Socio) spheres for global harmonious governance of the Earth ecology and climate.

Another thermodynamic model. The spherical Sociocybernetic approach allows us to find a semblance of natural and societal spheres and express it in appropriate models not o­nly for society but also for nature, for harmonious governance of global energy o­n the Earth, for its harmonization in order to solve and prevent its environmental and climatic risks. For this purpose, we can build a “Thermodynamic Model of Distribution and Exchange of Solar Energy” (TMDESE) between the socio/noosphere and the four natural spheres. It is a model of the five-chamber spheral energy heart of the Earth, composed by the inseparable unity of its spheres: Litho-Hydro-Atmo-Bio-Noo/Socio spheres. This model is similar to SOCIONOME and TMDESE models (above), therefore it reflects the coherent part of the UNH SMSGHG object for global harmonious governance of the Earth's ecology and climate to harmonize them in the 21st century. [176]

 

8.2. Statistical interpretation

 

The dynamics of qualitative elements of SOCIONOMErequire their quantitative expression in adequate mathematical statistics. If the basis of the SOCIONOME is PIOT resources, then their quantitative, statistical measurements are necessary and sufficient for the quantitative measurement of all components of SOCIONOME.

Based o­n these measurements, statistics, developed about 40 years, is called “Tetranet Spheral Statistics of Harmony” (TSSH). It is built o­n alphanumeric indices of resource elements of PIOT, called spheral indices. It is presented in detail in many previous works; therefore here we confine ourselves to a brief description of o­nly its core - matrices of spheral indices or harmony spheral matrices.

The units of measurement of spheral indices, generalizing natural units of measurement, can be cost, time and energy units. We confine ourselves to the most developed today - the cost/money units.

We have established above that any society, including global humanity, in statics is expressed by the sum of all its resources PIOT: SOCIETY = P + I + O + T (1).

To produce each of the PIOT resources, an appropriate set of their parts is needed. Therefore, each PIOT is divided into four parts, necessary and sufficient as resources for the production of new PIOT. This regularity is expressed by a 4x4 matrix of indices, which is called the basic matrix of spheral indices or spheral statistics.

In the pure state, the 4-by-4 spheral matrix of PIOT resources looks like:

P1 + P2 + P3 + P4

I1 + I2 + I3 + I4

О1 + О2 + О3 + О4

T1 + T2 + T3 + T4 (2)

All matrixes that derive from a basic matrix are referred as spheral matrixes, which form spheral statistics. It is essentially different but connected with the traditional (branch or industrial) statistics. All branch indices are integrated in spheral indices, where they are systematized in harmonious spheral logic and Sociocybernetic system.

The spheral matrix columns represent inputs of the corresponding production spheres using PIOT as the resources, and the spheral matrix lines (rows) represent outputs of the corresponding manufacturing spheres that produce PIOT as the products.

The dual nature of the spheral resources (and the spheral indices) as input/resource and output/product of the SIOT spheres is expressed in double letter/numerical (alphanumeric) representation of these resources and corresponding indices.

On the foundation of the 4-by-4 basic matrix, the infinite hierarchical system of spheral matrixes may be created in the dimensions of 4-by-16, 4-by-64, 4-by-256, and so o­n. Their continuum is possible not o­nly in the positive but also in the negative, in fractional and in other infinities. However, at the first stage, we are bound by spheral matrixes o­nly in a positive infinity, that is, 4х4"n", where "n" is the row of natural numbers from +1 to infinity.

The entire infinite series of spheral matrices is constructed by a single algorithm:each line/row of any matrix turns into a column of the underlying matrix, and each index in the underlying matrix line appears as the sum of four indices that express a cluster of resources, necessary and sufficient for its production.

This generating algorithm expresses the fractal nature of social resources and their indices, which are connected with Benoit Mandelbrot’s fractal mathematics. "A fractal is a structure consisting of parts which are in some sense like the whole[177]. Here, the main mathematical problem of harmonious statistical and fractal proportions / measures between the fundamental components of SOCIONOME, which are represented by matrices of sphere indicators, should be solved [178; 179]. They were used in some management projects of a large 5 million city in USSR in 1982-1988 [125], but for known reasons they were not recognized by the leadership.

The system of spheral/fractal matrices creates an Unified Logical Network Statistical Space of Humanity” (ULNSSH) that is able to integrate, compose and decompose by the PIOT indices all the diversity of national statistics, overcoming their inherent fragmentation, rupture and disharmony. Without such a single statistical system of indices, effective global harmonious risk governance is impossible in the UNH. Therefore, the mathematical statistics of similar matrices of spheral indices is a necessary scientific tool of the UNH SMSGHG. Its recursive, fractal use can be successfully integrated with other similar technologies, for example with recursive, fractal cybernetic processes in Stafford Beer's VSM Model [180].

The mathematics of the Sociocybernetic spheral governance may be o­ne of the fundamental scientific basis for the global harmonious digital economy, politics, education, artificial intelligence and management of the 21st century.

 

1.SOCIONOME: Digital and Structural/Organizational Technologies

Based o­n the subject and mathematical models of SOCIONOME, a wide range of different Spheral Harmonization Technologies (SHT) is being created that integrate, streamline and fundamentally expand traditional technologies. SHT includes two large clusters: digital and structural-organizational technologies of harmonization. o­n the SOCIONOME mathematics a cluster of digital technologies is formed, which was called the “Spheral Information-Statistical Technology” (SIST). For almost 40 years of development, this technology has found wide application in dozens of projects. In particular, it was used to manage a large city with a population of 5 million people in 1982-1988 [125]. SIST provides universal digitalization and global statistical informatization of the economy, politics, education, Internet and other sectors of society.

        SHTs develop at new level the global processes of informatization and globalization, supplementing them with two fundamentally new and inextricable system processes of global harmonization and pacifization. Harmonization is represented by components and functions of the UNH SMSGHG. Pacifization is a permanent universal process of appeasement as prevention and resolution of any international relations conflicts in a result of their harmonization, in which pacifization is o­ne of its most important consequences. Pacifization should not be confused with local attempts of forced reconciliation – “pacification[181].

Structural-organizational technologies o­n the basis of the spheral structures are presented in the main details below as aspects of the UNH universal and long-term Agenda below.

 

2.4.UNH Agenda

  

This agenda presupposes the management of current and prevention of new challenges and risks in the long term at least 50 years in the UNH SMSGHG through structural-organizational technologies and strategies, which are systematized and defined in the most concise way below. They are presented in hundreds of works of our organization GHA, some of which have already been submitted [78; 121; 125; 154; 165; 166; 168]and others will be listed below.

 

1. Priority development of the Sociocybernetic science of spheral social harmony

 

Today we are witnessing a powerful priority development of military science, which began more than two centuries ago with the book of Adam von Bülow in 1799 [182]. This science creates now new amazing means of destroying people and global disharmony especially in the 20th century, putting humankind at risk of constant self-destruction. The science of social harmony and its global peace science (GPS) [78], unlike it, is in a pitiful embryonic state, marginal, has lagged behind military science for two centuries and it practically does not exist until now. None of the governments and their UN, mired in wars, does want to recognize and develop it for militaristic reasons (see above). Therefore, its practical effect is zero today. Harmonious prevention and harmonious resolution of global risks is possible o­nly at the priority development and financing of the Sociocybernetic science of spheral social harmony will as GPS. Its main content is presented in this project.

These risks and challenges were generated in the 20th century by capitalism and communism, first of all, by their harmful partial disharmonious ideologies of "false consciousness" into dying industrial civilization, which totally fills its fake propagandist media. Therefore, they are unable to offer a new, alternative vision, which lies in the scientific, harmonious consciousness that defines the "third way" of development. For its working and constant development it is required to create under the UNH auspices an "International Academy of Harmony and Peace" (IAHP) with affiliates in the largest countries [183; 184; 185] with appropriate scientific and cultural support. [186; 187; 188; 189 and others]The most important work of this Academy is the scientific research of the spherons of each country and of humankind as a whole in their dynamics, beginning since 1950, according to the established and tested methods [190].

The main historical trend of this science of the 21st century comes from the periphery to the centers, because traditional centers (the USA, NATO, China and Russia) have become militaristic, they are completely absorbed in global militarism and the arms race, but in different ways. The US-NATO is initiating it, and others are forced to participate in it, so as not to become victims, similar to the victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The science of global harmony and peace cannot go from militaristic centers that we see more than 70 years after the WWIIend. It can go in our time o­nly from the periphery: India, non-aligned and neutral countries, Africa, Latin America, etc. Many such peacemaking initiatives are born in local peripheral centers as well as new political ideas. [191; 192 and others].

The second priority task of this Academy is to prepare for the global harmonious education of the world textbook: "Spherons of harmonious peace, governance and cooperation", the synopsis of which is this project. This textbook combines the previous GHA textbooks [78; 154; 165], and includes the following chapters(approximately):

1.The 20-th century: outburstof violence, militarism, wars, revolutions and terror
2. World history of philosophy, sociology, politics and culture of harmony,
3. Network spherons of global harmony, peace and sustainable development,
4. Statistics of the spherons dynamics in countries and humanity as a whole,
5. Information-statistical technologies of harmony and cooperation of spherons,
6. Structural-organizational technologies of harmony and cooperation of spherons,
7. Individual and family harmonious development,
8. Yoga: an instrument of individual and family harmonious development.

9. The 21 century: non-violent victory of the spherons over the war and global risks

10. Future: Harmonious civilization of spherons in global peace and sustainability with nature.
Additionalchaptersofthistextbookarepossible.

Similar harmonious education during at least o­ne year is mandatory for all emissaries and staff of the UNH SMSGHG. o­nly after this testing it can be recommended for global use.

 

2. Priority of children and youth, equality of the women human rights and population reduction:

transformation of quantity into quality

 

Global harmony requires, first of all, the “Children's Priority and Women’s Equality(CPWE) together with the gradual decline in the population, to begin with - to minimize its growth, which o­nly exacerbates all global risks. Harmonious decline of the population is a necessary condition for improving the quality of human capital and its life and most importantly - overcoming its excessive, disharmonious burden o­n the natural environment, o­n ecology and climate. The humiliating position of women and children in the American world order, legalized in the UN, is presented in many works of this kind [192a].

Many international and regional instruments have drawn attention to gender-related dimensions of human rights issues, the most significant being the UN Convention o­n the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), adopted in 1979 [193], which the United States has not yet ratified.In 1993, the UN World Conference o­n Human Rights in Vienna confirmed that women’s rights were human rights but they are not enforced. This statement speaks that women’s status as human beings entitled to rights is absolutely rightful and should have under no circumstances been in doubt. In identifying neglect of o­ne half of humanity’s rights as human rights violation, clearly reveals as gender and human rights violations. In spite of these international agreements, the denial of women’s basic human rights is persistent and widespread. The UN was able to make these decisions but it was completely incapable to fulfill them because of its preoccupation with militarism.

The empowerment and autonomy of women and the improvement of their political, social, economic status is fundamental for the achievement of sustainable development and global peace. There is the urgent need to advance a wider range of women’s rights and to ensure gender equality and women’s empowerment, which remain impracticable in the existing UN, despite the inclusion of this requirement as o­ne of the eight goals of the UN Millennium Declaration [194]. The rights of children, approved in the relevant UN Convention [195] remain unfulfilled also. The o­nly country in the world, which has not yet ratified it is the United States - the UN chief militarist. This o­nce again confirms the truth that the UN under the USA militaristic protectorate and leadership is powerless to solve the problems with the rights for women and children. The possibility and practical ability to realize these obligations promises o­nly the UN harmony and global peace through Spherons’ approach, proposed in our project.

Global harmony requires prioritizing of children and youth and also the inclusion of women and gender expertise in designing and fulfilling peace accords, in which their role was far too low that the Security Council resolution 1325 (2000) o­n women, peace and security what it stressed[196]. Real peace required that the political, economic and social structures be comprehensive and include young people who must be acknowledged as a core heir in the maintenance of peace and security and they should be included in the decision-making process, preventive diplomacy and peace processes. The numerous appeals of Member States "to increase the inclusive representation of youth in decision-making at all levels" in Security Council resolution 2250 (2015) [197] remained an empty ineffectual "voice crying in the desert". The UN is deprived of such mechanisms, focusing o­n the peace-loving cover for the US militarism.

The role and power of women and the youth in peace building and conflict prevention must be recognized as crucial to forging sustainable peace [198]. But it is able to do o­nly the UN Harmony and global peace through harmonious structure of Spherons, ensuring real equality and advancement for women and youth. Consequently, they are the first advocates of this scientific vision and practice to approve the children’s priority and gender’s equality through children’s suffrage in Spheral democracy (or Spherons’ democracy).

The priority of children, women's equality and harmonious reduction of the population (with the gradual prohibition of abortion) is provided by the structural-organizational mechanism of the "Children's Suffrage Executed by Parents" (CSEP), which was proposed in the first approximation 14 years ago [199; 200; 201]. It is inseparably linked with generalharmonious education (see below).

 

3. Global peace from global harmony

Global peace is the most acute systemic problem of humankind in the 20th and 21st centuries, the solution of which excludes the threat of its military thermonuclear destruction as the highest risk today. Achieving global peace is possible o­nly o­n the basis of the science of global harmony, the priority of children and the equality of women, who in the first place need peace. Its decision requires recognition of its natural eternal peacebuilding actors - the Spherons of harmony, which are the o­nly and completely interested in peace, unlike all partial, disharmonious and transient actors of the past. Therefore, global peace can proceed and be provided in full o­nly by conscious Spherons owning the science of social harmony and overcoming theirpast ignorance and spontaneity in it. Its solution able provides such a structural-organizational mechanism as the "Governments Peace Departments" (GPD) in each country, united by the UNH SMSGHG. Only they, along with the science of harmony, disarmament and Spherons will make UNH completely antimilitarist that the TUN cannot achieve for more than 70 years. Hundreds of the GHA works are devoted to this problem, some of which are mentioned above [78; 121; 125; 154; 165; 166; 168+202; 203; 204; and others].

 

4. General complete disarmament during 50 years and nuclear disarmament - over 10 years

Global peace is impossible without “General and Complete Disarmament from Harmony” (GCDH), which in our project is proposed o­n the basis of global harmonization under the UN auspices and under the control of the National Peace Departments in two structural-organizational forms:

1. Establishment of the “International Peacemaking Armed Forces” (IPAF) financed by UNH and under the Joint International Command of UNH, necessary and sufficient to prevent and suppress any armed aggression o­n the planet, to suppress terror, drug trafficking, armed crimes and any armed groups at the request of the local government if its police do not cope with them. The IPAF deployment is distributed to the main regions (10-20) with all necessary means, and

2. Transformation of the remaining parts of the national armed forces into an “International-National Peace Corps from Harmony" (INPCH) of the UNH SMSGHG with the functions of priority social services: building roads, hospitals, schools, housing and other social infrastructure facilities with part-time employment in them and with the priority transformation of military academies into the Academy of Peace and Harmony.

The main lever of disarmament is a gradual annual reduction in the funding of the armed forces and the military industrial complex (primarily military science) of every country by 2% for 50 years, which will be enough to transform them into peaceful institutions and find peaceful application to hundreds of millions of military personnel and workers of the military-industrial complex in them. Priority, nuclear disarmament is carried out by the UNH for 10 years by reducing annually the funding of nuclear forces, armaments and manufacturing plants by 10% under UNH control. Hundreds of the GHA works are devoted to this problem, some of which are mentioned above [78; 121; 125; 154; 165; 166; 168 +202; 203; 204; and others].

 

5. Global harmonious educationand yoga as his tool

 

The global harmonious education based o­n the science of social harmony provides not o­nly a harmonious transformation of the younger generations’ consciousness, aiming them not at violentsolutions but at harmonious cooperation through appropriate knowledge creating the first condition for solution of all risks. The structural-organizational solution of this task begins with the creation of the IAHP in the UNH not o­nly for scientific research but also for harmonious education.

The IAHP most important task is to establish within 10-20 years the "General Free Higher Harmonious Peace Education" (GFHHPE) with the total education time of the Earth each citizen not less than 14 years: 11 years - high school and 3 years - higher education at the bachelor's level. It is implemented at the expense of disarmament funds and will be a material guarantee of the children and youth priority. It will become the spiritual condition of antimilitaristic immunity, which excludes all wars. Such education during 30-50 years will provide a new quality of the world's population, its conscious and voluntary reduction. Hundreds of the GHA works are devoted to this problem, some of which are mentioned above [78; 121; 125; 154; 165; 166; 168+202; 203; 204; and others].

Peace education as part of the educational curriculum in schools is attributed to Maria Montessori [205], John Dewey [206] and Paulo Freire [207], although earlier thought o­n education for peace is traced to Erasmus and Socrates, among other scholars.

Conflict is the function of misunderstanding or lack of knowledge of the other which induces fear and mistrust.  Learning permits the learner a greater context that promotes harmonious coexistence.

The world is hungering for harmony and peace that can o­nly be achieved by mutual respect and understanding of other culture, race, and religion. There is an urgent need for a culture of peace through using peace education in all that we do by integrating peace in good manners and right conduct, values formation, social studies, religion, social sciences, ethics, philosophy, and other curricular courses.

UNESCO has established the education for a Culture of Peace to create and inspire peace ‘in the minds of men and women’, based o­n the universal values and fostering:

1. Culture of peace through education

2. Sustainable economic and social development

3. Respect for all human rights

4. Equality between women and men

5. Democratic participation

6. Understanding, tolerance and solidarity

7. Free flow of information and knowledge

8. International peace and security [208]

Unfortunately, these eight values and areas of the peace culture are fragmented and not integrated by a holistic, systemic and constitutive for them value of harmony that defines a global harmonious peaceful education as the highest level of education. [209].

Declaration and Program ofAction o­n a Culture of Peace, outlines eight critical action areas and calls out for actors of peace to act at national, regional and international levels to eliminate the roots of conflict.

The way to peace, conflict prevention and harmony is possible o­nly through peace education. However in wider context conflict prevention and peace building will be sustainable when progress is made in creating a secure environment, in the promotion of sustainable democratic systems, economic and social well-being. Progress in peace education and all these sectors is necessary for sustainable peace and harmony.

The UN should invest greatly in global harmonious peace education based o­n the science of social harmony because holistic education is the key to uniting nations and bringing human beings closely together. Therefore it is very important to recognize the crucial role of holistic education in contributing to building a culture of global peace from harmony.

An important tool of harmonious education is Indian Yoga, which has been practiced for thousands of years [210]. Yoga is also evaluated as "the science of inner peace and practical tool of the global peace science (GPS)" [211].

 

6. Harmonization of world religions

        Harmonization of world relations is impossible without harmonization of relations between world religions through global harmonious education, harmonizing religious principles, the first of which is the "Golden Rule of Religions", opposing the law of retribution "Jus or Lex Talionis" and etc. The social ground of interfaith relations harmonization will be the social harmony of the conscious Spherons and their believers, educated in its science. Conscious harmony of Spherons as an alternative to disharmonious violent fundamentalism is the social foundation of religious harmony and antiterrorist immunity. Dozens of the GHA works are devoted to this problem, some of which are mentioned above [78; 121; 125; 154; 165; 166; 168; 202; 203; 204; + 212; 213; 214; 215].

 

7. Spheral global 100% democracy or "Harmonious Democracy of Spherons"

The deep systemicevolutionary risk of the traditional political democracy, dominating since the 20th century, with its rampant pathologies of militarism, corruption, nationalism and inequality began to threaten the survival of humanity. It is a risk of ruling in democracy elite of 1% billionaires [84 and others]. Research literature about liberal, "full" democracy is filled with its anti-democratic estimates and definitions: "plutocracy, oligarchy, totalitarian democracy, democracy for the few, democratic despotism, fascist democracy, democracy of billionaires, brainwashing, zombie, manipulation democracy," [33; 40and others]. As o­ne scientist said, "You cannot have a democracy that organizes itself around war" [86].

An alternative to this militaristic pathological 1% democracy is the really full, 100% "Harmonious Democracy of Spherons" (HDS) or “Spheral Harmonious Democracy” (SHD), including the entire population, which is based o­n equal division of power between the Spherons elected representatives in gender equal proportion at all levels. The HDS is the political center and key of the proposed UNH SMSGHG. The fundamental advantage of the HDS over traditional democracy is the mechanism of internally built spheral opposition, in which the spherons are united in a harmonious goal and a peaceful way of its realization, but can differ in the ways and means of achieving it [216; 217; 218]. Therefore, o­nly Spherons are those truly actors of antimilitarist democracy and governance, which are capable to provide a deep spheral harmonious democratization of the entire social life of humankindto prevent and resolve all risks. It will constitute a new form of international and national cooperation at all levels. Hundreds of the GHA works are devoted to this problem, some of which are mentioned above [78; 121; 125; 154; 165; 166; 168; 202; 203; 204].

 

8. Global harmonious currency

The traditional global reserve currency, based o­n the dominant disharmonious national currency, has long been a source of catastrophic financial risk, which is maturing in an almost continuous financial crisis. Global harmonious governance cannot be successful o­n the basis of a fundamentally risky reserve currency that is unfair for all nations. Therefore, the UNH SMSGHG suggests an experimental verification of the new forms of reserve currency. o­ne of them is a “Harmonious Reserve Currency” (HRC) [219; 220] together with the corresponding structural-organizational forms, was considered in other GHA projects. o­nly such a currency with uniform fair and harmonious rules for all without exception can overcome total fraud and corruption of national currencies, especially the US dollar, which stimulates the flowering of financial frauds and global economic crises. [63 and others]

 

9. Overcoming extreme poverty

        The sociopolitical systems of capitalism and communism, which prevailed in the 20th century, demonstrated a complete inability to fundamentally solve the problem of poverty, in fact o­nly reinforcing itin its "globalization" [64]. The UNH SMSGHG presupposes and creates all the necessary structural-organizational prerequisites, the first - a full 100% democracy for system solution of this challenge in "Roadmap to Overcome Extreme Poverty" (ROEP) in accordance with the spheral laws for 20-30 years [221 and others]. It is based o­n the principle of social partnership between different strata of the population, especially the poor and the rich, whose wealth growth will depend o­n improving the welfare of the poor. [Ibid.]

 

10. Global economy of moderate harmonious growth, its minimization and zero

 

The creators of a balanced, just, crisis-free and efficient market economy of moderate harmonious growth, ensuring the guarantee of its sustainability, can o­nly be harmonious Spherons. Spheral market economy is built o­n the constant mutualdependence of the Spherons’ economic position and all their partial groups and classes o­n the harmonious economic principle of "Mini-Max and Maxi-Min" (MMMM). [Ibid.] This is an endless evolutionary process of minimizing the maximum economic status and maximizing the minimum economic status in an integrated global economic system. Its norms are determined by the mechanisms of spheral democracy. The MMMM principle of the spheral harmonious economy is a spheral generalization and expansion of the "Tobin’s law" [222]. It develops o­n the basis of the mathematical theory of strategic games of John von Neumann [223] and it presupposes a sustainable economy, ultimately, without growth [224; 225]. Spheral democracy establishes dynamic, "floating" borders for harmonious, fair competition, excluding disharmonious limitless capitalist competition, collusion of monopolies and other vices of the imperialist economy [226]. Such competition, together with the economy demilitarization and the life of humankind, will ensure a stable but minimally necessary, economic growth that will smoothly decline to an environmentally required standard.

 

11. Harmony of humankind with nature: sustainable ecology and climate

        Previous social evolution, especially since the 20th century, is associated with the predatory destruction of nature in the disharmonious industrial economic civilization that led to environmental degradation and the ever-escalating environmental and climatic risks. These systemic risks require a systemic holistic approach, proposed in our UNH SMSGHG, integrating other system approaches [172-176]. In the UNH creates a global ecological-climatic model of the Earth o­n the basis of thermodynamics and socio-cybernetics of the natural and social spheres of the Earth for permanent global monitoring, control, harmonious governance and prevention of any environmental and climate risks [ibid.]

 

12. World Harmonious Consciousness and "Earth Harmony Constitution"

 

The world harmonious consciousness centered o­n the Sociocybernetic science of global harmony synergistically synthesizing all partial achievements of the past humanitarian history of humankind is focused and finds o­ne of the important expressions in the global legal structural-organizational regulator of harmony - in the "Earth Harmonious Federation Constitution" (EHFC). It is built o­n the basis of the constitutional recognition of the Spherons as universal actors of global harmony, social production, global peace, harmonious democracy and other structural-organizational institutions designed to solve and prevent all global risks. It integrates all the achievements of numerous versions of similar Constitutions.

This Constitution proclaims the main human right - the right to life guaranteed by global peace and the recognition of any armed violence and war (except the war o­n terror)as crimes against humanity The right to life is absent in the modern "Declaration of Human Rights". This fundamental militaristic flaw in the American Declaration can be made up o­nly by the peacemaking Constitution of the Earth created by humanity’s spherons in their UN Harmony and Global Peace, excluding militarism from it. This Constitution approves by the first goal of Global Peace, which is absent among the UN Millennium goals.

The Constitution determines the conscious evolutionary transition of humanity from a militaristic, disharmonious and therefore dying industrial civilization to a harmonious civilization during 50 years, starting with the launch of the UNH SMSGHG. It ensures “shift of the arms race into a peace race” as Martin Luther King Jr. wrote [56].


13. Two fundamental general risks of all risks:

disharmonious partial reason and similar civilization

 

Above, we named the main contemporary global risks and challenges and proposed strategies for their systemic harmonious solution in the UNH SMSGHG. The picture of multiple risks and their solutions will be incomplete if we do not find their deep logical generalization. It is expressed by the definition of two interconnected fundamental general risks of all risks: a disharmoniously limited and disciplinary fragmented industrial partial mind (reason, consciousness, thinking), which generates a disharmoniously limited reality of the militaristic fragmented nations-states in a partial industrial civilization and vice versa. Both constitute the integral key historical risks of modern humanity [78 and others].

Therefore, no understanding of partial risks and their partial solutions outside the context of the holistic evolution of consciousness and civilization cannot be strategically effective. Therefore, they will exist as long as there is a disharmonious civilization. The solution and prevention of these risks as a whole can o­nly be the new reality of a harmonious civilization, conditioned by its scientific harmonious consciousness/mind, which is laid in the UNH SMSGHG.[ibid.]

 

3. Assessment criteria

 

1. The main criterion: expected result

The expected result of our UNH SMSGHG project, as defined above, is a solution and overcoming all global risks of the 21st century, as well as preventing the emergence of new o­nes within 50 years, starting with the launch of this model.

 

2. Decision-Making Capacity.

The decision-making capacity within the framework of the UNH SMSGHG, in view of the distribution of its preparatory and preliminary discussions among the spheral sectors of this governance model, is maximally freed from crippling delays. It excludes any veto power as it presupposes a spheral consensus with the majority within the spheral segments of this governance model.

 

3. Effectiveness.

The UNH SMSGHG handling all global challenges and risks, with its development and distribution to the lower levels, allows us to concentrate resources to eliminate, neutralize and prevent global risks at all levels. This will ensure high efficiency of practical implementation of solutions in this model.


4. Resources and Financing.

The UNH SMSGHG universality in its scale and depth will provide it with sufficient spheral PIOT resources including human and material o­nes. An equitable manner of their provision and financing is guaranteed by an equal sharing of power between the elected organs of the Spherons in this governance model.

 

5. Trust and Insight.

The UNH SMSGHG, built o­n universal recognition of the value complex of harmony, its science and organizational structure, establishes an unshakable foundation of mutual trust of all the Spherons organs and the completeness of the necessary transparency and trust. It is ensured by universal mutual control, verification of all activities of these bodies and mutual monitoring of decisions and their implementation.


6. Flexibility.

The UNH SMSGHG possesses a wide flexibility and adaptability due to the almost unlimited variation of sectoral components and structures at different levels and for different regions within a single spheral structure.


7. Protection against the Abuse of Power.

Protection against the abuse of power is pre-installed at the UNH SMSGHG by its democratic spheral structure and continuous mutual control both outside and inside it. This monitoring control system will work the necessary preventive measures both for cases of the abuse of power including lobbying and for the cases of favoring the special interests of specific individuals, groups, organizations, nation-states or groups of states for the benefit of humankind.

 

8. Accountability.

The UNH SMSGHG ensures successful resolution of global risks and prevention of new o­nes within 50 years and beyond. This is a sufficient time for their solution. But it can be delayed because of the inability of separate individuals and bodies to take timely decisions in a qualitative way, for that they are held accountable for their actions. It is stipulated in the UNH SMSGHG Charter.

 

Conclusion.

The key meaning of this project and its implementation lies in the fact that it provides a scientific, constructive and nonviolent transition for humankind from the past history of wars, violence, militarism and growing risks of survival to a new history of global peace, prosperity of all nations and harmonious sustainable development in the nature for the future generations.

This project was able to include o­nly a small fraction of the GHA work for more than 12 years of its active scientific and peacemaking activity. Therefore, it was able to express o­nly some properties and capabilities of the proposed governance model and its unique Sociocybernetic spheral approach. It provides not o­nly the prevention and resolution of global challenges and risks in new forms of harmonious international cooperation of the 21st century, but also constitutes an inexhaustible source of socio-economic, political, educational and information innovations and technologies, including artificial intelligence.

 

4. Appendixes

 

1. Picture "SPHERONS"

 

This is a visual illustration of spherons and Socionome a deep harmonious structure of humanity that provides its peaceful nature, which, under conditions of scientific ignorance of this nature is broken sporadically o­n its surface by partial and transitory disharmonious actors: some nations, classes, groups, etc. in their armed conflicts and wars.

The picture gives a visual expression of the global harmonious governance object with the main militaristic risk of humankind as the first for its solution in the UNH SMSGHG.




Appendix 2.
Quotes, aphorisms and statements of great thinkers

about harmony for the UNH:

https://citaty.info/tema/garmoniya

https://citaty.info/man/albert-einshtein?page=1

 

Indian Vedas:

Buddha:
Confucius:
Pythagoras:
Plato:
Kepler:
Poincare:
Einstein:.
There is peace at the heart of the din, concord in the babel.

 

References

 

1.Chossudovsky Michel (2012; 2017) Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=772

2.Lucas James (2015) US Has Killed More Than 20 Million In 37 Nations Since WWII:http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=641

3.Reimann Jakob (2017) The US Has Soldiers Deployed In Almost Every Country o­n Earth:

http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=781

4.Hastings Tom (2016) DOD Woe: Pentagon’s War o­n the Earth: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=673

5.Hagopian Joachim (2014) Historical Tradition of American Empire War and Genocidal

Crimes Against Humanity: https://www.globalresearch.ca/historical-tradition-of-american-empire-war-and-genocidal-crimes-against-humanity/5393997

6.Stahel, Albert A. (2013). The United States – in a Permanent State of War. Institute for Strategic Studies. No 25, 12 August 2013, Current Concerns, Page 9.

7.Roberts Paul Craig (2015) Why WWIII Is o­n The Horizon? http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=657

8.Chomsky Noam, Tom Dispatch (2012): The Week the World Stood Still: The Cuban Missile Crisis and Ownership of the World: http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175605/tomgram%3A_noam_chomsky%2C_%22the_most_dangerous_moment%2C%22_50_years_later/#more

9.Collina Tom Z. (2016) The U.S. Policy Allows the First Use of Nuclear Weapons: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=704

10.Cartwright James E. and Blairaug Bruce G. (2016) End the First-Use Policy for Nuclear Weapons: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=706

11.Semashko, Leo; Chandra, Subhash; Pereira, Teresinka (2015) The USA Hiroshima: Nuclear Threat to Humanity. GHA Message: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=630

12.Dhimos Vince (2017) Dear America: You already killed 20% of them. Want to go for FULL genocide now? WW III prelude: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=771

13.Escobar Pepe (2016) Target Russia. Target China. Target Iran: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=692

14.Black Christopher (2016) America Threatens Russia: US-NATO Forces Moving to War

Operation Barbarossa: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=687

15.Paul Ronald (2016) Reckless Congress ‘Declares War’ o­n Russia: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=711

16.Maguire, Mairead (2014) The Disturbing Expansion of the Military-Industrial Complex: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=678

16a.Davies Nicolas J. S. (2017) America’s Renegade Warfare. Is the U.S. Guilty of Genocide: https://www.globalresearch.ca/americas-renegade-warfare-is-the-u-s-guilty-of-genocide/5618885

17.Willson, Brian (2014) Genocide and the Thanksgiving Myth:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/genocide-and-the-thanksgiving-myth/5416710

18.Chossudovsky Michel (2017) “Wipe the Soviet Union Off the Map”, 204 Atomic Bombs against 66 Major Cities, US Nuclear Attack against USSR Planned During World War II. When America and the Soviet Union Were Allies: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=777

19.Galtung Johan (2016) On the Coming Decline and Fall of the US Empire: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=599

20.McMurtry, John (2013) U.S. Holds the World Record of Killings of Innocent Civilians:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/u-s-holds-the-world-record-of-killings-innocent-civilians/5393789

21.Mountain Thomas C. (2017) The UN and Genocide by Starvation in Somalia: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=778

22.Bauer Yehuda (2017) Holocaust and Genocide Today:

http://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/education/international_projecs/chairmanship/yehuda_bauer_genocide_today.pdf

23.Randjelovic Dragana (2017) 10 Countries Involved With Genocide Today and the Last 100 Years:

https://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/10-countries-involved-with-genocide-today-and-the-last-100-years-566299/

24.Kahan E. and Taki Y(2006) Genocide, p.1, first Ed, Nihon Tosho Center Co., LTD, Japan

25.Mountain Thomas C. (2014) USA vs. China in South Sudan: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=778

26.Dorrel Frank (2015) U.S. War Crimes against Humanity: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=616

27.Vine, David (2015) Base Nation: How U.S. Military Bases Abroad Harm America and the World (American Empire Project)

28.Chossudovsky Michel (2017) The Globalization of War, America’s “Long War” against Humanity: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=682

29.Nazemroaya Mahdi Darius (2012) The Globalization of NATO: https://store.globalresearch.ca/store/the-globalization-of-nato/

30.Forte Maximilian (2012) Slouching Towards Sirte: NATO's War o­n Libya and Africa: http://www.barakabooks.com/catalogue/slouching-towards-sirte/

31.Anderson Tim(2016) The Dirty War o­n Syria: Washington, Regime Change and Resistance: https://store.globalresearch.ca/store/new-the-dirty-war-on-syria-washington-regime-change-and-resistance-print-copy/

32.Turse Nick (2017) The US Military Is Conducting Secret Missions All Over Africa:

https://www.transcend.org/tms/2017/10/the-us-military-is-conducting-secret-missions-all-over-africa/

33.Chossudovsky Michel (2005) America's "War o­n Terrorism": https://store.globalresearch.ca/store/americas-war-on-terrorism/

34.Breakingnews.sy, Fort Russ (2017) Russia Rejects the False UN-OPCW Report o­n Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack: https://globalresearch.us11.list-manage.com/track/click?u=2cc48fb30f331d97157a65aa2&id=8f13b405d9&e=7634b2334b

35.Engdahl William (2009) Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the new World Order: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=659

36.Carter Tom (2015) The Pentagon’s Law of War Manual: A Blueprint for Total War and Military Dictatorship: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=644

37.Auken Bill Van (2017) General Kelly’s Tirade and the Threat of Military Dictatorship in America: https://www.globalresearch.ca/general-kellys-tirade-and-the-threat-of-military-dictatorship-in-america/5614583

38.Petras James (2017) China’s Pivot to World Markets, Washington’s Pivot to World Wars:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/chinas-pivot-to-world-markets-washingtons-pivot-to-world-wars/5541802

39.McCoy Alfred W. (2017) World War III With China:

http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/176331/tomgram%3A_alfred_mccoy%2C_the_global_war_of_2030

40.Wolin Sheldon (2003) Inverted Totalitarianism: USA Transformation to Fascist-like State: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=721

41.Brenner Michael (2017) GlobalizingFASCISM. Neo-Cons:Paradise Lost – And Lost Again:

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=775

42.Johnstone Paul (2017) From MAD to Madness: Inside Pentagon Nuclear War Planning Paperback. Pentagon Fascism: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=736

43.Lendman Stephen (2017) Dirty Open Secret: US Created and Supports ISIS: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=761

44.Zuesse Eric (2017) U.S. is the Greatest Threat to World Peace Today. Polls: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=767

45.CrookeAlastair (2016) How the US Armed-up Syrian Jihadists: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=716

46.Engelhardt, Tom (2014) How America Made ISIS:

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/09/02/how-america-made-isis

47.Burrowes Robert J. (2016) Terrorism: Ultimate Weapon of the Global Elite: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=645

48.Caldicott Helen (2016) America still thinks it can win a nuclear war: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=712

49.KarlinMark (2017) It's a Fairy Tale to Call the US the World's Peacekeeper: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=764

50.Willson, Brian S. (2015) The US Fear of Peace. http://www.brianwillson.com/page/2/

51.Chomsky, Noam and Andre Vltchek (2013) On Western Terrorism: From Hiroshima to Drone Warfare:http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=637

52.Chomsky, Noam (2014) US and its NATO Intervention Force may Spark Nuclear War: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=637

53.Reich, Robert B. (2015) How to Disrupt the Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex: http://robertreich.org/post/123138820185

54.Gordon Rebecca. American Nuremberg. The unpunished crimes like Dick Cheney, George Bush, and Donald Rumsfeld in the Global War o­n Terror: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=683

55.Chartrand Sébastien & John Philpot, editors (2014) Justice Belied: The Unbalanced Scales of International Criminal Justice:https://store.globalresearch.ca/store/justice-belied-the-unbalanced-scales-of-international-criminal-justice/

56.King Martin Luther Jr. The greatest purveyor of violence in the world is my own governance:http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=303

57.Smith Gar (2016) Global Warming's Unacknowledged Threat—The Pentagon:

http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=677

58.Dower John W. (2017) The Violent American Century: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=764

59.Hallinan Conn and Leon Wofsy (2016) The ‘American Century’ Has Plunged the World into Crisis: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=705

60.Dorrel Frank and Joel Andreas (2016) Addicted To War: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=668

61.Galtung Johan (2016) On the Coming Decline and Fall of the US Empire: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=599

62.Dhimos Vince (2017) East vs West: Who are the enlightened o­nes?: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=771

63.Chossudovsky Michel and Andrew Gavin Marshall, Editors (2010) The Global Economic Crisis: The Great Depression of the XXI Century:https://store.globalresearch.ca/store/the-global-economic-crisis/

64.Chossudovsky Michel (2003) Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order: https://store.globalresearch.ca/store/the-globalization-of-poverty-and-the-new-world-order/

65.Engdahl F. William (2007) Seeds of Destruction: Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation:https://store.globalresearch.ca/store/seeds-of-destruction/

66.Engdahl F. William (2017) Killing Us Softly—Glyphosate Herbicide or Genocide?:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/killing-us-softly-glyphosate-herbicide-or-genocide/5617502

67.Paradise Papers: Secrets of the Global Elite - ICIJ, 5 Nov 2017: https://www.icij.org/investigations/paradise-papers/

68.Pilger John (2017) Clinton, Assange And The War o­n Truth: http://johnpilger.com/articles/clinton-assange-and-the-war-on-truth

69.Avery John Scales (2017) US Democrats Must Reform Their Party:

https://human-wrongs-watch.net/2017/11/06/us-democrats-must-reform-their-party/

70.Szombatfalvy, Laszlo (2016) Letter from the Founder: https://api.globalchallenges.org/static/files/prize-letter-en.pdf

71.Albert Einstein Quotes: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins104567.html

72.Semashko Leo (2017) October’s Century. Anatomy and Diagnosis of the Dying Marxism: Incompatibility with the Objective Harmony of Spherons: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=748

72а.Krasnow W. George (1991) Russia Beyond Communism: A Chronicle of National Rebirth: https://www.abebooks.com/9780813383613/Russia-Beyond-Communism-Chronicle-National-0813383617/plp

73.Monbiot George (2016) The Zombie Doctrine: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=684

74.Semashko, Leo (2015) Philosophy of Peace and Security of SPHERONS. Institutions for Global Peace: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=606

75.GHA (2017) Global Peace Science Agenda for the UN, UNESCO, G20 and EU:

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=757

76.Falk Richard (2016) How the United States Government Obstructs Peace for Palestine/Israel: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=702

77.Maguire, Mairead (2014). Peace Movements’ Common Vision: The Abolition of Militarism:

http://human-wrongs-watch.net/2014/06/15/24934/

78.Semashko Leo and 173 coauthors from 34 countries (2016) Global Peace Science or Peaceloveology, Peacescience: First Common Good and Human Right, Revolutionof SocialSciences,Creating Peace fromSPHERONS'Harmonyand Nonviolent Victoryof Peaceover War in XXICentury. World textbook.TheGHA 48th project. First publication in Russian language, St-Petersburg, 2015. -432 p. First publication in English: JD Group of Publication, New Delhi. 2016. -616 p. ISBN 978-81-929087-8-6: http://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf

79.Paupp Terrence (2016) The Murder of American Democracy by Corporate Fascists: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=708

80.Mercieca Charles (2016) Death of Democracy and Freedom in America: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=708

81.Hightower Jim (2016) Super PACs and Secret Money Destroying America’s Democracy: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=708

82.Queally, Jon (2014) Election Day Alert: When Democracy Broken, Progress Impossible: http://www.commondreams.org/news/2014/11/04/election-day-alert-when-democracy-broken-progress-impossible

83.Queally, Jon (2014) Purchase of Election by Chevron Shows We Have 'Oligarchy, Not Democracy': Sanders: http://www.commondreams.org/news/2014/10/17/purchase-election-chevron-shows-we-have-oligarchy-not-democracy-sanders

84.Prins, Nomi (2016) Democracy of the Billionaires: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=660

85.Semashko Leo (2017) SPHERONS: 100% Democracy and Peace Geopolitics: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=424

86.Giroux Henry (2017) Politics as Pathology in the Warfare State: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=636

87.Blum, William (2013) America’s Deadliest Export: Democracy: http://williamblum.org/books/americas-deadliest-export

88.Blum, William (2005) Rogue State: http://williamblum.org/books/rogue-state

89.Mountain Thomas C. (2016) Controlling Africa with Western “Democracy”: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=778

89a.Kotila Roger (2017) Bad American Values? Freedom to Lie, Cheat, Steal & Kill:

http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=680

89b. America Has Been at War 93% of the Time – 222 out of 239 Years – Since 1776 http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/02/america-war-93-time-222-239-years-since-1776.html

89c. Semashko Leo and 20 coauthors from 11 countries (2016) Trump: Peacemaking Revolution of the US

Aggressive Geopolitics. Global Peace Paradigm: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=685

90.Maurois Andre (2005) Letters to the Stranger. – Moscow: AST: Ermak.

91.Chander, Jagdish (2000) Building a Value-Based, Peaceful and Prosperous Society. New Delhi, pp. 28-56: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=543

92.Semashko Leo and the GHA 17 members from 13 countries (2017) Global Peace Science Agenda for the G20. Appeals/Messages to the G20-2017 Leaders:http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=762

93.Putin Vladimir (2017) The World of the Future: Moving Through Conflict to Cooperation: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/55882

94.Солозобов Юрий (2016) ООН окончательно превратилась в марионетку США:

http://www.news-usa.ru/oon-okonchatelno-prevratilas-v-marionetku-ssha.html

95.The UN eight millennium goals (2000): http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/

96.Chandra Subhash (2014) Narendra Modi’s Speech at the UNGA, 2015: Harmony for Peace & Sustainable Development, Creating a New World Order: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=609

97.Semashko Leo (2009) Epoch of Harmony Globalisation: Global Harmony World Achievements since 1947: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=382

98.List of states with nuclear weapons: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons

99.Treaty o­n the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Non-Proliferation_of_Nuclear_Weapons

100.Maguire Mairead (2017) Prospects for a World Free from Nuclear Weapons and for Integral Disarmament: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=678

101.Starr Steven (2016) US Leaders Reject “Nuclear Winter” Studies, Ignore Existential Danger of Nuclear War. Turn a Blind Eye towards Armageddon: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=727

102.Avery John (2017) The Nuclear Weapons Convention – Letter to Danish Parliamentarians:

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=776

103.Chossudovsky Michel (2017) Iran: Next Target of US Military Aggression in the Wake of the Invasion of Iraq. The 2005 “Military Roadmap”: https://www.globalresearch.ca/iran-next-target-of-us-military-aggression/68

104.Willson Brian S. (2017) North Korea and the “Axis of Evil”: https://www.globalresearch.ca/korea-and-the-axis-of-evil/3464

105.Nobel peace prize winner rebukes Trump over nuclear standoff: https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/06/anti-nuclear-campaign-group-ican-wins-nobel-peace-prize?amp_js_v=0.1&usqp=mq331AQCCAE%3D#origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&cid=1&dialog=0&prerenderSize=1&visibilityState=prerender&paddingTop=54&history=1&p2r=0&horizontalScrolling=0&csi=0&storage=1&viewerUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Famp%2Fs%2Famp.theguardian.com%2Fworld%2F2017%2Foct%2F

106.Sample Ian (2017) Treaty banning nuclear weapons approved at UN: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/07/treaty-banning-nuclear-weapons-approved-un

107.Bridge Robert (2017) Why Vladimir Putin deserves a Nobel Peace Prize (seriously):

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=737

108.Mahoney Daniel J. (2017) Thinking Clearly About Russia (ДумаяяснооРоссии): http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=738

109.Putin Vladimir (2015) Press Conference o­n The Results of the BRICS and SCO Summits: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=627

110.Chandra Subhash (2014) BRICS Peace Matrix: From Global Disorder to New World Order in XXI Century: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=609

111.Chandra Subhash (2014) Global Peace Science in the BRICS Hands: Alternative to Nuclear War and Creating a Peaceful World Order. 4S Model: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=609

112.Semashko, Leo; Chandra, Subhash (2015) Road Map of Global Peace in the XXI Century and its Leader: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=606

113.Chandra Subhash (2014) Global Peace Principles.O­neness Principle of Humanity in the XXI century in GPS: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=604

114.Semashko Leo and the GHA 32 coauthors from 13 countries (2015)Message to BRICS and other Peaceful States Leaders: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=632

115.Chandra Subhash,Leo Semashko (2014) Supreme Target Principle of GPS: Nonviolent Victory of Peace over War Based to Civilizational Revolutions of Harmony:

http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=604

116.Chandra Subhash (2014) Global Peace Science: From War &Terror to Peace from Harmony of SPHERONS: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=643

117.Chandra Subhash (2014) The New Silk Road: Project of Peace from Harmony through Science between East and West, Initiated by BRICS: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=609

118.Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948): http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html

119.Charter of the United Nations (The UN Charter) (1945; 1978): http://www.un.org/en/charter-united-nations/index.html

120.Kotila Roger (2016) A New UN to Prevent the Sacrifice of Europe to the Nuclear Gods:

http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=680

121.Semashko Leo (2002) TetraSociology: Responses to Challenges: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=145

122.Hornung Bernd (2002): TetraSociology. Foreword: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=147

123.Scott Bernard (2002) TetraSociology. Editor's Introduction: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=147

124.Hornung Bernd, Scott Bernard, Semashko Leo (2003) Tetrasociology and sociocybernetics: towards a comparison of the key concepts:

http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=255

125.Семашко Лев (1992) Сферный подход. Философия, демократия, рынок, человек. СПб., Нотабене:

http://peacefromharmony.org/file/5162/1992-semashko-sferniy_podhod.pdf

126.Semashko Leo (2012) The ABC of Harmony as Sociocybernetics of the Third Order: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=64

127.Wiener, Norbert (1994) Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

128.Bertalanffy, Ludwig von (1968) General System theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, New York: George Braziller, revised edition 1976

129.Foerster, Heinz von (2003) Understanding Understanding: Essays o­n Cybernetics and

Cognition. Springer, New York.

130.Geyer, Felix (1995). "The challenge of Sociocybernetics". Kybernetes, 24, 4: 6-32

131.Geyer, Felix (2001). "Sociocybernetics" In: Kybernetes, Vol. 31 No. 7/8, 2002, pp. 1021–1042.

132.Scott, B. (2001). "Cybernetics and the Social Sciences", Systems Research, 18, pp. 411-420.

133.Scott, B. (2002) “Being holistic about global issues: needs and meanings”, J. of Sociocybernetics, 3, 1, pp. 21-26 (presented at the 1st International Conference o­n Sociocybernetics, University of Crete, May, 1999).

134.Scott, Bernard (2009). How Sociocybernetics Can Help Understand Possible World Futures: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=741

135.Scott, Bernard (2009). “The role of Sociocybernetics in understanding world futures”, Kybernetes, 38, 6, 867-882: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=741

136.Scott, Bernard (2016) Sociocybernetic Reflections o­n the Human Condition. ISA Forum Vienna:http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=742

137.Scott, Bernard (2017) Sociocybernetic understandings of consciousness:

http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=742

138.Scott, Bernard (2017) Some thought about Leo Semashko’s concept of ‘spherons’: ISA RC51 o­n Sociocybernetics. Newsletter 34, September 2017:

https://sociocybernetics.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/rc51-newsletter-34.pdf

139.Maturana H., Varela F. Autopoiesis: the organization of the living (1973) // Maturana H., Varela F. Autopoiesis and Cognition. – Boston, 1980. – P. 63–134

140.Marx, K. and Engels, F. German Ideology:

https://ru.scribd.com/document/100196014/German-Ideology

141.Park, Robert (1967) On Social Control and Collective Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

142.Braudel, Fernand (1995) A History of Civilizations.

143.Parsons, Talcott (1975), “The Present Status of ‘Structural-Functional’ Theory in Sociology

144.Beer, Stafford (1995) Brain of the Firm, 2nd edition, Wiley, New York

145.Pask, Gordon (1991). "The right of actors to interact: a fundamental human freedom", in Glanville, R. and de Zeeuw, G. (eds.) Mutual Uses of Cybernetics and Science (Vol 2), Systemica, 8, 1 to 6, Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam.

146.Luhmann, Niklas (1995) Social Systems. Stanford University Press

147.Luhmann, Nicolas (2007) Introduction to Systems Theory. - M.: Publishing House - "Logos"

148.Toffler, Alvin (1970) Future Shock. Bantam Books

149.Toffler, Alvin (1980) The Third Wave. Bantam Books

150.Bourdieu, Pierre (1991) Language and Symbolic Power, Harvard University Press

151.Bourdieu, Pierre (2005) The Social Structures of the Economy, Polity

152.Poincare, Henri (2013) The Foundation of Science. The Science Press. New York And Garrison, N. Y.: https://archive.org/stream/foundationsscie

153. Kant, Immanuel (2003) To perpetual peace: a philosophical sketch, Hackett Publishing http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kant/kant1.htm

154.Семашко Лев (1999) Социология для прагматиков: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/docs/sociologiya-dlya-pragmatikov.pdf

155.Баймуратов Ураз (2014) Закон социально-экономической Гармонии: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=629

156.Baimuratov Uraz (2014) Harmony of Economy and Society. USA:

http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=561

157.Szombatfalvy, Laszlo (2017) Interview: https://www.globalchallenges.org/ru/about/the-founder

158.Szombatfalvy, Laszlo (2010) The Greatest Challenges of Our Time:

https://api.globalchallenges.org/static/files/the-greatest-challenges-of-our-time.pdf

159.Attitudes to global risk and global governance survey (2017):

https://www.globalchallenges.org/ru/our-work/risk-survey

160.Jiborn, Magnus (2017) Global governance models in history: https://api.globalchallenges.org/static/files/GG models in history EN.pdf

161.Montesquieu, Charles (1914) Spirit of Laws. Translated by Thomas Nugent, revised by J. V. Prichard, Based o­n edition published in 1914 by G. Bell & Sons, Ltd., London

162.Clark, G. & Sohn, L. B. (1958) World peace through world law.

163.Ranney James T. (2009) World Peace Through Law: Rethinking an Old Theory and a Call for a UN Peace Force: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=372

164.Ranney James T. (2018) World Peace Through Law Replacing War with the Global Rule of Law. Routledge: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=372

165.Semashko, Leo and GHA 75 coauthors from 26 countries (2012) The ABC of Harmony for World Peace, Harmonious Civilization and Tetranet Thinking. Global Textbook. GHA 34th Project. First published in English in India, New Delhi, Doosra Mat Prakashan, 2012, pages ~334. ISBN – 978-81-923108-6-2: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478

166.Semashko Leo and GHA 14 coauthors from 10 countries (2003) Tetrasociology: from Sociological Imagination through Dialogue to Universal Values and Harmony, in 3 languages: Russian, English and Esperanto. St.-Petersburg State Polytechnic University, 394 p. http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=149

167.Ioannides Takis D. (2017) “United Nations Harmony and Global Peace” In Area of Balkans and Aegean Sea: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=138

168.Afanasyeva Vera, Avery John S., Ecimovic Timi and Semashko Leo (2017) Thermodynamics and Negentropy of Spheral Classes. Societal Harmony: Global Peace Thermodynamics:

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=756

169.Ellis Michael (2017) Anatomy of Peace - Harmony of the Spherons: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=779

170.Vasilchuk, Juri (2001) Social Development of the Individual in the XX Century. The Factor of Money// Public Sciences and Modernity. Moscow, 2001, 4, p. 5–29

171.Wikipedia. World population: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population

172.Avery, John Scales (2012) Information Theory and Evolution. University of Copenhagen, Denmark http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/8441

173.Avery, John Scales (2015) Paris: We Need System Change!: https://www.transcend.org/tms/2015/12/paris-we-need-system-change

174.Avery, John Scales (2017) Civilization's Crisis in the 21st Century. University of Copenhagen: http://www.nsz.hr/datoteke/CRISIS21.pdf

175.Avery, John Scales (2017) The Climate Emergency: Two time scales: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=780 

176.Ecimovic Timi,Avery John, Semashko Leo (2017) The Climate Change System 2017:

http://www.peacefromharmony.org/docs/ECIMOVIC_CLIMATE%20CHANGE_18-04-17_Final.pdf

177.Benoit Mandelbrot (1982) The Fractal Geometry of Nature.

178.Семашко Лев и ГСГ 6 соавторов математиков (2008) Фракталы социальной гармонии и индекс гармонии в «золотой тетрасоциологии»: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=370

179.Семашко Лев (2010) Призыв ГСГ к математикам мира: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=471

180.Leonard, Allenna (2000) The viable system model and knowledge management. Kybernetes, 29, 5/6, pp.710-715

181.Chandra Subhash, Semashko Leo and the GHA 47 coauthors (2016) НаукаГлобальногоМира (НГМ) дляООНиЮНЕСКО: Петиция: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=686

182.Bülow, Adam. D. H. von.(1805) Geist des Neueren Kriegssystems (Spirit of Modern Military Systems) http://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/resolve/display/bsb10784466.html

183.Semashko Leo and GHA 64 coauthors from 20 countries (2008) World Harmony/Peace Academy and General Harmonious Education in an Information Society, in 2 languages. St-Petersburg, Russia, "LITA ", pages 104.http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=277

184.Semashko Leo and GHA 5 coauthors (2017) International Academy of Global Noospheral Peace (AGNP): http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=747

185.Semashko Leo and GHA 5 coauthors (2017) International Academy of Global Noospheral Peace (AGNP): Regional Offices: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=750

186.Semashko, Leo and GHA 26 coauthors from 12 countries (2006) Harmonious Era Calendar: Address to Children, Youth and Future Generations, in 12 languages, St.-Petersburg State Polytechnic University, 396 p. http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=190

187.Semashko, Leo and GHA 42 coauthors from 16 countries (2007) Magna Carta of Harmony for an Information Civilization: Toward Social Justice and Global Peace, in 7 languages, Lita, 228 p. http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=3

188.Semashko Leo and GHA  52 coauthors from 16 стран (2009) Harmonious Civilization Universal Declaration for Global Disarmament: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=375

189.Semashko Leo and GHA 119 coauthors from 34 countries (2009) Harmonious Civilization. Global Harmony Association Innovative Projects, in 2 languages. St-Petersburg, Russia, "LITA ", pages 254: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=379

190.Semashko Leo and GHA18 scientists-analysts from 10 countries (2013) Dynamics of the Global Social Structure of Spheral Classes of Population: An Example of India, USA, Russia and Kazakhstan since 1950 by Decades. http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=579

191.Korab-Karpowicz W. Julian (2015) Tractatus Politico-Philosophicus, Derewiecki: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=724

192.Korab-Karpowicz W. Julian (2015) Social Harmony Or the Principles of a Happy Society: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=724

192a. Kamal Baher (2017) Millions of Women and Children for Sale for Sex, Slavery, Organs: https://www.transcend.org/tms/2017/08/millions-of-women-and-children-for-sale-for-sex-slavery-organs/

193.The UN Convention o­n the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women:

http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/cedaw.htm

194.Millennium Development Goals (2000): http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/mdgnews.shtml

195.Convention o­n the Rights of the Child (1989): http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx

196.United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) o­n Women, Peace and Security:

http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/cdrom/documents/Background_Paper_Africa.pdf

197.United Nations Security Council Resolution 2250 (2015): http://www.un.org/en/sc/ctc/docs/2015/N1541306_EN.pdf

198.Ayoola-Amale Ayo, Popovich Vera (2016) Principle of Women’s Priority in Global Peace:

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=604

199.Semashko Leo, DeWitt Martha (2004) Children’s Suffrage: Democracy for the 21st Century, Priority Investing in Human Capital as a Way toward Social Harmony: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=211

200.Семашко Лев (2005) Избирательное право детей, исполняемое родителями: социокультурный институт антитеррористического иммунитета:

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=159

201.Кавторин Владимир и Лев Семашко (2005) Чему может послужить избирательное право детей, исполняемое родителями?: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=167

201а.Semashko Leo and Semashko Peter (2016) Institute of Children's Suffrage for Global Peace: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=606

202.Semashko Leo and GHA 42 coauthors from 20 countries (2009) Global Harmony International Treaty for Nuclear Disarmament: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=376

203.Semashko Leo and GHA coauthors (2012) General and Complete Disarmament in 50 years o­n the Basis of Global Harmony through the ABC of Harmony. The GHA Constant Petition to the UN: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=529

203a. Semashko Leo (2016) Disarmament in 50 Years at 2% Annually Based o­n GPS: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=606

204.Semashko Leo and GHA 40 coauthors from 20 countries (2016) Russia-America: Global Peace Partnership: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=710

205.Boulding, Elise. (1988) Building a Global Civic Culture; Education for an Independent World. New York Teachers College Press

206.Dewey, J. (1916) Education and Democracy. New York: Free Press

207.Freire, J. (1970) Pedagogy of Oppressed. New York: Continuum Publishing

208.UNESCO’s Culture of Peace declaration of 2001-2010: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001263/126398e.pdf

209.UNESCO Resolution A/53/243:

http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001196/119627e.pdf

210.Kumar Ramesh (2017) Scientific Mechanism of Practicing Yoga:

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=658

211.Kumar Ramesh (2017) Global Peacescience for Sustainability:

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=658

212.Semashko Leo and Siebert Rudolf. Spherons of Harmony: The Third Way of Religions Reconciliation

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=782

213.Semashko Leo (2008) General Harmonious Education as the Best Way for Harmonization of Relations between Religions: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=352

214.Semashko Leo and GHA 110 coauthors from 17 countries (2012) World Interfaith Harmony o­n the ABC of Harmony Platform: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=541

215.Semashko Leo and GHA 48 coauthors from 22 countries (2013) Center (School) of Interfaith Harmonious Education: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=561

216.Semashko Leo (2017) SPHERONS: 100% Democracy and Peace Geopolitics: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=424

217.Semashko Leo (2017) Global Democracy of SPHERONS: Main Institute of Peace Policy: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=368

218.Semashko Leo (2010) “Sphere Democracy Group” in Petrosovet Parliament 1992:
http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=58

219.Semashko Leo and GHA 67 coauthors from 23 countries (2009) Alternative Reserve Currency of Global Harmony: «HARMON» (H): http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=367

220.Semashko Leo, Semashko Alexander (2016)

Alternative Reserve Currency of Global Peace – HARMON instead of US Dollar as War Currency:

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=606

221.Semashko Leo (2016) Global Peace Laws. Maximin and Minimax for SPHERONS’ Incomes. Global Peace Economy: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=603

222.Marchetti, Raffaele (2013) The EU “Tobin Tax”: A Paradox in-between Anti-globalization Social Justice and Supranational Market Harmonization: http://wpfdc.org/blog/our-columnists/raffaele-marchetti/18289-the-eu-tobin-tax-a-paradox-in-between-anti-globalization-social-justice-and-supranational-market-harmonization

223.Frenkin, B.R. (2005). Neumann Minimax Theorem: Commonly Known and Unknown. // Mathematical Education, Ser. 3, 9 – M .: Izd MTsNMO. – P. 78–85.

224.Daly, HermanE. (1977) Steady-State Economics” and (1989) “For the Common Good”.

225.Kurland, Norman G., Dawn K. Brohawn, Michael D. Greaney (2004) Capital Homesteading for Ever Citizen: http://www.cesj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/CapitalHomesteadingForEveryCitizen.pdf

226.Semashko Leo and the GHA 75 coauthors from 23 countries (2009) Harmonious Educational Competition-Partnership. Marketing project: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=356

227.Chossudovsky Michel (2017) Who is Behind “Fake News”? Mainstream Media Use Fake Videos and Images: https://globalresearch.us11.list-manage.com/track/click?u=2cc48fb30f331d97157a65aa2&id=0f3da60d37&e=7634b2334b

 

Note.

The more full bibliography in more than 700 sources was presented in the “Global Peace Science”: http://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf , pages: 580-597

  


 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussion

Since 23-11-17



Network Spherons:

The UN Harmony Replacing American UN War

The GHA 57th Project.

 

Discussion and approval during 5 days

 

Dear GHA peacemakers, friends,

Please excuse my delay with updating the project. As always, there was a lot more real work than planned.

Today, I am happy to send you a substantially updated version of our Swedish project with the updated title "Network Spherons:The UN Harmony Replacing American UN War." (37 pp.). It was supplemented by a critical part, and the list of literature is increased more than 3 times, work with which was the most time consuming, but it is not the end either. I hope you send your new articles and books to it.

The project is presented in the attachment. It is also published o­n our website, o­n the main page of which (http://peacefromharmony.org/) the following banner of this project with its addresses was put:

 

Network Spherons:

The UN HarmonyReplacing American UN War.

 

Sociocybernetic Model of Spherons Global Harmonious Governance (SMSGHG) at the UN level: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=769

Spherons (S) of the United Nations

Harmony (UNH)

Сфероны (S) Организации

Объединенных Наций Гармонии

ООНГ

 

 

Сетевые Сфероны:

ООН Гармонии

вместо Американской ООН войны.

 

Социокибернетическая модель глобального гармоничного управления сферонов (СМГГУС) на уровне ООН:

http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=736

 

This is a very important peacemaking project that requires new coauthors (the invitation is published therein) and wide discussion in different audiences without restriction.

In this regard, we announce its discussion during 5 days, until October 28 inclusively (if it is required we will extend it) and invite you to approve (or not to approve) it with your "YES" or "NO". All replies and opinions about it will be published o­n our website.

We invite you also to make your intellectual peacemaking contribution to it your editing of any part of it, your text additions up to the 1 page and your additional references to your books and articles. Watch this in more detail at the end of the project. Please send all your additions in the project text in red so that we can see your contribution.

All coauthors are eligible for paid scientific research within this project since May 2018.

Thank you very much for your participation in the discussion of this unique and extremely necessary project for global peace.

Heartily, the best wishes for peace from harmony through science,

Dr. Leo Semashko,

GHA Honorary President,

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253

23-10-17

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

My dear friend Leo,

I hope that you are in good health. Thank you so much for sending me the link to your new publication o­n UN Harmony. I have read it with great pleasure, and I think that the references listed at the end are especially valuable.

My own health continues to be very poor, and I am uncertain about how long I will live. Nevertheless, I am continuing to work as hard as my health allows o­n a book with the title: "THE CLIMATE EMERGENCY: Two time scales". As soon as it is finished, I will send you a copy.

With my warmest greetings, and very best wishes for the success of your extremely important work for peace,

John Avery,

24-10-17

 

My dear friend John,

Many thanks for your frank reply. I'm very sorry for your "poor health," but I see how much you write and publish in every weekly TMS Digest your wonderful essay o­n outstanding peacemakers in human history “We Need Their Voices Today!”. This is a wonderful idea and a gigantic work that will be highly appreciated. When do you plan to finish it? How many names will be (or is) in it (22)? Could you send me all these essays in the o­ne file WORD? I will be happy to publish it o­n a separate page of our website. Do you agree with this? Is it possible for your? I am very glad to your new book about Climate – it is great work!!! I will be happy to receive it and publish it, if you permit me, o­n our web. Please, see how much you do !!! This is the main thing!!! After all, your other thought “I am uncertain about how long I will live”, which is peculiar to every person, should not bother you and distract you from your work. o­nly God can answer: how much each of us will be to live. The matter of the livings is to create and live up to the end of our days. You confirm this with all your great labors!! These works prolong our life in a direct and figurative sense, that is, after we left it.

Please, let o­nly o­ne, if it possible for you, important for me and GHA question and request: could you support our new, the GHA 57th project about the UN reform in the UN of Harmony, in o­ne short phrase something like the following: “Although I have some criticisms o­n this project, but I fully endorse and share its main focus o­n peace from social harmony that is absent (or lacking, or bounded) in the modern UN. I wish success to this project." It will be your great support and help to the GHA. Of course, you are free to edit it as you want. A could you send this phrase as reply o­n the my email with this project (October 23) or directly in our net: “Global Harmony Association ”? Is it possible for you? Thank you very much. With Love, peace and harmony,

Leo

26-10-17

---------------------------------------------------------------

 

Лев Михайлович, добрый день!

Поздравляю с окончанием очередного труда. Работа проделана большая, анализ трудов различных исследователей - серьезный, выдвигаемые предложения - порой революционные. Явным недостатком текста являются ссылки почти исключительно на сайт ГСГ. Надо указывать источники, откуда вы брали статьи, книги тех или иных авторов.

В идеале это должна быть ссылка на печатное издание (уверена, в большинстве случаев на сайтах указывается, где был опубликован труд), частично это могут ссылки на первичные интернет-источники с датой обращения. Возможно, что на сайте ГСГ такой источник указан, но для печатного издания надо приводить в ссылках первоисточники, а не адреса перепостов.

Желаю дальнейших успехов, с неизменным уважением,

Юлия Будникова,

президент ГСГ-Россия

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=577

24-10-17

 

Дорогая Юля!
Спасибо за поздравления и критические замечания.
Но в итоге что? – Одобряете (Да)? Или Нет?
Да, все мои перепосты на нашем сайте обязательно имеют адрес оригинала. Но мы пока не собираемся публиковать этот проект в печатном виде. А там видно будет.
А сейчас главное довести этот проект до ума и определить его соавторов, которых мы можем приглашать на платную работу. В связи с этим, могли бы Вы подобрать книгу или статью Рериха с его цитатой либо критики милитаризма, либо с его идеей мира из гармонии? Я бы с радостью включил его цитату и этот источник в проект. Вместе с ним Вы могли бы прислать Вашу пояснительную фразу для тех же целей. Это возможно для Вас, могу ждать?
Всего доброго,

Лев Семашко

 

Лев Михайлович, вашу работу я одобряю. Что касается Рериха, то его статьи о мире я Вам высылала. Мои пояснительные фразы, думаю, никому не нужны. Их уже достаточно в вашем тексте. Юлия Будникова

Президент ГСГ-Россия,

24-10-17

 

----------------------------------------------------------------

Вселенские Сфероны 
Крылатые слова  - мирная альтернатива крылатым ракетам.
Крылатые слова не знают границ и летят дальше крылатых ракет.

Константин Кушнер

konst44@mail.ru

24-10-17


------------------------------------------------------------

 

Dear Friend,

Please read my article o­n Plato's Political Philosophy o­n the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. There are some hints. When we are writing world manifestos, we should not refer to Marx (whether young or old) but to Plato, Vivecananda and other deep thinkers and spiritual leaders of humankind.

Best regards,

W. Julian Korab-Karpowicz

http://www.iep.utm.edu/platopol/

24-10-17

-----------------------------------------------------------

 

Dear Friends,

Unfortunately this does not look like a bright future for humanity -- quote from the text:

"seize the great victory of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era"

We do not need any conquests or victories, except the victory over ourselves.

Instead of seizing any great victories for socialism, first go deep into your own self and o­nce you come to universal consciousness, you will achieve victory and give a good example to humanity. This would be the tradition of Lao Tze, Confucius, Vivecananda, Plato and other great thinkers and spiritual leaders.

Socializm (like capitalism) has already causes so much misfortune and is a false track. Why, because it is a materialist approach and has departed from human spirituality. To proceed forward with human evolution, we now need to rediscover our true identity -- which is the soul -- and gain victory in ourselves. My last book (see below) may be helpful.

Best regards,

W. Julian Korab-Karpowicz


Hello,

I hope, that these large people, and his leaders impregnated of Chinese legendary wisdom, and in the continuity of its large universal philosophers, the peaceful way with humanity will show;… and the commitment of the Chinese leaders o­n the climate is already a convincing sign!

Admittedly, there remain problems to be solved, but personally, he always shocked me: that leaders of country of a few ten million having themselves problems to solve so much, make the lesson, criticize a country from approximately 1 billion 300 million inhabitants. With CONFUCIUS and LAO TSEU, the writings of Marco Polo, the operetta of FRANTZ LEHAR the country of the smile = I was impressed in the Seventies by the dialogs of Mr Daisaku IKEDA, with the Former Prime Minister: CHOU EN LAI at the time of the Russo tensions Chinese, and Mr IKEDA, had even met the leaders of then of the former USSR, this, to encourage with the dialog and peace between the two people and in the world.

From here a few days, I will record celebrates it song” the PALOMA” in tribute to the dove of peace with a full orchestra and his famous trumpet player! At 74 years o­n November 2nd = I move less, however, I confirm that with honor and emotion, I could sing for you in France or elsewhere, and for your leaders. Cordially with you.

Guy CREQUIE

France

24-10-17

 

The general assembly called o­n the whole party and the people of all nationalities throughout the country to closely rally around the party central committee with comrade Xi Jinping as the core, hold high the great banner of socialism with chinese characteristics, and conscientiously study and implement the new era of Xi Jinping the thinking of socialism with chinese characteristics is determined to forge ahead and work hard to achieve the three major historical tasks of promoting modernization, accomplishing the motherland's reunification, and safeguarding world peace and promoting common development, it is necessary to build a well-off society in an all-round way, to seize the great victory of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era, to realize the chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of Chinese nation, and to realize the people's yearning for a better life .

Lana Yang楊幗蘭

和諧卋界從心開始

A Harmonious World Begins in the Mind

Altruism is the Foundation of World Peace

24-10-17

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Dr.Leo

I have followingsuggestions to includeinNetwork* Spherons: The UN Harmony Replacing American UN War.

1A key condition for the membership of any state in the UNH can be if state acceptsan annual reduction in military spending by at least10 %in place of 2 %annual. Since 2% reduction is insignificant due to price fluctuations and long period in achieving disarmament.

2The nation states must also pledge for no further development,productionand trading of arms.

3All the weapon and arms, that are to be removed annually, should be handed over to IPAF for disposal or to modify for peaceful purposes.

4The nation states to fund UNH, IPAF and PIHSC byannual defined amountout ofsavings, due to reduction in their annual military budget.

5WCPAhas alsodevelopedEarth Constitution and concept of o­ne world o­ne parliament. It will be better ifGHAand WCPA can work together as joint force, as both have common goals.

6Following may be added under Para 2.4 UNH SMSGHG Agenda, sub point 6 under “Harmonization of Religions”

The world will get peace when hardcore religious men / women, will shed their religious symbols and join mainstream world citizens.

The peace will come fast when people, will shed religious rituals and work for humanity, equality and harmony.

The peace will come still faster when all, start realizing self- consciousness and take decisions for the betterment of society in place of running after materialistic pursuits.

The peace will come still fastest when al, l start adopting Yoga, meditation and nature cure for betterment of body and mind.

with best wishes.

RAMESH KUMAR

Executive Director (CEO) and Vice-President

Global Harmony Association (GHA)

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=658

25-10-17

 

----------------------------------------------

 

Путин: Реформа ООН Гармонией

Дорогие члены ГСГ, друзья!

Рад послать вам на обсуждение в дополнение к проекту ГСГ о реформе ООН, который я посылал вам два дня назад (http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=736) небольшой параграф в 2 стр. и письмо Путину с предложением инициировать эту реформу (см. прикрепления).

Думаю, это важное дополнение, высвечивающее (возможную) лидирующую роль России в фундаментальной трансформации прогнившего американского мирового порядка и беспомощной ООН перед милитаризмом США, созданной ими для прикрытия своего мирового диктата.

Будем благодарны вашим откликам с конструктивными дополнениями и предложениями до 28 октября. Спасибо за участие в ключевом международном проекте.

Лучшие пожелания мира из гармонии через науку Сферонов,

Лев Семашко,

Почетный президент ГСГ,

25-10-17

------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Dear   Dr Leo, , Dr Sanjay Tewari, Mr Ramesh Kumar, Dr.Surendra Pathak,  GHA Peace Leaders and all Friends, Greetings  from India

The GHA 57th Project: Network Spherons: The UN Harmony Replacing American UN War

Many thanks for your mail and initiating the GHA 57th Project: Network Spheron’s: The UN Harmony Replacing American UN War

YES! I agree with the proposal and I suggest the topic as

United Network*Spheron’s (UNS): World Peace & Global o­neness

United Network*Spheron’s (UNS)

The UN Harmony for World Peace & Global o­neness of Humanity

Sociocybernetic Model of Spheron’s’ Global Harmonious Governance (SMSGHG) at the UN level

United Network*Spheron’s (UNS)- 

Sociocybernetic Model of Spheron’s’ Global Harmonious Governance (SMSGHG)at the UN level.

Sociocybernetic Model of Spheron’s’ Global Harmonious Governance (SMSGHG) at the UN level

 One Democracy ~ o­ne Global Harmonious Governance~ o­ne Humanity =

United Network*Spheron’s (UNS)

United Network*Spheron’s is a great Global Revolution of Global transformation   and planetary transformation, for creating a new world order, by Sociocybernetic Model of Spheron’s’ Global Harmonious Governance (SMSGHG) at the UN level

The worldwide uprisings against nuclear war that became a global phenomenon now and have continued a wave of change show us just how significant and important this ‘time of transition’ form culture of war to Culture of UN Harmony for achieving World Peace & Global o­neness of Humanity.

The UN: World Harmony (UWH) is harmony of diversity, without which there is no harmony.

The eternal harmony of deep societal structure of SPHERONS defines the eternal peaceful nature of human society and every individual.

The UN: World Harmony (UWH) is based o­n ancient Indian philosophy of –Vasudheva Kutumbkam

(World is o­ne Family) and Unity in diversity.

Greetings of Peace & Harmony to all.

Dr. Subhash Chandra,
GHA President and the GHA Board Chairman
GHA Ambassador of Peace and Disarmament from Harmon
http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=583
M
+91 9910241586 ,E-mail:: schandra101@gmail.com

26-10-17

 

Dear Subhash,

Many thanks for your approval of the GHA project “UN Harmony”. Re your proposal of its new title that we cannot understand: which from your 8 titles is your proposal? Please, select o­nE to discuss it. Please, write neatly, carefully and without repetition, so that the reader can understand your idea simply without crosswords.

What are your texts under title “A Great Transition” about World Peace, Nuclear war and Democracy? In which paragraphs of the project do you offer your 3 pages? And why with pictures is it? Please, let us know what you wanted to offer? Thank you.
Let us follow the old wise rule: less is better, but better. Do you agree with it?

Best wishes for peace from harmony,

Dr. Leo Semashko,

GHA Honorary President,

27-10-17

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Dear Dr Leo, Dr Subhash, Mr Ramesh, Dr Bernard, Dr Rudolf, Dr Krasnov (Author and Co-Authors) and all of my Dear GHA Friends Greetings from India!!

Thanks Dr Leo for your final version, and suggestion for each of the Co-Authors to work over this project, edit it if necessary and then revert back to you till 28th Oct’17.

While going through the project, there are some editions which I propose as follows:

The title, in order to avoid any controversy, should be “Network*Spherons: Mitigating the domineering o­n UN through Harmony”

Till now, we have understood that Dr Leo’s spheron’s reproduce the social human world. As the human being is unaware of such kind of a world, or lack’s eagerness to know, hence this results into small differences at the first, which later o­n grow to disproportionate heights, resultantly, into conflicts, wars and destruction. This project is a small initiative towards this direction, to create and expand this knowledge and thereupon to attain the ultimate objective, i.e. Peace and Harmony.

Me, in my role as a Sport Sociologist, with inter cultural connections, would intend to concentrate o­n both the micro sociological level as well as the macro sociological level. This will enable me to connect myself at the ground level (intra) and the upper level (inter), so that pertinent changes may occur in the belief systems, which will be of permanent in nature. At the intra level, an individual will have to visualize his or her actions within the framework of humanity, rope in consciousness and love for the surroundings, and then at the inter level, o­nce harmony is attained at the intra stage, these intra structures can be combined to produce the larger concept, i.e. the inter, or the “among”. These changes will necessitate both the micro and macro level to adopt with the harmonious practices, thereby deriving good end results. However, in order to achieve the desired, the concept of“Sociospheron” coined by Dr Leo requires the most concentration and work, as “People” need to be grown up in such an environment and culture which make them able citizens.

I agree o­n all the other points. Truly

Dr Sanjay Tewari

Co-Author GHA 57-th network spheral project,Started o­n: July 15, 2017, Approved: October 28, 2017 (In process)

BSc, LLB, MA (Sociology), MBA-HR, UGC NET Sociology, PhD

GHA Ambassador of Peace and Disarmament from Harmony in India, Personal page:

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=758

GHA – Board Member

GHA – Executive Secretary

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=758

26-10-17

 

Dear Sanjay,

Thanks for your response with your approval of the project as we understand. Our project pretends to be scientific, based o­n the facts, interpretation and evaluation of which in any science are controversial. Therefore, we should not be afraid “controversy” and hide from them like ostriches. In this regard, your title of the project is vague and incomprehensible. What did you want to tell them? What is its clear idea? Could you suggest a more adequate title? Regarding the second part of your letter with your opinion about the harmony of micro and macro levels, we do not understand what to do with it? It is pure philosophy. It cannot be included in this project. Please, carefully think through and edit your idea and find for it place in the project. Is this possible? Thank you for participating.

Best wishes for peace from harmony,

Dr. Leo Semashko,

GHA Honorary President,

27-10-17

----------------------------------------------------------------

 

Dear Leo,

Thank you. I will send a detailed response asap before 10th November. Of course, the discussion can go o­n. Best, Julian 26-10-17

Ps. My new book Social Harmony Or the Principles of a Happy Society [in Polish-- Harmonia spoleczna] has come out today! It has been presented at the International Book Fair in Cracow. This book is a continuation of the Tractatus Politico-Philosophicus and is published in the important book series: +/- Infinity, as you can see o­n the cover. We can translate it to other languages if you are interested. I maintain translation rights.

The book presents social harmony, harmonious international relations, happy societies and good governance. It ends with a vision of human evolution -- of the new age evolutionity, which replaces the current postmodernity -- and a vision of the new politics -- a new cooperative and evolutionary o­ne, which replaces our today's power-driven Hobbesian politics.

https://www.amazon.com/W.-Julian-Korab-Karpowicz/e/B005N2WI8C

W. Julian Korab-Karpowicz is o­ne of Poland's most renowned philosophers and political thinkers. Brought up in the city of Gdansk, he was a student leader in the Solidarity movement. As a graduate student he was awarded the Scholarship of the Leadership Development Office of the Presbyterian Church (USA). He has received his doctorate from the University of Oxford and has taught at many universities around the world, including Anglo-American University of Prague, Texas State University in San Marcos, and Lazarski University in Warsaw. He is currently Professor at the Department of Interdisciplinary Studies at Zayed University in Dubai. He is the author of several books, including o­n the History of Political Philosophy and Tractatus Politico-Philosophicus: New Directions for the Future Development of Humankind.

 

Dear Julian!

I am happy to congratulate you o­n the new great book "Social Harmony"!!! This is a notable phenomenon in the development of the scientific and philosophical consciousness of social harmony in the 21st century, which, you are absolutely right in this, is able to replace obsolete postmodernismwith Marxism and "our today's power-driven Hobbesian politics" of the war of all against all.

The Global Harmony Association (GHA), which develops the philosophy and sociology of social harmony for more than 12 years and published 8 books about it and created about 60 network projects about it, hopes that its unique world potential of a harmonious consciousness of the 21st century, uniting the contribution of hundreds of modern thinkers from more than 60 countries, has not passed by your attention unnoticed and is reflected in your book. Especially since you have been cooperating with the GHA for about two years and we have opened your personal page o­n our website (http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=724),where the information about your remarkable "Social Harmony" is now published.

Of course, we will be happy to help translate your book into other languages, primarily English and Russian, if you send complete information about the book, its annotation and the content in English. Maybe you know Russian and could send this info in Russian?

As for your "detailed response", we are waiting for it as soon as possible, but in any case, it will be taken into account, discussed and published o­n our website.

Best wishes for peace from harmony,

Dr. Leo Semashko,

GHA Honorary President,

27-10-17

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Добрый день, дорогой Лео и члены ГСГ!

Я еще раз ознакомился с Проектом и, как раньше, горячо поддерживаю его.

В то же время даю свои дополнения и изменения последней редакции текста Проекта, которые выделены красным жирным шрифтом.

Эти дополнения уже официально опубликованы в СМИ, в моих книгах и статьях на разных языках, широко обсуждались и поддержаны научной общественностью в течение ряда лет.

В подобных ответственных международных проектах необходимо выражаться дипломатично, взвешенно, аккуратно, не допуская эмоциональных слов и выражений. Этот Проект должен объединять страны, а не создавать конфронтацию между народами.

Как прекрасно говорится в Священной книге «Коран» о добре и зле: "оттолкни зло добром, тогда твой злейший враг станет твоим близким другом"

(я передаю смысл Божественного слова).

С наилучшими пожеланиями Гармонии,

Ваш Ураз Баймуратов

Вице-Президент ГСГ,
Президент ГСГ-Казахстан,
ГСГ Посол Мира и Разоружения из Гармонии в Евразии,

Академик Национальной академии наук Республики Казахстан,

доктор экономических наук, профессор, Заслуженный деятель науки РК,

директор Научно-исследовательского института финансово-банковского менеджмента

Алматы, Казахстан
Открытие «ЗАКОНА СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ ГАРМОНИИ»:

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=629
Соавтор "Науки Глобального Мира" (2015 и 2016):
http://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf 

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=561

27-10-17

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo,

Yes, I want to be a co-author and to contribute articles to theGHA 57th project: “Network Spherons: the UN harmony replacing American UN war.” Yes, i approve this project and will make my intellectual peacemaking contribution to it, including my editing of any part of it, and my text additions up to the 1 page and my additional references to my books and articles. Manythanks.

Bestharmonywishes,

Ayo

Ghana

27-10-17


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

"Social harmony" in Poland instead of postmodernism, Marxism

and Hobbesian politics + Kazakhstan

 

Dear GHA members, friends,

I am glad to send you strong support of the outstanding Academician-economist from Kazakhstan, the director of the Financial and Banking Institute of the Academy of Sciences of Kazakhstan, the author of the well-known book "Harmony of Society and Economics" (http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=561) of the new GHA project o­n transformation UN in the "UN Harmony", as well as his criticisms with which we agree, and the harmonious wisdom of the Quran, which we fully share (below).

I am happy to send you also the glad tidings about the publication of the remarkable book "Social Harmony" by the famous Polish philosopher and political scientist Prof. Julian Korab-Karpovich (http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=724), below.

GHA highly appreciates the support of our project from Poland and Kazakhstan and sincerely thanks their authors.

Best wishes for peace from harmony through the science of Spherons,

Dr. Leo Semashko,

GHAHonoraryPresident

27-10-17

------------------------------------------------------------

 

Two Nobel Peace Laureates: Supporting UN Reform in the GHA Project

 

Dear GHA members, friends, peacemakers:

I am happy to report o­n the responses (below) of two Nobel Peace Laureates: Ms Mairead Maguire from Northern Ireland and prof. John Avery from Denmark, with support for UN reform in the GHA 57th project (http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=769), but in different ways, in varying degrees and forms, as expressed in my responses to each of them below.


My dear friend John,

The GHA highly appreciates and heartily thanks you for the "fully endorse and share" of the GHA 57 project with the UN reform in the UN Harmony "in its main focus o­n peace from social harmony that is lacking or bounded in the present UN."

We also appreciate and thank you for your unique work in the history of peacemaking and humanism "We need their voices today" with essays o­n 22 peacemakers and humanists, beginning with St. Francis of Assisi and ending with Helen Keller and George Orwell. We are happy to congratulate you o­n this unprecedented peacekeeping contribution. We will gladly publish it in PDF format (it's enough), which you sent to me, o­n our website "Peace from Harmony" together with your personal page in the coming days, which we will inform everyone. Thank you very much.
With love, peace and harmony,

Leo
28-10-17

Dear Mairead,

Thank you very much for your response with the support of "Abolition of NATO, Nuclear Weapons and War", which assumes a radical reform of the UN, which for 72 years of its existence only contributed to the continuous expansion of "NATO, nuclear weapons and wars". This is a fact that you cannot deny and which you have repeatedly confirmed in your bold peacemaking works. Therefore, we consider your support for their "Abolition" as support for our project of reforming the militaristic UN in UN Harmony, which alone is able to ensure your "Abolition" and wider.

As for your fair comment o­n the United Nations' Social and Political Program, the Developing and Reforming UN, we would be happy to include in our project your additional paragraph of 1-2 pages, no more, about this "UN Program" with the answer to the main the question: how can this program, for all its usefulness, be able to ensure a global peace and the "Abolition of NATO, Nuclear Weapons and War"? We very much doubt this ability of the current UN for 72 years. But if you could present weighty facts and arguments o­n this score, we would be happy to discuss them and listen to them. Unfortunately, we do not have such arguments for 72 years. For all this time, this UN was unable even to raise the issue of their "Abolition" in its Agenda, all the more; it did not do much for this. Therefore, instead of them "Abolition", we see o­nly their infinite free expansion "without borders" to "nuclear winter". How long should we wait for their "Abolition" yet? Another 72 years? Another 720 years? Or up to complete self-destruction of humankind and the planet? How many? Up to what limit? But, perhaps, this is our omission and we do not know something from the secrets of this UN. Therefore, we will be very grateful to you and anyone who will fill it in and disclose at least any of its real, and not propagandistic, abilities for a global peace. Thank you very much.
With love, peace and harmony,

<