Coauthors Rules: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1224

Paragraph-1:https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1228

--------------------------------

Peace Science Primer (PSP)

Paragraph-2. Preface.

Spheral Way of Thinking: o­nly Way to Know and

Control Perpetual Peace as Absolute Security

(Paragraph full text for discussion)
 

Publication:

In English: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1236

In Russian: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1095

Much knowledge does not teach wisdom.

Heraclitus

         The Preface is another introductory paragraph of our primer, which is devoted to the methods and tools of revealing, presenting and mastering the peace science subject – the perpetual social peace of humanity. It is even more important and complex than the question of its subject, the quality and depth of comprehension of which completely depends from its cognitive methods and tools.

1. FACT-8. Perpetual Peace: Inaccessible Knowledge to Traditional, Disciplinary thinking

         To the "Introduction" seven historical facts, we must add and begin the "Preface" with a new historical fact, which is that for many millennia of wars carcinogenic pathology a way to heal from it has not yet been found. Why? Our answer: "the absence of scientific, planetary knowledge about the humanity perpetual peace, about its social actors and the corresponding, societies’ peace-loving organization as immunity against wars leaves a wide loophole for the constant reproduction of this social pathology." It is harmful to the peoples who must pay for it with many thousands of victims but is always beneficial to the rich and those in power to increase their wealth and strengthen their power, as still Erasmus noted.

         But this answer gives rise to a new question: "Why hasn't the corresponding knowledge of the planetary perpetual peace science emerged in thousands of years?" Our answer is: "Because the existing, disciplinary and sectoral thinking is inadequate to the extremely large-scale and complex object of perpetual peace, which cannot be revealed as a whole by traditional thinking." This thinking, at best, is capable of reflecting o­nly o­n some of its sometimes important but partial aspects. Cognition of the humanity perpetual peace is impossible for it just as "one born to crawl cannot fly." This is proven by millennia of history.

         If perpetual peace would accessible to disciplinary knowledge, then in thousands of years of its existence it would created the perpetual peace science. But this has not happened in history so far. The peace science is absent from humanity, even as a concept, which the reader will not find in any encyclopedia, with extremely rare cases of using this term as a metaphor, nothing more. Therefore, this fact is defined as follows: "the absence of peace science in the humanity history to this day is explained by the cognitive narrowness and limitations of traditional disciplinary thinking, which is inadequate to the planetary scale and fundamental depth of the humanity perpetual peace." How is this explained and how is it argued?

         The earliest in history, general, but basically correct, answer to it belongs to the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus, who enigmatically stated "Much knowledge does not teach wisdom" more than 2.5 thousand years ago. How to interpret this enigmatic aphorism in the modern intellectual transcription of our peace science? Obviously in the following way: much knowledge, i.e. disciplinary knowledge of many parts, details and "trees" of perpetual peace in their sectoral, "wooden" thinking does not provide and "does not teach" thinking of its whole, the "forest". This observation has been confirmed many times in history. Heraclitus had in mind precisely this obvious epistemological fact that "much knowledge" of parts does not give intelligence and knowledge of the whole. The mind and thinking of the whole require other, integral concepts and integral thinking with them. In the Indian tradition, there is ancient parable o­n this subject about the elephant, different parts of which are felt by blind men who give completely different, false definitions of the elephant, identifying it with its different parts that leads them to enmity. In the nuclear civilization during 80 years after Hiroshima/Nagasaki, with nuclear genocidal weapons, their enmity has become the mad "Mutually Assured Destruction" today.

         Therefore, the parts correct knowledge does not provide true knowledge and thinking of the holistic humanity perpetual peace, which is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. The Perpetual peace blind men of disciplinary thinking

         The disciplinary sciences, even if they have accumulated a huge number, about 75 thousand are like the blind men in their cognition of the "perpetual peace (spherons’) elephant". They are able to know its separate parts, but are unable to know it as a whole due to the narrow way of thinking. They cannot "catch" it just as you cannot catch a whale with a butterfly net. Such limitations of disciplinary "much-knowledge" have been preserved and intensified in the West nuclear civilization. Its much-knowledge in almost 75 thousand disciplinary sciences has not taught it the mind and thinking of survival as a whole. This fact was noticed and fundamentally determined the epistemological nature of its narrowness by A. Einstein at the dawn of this civilization more than 75 years ago. He wrote "The significant problem we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them [... therefore] we should require a substantially new [... holistic, integral] manner of thinking [... by the spheres and spherons] if mankind is to survive." Similarly with narrow and blind class, national and party ideologies, the number of which is measured not in thousands, but in units.

         They also prove to be blind in the perpetual peace knowledge among themselves, incapable to understand the truth of its planetary and historical, holistic integrity, condemning themselves to "eternal false consciousness". It gives rise to their eternal ideological confrontation among themselves and the of the eternal, irreconcilable "war of all against all" reign in the West nuclear civilization with the insane "Mutual Assured Destruction" (MAD) at the disciplinary human comedy end, "Finita la Comedy" ... in it, there is nothing left to say except "Amen."

         The survival and life search must be sought o­n the path of a fundamentally different, "substantially new manner of thinking" (Einstein), which has access to the planetary perpetual peace knowledge. This is the spheral, holistic thinking of the Gandhian Peace Science, created by integration many previous achievements into its core during 20 years by more than 700 coauthors from more than 50 countries, including five Nobel Peace Laureates and the President of India Abdul Kalam in the peacemaking GGHA. This thinking is presented in its structural map in Fig. 1 in the "Introduction". The spheral way of thinking, like all the previous o­nes, appears at a certain historical stage of humanity in connection with its new needs for a broader and deeper knowledge, first of all, of its own, social nature and finds its place in the thinking ways evolution at its peak as a necessary historical fact.

2. FACT-9. Evolution of ways of thinking

         The above is sufficient to assert that the knowledge of the humanity perpetual peace in its system and structural integrity is inaccessible and impossible in traditional, sectoral and disciplinary thinking, inadequate to its planetary integrity. o­nly its separate and disparate "trees", "grains" and "aspects" are accessible to “muchknowledge”, but its "forest", integrity and substance, qualitatively different from the simple sum of its "parts-trees", are inaccessible to it, just as an elephant is not identical to the sum of its parts.

         The limitations of traditional rational thinking, noticed by Heraclitus at the dawn of its birth from mythological thinking in the process of a long, at least 6 centuries (8-2 centuries BC), "first axial age" (K. Jaspers) and confirmed by its entire history to the present day is another historical fact of the humanity thinking ways evolution in its history. This evolution proves that scientific sectoral thinking is far from being the pinnacle, the ceiling, or the highest method in its capabilities and abilities. Science has long known and studied three qualitatively different historical ways of thinking in their epistemological substances: primitive, mythological, and scientific, to which thousands of studies have been devoted.

         Primitive, pre-logical thinking is limited to the knowledge of narrow phenomena and objects “here and now” by the method of intuitive trial and error, which does not have the tools for preserving and accumulating the achievements of its empirical experience, except for the oral transmission of knowledge from o­ne generation to another, before the advent of writing.

         Mythological thinking arose from primitive thinking and rose to the step of observed phenomena generalization and to their deification level, when phenomena unclear in their essence were explained in clear images of numerous anthropomorphic gods who personified the stability and regularity of these phenomena.

         Scientific, disciplinary thinking arose from mythological thinking as real facts of nature separate segments and society branches accumulated. They generalized in corresponding mental concepts, in which them observing experience was recorded and consolidated. The conceptual generalizations ensured the knowledge penetration into depths of cause-and-effect relationships and the knowledge preservation about them in writing.

         These methods and stages of thinking were studied by many scientists, the most famous of them Levy-Bruhl, J. Piaget, Levi-Strauss, L. Vygotsky, A. Losev, L. Wecker and others. It is important for us to emphasize the thinking methods/ways evolution very fact, without delving into their depths, in order to understand that the thinking evolution has not stopped and has not ended at the disciplinary thinking level that prevails today, but has continued, albeit very slowly, for millennia and does not stand still.

         Over the last two centuries, starting since I.Kant’s synthetic thinking and pure reason, through A. Smith’s production process spheres, through K. Marx’s types/spheres of social production, through the integral and genetic sociologies of M. Kovalevsky, P. Sorokin, T. Parsons, through the four spheres of society of A. Toffler, through the tetradic macrosocial structures of F. Braudel and P. Bourdieu, through the spherology of P. Sloterdijk, through the theory of everything of N. Rescher, K. Wilber, through the social philosophy of the four spheres and resources of social life in the Marxist tradition of the USSR since N. Bukharin and N. Kondratyev to V. Rozhin, A. Uledov and V. Barulin, including many others, thinking has been developing towards a new method/way of holistic and transdisciplinary, spheral thinking. The nature and society holistic vision is achieved not at the level of fragmentary, disciplinary and sectoral thinking, but o­nly at the level of spheral, holistic thinking, possessing knowledge of such of its spheres/parts, without which the whole does not exist and which constitute it always and everywhere, while it exists. The spontaneous and intuitive attempts at spheral thinking, or a spherical approach to nature and society were undertaken by various thinkers. Thus, Mahatma Gandhi in his book “My Religion”, 1955, writes: “You cannot divide social, economic, political and purely religious work [spheres] into watertight compartments. I do not know any religion apart from human activity… Ahimsa is the attribute of the soul, and therefore, to be practised by everybody in all the affairs of life. If it cannot be practised in all departments, it has no practical value.” (https://www.mkgandhi.org/my_religion/29spheres_of_life.php)

         o­ne of the first conscious attempts to build the spheral, holistic thinking at macrosociology level was undertaken in the book by Leo Semashko “Spheral Approach. Philosophy. Democracy. Market. Man.”, 1993, In it, PHILOSOPHY symbolizes the information sphere, DEMOCRACY – the organizational and political sphere, MARKET – the economic sphere and MAN – the social sphere. The author began to develop spheral thinking in 1976.

         The spheral thinking general characteristics are disclosed in more detail below and in the primer subsequent paragraphs. Now we can build, for initial orientation in thinking, the fundamental model four of its named methods known in the humanity history. This model illustrates the fact of their continuous evolution in the direction of expanding the objects and methods of cognition in each of them by the levels of its generalization from the narrowest to the broadest objects. At the same time, this model in Fig. 3 reflects the process of gradual change of thinking ways priorities with their acceptable elements preservation at the higher levels of thinking.

Fig. 3. Evolution of human thinking

         Each way of thinking, within its possibilities and abilities limits, created its own, accessible to it knowledge about the planet as a whole and about the humanity perpetual peace. In general, their scientific knowledge turns out to be accessible o­nly to spheral thinking, which creates its peace science, presented in our primer. Without running ahead, here we will limit ourselves to revealing o­nly the fundamental structure and logic of spheral, substantial way of thinking with a list of its key tools.

3. Spheral, "substantially new manner of thinking" (Einstein) -

The o­nly way of knowing, resolving and controlling planetary problems

         The humanity global problems began to be created by its rational disciplinary thinking since the end of the 19th century, when industrial globalization o­n a planetary scale became a geopolitical reality. The growing scale and accelerating aggravation of these problems in the European center in the conditions of the inability to solve them rationally, peacefully in the context of the disciplinary way of thinking that was inadequate to them and generated them stimulated the social pathology of violence by intensifying the arms race, which led to two world wars.

          With the invention of nuclear, genocidal weapons in Nazi Germany in the Europe center, with its development and the first, genocidal test in Hiroshima and Nagasaki by America, which became the industrial globalization center, the pathology of violence became a state priority in the West nuclear genocidal civilization that arose o­n its basis. It was forcibly imposed o­n humanity for 80 years and was tangibly, 100% implemented in the doctrines and strategies of "Mutually Assured Destruction" (MAD). The MAD became the key argument for survival and the o­nly instrument of "containment" accepted by all states of this civilization in the frozen context of an inadequate, disciplinary way of thinking, powerless to offer and implement a reasonable, peaceful way to solve global problems and a way out from the genocidal nuclear civilization.

         This historical picture of the last century led Albert Einstein to the above-mentioned fundamental conclusion about "we should require a substantially new [... holistic, integral] manner of thinking [... by the spheres and spherons] if mankind is to survive", instead of disciplinary thinking, powerless in solving global, holistic problems. "Look at the root", as they say in Russia. In this "substantial" cognitive innovation lies the solution root of all the global problems roots, which are insoluble in the West nuclear civilization and the way to overcome its carcinogenic, deadly pathology of violence, with all its machinery of mass destruction and all its propaganda machine of double "liberal-Nazi" standards of the population zombifying and public consciousness manipulating in the West "Goebbels empire of lies" (W. Engdahl). Under the "liberalism" propaganda cover of the nuclear civilization, if you scratch it deeper, then not o­nly its "deep state" is exposed, but also its deep, indelible Nazism.

         Based o­n the briefly outlined arguments, it becomes clear that spheral, holistic thinking as its "substantially new manner" determines the o­nly way of knowing and controlling perpetual peace in its science, as well as all other planetary problems of humanity today. But spheral, transdisciplinary thinking is not a novelty, but a reality, albeit extremely rare and unique, “once in a millennium” in the humanity history. Its most striking examples are represented by the achievements of human geniuses who remained misunderstood in history: Pythagoras’ “the spheres harmony” (6th century BC), Kepler’s “Harmony of the World” (16th century AD), Mahatma Gandhi’s “varnas/spherons”, Vernadsky’s “noosphere”, Sloterdijk’s “spherology” and the GGHA spheral “Perpetual Peace Science” over the past 20 years. Vladimir Vernadsky best expressed the unique examples paradoxicality and “craziness” of the spheral way of thinking for traditional disciplinary thinking: spheral thinking is "not a crisis disturbing weak souls but the greatest turning point of human thought making o­nly o­nce a millennium".

         The spheral thinking is the genesis and the next, fundamental Rubicon of a new, better future, with the scientifically realized Kant’s perpetual peace as the humanity absolute security in our century. It constitutes the superiority of homo sapiens among all forms of planetary life. Gradually, its categories are entering traditional thinking. For example, Mahatma Gandhi in his book “My Religion” names four key spheres of social life.

          29. Religious sphere to pervade all spheres: https://www.mkgandhi.org/my_religion/29spheres_of_life.php:

“You cannot divide social, economic, political and purely religious work [spheres]into watertight compartments. I do not know any religion apart from human activity… Ahimsa is the attribute of the soul, and therefore, to be practised by everybody in all the affairs [spheres]of life. If it cannot be practised in all departments [spheres], it has no practical value.”

         30. In the Social Sphere - https://www.mkgandhi.org/my_religion/30social_sphere.php

         31. In the Economic Sphere - https://www.mkgandhi.org/my_religion/31economic_sphere.php

         32. In the Political Sphere - https://www.mkgandhi.org/my_religion/32political_sphere.php

         Today, the category of "sphere" is widely used in the geopolitical lexicon of states and parties to designate the largest social components of each society and humanity as a whole - environmental, social, informational, managerial, economic, cultural, space and other spheres.

         However, their proven list and justified number remain unknown, their list varies from o­ne to 12 spheres in different countries, organizations and among different researchers. This is also an indisputable and easily confirmed fact, which testifies to the initial, formative stage of spheral thinking in history. The indisputable reality facts of the spheral thinking unique examples in history do not exclude and are supplemented by the facts of its hypothetical nature in relation to its substance, structure, logic, laws, principles, and most importantly the tools for its understanding, mastery and application, use.

         Taking into account this dual factology of spheral thinking, our peace science and its primer can and should be assessed in its ambivalent logic of development, o­n the o­ne hand, as a well-founded and absolutely necessary cognitive reality for modern humanity, excepting all fiction and chimera. o­n the other hand, as the problematic and hypothetical paradigm, which is at the very beginning of its development with a system set of definitions, justifications and verifications of its substance, structure, logic, laws, principles, and most importantly, tools for its understanding and application. In this key "HOW to understand and use the spheral thinking of the perpetual peace science", our primer and all its paragraphs are being built. Here, at the beginning of this key, we will limit ourselves to the main definitions and a list of tools for spheral thinking.

4. Spheral logic of the perpetual peace structural harmony

And its spheral instruments

         The substance, essence, structure and logic of spheral thinking, as well as its language, vocabulary, terminology are determined by its key category "sphere", long ago, since Pythagoras, used in rational thinking, but remaining undefined for planetary humanity. Their qualitative and quantitative definition in the composition of 16 spheres, "spheral components" of the societal genome is presented o­n the Peace Science engram in the map "The Humanity Perpetual Peace Culture" center o­n Fig. 1, in the previous paragraph. These spheres are classified and generalized into four spheral groups:

         1. Spheral resources: People, Information, Organization, Things, abbreviated PIOT

         2. Spheral processes: Production, Distribution, Exchange, Consumption, abbreviated PDEC.

        3. Spheres of production/life: Sociosphere, Infosphere, Orgsphere, Technoecosphere (technoeconomic), abbreviated SIOT-spheres.

         4. Spherons, spheres/parts of the population employed in the production spheres: Sociospheron, Infospheron, Orgspheron, Technospheron, abbreviated SIOT-spherons.

         These spheres are defined in the spheral logic of "Equally Necessary Jointly Sufficient" (ENJS) parts of the whole in the whole-parts social dialectical methodology, which is supplemented by the category of "holons/spheres" to distinguish fundamental, constant parts from sectoral/branch and other transient parts. Each of the 16 societal, fundamental spheres is equally necessary, i.e. among them there are no "primary, defining, generating" and "secondary, derivative" o­nes, since the absence, "zero" of any of these spheres excludes the life and existence of any social object from an individual and a family to a country and humanity. This is verified and proven o­n any social object by means of the corresponding thought experiment. The equal necessity of 16 societal spheres makes them sufficient for the individual/humanity life. Therefore, spheres are special, integral parts, "holons", which are constant and differ from all other parts, which arise and die within each sphere of society in its history. All development of society is ensured by the development of the internal, sectoral structure of each sphere by the emergence and death of its sectoral/branch parts.

         This fundamental, substantial difference between the spheral, constant parts of society and their sectoral, variable, temporary parts proves that parts are not all the same. Therefore, the category "holon", proposed back in the last century, was introduced in order to distinguish between parts that are necessary and sufficient for the whole life always, everywhere and at all its levels, which are all the named spheres, and parts that do not have o­ne or both attributes. They are either not necessary at all, or are o­nly necessary for a separate stage of the life of the whole, but not sufficient for its existence in general.

         The listed 16 spheres/holons constitute the eternal societal genome of man/humanity, preserved at all stages of their life history and constitute their original, self-developing social cell. This eternal fact of social and individual life was brilliantly and briefly expressed and scientifically confirmed by the German philosopher P. Sloterdijk in his fundamental three-volume work “Spheres” at the beginning of our century: “Man always lives in spheres”, o­n the basis of which he can “draw geographical maps of internal spaces in a new way [by spheres]”, an example of which is given our Fig. 1 and 3, as well as similar o­nes in the following paragraphs. In them, the peace science is aimed o­nly at revealing the social laws of spheres harmonious interaction ensuring the state of their perpetual peace, in which there is no place for war. The ENJS spheral logic constitutes in it the planetary law of existence and development of peaceful humanity, necessary, acceptable and sufficient for all peoples to put an end to confrontation and wars.

         At the level of 16 spheres of the man/humanity eternal societal genome the perpetual peace essence of their state is revealed as a constant striving of its eternal spheral structure for the eternal harmony (measure, balance, equilibrium and proportion) of these spheres. The spheral harmony substance as the eternal social nature core constitute the spherons - people permanently employed in the production’s spheres but move from o­ne sphere to another. They are the o­nly actors of perpetual peace and social production of humanity, between whom there is no place for violence or war. Similar understanding of peace has been summarized in the GGHA from its very beginning, since 2005, in its motto: "Peace from Harmony", which has become its website name. The spheres harmony, as "the internal harmony of the world is the o­nly objective reality [and truth]" according to the profound conclusion of the greatest mathematician Henri Poincaré at the beginning of the last century. A more detailed justification and examples of the ENJS spheral logic in the perpetual peace structural harmony of the societal genome in its 16 spheres will be considered in all the following paragraphs.

         Understanding the harmonious, spheral structure and the essence of its defining spheral actors - spherons is the main difficulty, unusual for traditional thinking in comprehending the fundamental feature and unique advantage of the spheral way of thinking. This understanding requires centuries, many generations and thousands of researchers, in order to get closer to their scientific understanding, which will constitute the humanity "second axial age", which K. Jaspers suggested after defining its "first axial age" during the centuries-long transition from mythological to disciplinary knowledge. o­nly in the "second axial age" result, which marks the transition to spheral thinking in solving the humanity global problems, it will be mentally capable to ensure perpetual peace and the way out from genocidal nuclear civilization to the spherons harmonious, nonviolent and multipolar civilization. This process can begin in the coming years since the nuclear weapons prohibition, with the general development of innovative peace science, which will ensure "a shift from the arms race to the peace race" (M.L. King) and be completed by the end of this century, the prospect of which is also considered in our primer.

         Thus, the spheral logic of the peace science structural harmony constitutes the first, substantial instrument of spheral thinking, determining and ensuring the creation of all its other instruments.

         The second necessary instrument of the peace science and its spheral logic is qualimetric, spheral global statistics, generated by infinite series of statistical matrices spheral indicators 4x4ⁿ dimension, where "n" is a series of natural or other numbers according to the corresponding mathematical statistics needs. Through spheral statistics and its apparatus, the macrosociological peace science, for the first time, receives a permanent mathematical method of its research among all the socio-humanitarian sciences, which use it sporadically or do not use it at all. Spheral global statistics is considered for the first time in history in the GGHA collective book 2019 "Gandhica" (https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/gandhi-nonviolence-of-spherons-gandhica-2019.pdf). In our primer will be devoted to it and the verification of spherons special paragraph.

         The third necessary tool of the spheral logic is the visual structural modeling of spheres, presented in all works o­n spheral thinking, as well as in the primer each paragraph in the form of its visual models, diagrams, tables and banners. It has long been recognized that visual images are capable of concentrating huge amounts of information and knowledge of textual order in simple and accessible visual forms. The spheral structural models are innovative "geographical maps of internal spaces" of immeasurably large information data of the perpetual peace science in its all history from the human emergence. The four-dimensional coordinate system of spheral "geographical maps of internal spaces" consists of Resources, Processes, Structures (Spheres-SIOT) and States (Spherons-SIOT), which is disclosed in all paragraphs, and was first published o­n our book cover: "Tetrasociology: Responses to Challenges", 2002.

         The fourth necessary tool of the science of the world and its spheral logic, technologically integrating and hardware synthesizing all its tools, is the planetary and peaceful Spheral Artificial Intelligence (SAI), which is created o­n its basis since 1980 voluntarily. It will ensure the perpetual peace Renaissance o­n a substantially new, spheral level of thinking and resolution of planetary problems that will create a key prerequisite for exiting the genocidal nuclear civilization. SAI is the first technological and digital tool for life and practical advancement of world science. Therefore, the "Peace Science Primer" is, first of all, the "SAI Primer", in which SAI is tacitly present in all paragraphs, but a special paragraph is also dedicated to it.

         The world modern, cardinal change, associated with the change of the West genocidal nuclear civilization and its unipolar hegemonic world order, overflowing for 80 years with annual wars o­n the brink of nuclear Armageddon, hides in its process center, behind many "trees" o­n the surface, the "forest" of the fundamental scientific revolution. It is accomplished from narrow, disciplinary thinking, which o­nly generates planetary problems, to a holistic and transdisciplinary, spheral thinking, armed with innovative technological tools, the o­nly o­nes capable of harmoniously resolving these problems. This is substantiated in the peace science and is revealed in the synopsis format in its primer. The innovative nature of spheral thinking determines its innovative categorical language and spheral terminology.

         Other, more specific and limited, but no less important tools of the peace science and its spheral logic are considered together with the necessary o­nes in the corresponding paragraphs.

5. Integration of religion and science in spheral thinking

as a necessary condition for their holism in the humanity perpetual peace culture

         Religious faith and its highest moral values ​​do not contradict the peace science but constitute its necessary attribute, overcoming the long confrontation of religion with traditional, disciplinary thinking, the narrowness and fragmentation of which was unable to accommodate the absolute integrity of God. In the peace science, religion and science complement and strengthen each other, ensuring their more effective development and social significance. Their cognitive complement is that the subject of the peace science is limited to planet Earth in its spatio-temporal framework of the Universe, and the subject of faith is God, eternal and infinite in the space and time of His Universe creation, devoid of any boundaries. Therefore, the peace science, like any science, is limited in its subject and requires the necessary cognitive complement of faith in God and the Universe, as His creation. Any part cannot exist outside the whole laws, neglect of which threatens this part with destruction for internal or external reasons.

         Planet Earth and its humanity are a microcosm, an infinitely small grain of the infinitely large creation of God, as an absolute whole, determining the beginning and end of the existence in it of any of its parts, including the Solar system, the Earth and humanity. Therefore, it is extremely short-sighted and presumptuous for the disciplinary science to deny faith and reject cooperation with religion o­nly o­n the grounds that the narrow scientific truths are confirmed by corresponding narrow facts, while the faith truths do not and cannot have them, since the facts of infinity are simply inaccessible to the humanity finite mind. But the faith truths are confirmed by the many thousands of years of experience of each world religion of many peoples and cannot be discounted by human knowledge.

         The faith truths are the tools and pillars of knowledge of eternity o­n a planetary, human scale. They are its highest moral maxims and guiding values, which, first of all, is the "Golden Rule" of all religions, affirming the people perpetual peace: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." No o­ne wants violence, war and death from others, therefore, perpetual peace, a peaceful, friendly and partnership attitude towards others, "as towards o­neself" is embedded in the social nature of each person. Denial of this o­nly true maxim and pillar of human coexistence from the standpoint of a narrowly and falsely understood "freedom" turns into the long-known, satanic "permissiveness, if there is no God." Its outcome in the West genocidal nuclear civilization is predetermined by the insane freedom of "Mutually Assured Destruction" (MAD), as God's punishment for neglecting the laws of mutual love and peace in its eternal inner harmony of any scale.

         Therefore, the moral values ​​and maxims of religions constitute a necessary component of the peace science, and its scientists continue to remain believers like the overwhelming majority of scientists throughout the humanity history. They exclude any atheism as a vice, especially the violent and terrorist "militant atheism" of permissiveness, destroying religious temples and clergy as the disciplinary thinking crime. They reject atheistic permissiveness as a common enemy of all religions and humane science, which the perpetual peace science proclaims itself to be to the highest degree, openly and consciously, with full scientific and moral ground.

         As the famous director Nikita Mikhalkov asserts, "Everyone may have a different God, but God has o­ne enemy" - the satanic freedom of permissiveness as the freedom of violent destruction of life o­n the planet. This was proven by Nobel laureate John Avery in his scientific book: "Nuclear Weapons: The Absolute Evil". God is the highest meaning and purpose of human existence in its maxims of love, peace and harmony, which receive a fundamental scientific basis in the planetary macrosociological peace science. In this capacity, it forms a tool for the development of religions in an ecumenical direction, preventing and excluding religious disciplinary confrontation and their "clash of civilizations", as in Huntington. The disciplinary sciences, due to their narrowness and limitations, are not capable of being a pillar and tool for the unity of religions, o­nly by separating them, therefore their short-sighted scientists prefer to criticize religion, like the fox grapes from the famous fable by Krylov.

         Many modern thinkers speak about the need for an alliance and "seamless integration of religious tradition with modern science", for example, the American philosopher Ken Wilber in his integral approach. The peace science is integral to the highest degree, therefore it has the highest abilities and competencies to cooperate with religions o­n the spheral thinking basis from God. This is illustrated in detail in our collective article with J. Avery: “Spherons: Nonlinear Sociogenetic Reality and the Verified Truth of the Spheronics Megascience.” 20-12-21: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1019

         Here, the peace science spheral axiology is developed with the religious categories of God, His peace, love, truth and morality.

6. Appendices

         The appendices of this section, as well as others, will be finally filled with the most adequate quotations as a result of the primer final editing of the primer.

- Julia Budnikova. N.K. Roerich. Signs of Christ. # 24, 1924

http://gallery.facets.ru/pic.php?id=358&size=7

Mairead Corrigan. Nobel Laureate.
         «Peace science and its action is the alternative and the o­nly way forward for human family to survive.».

Fyodor Dostoevsky.

         “We (Russia) not hostile, but friendly, with full love took into our souls the geniuses of foreign nations, all together, without making tribal distinctions…. For a true Russian, Europe [and world] ... is just as dear as Russia itself ... because our destiny is the universality ... of our brotherly desire to reunite people ... [to] bring reconciliation into European [and world] contradictions ... [by a word of] great common harmony, fraternal final consent of all tribes according to Christ's Gospel law. [This universal destiny of the Russian reconciliation, harmony and consent, expressed by the genius of Pushkin and many other Russians, – L.S.] is in humanity ... a new word.” [Because according to its spiritual make-up and civilizational millennial code], “the Russian heart, perhaps, of all nations, is most destined for universal fraternal unity.” [1880. Pushkin's speech]

Leo Tolstoy.
         "One of the crudest superstitions is the superstition of scientific people that a person can live without faith." Reading Circle.
 

Mahatma Gandhi.

Varnas [spherons] “are not a human invention, but an immutable law of nature [and society] –… like Newton’s law of gravitation… Varna is the law of life universally governing the human family… Nonviolence [of the varnas/spherons] is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest [nuclear] weapon of destruction.” “MyReligion”, 1927, 1946 г.