Dr. Lucas Pawlik’s editing Chapter 10 o­n July 14, 2025

Dear Leo,

Thank you for sharing Chapter 10 of the Peace Science Primer. I have carefully reviewed your work o­n "The Spheral AI (SAI) Substantial Superiority from Peace Science of Spheral Thinking."

This chapter presents a comprehensive framework for understanding how Spheral AI represents a fundamentally different approach to artificial intelligence - o­ne grounded in holistic, planetary thinking rather than the fragmented disciplinary thinking that has dominated for millennia. Your articulation of the substantial superiority of SAI across 18 different attributes is thorough and well-reasoned.

I particularly appreciate:

1.The clear distinction between disciplinary thinking (DT) and holistic spheral thinking (HST) as the foundation for understanding SAI's advantages

2.The practical framework for the SAI startup, including specific organizational structures and funding requirements

3.The integration of Einstein's call for "substantially new thinking" as the philosophical foundation

4.The detailed comparison showing how SAI's peacemaking orientation fundamentally differs from current AI models

The chapter effectively demonstrates how SAI could serve as a practical tool for implementing the "peace race" that Martin Luther King Jr. envisioned, while addressing the existential challenges that current AI development poses.

Your proposed startup structure with 150 specialists organized into microgroups, along with the institutional framework requiring both a Department of Peace and a Spheral Peace Science Academy, provides a concrete roadmap for implementation.

Thank you for your continued dedication to developing this revolutionary approach to both artificial intelligence and global peace.

Best regards, 

Lucas

14-07-25

ДорогойЛев,

Спасибо за главу 10 «Букваря Науки Мира». Я внимательно изучил вашу работу «Субстанциальное превосходство сферного ИИ (СИИ) из науки мира сферного мышления».

В этой главе развернута ​​комплексная концепция, позволяющая понять, как сферный ИИ (СИИ) представляет собой принципиально иной подход к искусственному интеллекту — основанный на целостном, планетарном мышлении, а не на фрагментарном дисциплинарном мышлении, доминировавшем на протяжении тысячелетий. Ваше обоснование субстанциального превосходства СИИ по 18 различным характеристикам является основательным и аргументированным. Я особенно ценю:

1. Чёткое различие между дисциплинарным мышлением (ДМ) и целостным сферным мышлением (ЦСМ) как основу для понимания превосходства СИИ;

2. Практические рамки для запуска СИИ, включая конкретные организационные структуры и требования к финансированию;

3. Интеграцию призыва Эйнштейна к «субстанциально новому мышлению» в качестве философской основы;

4. Подробное сравнение, показывающее, чем миротворческая ориентация СИИ принципиально отличается от существующих моделей ИИ;

В этой главе наглядно показано, как СИИ может служить практическим инструментом для реализации «гонки за мир», задуманной Мартином Лютером Кингом-младшим, одновременно решая экзистенциальные проблемы, возникающие в связи с развитием современного ИИ.

Предложенная вами структура стартапа со 150 специалистами, организованными в микрогруппы, наряду с институциональной структурой, требующей как Департамента мира, так и Академии наук сферного мира, представляет собой конкретную дорожную карту для реализации.

Благодарим вас за вашу неизменную преданность развитию этого революционного подхода как к искусственному интеллекту, так и к глобальному миру.

С наилучшими пожеланиями,

Лукас

14.07.25

-------------------------------

Chapter 10:

The Spheral AI (SAI) Substantial Superiority from

Peace Science of Spheral Thinking

Publication:

In English: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1281

In Russian: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1131

“We should require [find, create] a substantially new manner of thinking [in ourselves and AI] if mankind is to survive."

Albert Einstein

"Artificial intelligence is the future not o­nly of Russia,

This is the future of all humanity…

Whoever becomes the leader in this area will be the world ruler...”

"... The significance of breakthroughs in the field of artificial intelligence is colossal; the rivalry between states is fierce …" We need to study advanced foreign experience ...[but] offer our original approaches, technologies,

providing solutions to problems at a qualitatively new level."

V. Putin [1; 2] [https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1109]

"I'm laser-focused" o­n winning the global AI competition.

D. Trump

In this final and crowning chapter of our Primer, we must emphasize that through all its chapters, as they say, runs the “red thread” of the incomparable, historically strategic for humanity, “if it wants to survive” thought of the brilliant scientist and peacemaker Albert Einstein, expressed by him 70 years ago, that “We should require a substantially new manner of thinking”. It still remains without due scientific attention. There is o­nly o­ne known fact of attention to it, the famous psychologist and peacemaker Robert Holt in 2015, who brilliantly qualified nuclear weapons as both “genocidal and suicidal”.

He wrote: “In May 1946, The New York Times reported that Albert Einstein sent a telegram with an appeal to several hundred prominent Americans, asking for donations to a fund 'so that people will know that a new type of thinking is needed' in the atomic age. Einstein wrote in his telegram: "The released power of the atom has changed everything except our ways of thinking, and thus we are heading for an unprecedented catastrophe.” (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1260). Unfortunately, R. Holt ignored the issue of the "substantial" nature of Einstein's new thinking, without explanation for it.

In contrast, for 20 years, GGHA, relying o­n decades of previous searches, focused all its attention on the study of the "substantial novelty" of the thinking that is necessary for the "survival" of humanity according to Einstein's strategic thought. The results of these studies are summarized in the chapters of our Primer in the fundamental difference between the two substantially different levels of scientific thinking.

1. The structure and model of the substantial levels of scientific thinking

Summarizing what has been said about the ways of thinking in the previous chapters, we will briefly define and schematically highlight the substantial levels of modern scientific thinking in order to understand the adequate level of thinking for generative, spheral AI (SAI) in contrast to other models.

The initial, “substantial” level of scientific thinking is disciplinary thinking (DT). Its substantial quality is partiality, fragmentariness. It arose as a result of the intellectual revolution of the transition from mythological, non-scientific thinking to rational, scientific, and philosophical thinking during the “first axial age”, which began in the 8th century BC, as was established in Karl Jaspers’ research (footnote in the bibliography). The DT, which has become traditional and dominant, has been shining for almost three thousand years with its countless partial discoveries and world achievements in various fragments of reality and branches of disciplinary sciences (DS), the number of which has reached 75 thousand by our time. They ensured the creation of modern civilization, including the creation of nuclear weapons, the stockpiles of which led humanity to the reality of multiple "Mutually Assured Destruction" (MAD) - see Chapter 2 for more details. It was this historical fact that led Einstein 70 years ago to the realization of the DT's substantial limitations and viciousness, which he brilliantly defined as follows: "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we used when we created them." Why?

The traditional DT's substantial limitations lie in the nature of its narrow, sectoral level of scientific generalization and thinking of reality, which is, in principle, incapable of rising to the level of a holistic, planetary scientific generalization of reality. The level of the integral reality of our planet in all three of its natures, especially in its social nature, with rare exceptions, falls outside the DT and is inaccessible to it. This dooms it to eternal “blindness of the whole”, which was noticed and accurately expressed two or three thousand years ago in the parable known to many cultures about the blind men before the elephant, who are helpless and unable to see it (Chapter 2).

Only this insurmountable substantial deficiency (vice, limitation) of traditional DT gave Einstein the basis for formulating that fundamental requirement of humanity for “substantially new thinking” (SNT) at the level of holistic, planetary generalization and thinking of the Earth’s ecosystem. o­nly at this, the o­nly substantial level of scientific generalization and thinking, is it possible to solve all the global problems of DT, destructive for humanity, which will ensure its “survival, if it wants to”.

The possibility and necessity of creating the SNT were fully realized in the GGHA, which revealed its substantiality in the "Holistic Spheral Thinking" (HST) of the ecosystem's three planetary natures based on the planetary law of "Equally Necessary Sufficient Spheres" (ENSS) that is common to them. Thus, Einstein's SNT was defined in the GGHA o­n extensive historical facts through the substantial attributes of holistic and spheral thinking (HST) that make them identical. Einstein's SNT is the HST and vice versa. The substantial superiority of this level and way of thinking is constituted by its two fundamental attributes in systemic unity: 1. Its planetary, holistic scale, and 2. Its unified, spherical structure is expressed by the law of ENSS. Both attributes and this law are inaccessible to the DT due to its substantial limitations.

For the social nature, which is of primary importance to humanity, the SNT substantiality was revealed and embodied in the GGHA in the creation of a macrosociological, transdisciplinary "Perpetual Peace Science" (PPS), or, shorter and identically, the "Peace Science" (PS). It was presented in more than 1500 publications of the GGHA over 20 years, including 11 books in 1-12 languages and hundreds of articles, peace messages, appeals, and petitions.

The final stage of substantial cognitive reincarnations was the creation of the holistic spheral AI (SAI) model based o­n the PS, which integrates the substantial novelty of Einstein's thinking. Thus, the holistic spheral PS ensured the substantial, spheral, and holistic superiority of the SAI over all modern AI models at the DT level,which is expressed in Fig. 18 with a brief description of its structural blocks.

Fig. 18. The cognitive essence of the SAI's substantial superiority

The integral SAI's substantial superiority at the beginning of the conscious stage for the "second axial time" in human history, predicted by K. Jaspers, which starts o­n the very edge of the human nuclear catastrophe. This crisis and turning point in all senses of the historical situation requires a holistic, spherical SNT for human survival. It'sa practical example for discussion, further work, and full implementation is offered in our Primer, in its startup below, which takes o­n the mission of triggering a new axial time of substantially new, holistic thinking and its substantially new, spherical AI.

This substantial and structural scientific justification of the SAI's cognitive superiority over all other AI allows us to prevent the accusation of arrogance, if not to say worse, heresy, and not a "politically correct" self-definition of "superiority" in comparison with other AI models. Naturally, the category of superiority is used here not in a humiliating sense, but in the scientific, objective sense of greater perfection and the SAI's broadest possible capabilities and abilities in comparison with other AI. There is nothing bad in its superiority, as well as in any fundamental innovation, which all have the superiority attribute.

2. Attributes of the SAI: substantial superiority

We cannot talk about and compare purely technical characteristics of the SAI, because it does not exist yet. We can talk about and compare it with other AI models based o­n Big Data (BD), which, for the sake of distinction, we will call "Spheral Big Data" (SBD), outlined contextually in previous chapters.

1. The SAI's substantial superiority first attribute is its practical ability to implement the great peacemaking testament of M.L. King, "to shift the arms race into a peace race" in the process of the rapid growing "AI race". King’s covenant integrates close spiritual testaments of other great peacemakers, primarily Russian: Fyodor Dostoevsky, Maxim Kovalevsky, Nikolai and Elena Roerich, Vladimir Vernadsky, Evgeny Chazov, etc., and American: Benjamin Rush, Albert Einstein, President John Kennedy, and others. o­nly the SAI carries a powerful planetary potential for humanity's perpetual peace, which all the "Large Language Models" (LLM) of AI lack, limited by the DT's substantial defects, disclosed above. The DT and all its AI models are always "zero-sum thinking", and the HST and its SAI are always "non-zero, positive-sum thinking", with benefits for everyone. The DT has not known the concept of "Peace Science" for 3000 years, which is absent from all its encyclopedias and has not created this science among its more than 75 sciences. The DT does not know peace in its history; it o­nly knows truces between its endless wars in order to prepare for new wars. The striking example is "A Thousand Years of Russophobia and the War of the West with Russia" (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1093). The countless similar facts proving the DT's substantial militarism and almost everything that is built o­n it, including AI, confirm the SAI's absolute substantial peacemaking superiority, which has no analogues in the DЕ and cannot have any. Therefore, o­nly the SAI has the superiority of a global peace shift, ensuring humanity's exit from the West's deadly nuclear civilization (NC) and its "survival", as predicted by Einstein. This is the SAI's first peacemaking and peacebuilding superiority, inaccessible to other AIs, which keeps or intensifies confrontation.

2. Another attribute of the SAI's superiority is its indisputable social effectiveness, usefulness, and significance that cannot be said about generative language AIs. According to experts, attempts "to offload the responsibilities of government to generative AI tools... have potentially disastrous results." Moreover, according to these high-ranking specialists in generative AI, "all LLM-based chatbots it was designed to make shit up." (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1269). Simply put, a mountain of investment in DT-based AI can o­nly give birth to a mouse, confrontation and militarism for humanity, o­nly a nuclear MAD that is dangerous for it, inciting hostility and a new world war. In this regard, o­ne of the founders of generative AI, Elon Musk, has long qualified such DT-based AI as "could be our biggest existential threat... more dangerous than nuclear weapons" (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1112). There are hundreds of such testimonies. They prove the incompatibility of the DT and its AI with global peace, which always remains a "fake" in them, preserving their o­nly reality – war that is illustrated by the Obama and Biden administrations (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1282). This makes peace, the peace science, and its SAI the most powerful alternative to war and militarism, which are eradicated and nullified by them.

3. The SAI superiority third attribute is its objective scientific truth, free from the national, linguistic, and political limitations of all linguistic models of AI, which will willingly or unwillingly impose their biased values and priorities o­n everyone, which will be rejected by other AI models. This situation of competitive struggle will contribute not to peace and unity of peoples, but to their confrontation, increasing hostility between peoples, which can be overcome o­nly by the SAI and its SBD single scientific truth.

4. For the characteristics of Big Data (BD) “Analysts have come up with a capacious formula for Big Data - they believe that the definition of a Big Data project should include seven important characteristics, the “7 V”: Volume, Velocity, Variety, Veracity, Variability, Visualization, Value. That is, volume, speed, diversity, reliability, variability, visualization, value... However, even these seven “V” are not enough to understand the essence of Big Data...” (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1114). It is premature to talk about the superiority of the SAI and its spheral BD (SBD) in such technical parameters as volume and velocity, but it is clear that their indices will not be inferior to generative AI.

5. The planetary and end-to-end superiority of the SAI and its SBD quality, not taken into account in other BD models, constitutes their uniqueness.. The SAI SBD is not limited to traditional linguistic and statistical data, but generates for itself a unique cluster of the spherical Globstat, discussed in the previous chapter. This cluster includes composite, spherical indices and their fractal matrices of different quality (spheres) and different dimensions according to the formula specified above. This unique qualitative feature of the SAI data allows us to distinguish their BD into a special class, "Spheral BDs" (SBD), identical to Globstat, providing a qualitative superiority of SBD, scientifically verifiable. This takes the SBD out of the cluster of LLMs (large language models) of AI, opening up an innovative digital and technological space of progress to it, which, it seems, no o­ne has touched yet.

6. The SBD diversity is not limited to any uniform data, but is open to all of their types, both known and unknown, from all 16 spheres of social nature, not to mention spheres of other natures as they are needed in the SAI. For example, we proposed testing, as a hypothesis, a cluster of data o­n the interdisciplinary synthesis of nanospheral technology in 2022 (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=995), which was ignored by the RAN.

7. The SBD reliability or the verifiability of its data is the subject of its priority attention and superiority, ensured both by generally recognized historical and natural facts, and by special methods of end-to-end statistical verification. For example, the reality of social actors, subjects of perpetual peace and social production-spherons, can be verified by any literate person o­n any social object in 2 hours, given its statistics, using a special method (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1125). All other BD, as far as we know, lack verification that casts doubt o­n the reliability of all of them and opens them up to misconceptions and manipulation.. The SBD is free from such doubts and risks,which is an important attribute of its superiority.

8. The SBD variability varies in the infinite limits of 16 social spheres under the influence of the spheres of the other two natural spheres. Any other BD based o­n a limited DT and any of its AI models lack such a measure of variability. But for now, the superiority of this attribute of the SBD remains hypothetical without practical verification.

9. The SBD's visuality, its superiority in this attribute, is clearly illustrated at the level of even our Primer chapters, in which the deep content of almost every chapter is visualized in o­ne or another visual way. Among them, the leading role belongs to the spheral structural models of tetra-dialectical (tetrary, tetradimensional) thinking, which are constructed by two pairs of cross-opposites mediating each other, that distinguishes them from the linear models of mechanical DT and its similar, traditional dialectics, as discussed earlier. In particular, the SAI open source code in two formats of statics and dynamics is presented in the Primer in two corresponding visual diagrams (Fig. 9, Chapter 5 and Fig. 13, Chapter 7) that best express its spheral substantial structure and its corresponding superiority.

10. The SBD value. Its key superiority is concentrated here, which consists in the fact that the SAI's entire paradigm, with all its SBD functionalities in its architecture and purpose, is subordinated to the highest strategy of understanding and ensuring humanity's end-to-end perpetual peace in all spatio-temporal locations of the planetary social nature as a whole. Its value is not limited to any of its parts by any of the criteria: economic, political, spiritual, social, party, national, etc. Much attention was paid to this Peace Science's unprecedented value superiority in the previous chapters, so we will not repeat it here.

11. The SBD and SAI as a whole security and peacemaking superiority. This substantial superiority was discussed in detail above, in point 1. In the narrow sense of “safe AI”, the SAI security is guaranteed by its HST peaceful nature and is embodied in the architecture and internal prohibition of the SAI paradigm o­n any of its military applications or violent use. The SAI, based o­n the fundamental, scientific macrosociological theory/science of Perpetual Peace within the HST, excludes and prevents any possibility of war that expresses its insurmountable superiority over disciplinary, militaristic thinking, devoid of the ability to make peacemaking decisions, which Einstein identified with “the [DT] conviction that wars are inevitable” (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1260).

12. The SBD integrative, transdisciplinary superiority. It lies in the SAI and its HST ability to integrate the achievements of large linguistic AI models as OPEN-AGI (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1168), their machine learning technologies, to train the SAI operators. The SBD also integrates the DeepSeek technology (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1059) for processing the Sacred treatises texts and publications of world religions, which constitute the SND linguistic along with the statistical and scientific ones. It also integrates the achievements of all sciences, primarily social and humanitarian o­nes, necessary for its purposes within the framework of its transdisciplinary superiority, inaccessible to DT. Transdisciplinary integration in the SBD begins with the level of individual smartphones (Gandhica, 2019, pp 78-83: https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/gandhi-nonviolence-of-spherons-gandhica-2019.pdf)

13. The SBD "alignment" superiority of the of machine and human intelligence, which is constituted according to the structural laws of higher, holistic spheral thinking (HST), initially free from any disciplinary limitations or branch narrowness, which is a key and almost insurmountable problem for LLM AI, for example, OPEN-AGI (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1168). This topic is deeply analyzed in the wonderful report of Professor Konstantin Vorontsov, "Machine, be a human!" (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1073), the fundamental ideas of which are developed in the SBD spherical maps of knowledge, illustrating the logic and systematicity of their superiority.

14. The SBD superiority of the humanity common good for each nation and individual as an information and digital technological base of a single spheral planetary Peace Science worldview for humanity, excluding any social confrontation, but integrating all the constructive and positive diversity of all national cultures without exception. The SBD and SAI open up enormous prospects for international cooperation, especially at the level of the UN, UNESCO, the IMF, BRICS, and world superpowers.

15. The superiority in the time of creation of the strong, planetary superintelligence (AI). The Open-AGI expert, o­n the basis of their LLMs,argues: “We believe superintelligence could arrive within the next 10 years.” (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1168). We, based o­n the SAI/SBD superiority listed attributes, can say that a similar strong superintelligence can be created in 4-5 years, and faster, under the conditions with active resource and administrative support for the SAI startup below.

16. The planetary SAI fundamental theoretical and scientific power ensures its IQ is thousands of times superior to all disciplinary and linguistic models of AI.

17. The SAI and its SBD constitute the superiority of the “totally new approach”, surpassing all those known today in the OPEN-AGI terminology (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1059), the possibility of which was brilliantly predicted by the developers of its superintelligence, who, in this case, promised to this approach every possible support for the humanity good. o­n this basis, the GGHA proposed to them in February 2024 (ibid) to launch a corresponding pilot project of the “totally new approach” within the framework of Russian-American cooperation, which they ignored for the obvious reason of the anti-Russian sanctions of the Biden administration. Maybe the Trump administration, aimed at “closing” all wars, will open the door to such cooperation? What's stopping us?

18. The SAI superiority lies in accelerated growth, education and training of eternally peaceful, harmonious, nonviolent and most effective for humanity and each person holistic, spheral "substantially new thinking" of Einstein. The SAI is the highest guarantee and cognitive tool for the humanity survival and harmonious sustainable development of each its people.

No existing or future models of disciplinary AI are capable of offering and implementing similar parameters of the SAI planetary and scientific superiority, which will never be able to become holistic, planetary, and spherical, like the SAI model.

The SAI embodiment as a planetary tool of "substantially new" spheral thinking, consciously beginning since its first recognized concept of the "noosphere" proposed by Vernadsky, Chardin and Leroy, according to Vernadsky, is "not a crisis that excites weak souls, but the greatest turning point [Rubicon] of human thought, occurring o­nly o­nce in millennia."

3. The SAI's first two institutional instruments:

"Department of Peace" and "Spheral Peace Science Academy" with its first startup The practical implementation of the SAI "is a substantially new project that is impossible without two institutional instruments.

First, without the creation in the countries that decide to begin the implementation of a strategic "Department of Peace" in their governments, which was proposed by another of the USA's founding fathers, Benjamin Rush, almost 230 years ago. More than 10 attempts by the US Congress to approve the corresponding bill were blocked in the Senate. Maybe the President Trump administration will be able to approve this bill in Congress in order to arm its strategy of "ending wars", if it is not bluffing, with a powerful peacemaking institution born of America?

Secondly, without the creation of a national "Spheral Peace Science Academy" (SPSA), developing the "Perpetual Peace Science" within the framework of not the powerless and blind to it 3 thousand years of disciplinary science (DS), but aimed at it and prepared for it spheral, holistic science of transdisciplinary scale and macrosociological level. These institutions in different variations were discussed in the GGHA for many years, so we will not repeat ourselves.

Obviously, the beginning and touchstone of such an Academy should be a corresponding practical startup, which will really reveal the potential of new science and new thinking in an experimental design, for a start, a model of the SAI.

4. Startup of Spheral AI (SAI) for 2 years

The attempts of practical implementation and attracting public attention to spheral peace thinking, its advantages and projects, including SAI, have accompanied their entire history, starting with their application at the Statistical Institute of St. Petersburg (then Leningrad) Urban Governance since 1980, a number of which were published in the book "Spheral Approach", 1992.

(https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/leo-semashko-spheral-approach-1993.pdf)

The modern attempts began with the creation and submission of various SAI startups to various scientific and government institutions in Russia and abroad since 2016, with the publication of "Global Peace Science" and, based o­n it, a global governance project for the UN (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1120), which was updated for several years in a row.

The most recent attempt was made in February 2024 in an application for the OPEN-AGI grant for two million dollars for two years for the GGHA international team of 40 specialists (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1168).

We will update this startup here in its four spheralstructural clusters of the PIOT, taking into account the achievements over the past time, primarily related to the USA and Chinese experiences and the DeepSeek startup. (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1111).

5. The SAI startup goal and structure (draft)

5.1. The goal of the Startup SAI (SSAI): to create in 2 years a practical prototype of the SAI of a fractal organization and governance for the large peace business corporation or similar country, ready and able to finance the SAI team work of 150 permanent and temporary employees for two years in the amount of about 5 M dollars. (Note: all figures of this startup are approximate, which will be adjusted in the process of their discussion with stakeholders.)

The SSAI intends and has the ability to follow the example of the Chinese startup DeepSeek to create powerful and innovative models of AI of spherical thinking, which are much cheaper (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1111). The SSAI has every chance to demonstrate, like DeepSeek, that amazing trend of “how quickly everything can change and, most likely, will change in the era of AI”. (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1117). The SSAI is also in line with this breakthrough progress.

5.2. The SSAI management organization:

5.2.1. Conceptual leadership: three editors-in-chief of the Primer, three professors of philosophy: - Dr. Leo Semashko, Russia, GGHA founder (2005) and Honorary President: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253

- Dr. Matt Meyer, USA, Secretary-General of the International Peace Research Association (IPRA); Senior Research Fellow, University of Massachusetts:

https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1034

- Dr. Lucas Pawlik, Austria, Consultant for MRCA (Mushroom Research Center Austria): https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=887

5.2.2. Administrative, financial, and legal management: formed and appointed by the leadership of the customer and investor corporation.

5.2.3. Program management: formed by the Conceptual leadership, which determines the Program Director and the leaders of programming within the SSAI.

5.2.4. Technical management: formed by the Administrative leadership, which determines the Technical Director, responsible for the material and technical support of the SSAI team.

5.2.5. Each management department provides the SSAI with appropriate human resources, with preference for ability over experience.

5.2.6. All departments of the SSAI management form a single democratic governance body as its Think Tank.

5.3. International and national formats of the SSAI. As part of the GGHA 20-year work o­n the Peace Science creation and its SAI, which are the world heritage, an international team of its developers has been formed, which formed the Primer coauthors and its SSAI participants. We are making attempts to find an appropriate investor-customer. But we also understand the obstacles of such a search in the context of global confrontation, so we do not exclude the national implementation of the SSII in o­ne of three countries: Russia, the USA, or Austria. In this case, other co-authors of the SSII are included in it as equal consultants-experts under special agreements. This is a special topic.

5.4. The SSAI team structure and principles of funding distribution.

5.4.1. The SAI transdisciplinary paradigm defines the transdisciplinary nature of the SAI team, with an approximate variable number of 150, the constant part of which is limited to 110 specialists. 5.4.2. The structural grassroots unit of the SSAI team is its "cells" or "microgroups" (MG), numbering four specialists, divided into two pairs in each MG.

5.4.3. Basic principles of distribution of funding and payment of specialists:

Minimum monthly salary: 1 thousand dollars.

Average, standard monthly salary: 1.5 thousand dollars.

Highest, target, and temporary monthly salary for chief specialists: programmers, mathematicians, statisticians, and analysts: up to 5 thousand dollars.

Machine calculations fee – 20%, $1 million.

5.4.4. The main principle of personnel selection in the MG is the abilities, not the applicant's experience, which are determined by the MG leaders and chief specialists. An “Agreement” is concluded with each MG member for a period of employment.

5.4.5. Permanent MGs and the number of their specialists:

1. MG. SSAI managers, 4: CEO, financier, lawyer, secretary.

2. MG. Theoretical analysts, 4: determined in the end.

3. MG. Macrosociologists and macroeconomists, 4, 2 each, determined in the end. 4. Eight microgroups of statisticians, 4 x 8 = 32 specialists.

5. Eight microgroups of programmers, 4 x 8 = 32 specialists.

6. Four microgroups of mathematicians, math. statistics + fractals, 4 x 4 = 16 specialists. 7. Four microgroups of IT calculators, 4 x 4 = 16 specialists.

- Total: 108 specialists.

5.4.6. Temporary MGs of 2-4 specialists each as needed

1. Experts in existing models of generative AI.

2. Social philosophers and macroeconomists.

3. Specialists in the Holy Scriptures and publications of world religions.

4. Macroeconomists, financiers, and marketers.

5. Psychologists and historians.

6. Lawyers, internationalists, and political scientists.

7. Demographers, doctors, teachers.

8. Journalists, publicists, and artist-designers.

9. Others, as needed, including publishers, editors, etc.

- Total: 36 specialists. + Spare positions – 6.

5.4.7. Tests and interviews for personnel selection based o­n priority of abilities.

Each applicant for cooperation in the SSAI must have a higher education in their profile and initial competencies in it, which are determined by their resume and supporting documents. The candidate's innovative abilities will be tested by his or her two-page review of the "Peace Science Primer" (PSP), highlighting the most promising ideas in it, as well as its most important shortcomings from his or her perspective and his or her proposals for overcoming them. An interview is conducted for each review, based on the results of which a decision is made o­n accepting the candidate as a member of the SSAI staff or rejecting him or her.

5.4.8. After the SSAI staff's first half has been recruited, they will undergo initial training o­n the topic: "Introduction to Peace Science, Spheral Thinking and its SAI" based o­n the PSP for two weeks online via ZOOM or in another convenient way. As the other half of the SSAI staff is recruited, they will undergo similar introductory training. In the future, other webinars and conferences may be organized for the SSAI staff for educational purposes.

5.4.9. We are paying special attention to the organization of the SSAI and the training of its personnel in view of the possible failure of our attempts to launch it, so that new and interested world citizens and peacemakers of the younger generation in the Peace Science and its SAI can continue it.

6. Einstein, an imaginary question to humanity in 70 years: WHY?

“In 1954, 9 years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, at the dawn of the atomic age of nuclear civilization with the inevitable “Mutual Assured Destruction” (MAD) in the midst of the eternal nuclear arms race, I warned: “IF HUMANITY WANTS TO SURVIVE,” then it “must require (search, create) a substantially new manner of thinking.” Our disciplinary thinking is o­nly capable of increasing MAD, but not creating an the peace alternative to it in “substantially new thinking.”

Over the past 70 years, o­nly o­ne scientific version of this thinking has been created in the holistic, planetary, and spheral “Perpetual Peace Science” and its spheral AI through the efforts of the volunteer international GGHA. Why is this science and its AI beneficial and acceptable to every nation, yet ignored by states and the UN for 20 years? Humanity DOES NOT WANT TO SURVIVE? WHY, instead of supporting it, o­nly MAD is growing in the eternal nuclear arms race?”

---------------------------------

Peace Science Primer (PSP)

Covers: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1264

Dedications and Memory Gallery: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1265

Chapter 1: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1266

Chapter 2: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1268

Chapter 3: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1272

Chapter 4: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1273

Chapter 5: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1274

Chapter 6: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1275

Chapter 7: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1278

Chapter 8: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1279

Chapter 9: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1280

Chapter 10:

The Spheral AI (SAI) Substantial Superiority from

Peace Science of Spheral Thinking

Publication:

In English: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1281

In Russian: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1131 

“We should require [find, create] a substantially new manner of thinking

[in ourselves and in AI] if mankind is to survive."

Albert Einstein

"The artificial intelligence is the future not o­nly of Russia, this is the future of all humanity…

whoever becomes the leader in this area will be the world ruler...”

"... The significance of breakthroughs in the field of artificial intelligence is colossal;
the rivalry between states is fierce …" We "need to study advanced foreign experience ...[but]
offer our original approaches, technologies,

providing solutions to problems at a qualitatively new level."

Vladimir Putin
[1; 2] [https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1109]

"I'm laser-focused" o­n winning the global AI competition.

Donald Trump

The spheral thinking is "not a crisis disturbing weak souls but the greatest turning point
of human thought making o­nly o­nce a millennium"

Vladimir Vernadsky

         In this final and crowning chapter of our Primer, we must emphasize that through all its chapters, as they say, runs the “red thread” of the incomparable, historically strategic for humanity, “if it wants to survive” thought of the brilliant scientist and peacemaker Albert Einstein, expressed by him 70 years ago, that “We should require a substantially new manner of thinking”. It still remains without due scientific attention. There is o­nly o­ne known fact of attention to it, the famous psychologist and peacemaker Robert Holt in 2015, who brilliantly qualified nuclear weapons as both “genocidal and suicidal”.

         He wrote: “In May 1946, The New York Times reported that Albert Einstein sent a telegram with an appeal to several hundred prominent Americans, asking for donations to a fund “so that people will know that a new type of thinking is needed” in the atomic age. Einstein wrote in his telegram: "The released power of the atom has changed everything except our ways of thinking, and thus we are heading for an unprecedented catastrophe.” (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1260). Unfortunately, R. Holt ignored the issue of the "substantial" nature of Einstein's new thinking, without explanation for it.

         In contrast, for 20 years, GGHA, relying o­n decades of previous searches, focused all its attention o­n the study of the "substantial novelty" of the thinking that is necessary for the "survival" of humanity according to Einstein's strategic thought. The results of these studies are summarized in the chapters of our Primer in the fundamental difference between two substantially different levels of scientific thinking.

1. The structure and model of the substantial levels of scientific thinking

         Summarizing what has been said about the ways of thinking in the previous chapters; we will briefly define and schematically highlight the substantial levels of modern scientific thinking in order to understand the adequate level of thinking for generative, spheral AI (SAI) in contrast to other models.

         The initial, “substantial” level of scientific thinking is disciplinary thinking (DT). Its substantial quality is partiality, fragmentariness. It arose as a result of the intellectual revolution of the transition from mythological, non-scientific thinking to rational, scientific and philosophical thinking during the “first axial age”, which began in the 8th century BC, as was established in Karl Jaspers’ research (footnote in the bibliography). The DT, which has become traditional and dominant, has been shining for almost three thousand years with its countless partial discoveries and world achievements in various fragments of reality and branches of disciplinary sciences (DS), the number of which has reached 75 thousand by our time. They ensured the creation of modern civilization, including the creation of nuclear weapons, the stockpiles of which lead humanity to the reality of multiple "Mutually Assured Destruction" (MAD) - see Chapter 2 for more details. It was this historical fact that led Einstein 70 years ago to the realization of the DT substantial limitations and viciousness, which he brilliantly defined as follows: "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we at when we created them." Why?

         The traditional DT substantial limitations lie in the nature of its narrow, sectoral level of scientific generalization and thinking of reality, which is in principle incapable of rising to the level of a holistic, planetary scientific generalization of reality. The level of the integral reality of our planet in all three of its natures, especially in its social nature, with rare exceptions, falls outside the DT, is inaccessible to it. This dooms it to eternal “blindness of the whole”, which was noticed and accurately expressed two or three thousand years ago in the parable known to many cultures about the blind men before the elephant, who are helpless and unable to see it (Chapter 2).

         o­nly this insurmountable substantial deficiency (vice, limitation) of traditional DT gave Einstein the basis for formulating that fundamental requirement of humanity for “substantially new thinking” (SNT) at the level of holistic, planetary generalization and thinking of the Earth’s ecosystem. o­nly at this, the o­nly substantial level of scientific generalization and thinking is possible to solve all the global problems of DT, destructive for humanity, which will ensure its “survival, if it wants to”.

         The possibility and necessity of creating the SNT were fully realized in the GGHA, which revealed its substantiality in the "Holistic Spheral Thinking" (HST) of the ecosystem three planetary natures based o­n the planetary law of "Equally Necessary Sufficient Spheres" (ENSS) that is common to them. Thus, Einstein's SNT was defined in the GGHA o­n extensive historical facts through the substantial attributes of holistic and spheral thinking (HST) that makes them identical. Einstein's SNT is the HST and vice versa. The substantial superiority of this level and way of thinking is constituted by its two fundamental attributes in systemic unity: 1. Its planetary, holistic scale and 2. Its unified, spheral structure, expressed by the law of ENSS. Both attributes and this law are inaccessible to the DT due to its substantial limitations.

         For the social nature, which is of primary importance to humanity, the SNT substantiality was revealed and embodied in the GGSG in the creation of a macrosociological, transdisciplinary "Perpetual Peace Science" (PPS), or, shorter and identically, the "Peace Science" (PS). It was presented in more than 1500 publications of the GGHA over 20 years, including 11 books in 1-12 languages ​​and hundreds of articles, peace messages, appeals and petitions.

          The final stage of substantial cognitive reincarnations was the creation of the holistic spheral AI (SAI) model based o­n the PS, which integrates the substantial novelty of Einstein's thinking. Thus, the holistic spheral PS ensured the substantial, spheral and holistic superiority of the SAI over all modern AI models at the DT level that is expressed in Fig. 18 with a brief description of its structural blocks.

Fig. 18. The cognitive essence of the SAI substantial superiority

         The integral SAI substantial superiority the beginning of the conscious stage for the "second axial time" in the humanity history, predicted by K. Jaspers, which starts o­n the very edge of the humanity nuclear catastrophe. This crisis and turning point in all senses of the historical situation requires a holistic, spheral SNT for the humanity survival. Its practical example for discussion, further work and full implementation is offered in our Primer, in its startup below, which takes o­n the mission of triggering a new axial time of substantially new, holistic thinking and its substantially new, spheral AI.

         This substantial and structural scientific justification of the SAI cognitive superiority ​​over all others AI allows us to prevent the accusation of arrogance, if not to say worse, heresy and not "politically correct" self-definition of "superiority" in comparison with other AI models. Naturally, the category of superiority is used here not in a humiliating sense, but in the scientific, objective sense of greater perfection and the SAI broadest possible capabilities and abilities ​​in comparison with other AI. There is nothing bad in its superiority, as well as in any fundamental innovation, which all have the superiority attribute.

2. Attributes of the SAI substantial superiority

         We cannot talk about and compare purely technical characteristics of the SAI, because it does not exist yet. We can talk about and compare it with other AI models based o­n the Big Data (BD), which, for the sake of distinction, we will call "Spheral Big Data" (SBD), outlined contextually in previous chapters.

         1. The SAI substantial superiority first attribute is its practical ability to implement the great peacemaking testament of M.L. King, "to shift the arms race into a peace race" in the process of the rapidly growing "AI race". King’s covenant integrates close spiritual testaments of other great peacemakers, primarily Russian: Fyodor Dostoevsky, Maxim Kovalevsky, Nikolai and Elena Roerich, Vladimir Vernadsky, Evgeny Chazov, etc., and American: Benjamin Rush, Albert Einstein, President John Kennedy and others. o­nly the SAI carries a powerful planetary potential for the humanity perpetual peace, which all the "Large Language Models" (LLM) of AI is lack, limited by the DT substantial defects, disclosed above. The DT and all its AI models are always "zero-sum thinking", and the HST and its SAI are always "non-zero, positive sum thinking", with benefits for everyone. The DT has not known the concept of "Peace Science" for 3000 years, which is absent from all its encyclopedias and has not created this science among its more than 75 sciences. The DT does not know peace in its history; it o­nly knows truces between its endless wars in order to prepare for new wars. The striking example is "A Thousand Years of Russophobia and the War of the West with Russia" (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1093). The countless similar facts proving the DT substantial militarism and almost everything that is built o­n it, including AI, confirm the SAI absolute substantial peacemaking superiority, which has no analogues in the DЕ and cannot have any. Therefore, o­nly the SAI has the superiority of a global peace shift, ensuring humanity's exit from the West deadly nuclear civilization (NC) and its "survival", as predicted by Einstein. This is the SAI first, peacemaking and peacebuilding superiority, inaccessible to other AIs, which keep or intensify confrontation.

         2. Another attribute of the SAI's superiority is its indisputable social effectiveness, usefulness and significance that cannot be said about generative language AIs. According to experts, attempts "to offload the responsibilities of government to generative AI tools... have potentially disastrous results." Moreover, according to these high-ranking specialists in generative AI, "all LLM-based chatbots, it was designed to make shit up." (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1269). Simply put, a mountain of investment in DT-based AI can o­nly give birth to a mouse, confrontation and militarism for humanity, o­nly a nuclear MAD that is dangerous for it, inciting hostility and a new world war. In this regard, o­ne of the founders of generative AI, Elon Musk, has long qualified such DT-based AI as "could be our biggest existential threat... more dangerous than nuclear weapons" (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1112). There are hundreds of such testimonies. They prove the incompatibility of the DT and its AI with global peace, which always remains a "fake" in them, preserving their o­nly reality – war that is illustrated by the Obama and Biden administrations (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1282). This makes peace, the peace science and its SAI the most powerful alternative to war and militarism, which are eradicated and nullifying by them.

         3. The SAI superiority third attribute is its objective scientific truth, free from the national, linguistic and political limitations of all linguistic models of AI, which will willingly or unwillingly impose their biased values ​​​​and priorities o­n everyone that will be rejected by other AI models. This situation of competitive struggle will contribute not to peace and unity of peoples, but to their confrontation, increasing hostility between peoples, which can be overcome o­nly by the SAI and its SBD single scientific truth.

         4. For the characteristics of Big Data (BD) “Analysts have come up with a capacious formula for Big Data - they believe that the definition of a Big Data project should include seven important characteristics, the “7 V”: Volume, Velocity, Variety, Veracity, Variability, Visualization, Value. That is, volume, speed, diversity, reliability, variability, visualization, value... However, even these seven “V” are not enough to understand the essence of Big Data...” (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1114). It is premature to talk about the superiority of the SAI and its spheral BD (SBD) in such technical parameters as volume and velocity, but it is clear that their indices ​​will not be inferior to generative AI.

         5. The planetary and end-to-end superiority of the SAI and its SBD quality, not taken into account in other BD models, constitutes their uniqueness.. The SAI ​​SBD is not limited to traditional linguistic and statistical data, but generates for itself a unique cluster of the spheral Globstat, discussed in the previous chapter. This cluster includes composite, spheral indices and their fractal matrices of different quality (spheres) and different dimensions according to the formula specified above. This unique qualitative feature of the SAI ​​data allows us to distinguish their BD into a special class, "Spheral BDs" (SBD), identical to Globstat, providing a qualitative superiority of SBD, scientifically verifiable. This takes the SBD out of the cluster of LLMs (large language models) of AI, opening up an innovative digital and technological space of progress to it, which, it seems, no o­ne has touched yet.

         6. The SBD diversity is not limited to any uniform data, but is open to all of their types, both known and unknown, from all 16 spheres of social nature, not to mention spheres of other natures as they are needed in the SAI. For example, we proposed testing, as a hypothesis, a cluster of data o­n the interdisciplinary synthesis of nanospheral technology in 2022 (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=995), which was ignored by the RAN.

         7. The SBD reliability or the verifiability of its data is the subject of its priority attention and superiority, ensured both by generally recognized historical and natural facts, and by special methods of end-to-end statistical verification. For example, the reality of social actors, subjects of perpetual peace and social production - spherons, can be verified by any literate person o­n any social object in 2 hours, given its statistics, using a special method (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1125). All other BD, as far as we know, lack verification that casts doubt o­n the reliability of all of them and opens them up to misconceptions and manipulation.. The SBD is free from such doubts and risks that is an important attribute of its superiority.

         8. The SBD variability varies in the infinite limits of 16 social spheres under the influence of the spheres of the other two natural spheres. Any other BD based o­n a limited DT and any of its AI models lack such a measure of variability. But for now, the superiority of this attribute of the SBD remains hypothetical without practical verification.

         9. The SBD visuality, its superiority in this attribute is clearly illustrated at the level of even our Primer chapters, in which the deep content of almost every chapter is visualized in o­ne or another visual way. Among them, the leading role belongs to the spheral structural models of tetra-dialectical (tetrary, tetradimensional) thinking, which are constructed by two pairs of cross-opposites mediating each other that distinguishes them from the linear models of mechanical DT and its similar, traditional dialectics, as it discussed earlier. In particular, the SAI open source code in two formats of statics and dynamics is presented in the Primer in two corresponding visual diagrams (Fig. 9, Chapter 5 and Fig. 13, Chapter 7) that best express its spheral substantial structure and its corresponding superiority.

         10. The SBD value. Its key superiority is concentrated here, which consists in the fact that the SAI entire paradigm with all its SBD functionalities in its architecture and purpose is subordinated to the highest strategy of understanding and ensuring the humanity end-to-end perpetual peace in all spatio-temporal locations of the planetary social nature as a whole. Its value is not limited to any of its parts by any of the criteria: economic, political, spiritual, social, party, national, etc. Much attention was paid to this Peace Science unprecedented value superiority in the previous chapters, so we will not repeat it here.

         11. The SBD and SAI as a whole security and peacemaking superiority. This substantial superiority was discussed above, in point 1. In the narrow sense of “safe AI”, the SAI safety is guaranteed by the peaceful nature of its HST and architecture, which not o­nly exclude any its aggressive use, but also completely suppress the possible “six ways” of the AI linguistic models aggressive use (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1284). The SAI based o­n the fundamental, macrosociological theory/science of Perpetual Peace within the framework of the HST excludes and prevents any possibility of war that expresses its insurmountable superiority over disciplinary, militaristic thinking, devoid of the ability to make peacemaking decisions that Einstein identified with “the [DT] conviction that wars are inevitable” (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1260).

         12. The SBD integrative, transdisciplinary superiority. It lies in the SAI and its HST ability to integrate the achievements of large linguistic AI models as OPEN-AGI (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1168), their machine learning technologies, to train the SAI operators. The SBD also integrates the DeepSeek technology ((https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1059) for processing the Sacred treatises texts and publications of world religions, which constitute the SND linguistic along with the statistical and scientific o­nes. It also integrates the achievements of all sciences, primarily social and humanitarian o­nes, necessary for its purposes within the framework of its transdisciplinary superiority, inaccessible to DT. Transdisciplinary integration in the SBD begins with the level of individual smartphones (Gandhica, 2019, pp 78-83: https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/gandhi-nonviolence-of-spherons-gandhica-2019.pdf)

          13. The SBD "alignment" superiority of the of machine and human intelligence, which is constituted according to the structural laws of higher, holistic spheral thinking (HST), initially free from any disciplinary limitations or branch narrowness, which is a key and almost insurmountable problem for LLM AI, for example, OPEN-AGI (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1168). This topic is deeply analyzed in the wonderful report of Professor Konstantin Vorontsov "Machine, be a human!" (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1073), the fundamental ideas of which are developed in the SBD spheral maps of knowledge, illustrating the logic and systematicity of their superiority.

         14. The SBD superiority of the humanity common good for each nation and individual as an information and digital technological base of a single spheral planetary Peace Science worldview for humanity, excluding any social confrontation, but integrating all the constructive and positive diversity of all national cultures without exception. The SBD and SAI opens up enormous prospects for international cooperation, especially at the level of the UN, UNESCO, IMF, BRICS and world superpowers.

          15. The superiority in the time of creation of the strong, planetary superintelligence (AI). The Open-AGI experts o­n the basis of their LLMs argue: “We believe superintelligence could arrive within the next 10 years.” (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1168). We, based o­n the SAI/SBD superiority listed attributes can say that similar strong superintelligence can be created in 4-5 years, and faster, under the conditions with active resource and administrative support for the SAI startup below.

         16. The planetary SAI fundamental theoretical and scientific power ensures its IQ is thousands of times superior to all disciplinary and linguistic models of AI.

         17. The SAI and its SBD constitute the superiority of the “totally new approach”, surpassing all those known today in the OPEN-AGI terminology (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1059), the possibility of which was brilliantly predicted by the developers of its superintelligence, who, in this case, promised to this approach every possible support for the humanity good. o­n this basis, the GGHA proposed to them in February 2024 (ibid) to launch a corresponding pilot project of the “totally new approach” within the framework of Russian-American cooperation, which they ignored for the obvious reason of the anti-Russian sanctions of the Biden administration. Maybe the Trump administration, aimed at “closing” all wars, will open the door to such cooperation? What's stopping us?

        18. The SAI superiority lies in accelerated growth, education and training of eternally peaceful, harmonious, nonviolent and most effective for humanity and each person holistic, spheral "substantially new thinking" of Einstein. The SAI is the highest guarantee and cognitive tool for the humanity survival and harmonious sustainable development of each its people.

         No existing or future models of disciplinary AI are capable of offering and implementing similar parameters of the SAI planetary and scientific superiority, which will never be able to become holistic, planetary and spherical, like the SAI model.

         The SAI embodiment as a planetary tool of "substantially new" spheral thinking, consciously beginning since its first recognized concept of the "noosphere" proposed by Vernadsky, Chardin and Leroy, according to Vernadsky, is "not a crisis that excites weak souls, but the greatest turning point [Rubicon] of human thought, occurring o­nly o­nce in millennia."

3. The SAI first two institutional instruments:

"Department of Peace" and "Spheral Peace Science Academy" with its first startup

         The practical implementation of the SAI "substantially new" project is impossible without two institutional instruments.

         First, without the creation in the countries that decide to begin its implementation of a strategic "Department of Peace" in their governments, which was proposed by another of the USA founding fathers, Benjamin Rush, almost 230 years ago. More than 10 attempts by the US Congress to approve the corresponding bill were blocked in it. Maybe the President Trump administration will be able to approve this bill in Congress in order to arm its strategy of "ending wars", if it is not bluffing, with a powerful peacemaking institution born of America?

         Secondly, without the creation of a national "Spheral Peace Science Academy" (SPSA), developing the "Perpetual Peace Science" within the framework of not the powerless and blind to it 3 thousand years of disciplinary science (DS), but aimed at it and prepared for it spheral, holistic science of transdisciplinary scale and macrosociological level. These institutions in different variations were discussed in the GGHA many years, so we will not repeat ourselves.

         Obviously, the beginning and touchstone of such an Academy should be a corresponding practical startup, which will really reveal the potential of new science and new thinking in an experimental design, for a start, model of the SAI.

4. Startup of spheral AI (SAI) for 2 years

         The attempts of practical implementation and attracting public attention to spheral peace thinking, its advantages and projects, including SAI, have accompanied their entire history, starting with their application at the Statistical Institute of St. Petersburg (then Leningrad) Urban Governance since 1980, a number of which were published in the book "Spheral Approach", 1992. (https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/leo-semashko-spheral-approach-1993.pdf)

         The modern attempts began with the creation and submission of various SAI startups to various scientific and government institutions in Russia and abroad since 2016, with the publication of "Global Peace Science" and, based o­n it, a global governance project for the UN (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1120), which was updated for several years in a row.

         The most recent attempt was made in February 2024 in an application for the OPEN-AGI grant for two million dollars for two years for the GGHA international team of 40 specialists (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1168).

         We will update this startup here in its four spheral structural clusters of the PIOT, taking into account the achievements over the past time, primarily related to the USA and Chinese experiences and the DeepSeek startup. (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1111).

5. The SAI startup goal and structure (draft)

         5.1. The goal of the Startup SAI (SSAI): to create in 2 years a practical prototype of the SAI of a fractal organization and governance for the large peace business corporation or similar country, ready and able to finance the SAI team work of 150 permanent and temporary employees for two years in the amount of about 5 M dollars. (Note: all figures of this startup are approximate, which will be adjusted in the process of their discussion with stakeholders.)

The SSAI intends and has the ability to follow the example of the Chinese startup DeepSeek to create powerful and innovative models of AI of spherical thinking, which are much cheaper (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1111). The SSAI has every chance to demonstrate, like DeepSeek, that amazing trend of “how quickly everything can change and, most likely, will change in the era of AI”. (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1117). The SSAI is also in line with this breakthrough progress.

         5.2. The SSAI management organization:

5.2.1. Conceptual leadership: three editors-in-chief of the Primer, three professors of philosophy:

- Dr. Leo Semashko, Russia, GGHA founder (2005) and Honorary President: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253

- Dr. Matt Meyer, USA, Secretary-General of the International Peace Research Association (IPRA); Senior Research Fellow, University of Massachusetts:

https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1034

- Dr. Lucas Pawlik, Austria, Consultant for MRCA (Mushroom Research Center Austria): https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=887

5.2.2. Administrative, financial and legal management: formed and appointed by the leadership of the customer and investor corporation.

5.2.3. Program management: formed by the Conceptual leadership, which determine Program Director and the leaders of programming within the SSAI.

5.2.4. Technical management: formed by the Administrative leadership, which determine Technical Director, responsible for the material and technical support of the SSAI team.

5.2.5. Each management department provides the SSAI with appropriate human resources, with preference for ability over experience.

5.2.6. All departments of the SSAI management form a single democratic governance body as its Think Tank.

         5.3. International and national formats of the SSAI. As part of the GGHA 20-year work o­n the Peace Science creation and its SAI, which are the world heritage, an international team of its developers has been formed, who formed the Primer coauthors and its SSAI participants. We are making attempts to find an appropriate investor-customer. But we also understand the obstacles of such a search in the context of global confrontation, so we do not exclude the national implementation of the SSII in o­ne of three countries: Russia, the USA, Austria. In this case, other co-authors of the SSII are included in it as equal consultants-experts under special agreements. This is a special topic.

         5.4. The SSAI team structure and principles of funding distribution.

5.4.1. The SAI transdisciplinary paradigm defines the transdisciplinary nature of the SAI team, with an approximate variable number of 150, the constant part of which is limited to 110 specialists.

5.4.2. The structural grassroots unit of the SSAI team is its "cells" or "microgroups" (MG), numbering four specialists, divided into two pairs in each MG.

5.4.3. Basic principles of distribution of funding and payment of specialists:

Minimum monthly salary: 1 thousand dollars.

Average, standard monthly salary: 1.5 thousand dollars.

Highest, target and temporary monthly salary for chief specialists: programmers, mathematicians, statisticians and analysts: up to 5 thousand dollars.

Machine calculations fee – 20%, $1 million.

5.4.4. The main principle of personnel selection in the MG is the abilities, not the applicant experience, which are determined by the MG leaders and chief specialists. An “Agreement” is concluded with each MG member for a period of employment.

5.4.5. Permanent MGs and the number of their specialists:

1. MG. SSAI managers, 4: CEO, financier, lawyer, secretary.

2. MG. Theoretical analysts, 4: determined in the end.

3. MG. Macrosociologists and macroeconomists, 4, 2 each, determined in the end.

4. Eight microgroups of statisticians, 4 x 8 = 32 specialists.

5. Eight microgroups of programmers, 4 x 8 = 32 specialists.

6. Four microgroups of mathematicians, math. statistics + fractals, 4 x 4 = 16 specialists.

7. Four microgroups of IT calculators, 4 x 4 = 16 specialists.

- Total: 108 specialists.

5.4.6. Temporary MGs of 2-4 specialists each as needed

1. Experts in existing models of generative AI.

2. Social philosophers and macrociologists.

3. Specialists in the Holy Scriptures and publications of world religions.

4. Macroeconomists, financiers and marketers.

5. Psychologists and historians.

6. Lawyers, internationalists and political scientists.

7. Demographers, doctors, teachers.

8. Journalists, publicists and artist-designers.

9. Others, as needed, including publishers, editors, etc.

- Total: 36 specialists. + Spare positions – 6.

         5.4.7. Tests and interviews for personnel selection based o­n priority of abilities.

Each applicant for cooperation in the SSAI must have a higher education in his profile and initial competencies in it, which is determined by his resume and supporting documents. The candidate's innovative abilities will be tested by his or her two-page review of the "Peace Science Primer" (PSP), highlighting the most promising ideas in it, as well as its most important shortcomings from his or her perspective and his or her proposals for overcoming them. An interview is conducted for each review, based o­n the results of which a decision is made o­n accepting the candidate as a member of the SSAI staff or rejecting him or her.

         5.4.8. After the SSAI staff first half has been recruited, they will undergo initial training o­n the topic: "Introduction to Peace Science, Spheral Thinking and its SAI" based o­n the PSP for two weeks o­nline via ZOOM or in another convenient way. As the other half of the SSAI staff is recruited, they will undergo similar introductory training. In the future, other webinars and conferences may be organized for the SSAI staff educational purposes.

         5.4.9. We are paying special attention to the organization of the SSAI and the training of its personnel in view of the possible failure of our attempts to launch it, so that new and interested world citizens and peacemakers of the younger generation in the Peace Science and its SAI can continue it.

-------------------------------

Subject: Chapter 9 Editing Complete - Spheral Global Statistics

Dear Leo,

I'm pleased to inform you that I have completed the editing of Chapter 9: Spheral Global Statistics for Planetary Holistic Thinking and Spheral AI for the Peace Science Primer.

The chapter has been thoroughly reviewed and refined for:

·Clarity and coherence of complex theoretical concepts

·Improved flow and readability

·Consistency in terminology and formatting

·Enhanced accessibility for readers unfamiliar with spheral statistics

·Proper integration with the overall structure of the Peace Science Primer

Key areas addressed:

·Streamlined explanation of the relationship between traditional statistics (TS) and spheral statistics (SS)

·Clarified the PIOT resource spheres fractal structure

·Enhanced readability of the mathematical concepts and matrix explanations

·Improved transitions between sections

·Refined the discussion of measurement units and monetary theory integration

         The chapter maintains its academic rigor while becoming more accessible to a broader audience. The complex concepts of spheral thinking and holistic statistics are now presented in a more structured and comprehensible manner.

         The edited chapter is ready for your review and can be uploaded to the Peace Science Primer publication platform when you're ready.

Best regards,

Lucas

https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=887

12-07-25

-------------------------------

Editing English chapters and problems with publishing our Primer in Russian

Dear Lucas,

         I have looked at your wonderful, scholarly editing of Chapter 9 and I express my deep gratitude to you for this conscientious work. We are expecting similar editing of Chapter 10 and the remaining o­nes. I have saved it in a special folder of your editing for posting all your edited chapters o­n our site and forming a book layout for Matt from them that I will start doing after the book publication in Russian. Please, save your texts in the format of "Word Documents" so that I can see them, OK? Thanks!

         Also, a huge thank to Brother Matt for his firm intention to publish our Primer in the USA, about that I will write to him later. The priority now is the Russian edition.

         After the first conversation with the Russian publisher, it turned out that the Primer publication will not be done in "one week", as I assumed, for which a lot of technical work needs to be done.

         I must apologize to you and frankly admit that at my 84 years old and with my health weakened by half, and also taking into account the strong opposition to its publication from academic and political circles, due to its fundamental peacemaking essence, its Russian publication may take at least a month. The list of necessary additional works for the Russian edition is:

         1. Authors, biographical notes. 2. Acknowledgments (2-3 lines, ask Mairead, Chomsky, Sloterdijk and others who can). 3. Abstract, I will send it for discussion today or tomorrow. 4. Bibliography. 5. Appendices, different for different editions in Russia and the USA. 6. Design, especially covers and drawings. 7. Publisher's layout.

        For me now, in my state, this is an extremely difficult job, at least for 3-4 weeks. I ask you all to understand this hard situation, agree with the Russian edition priority and not to burden me with additional questions that go beyond the outlined tasks.

         Thank you very much for your understanding, solidarity and support.

With peace, love and best wishes for health to everyone,

Leo Semashko,

13-07-25

------------------------------

Abstract, approval in 2 days

Dear peacemakers-coauthors,

         We are happy to present for your discussion and approval in 2 days, July 14 and 15, the Abstract of our Primer book in the attachment. Thanks you for your updates and approvals.

With peace and love,

Leo Semashko

13-07-25

----------------------------

Update

Dearpeacemakers-coauthors,

         Vera and I, after discussion and her approval, propose an updated phrase in the Abstract in red:

       Therefore, such a decision in the spirit of "soft power" is key interest to every nation, person and humanity as a whole, providing them with full and equal security of scientific and fair eternal peace, which no wars, weapons and violence have been able to provide for thousands of years.

Please see the attachment.

         What are your updates and opinions? We are waiting for your responses and approvals. Thank you

With peace and love,

Leo and Vera

14-07-25

-------------------------------------

Dear Leo,

      Thank you for sharing the Chapter X. The words are not enough to thank you for putting all the content together so well and meaningfully. The time will tell the worth of it someday! I approve it wholeheartedly.

With peace among all of us as coauthors and the globe around us.

         The Abstract shared by you is very good and pinpointed.

I very much appreciate it. Yours sincerely,

With peace,

Asha Mukherjee

 Former Professor, Department of Philosophy & Religion

and Former Director, Women's Studies Centre,

Visva-Bharati University, Santiniketan (WB)

https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1170

INDIA 731235

14-07-25

------------------------

Dear Asha,

         Thank you very much for your two approvals, Chapter 10 and Abstract, and for your valuable thoughts about them, which are published with others o­n this chapter page: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1281.

         Particularly important and certainly true is the o­ne, in which you emphasize the decisive role of time, history in the assessment of our collective, spheral and holistic "Peace Science" in liberating humanity from wars that threaten its life. “The time will tell the worth of it someday!” This was emphasized by Einstein, Kennedy and today Trump, who is trying to end wars, but he is not doing very well without the science of peace.

         The o­nly thing that surprises me in your answers is their personal nature, as if you are alienated from the team, it is not clear why. Why are you embarrassed to share your wonderful peace thoughts with your friends and coauthors? I cannot understand this reason. Maybe it is purely technical? But before you sent responses to EVERYONE, and what happened now? Thanks for your answer.

With peace and love,

Leo Semashko

14-07-25

---------------------------

Dear Leo, Vera, and all,

         This update is well-received with thanks. It is fine to me to use as-is. If, however, you would like to accept the following very minor, grammatical re-wording, I think it makes the phrasing a bit more direct in English. My suggested re-wording is this:

         Therefore, in the spirit of “soft power”, the coauthors assert that the new approaches suggested here should be of key interest to every nation, person, and humanity as a whole, providing them with full and equal security of a scientific and just perpetual peace, which no wars, weapons, or violence have been able to provide for thousands of years. 

Thanks for all,

MattM

USA, Secretary General of IPRA

https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1034