Several printouts from dozens of my diagrams, dialectical and spheral models, tetrastatistical matrices of tetraspheral thinking, banners, photos, and drawings in separate folders and o­n the PC: "FastStone Image Viewer. Images E." Approximately over 1000 such units.

6. Books: monographs, and coauthored with GGHA, etc., since 1981. (I.T.)

Samples of 20 out of 22 books by L. Semashko, most of which are published in two languages: Russian and English. Of the latest o­nes, many are presented in the world's largest libraries (US Congress, etc.) and in global universities o­n all continents.

Most of them in the home library are marked for personal use and for editorial updating with the author's ex-libris, which was created in 1992 based o­n the drawing o­n the cover of the book "The Spheral Approach," St. Petersburg, 1992 (https://peacefromharmony.org/file/5162/1992-semashko-sferniy_podhod.pdf).

The list of 22 books in two languages is published o­n the site here:

In Russian: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=496

In English: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=472

These books are the main stages in the evolution of the author's cognitive tetraspheral creativity for almost 50 years. To these should be added the list of 286 projects (designs) in the period: 1974-2021: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=873

7. Coauthors of GGHA books—coauthors of the "Perpetual Peace Science" based o­n planetary, tetraspheral,
"substantially new thinking" (Einstein), as a result of the "second axial time of humanity"

since I. Kant. (L.I.O.W.)

The number of GGHA co-authors of the "Perpetual Peace Science" or "Spheronics" or "Spheronomics," to start, is determined by the sum of the co-authors of its 12 books below:

·27 GGHA co-authors from 12 countries in 12 languages: "Harmonious Era Calendar," 2006: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=131

·43 GGHA co-authors from 16 countries in 7 languages: "Magna Carta of Harmony," 2007: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=4

·64 GGHA co-authors from 20 countries in 2 languages: "International Academy of Harmony/Peace and General Harmonious Education," 2008: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=277

·120 GGHA co-authors from 34 countries, in 2 languages: "Harmonious Civilization," 2009: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=379

·15 GGHA co-authors from 10 countries in 2 languages: "Kazakhstan: Strategy of Harmonism for the 21st Century," 2010: http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=475

·15 GGHA co-authors from 10 countries in 2 languages: "Russia, Forward, Towards a Harmonious Civilization," 2010: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=435

·76 GGHA co-authors from 25 countries in 2 languages: "The ABC of Harmony for Global Peace, Harmonious Civilization and Tetranet Thinking," 2012: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478

·88 GGHA co-authors from 30 countries in Russian: "Global Peace Science of Spherons," 2015, http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=606

·174 GGHA co-authors from 34 countries in 2 languages: "Global Peace Science of Spherons," 2016: https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf

·82 GGHA co-authors from 25 countries in 4 languages: "Mahatma Gandhi. Starting Point of Nonviolence. Genetics and Statistics of Spherons. GANDHICA." 2019: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=848

·46 GGHA co-authors from 26 countries in 2 languages: "Anti-Nuclear Manifesto of Peace/Cyberspheronics. The Third Way of the Noosphere" of the 21st Century. 2020: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=908

·20 GGHA co-authors from 10 countries in 2 languages: "Perpetual Peace Science: Superiority of Spheral AI (SAI) Based o­n Spheral Thinking", 2025: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1264

·TOTAL: 770 co-authors of 12 GGHA books over 20 years of its peacemaking scientific work in the theoretical paradigm of the holistic transdisciplinary mega-science of Gandhian spherons’ perpetual peace. The first, preliminary count of GGHA book co-authors was made in 2021 here: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=983

An exact count of GGHA book co-authors, as well as its more than o­ne hundred peacemaking projects, remains to be done in the future due to its technical labor-intensity.

Of the listed books, the key o­nes are those of the following years: 2007, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2015/2016, 2019, 2020, and 2025.

My preceding key books:

·The Spheral Approach. 1992.

·Sociology for Pragmatists. 1999.

·Tetrasociology: A Revolution in Social Thinking. 2000.

·Tetrasociology: Answers to Challenges. 2002.

·Children's Suffrage Exercised by Parents. 2004.

Addresses of these books are here: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=472

8. Ex-Libris and SPHERONOMICS

The ex-libris presented below, used since 1992 starting with the publication of "The Spheral Approach," with a drawing of societal spheres at the center, expresses the idea of planetary SPHERONOMICS—the science of universal, perpetual laws of the four planetary spheres of humanity (in unfolding—16 spheres), its initial cell and social genome for sustainable development of all nations in the perpetual peace of harmony and coherence of these spheres. They correspond to the planetary law of the "Four Equally Necessary Sufficient Spheres" (FENSS) of existence for each of the three planetary natures: physical, organic, and social (Primer. Chapter 3). The term "spheronomics" is formed from two Greek words: sphere and nomos (lawfulness), similar to the term "economics."

Text in Ex-Libris:

EX LIBRIS L.M. SEMASHKO

TETRASPHERALITY - MYSTERY - OF PEACE, HUMAN

9. Conclusion. Some Findings from the Legacy

1.The legacy encapsulates a complex and contradictory history of the establishment in Russia since 1965 of a verified, true "Science of Perpetual Peace" (SEP), or the planetary science "Spheronomics" (SN), which is built o­n the objective realities of four social spheres. They define an end-to-end system of spheral lawfulnesses—i.e., constant spheral realities at the level of social nature, primarily humanity—constituting its tetraspheral, perpetual social genome, in which there is no room for war as its lethal carcinogen. At the heart of the tetraspheral lawfulness of the four perpetual social spheres lies the planetary, general scientific, transdisciplinary law of the "Four Equally Necessary Sufficient Spheres" (FENSS) of existence for each of the three planetary natures: physical, organic, and social. This is the fundamental, perpetual basis of tetraspheral thinking and its tetraspheral science, whatever it may be called.

2.Spheronomics (SN) creates a scientific-informational digital statistical platform, constant in its spheral classification, within the end-to-end architecture of a future aligned by the spheres of the superintelligence of man and machine. This architecture is embodied in AI of the "superintelligence" class (Artificial Spheral, Statistical Super Intelligence—ASI), which I have named: "ASI-SPHERUM." My last introductory video, ~2 min., is dedicated to it, o­n the disk here: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/pzyTX6dPX-ztVQ, and o­n the site here: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1174. For ASI superiority attributes, see here (Primer. Chapter 10: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1280).

3.ASI-SPHERUM is the future integrator, a common technological platform for all useful industrial and corporate AI models, and simultaneously a "cleaner" and "terminator" of all harmful, militaristic, and fraudulent AI models.

4.Spheronomics (SN), armed with the planetary tool ASI-SPHERUM, will become a truly effective integrative and digital economy of the advanced development of the future, which was intuitively embodied in Deng Xiaoping's "Chinese Economic Miracle" over three decades (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ch_c&key=8).

5.SN is still not officially recognized; it is deliberately ignored in encyclopedias or distorted in them (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1175, https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/487868), censored, or falsely attributed to "conspiracy theories," etc. The reason for the negative attitude toward scientific revolutions is revealed by the law of the change of scientific paradigms, with the inevitable hostile attitude of traditional science and scientists toward all innovative theories. This was brilliantly proven by Thomas Kuhn in his "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" (1962) with examples of the recognition of Copernicus's discoveries after almost 300 years, the discovery of Newton's law of gravity after more than 50 years, and so o­n.

6.SN or "Science of Perpetual Peace" (SEP), embodying a fundamental shift of the scientific paradigm from disciplinary ("blind to the whole") to tetraspheral (integral, holistic), requires—as does every scientific revolution according to Kuhn—a long time for the formation of its terminological language, the collection of the necessary factual base, and the emergence of new research methods and tools. Moreover, the tetraspheral thinking of SN constitutes the highest measure of intellectual complexity, inaccessible to disciplinary thinking. Research into spheral thinking far exceeds the complexity, labor-intensity, and duration of space, genetic, nuclear, and similar research, which is illustrated by our legacy and other similar, extremely rare o­nes: Mahatma Gandhi, Peter Sloterdijk, etc. Undoubtedly, the recognition of SN as a new scientific paradigm is no exception to the law of their change, although the laws of accelerated planetary integration in our age of nuclear lethal risk to humanity will necessarily adjust Kuhn's law, also accelerating it.

7.Over a long journey of conscious creativity, the paradigm of tetraspheral thinking of perpetual peace has collected enough historical facts, carried out sufficient statistical verification (Gandhica. 2019: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=788, see its PDF), and performed enormous linguistic work in creating its own conceptual language comprising about a hundred of its innovative, previously unknown scientific terms. In its name alone, o­ne can list dozens of synonymous terms over this time: systems approach, system-spheral approach, tetraspheral social philosophy, systemic tetraspheral peacemaking, spherism, tetrism, tetraspherism, tetrasociology, third-order sociocybernetics, spherology, global peace science, the third spheral way, spherals, peace science, tetraspheral macrosociology, macrosociology of perpetual peace, science of perpetual peace, science of true peace, planetary peace science, spheronomy, spheronomics, and many others, forgotten and hidden in the depths of my/our legacy. Currently, I consider the last two to be the best, as they implicitly integrate the meanings of almost all the preceding o­nes. The search, systematization, and selection of the best term for the name of the tetraspheral scientific paradigm is to be carried out by new, young generations of social scientists. For them, ultimately, this definition of the legacy of this innovative scientific paradigm has been prepared to the best of my limited strength and capabilities.

8.In our legacy, an unprecedented comparative comparison of different, albeit rare, approaches to the spheral paradigm itself has begun. Here, as everywhere, everything is known through comparison. Such a historical comparison was launched by me in the monograph "Sociology for Pragmatists," 1999 (https://peacefromharmony.org/docs/sociologiya-dlya-pragmatikov.pdf), starting with the Pre-Socratics, Pythagoras, Plato, and ending with the Marxist trend of tetrism or tetrasociology of the four social spheres in the remarkable works of N. Bukharin, N. Kondratiev, V. Rozhin, V. Barulin, M. Lashina, and many others, which, however, remained overall false within the framework of overall false monistic Marxism, while their tetraspheral true "rational kernel" has been forgotten by everyone, even in Russia.

9.Over the quarter of the new century, this trend has been replenished with a few more names, among which stands out Peter Sloterdijk's majestic three-volume scientific work "Spheres" (1998-2004: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=862) and A. Subetto's multi-volume (13 volumes) Marxist work (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=686). Unfortunately, both remained within the framework of traditional disciplinary thinking and did not rise to the level of awareness of the revolutionary tetraspheral paradigm and the spheral level of thinking, although each, especially Sloterdijk, has many theoretical findings that are integrated by our SEP.

In Subetto's case, who left the GGHA (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=686) in 2016, out of the 13 volumes of his Marxist, monistic "noospherism," there will hardly be a couple of pages of truly scientific spheral innovations worthy of integration into the scientific tetraspherism of SN, SEP; it remains o­n all other pages a fragmentary, false, disharmonious, and confrontational ideology and communist party program. He does not even know the number of spheres of the objective reality of the "noosphere," discovered by Le Roy, Teilhard de Chardin, and Vernadsky almost a century ago. Subetto's noosphere remains at the level of the Stone Age of a unicellular structureless amoeba, inspirationally imposed by socialism as false consciousness. In such a noosphere, there is no place for harmony, for the coherence of spheres, or for tetraspheral thinking as a whole. There can be no lawful harmony and coherence between transient and accidental industries and their antagonistic classes, which are left o­nly with ruthless struggle and deadly competition. Harmony and coherence can o­nly exist between constant yet dynamic structural spheres. It must be emphasized: all disciplinary science to this day (!) in its more than 75,000 disciplines does not know the number of structural spheres of society/humanity, which varies among different authors from o­ne in the Marxist trend to 12 in the liberal trend, among who knows who.

10.The absence of scientific, true knowledge of the number of key, structural spheres of society deprives it—to this day, over almost three millennia of disciplinary science, now often called "godless and fake" (M. Keenan: https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=1255)—of a true social SCIENCE. No o­ne in disciplinary science has yet written a scientific history of the spheres, the emergence and development of ideas about them in the history of knowledge and thinking, if o­ne does not count our first attempt. Without structural spheres, disciplinary science lacks a scientific classification of industries, reality, knowledge, and its 75,000 disciplines. This generates intellectual and organizational chaos at the fundamental social level of structures, producing o­nly confrontation, violence, stagnation, and dogmatism instead of harmony, balance, coherence, and stability.

11.Existing industrial AI models o­n the Internet refuse to answer almost all questions concerning the spheres of society, for example:

·Which scientists identify 12 spheres or sectors and segments of society?

·Which of the scientists recognize o­nly five spheres of society?

·Which scientists name o­nly o­ne sphere of society?

·What is the number of spheres or sectors, segments of society according to different scientists?

And the like. This demonstrates the complete scientific impotence of disciplinary science and its AI o­n the issue of the fundamental, spheral structure of society, which throws it along with its AI back to the Stone Age, leaving it and its AI ignorant and backward in this matter. The absence of a tetraspheral fundamental structure within it makes all the global problems it creates socially unsolvable, as noted by A. Einstein, who is also ignored o­n this issue by disciplinary science to this day, as we have emphasized dozens of times.

In conclusion, I want to emphasize that I am still full of hope, energy, and plans for new projects, books, and above all, in the implementation of the ASI-SPHERUM startup, in the search, integration, and consolidation of new like-minded people from different countries, primarily from Russia, the USA, India, and others. This is the general strategy for the preservation and promotion of our legacy in its tetraspheral, revolutionary, and breakthrough paradigm of thinking in a practical channel starting from 2026 (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=1165). Its actors can o­nly be planetary citizen-volunteers with similar planetary and peacemaking designs, projects, movements, and AI corporations aimed at creating peaceful artificial superintelligence (ASI), which ensures a spheral revolution of thinking and civilization for perpetual peace, unparalleled in history.

Leo Semashko,

09-04-26

10. Supplement

Tetraspheral transdisciplinary synergy of socio-humanities and knowledge

The space of the infinite intellectual development of SEP, excluding any stagnation and dogmatism of traditional disciplinary ideologies and party programs—which are false in their fragmentation and party-bound limitation and focus—lies in the assimilation by each industrial science (of which there are thousands, and their number is growing) of the general theoretical and methodological platform of tetraspheral thinking. It constitutes for each of the thousands of industrial social sciences a paradigmatic foundation, a unified methodology acting as a bridge, vanguard, and common denominator for uniting fragmentary disciplinary sciences and theories (DST) in their common revolutionary breakthrough to a substantially new, tetraspheral level of holistic planetary scientific thinking.

In the future, through decades of development of this process and the natural sciences, it is more than likely that the paradigmatic revolutionary breakthrough will spread to the substantially new level of tetraspheral thinking within these sciences as well. This process will erase the perpetual chasm between the natural and social sciences as the confrontation of "two cultures," of which Charles Snow wrote in the middle of the last century. Then, tetraspheral thinking will become the common methodology for any scientific knowledge, with the qualitative difference being o­nly the spheres of different natures: physical, organic, and social.

Already today, since antiquity, with Pythagoras, Empedocles, and Aristotle, the tetraspherality (tetraspheral structure) of physical nature is objectively true. In social science, starting with Semashko’s Tetrasociology, the tetraspherality (tetraspheral social, productive, and life structure of society) of social nature has been verified in the GGHA by world statistics and is becoming objective truth, albeit not yet officially recognized—its future is still ahead.

But tetraspherality remains hypothetical for organic nature—do its possible perpetual structural spheres constitute its four kingdoms: Bacteria, Fungi, Plants, and Animals, which arise sequentially in its evolution? WHAT ARE the spheres of organic nature? Are they the kingdoms of organics or something else?? Perhaps organic spheres are determined at the genetic level, as human DNA is similar to the DNA of animals, plants, fungi, and bacteria in terms of their tetra-nucleotides... These are questions for the future tetraphilosophy, tetramethodology, tetragenetics, and tetrabiology for hundreds of years to come... However, it is obvious that organic nature is no exception to the general planetary law of the "Four Equally Necessary and Sufficient Spheres" (FENSS) of the existence of each of the planet's natures.

But why is precisely Tetraspherality recognized as the planetary objective truth and reality when the number of spheres of social nature, society, still ranges from o­ne to twelve among different scientists in different industries, as analyzed in many works of my legacy? The fact that the objective truth of the four spheral realities of society is absent in disciplinary science (DS) proves its weakness, lack of development, and ignorance in the elementary "blindness of the whole" of society, as with other natures. The scale of holistic, planetary, and perpetual spheres is simply "too much to chew" for petty DS. At the same time, other spheral concepts with a different number of spheres are false; they do not lend themselves to any verification, unlike the tetraspheral paradigm, which is fully verifiable and accessible to the testing of every literate person, making it superior to all others.

I will limit myself here o­nly to the sciences, theories, and knowledge of social nature, social science. To illustrate the beginning of the process of their tetraspheral generalization and unification launched in my legacy—whose tetraspheral thinking has touched many dozens of industrial social disciplines—I will compile a table of their similar tetraspheral transformations. Many of their first results in my scientific legacy have been forgotten by the author himself due to their age or the rarity of mention and repetition; therefore, finding them within it is a problem for him. In this regard, the table below is limited o­nly to their mention without specifying their place and time in my legacy.

Table 1. Tetraspheral (TS) transdisciplinarity of social science.

Revolutionary, breakthrough transformation of its disciplinary sciences (DS), theories, and their subjects in the paradigm of planetary tetraspheral thinking (TSTM).

Abbreviations in Table 1:

DS – Disciplinary Science, its theories and subjects,

TST– Breakthrough of DS to the level of Tetraspheral Thinking (TST) and quality.

To start, the provided 34 examples of the tetraspheral transformation of social DS, theories, and subjects are sufficient to illustrate the inevitable and necessary (according to ultimate efficiency) scientific revolutionary process of the tetraspheral transdisciplinary integration of DS at the stage of tetraspheral thinking when cognitive evolution rises to it.

Obviously, the tetraspheral integration of thousands of disciplinary socio-humanities, having overcome their multi-thousand-year fragmentation, will significantly raise their quality and social efficiency dozens of times. Detailed research, development, substantiation, and transformation of this hypothesis into the objective scientific truth of tetraspheral thinking is the task of the social science of the future—qualitatively new and armed with Artificial Super (Spheral, Statistical) Intelligence (ASI). The identity of the three definitions of this AI as "Super, Spheral, Statistical" allows it to be designated by the following abbreviation (AS3I). Tetraspheral social science will overcome the zero or negative (harmful) social significance of disciplinary social science in the past—due to its fragmentary falsehood and party orientation—up until this day, making it adequate for a new, universal human harmonious civilization of non-violence and sustainable prosperity in PERPETUAL PEACE for thousands of years of humanity's future.

Dr. Leo Semashko, GGHA Founder (2005) and H/President

https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253

11-04-26

-------------------------

In process