The finish and result of the article discussion

Dear friends,

I am glad to report that our sharp polemics about the Trump’s peace program in our international article is completed.

Of the 45 invited coauthors o­n November 27 were remained 20 coauthors o­n December 3 from 12 countries. But some have written so vaguely between "YES" and "NO", that I doubt so far. The updated article was posted here: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=685 and its discussion here: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=730

Please read it carefully and let me know about the errors to correct them. All other persons who were invited to the coauthorship but rejected - were excluded from the article and from the mailing list. I ask you not to use their emails in the future.

I was able to take into account is not all your suggestions. We will work o­n them o­n the article reduction, its editing and othersin the future. We will update this article in 100 days, o­ne year, two years, four years later. We can always choose from it the most important 3-4 pages to send them to Trump to the White House and any structure of his administration after January20. But it is a matter of the future. Now we have created the basis for it.

I ask to excuse the discussion participants for its some discomfort generated by excessive arrogance, impatience and tantrum of three American "colleagues" o­n their emails. Now the debate is finished. Once again, all unnecessary emails I deleted from the mailing list, - please o­nly use the remaining in this letter that there was no a new hysterics o­n paltry issue. Our "colleagues" are not able to rise in their thinking above this level and, obviously were afraid that their secret Pentagon’s sponsors or funds will refuse to finance them. But we forgive them and continue our constructive work, in spite of all obstacles and resistance of the fake peacemakers.

The first generalization and evaluation of the discussion results

We must clearly understand that the election of US President peacemaker Trump became a test and a moment of truth for the peacemakers. This unexpected happy event for alldivided them into the true peacemakers and the fake peacemakers as "inverted militarists" who are financed the Pentagon’s militarists or its hidden funds. These are two fundamentally different groups of peacemakers - they have exactly the opposite ways. This split, o­n the o­ne hand, is the dramatic situation, but o­n the other hand is a catharsis and purification of peacemaking from its degenerate, dead, useless and harmful, fake, counterfeit parts. This catharsis is a long process, for many decades of the union of peacemakers based o­n two pillars: Global Peace Science and the real peacefulness of Trump.
       Their union overcomes the "paranoia" of fragmentation. issues insignificance and powerlessness before the eternal war of the pacifist traditional peacekeeping, degenerated into a fake (false) o­ne. But this catharsis integrates all decent and constructive peacemaking achievements of the past. This science gives to peacemaking main resource, which it is deprived of so far, which ensures the unity of global peacebuilding and the victory over the war, therefore, transforms it into a completely new peacemaking, revolutionizing it. This resource equips a program of peace Trump and guarantees his victory. This is the result of our discussion, which is presented below in detail.

Best wishes for peace from harmony through science, Dr. Leo Semashko,

03/12/16

Discussion
Since November 27, 2016  

Joint article about Trump’s peaceful geopolitics

Dear friends!

I am happy to invite you, 45 co-authors:

Mairead Maguire, Sergey Glazyev, Ayo Ayoola-Amale, Delasnieve Daspet, Michel Chossudovsky, John McMurtry, F. William Engdahl, Henry Giroux, Reimon Bachika, Roger Kotila, Sharon Tennison, Neil Hawkes, Theodore McIntire, Peter Hayes, David Hartsough, Regis Tremblay, Vladislav Krasnov, Charles Mercieca, Paul Craig Roberts, Michael Hudson, Francois Houtart, W. Julian Korab-Karpowicz, Subhash Chandra, Ramesh Kumar, Surendra Pathak, Noor M. Larik, Uraz Baimuratov, Robert J. Burrowes, Takis Ioannides, Joachim Hagopian, Robert Bridge, GaryBrumback, Amy Benjamin, Tulsi Gabbard, Robert M. Weir, Norman Kurland, Ernesto Kahan, Guy Crequie, Susana Roberts, Heli Habyarimana, Rudolf Siebert, Nina Meyerhof, Julia Budnikova, Volodya Shestakov,

from 20 countries, five continents: Argentine, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Ghana, Greece, India, Ireland, Israel, Japan,Kazakhstan, New Zealand, Pakistan, Poland, Russia, Rwanda, USA,

to a joint fundamental article:“Trump: PeacemakingRevolutionoftheUSAggressiveGeopolitics”(In attachment, 16 pages).

Scientific analysis of the unprecedented peaceful program of Trump’s foreign policy with his search for a "new vision, new minds, new approaches and new practical ideas" in "harmony" has defined the motto of this program in our interpretation: "Make America Great Again in Global Peace from Harmony through SPHERONS Science", which is published here: http://peacefromharmony.org/#top and I invite you to share it along with the article.

Why I invite you? We are very different people but we have four common qualities that unite us and allow us to collaborate in a joint article of exceptional importance. Incorporating us qualities are:
1. We are the peacemakers / anti-militarists.

2. We welcome the victory of Trump peacefulness over Hillary militarism.

3. We are the Global Peace Science coauthors and/or positive estimate it as common scientific platform for Trump peaceful geopolitics: http://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf
4. We believe it is necessary to actively support the Trump geopolitics of peace, participate in it and to help it in its development and distribution for all countries. This geopolitics transforms America of global aggressor to global leader in peacebuilding, which is a revolution of modern history and that we have to recognize as a given.

If I am not mistaken in definition of uniting our aspirations, then I am happy to invite you to coauthorship in scientific article disclosing an unprecedented revolution of Trump peacemaking thinking. See attachment. It is also published here: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=685

The article subject is program of peacefulness and peacemaking Trump proposed them to the US foreign policy for the next 4 years, which is ignored, silenced or radically distorted in the mainstream media. Our duty I see in the joint scientific analysis, the assessment and the maximum identification of all its advantages and benefits as кevolution of the US geopolitics. If we are peacemakers / anti-militarists, we cannot pass and ignore follow media the revolutionary content and value of this program required the peoples of the planet.

Trump is the first American president who puts forward the agenda of peacemaking. We, as responsible journalists and scholars are obliged to support and every effort to promote peacebuilding strategy Trump.

If you agree with this motivation of our common article, I invite you to edit this article: reduce, add or change the text and send it to me in two days: November 28-29that I formed its final o­n November 30-31. It will be published, first of all, by the site "Peace from Harmony» (http://peacefromharmony.org), which has the number of visits each day ranges from 5 to 10 thousand. It will be also proposed to publish o­n friendly sites (Global Research, TMS Digest) and other available to each of us. If o­ne of you does not want or cannot participate in this article, please let us know it. Your silence will be a sign of your refusal. If the article will find, ultimately, 50 or 30% authors - it will be great!

Trump announced the opening admission of 4 thousand employees in accordance with his intention: "I will also look for talented experts with new approaches, and practical ideas." We can and should help him in his passionary quest for peace. Our innovative and constructive article will give us the moral right to offer our services to his team as either individual experts or "International Peace-building Institute Trump" (IPIT), under the direction of, for example, Mairead Maguire or Michel Chossudovsky, or anyone who is ready to lead it. This is a great prospect for development and application of our peacemaking ideas, theories and aspirations in a single complex of Global Peace Science. We must counter to the globalization of war the peacebuilding globalization to perform a brilliant testament of Martin Luther King: "We must shift the arms race into a peace race." Trump began this shift. We have to help him in this. He needs our help. Now I pray to God about o­ne thing: that cruel America did not kill Trump as it killed its best citizens: John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King and others. Trump gave humanity the first real hope for global peace. We believe in divine favor and mercy. Best wishes, Dr. Leo Semashko,

27/11/16

---------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Léo,

Received your proposal = all that I have to say o­n peace, appears in my recent books: that published by Bruce COOK and Maria Cristina AZCONA, and my 3 works “:philosophy aujourd' today-philosophy tomorrow” and poetry of peace and the harmony” works published in English language by Bruce, and more recently still but in French language, in the work “Which to become for the Homo sapiens at horizon 2120” I will thus not publish another contribution planning soon o­n a literary level to put an end to my public life.

However, I support and encourage your approach of peace based o­n the scientific analysis of harmonious spheres which proposes in Americaits place in the international concert of peace, and in particular to open a new era of the harmonious relations with Russia, and the world, and in particular within this framework with the European Union.

From this point of view, the first declarations of TRUMP, imply a hope of a news gives as regards USA/ Russie relations, like besides in France, the last 2 candidates of the primary education of the right-hand side whose result will be known in evening, (and even if I have with them serious divergences as regards the French domestic policy), = decide with their differences, for a positive resumption of the dialog of France and European Union with Russia.

What I will do for the universal dialog and the respect of the basic rights of the woman, is to use my specificity within the group = of singer lyric to offer my last songs to 13 women of various countries and continents engaged with us within our network, or while dividing in acts, the values and this at the time of concerts. It is my specific way to support GPS and our group of conciliators for peace.

Hoping by you, thanks to you, with new projections, with this hope, cordially.

Guy CREQUIE
27/11/16

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Professor Semashko,

Thank you for your article and for your invitation to sign it. I believe that before it will become public and before it will be signed, it needs a serious editing work (please see the attachment). I have already started editing it.

1. The text is too long. Research articles can be long. But this text is not a proper research article, but a text that conveys a political message. Therefore, it should not be longer than maximum ten pages. Otherwise none will find time to read it.

2. Terminology has to be improved. For example, you are using frequently the word "geopolitics", which has a very specific technical meaning. It is much better to use the phrase "foreign policy".

3. The text has also many grammatical mistakes.

I would be happy to help with editing. I have already used two hours of my time to edit just the beginning pages.

Nevertheless, I can devote more of my time, if you agree with my suggestions and find my work as useful. By the way, I am indeed a philosopher, but primarily a political philosopher. More then fifteen years I spent teaching at department of international relations of various universities in the English speaking world. I am now preparing to write a book o­n World Peace. Best regards,

Prof. W. Julian Korab-Karpowicz, Zayed University

28/11/16

DearProfessorW. Julian Korab-Karpowicz,

Thank you very much for your support, work and criticism. OK, please write your version of the "political message" in 10 pages, so we can evaluate it as a whole. As for the new terminology, without it cannot be any o­ne revolution, especially scientific, spiritual and peacemaking. About ‘Geopolitics’ – it is the old term. Wikipedia gives this definition: «Geopolitics is a method of studying foreign policy to understand, explain and predict international political behavior through geographical variables. These include area studies, climate, topography, demography, natural resources, and applied science of the region being evaluated. [2] Geopolitics focuses o­n political power in relation to geographic space. In particular, territorial waters and land territory in correlation with diplomatic history. Academically, geopolitics analyses history and social science with reference to geography in relation to politics. Topics of geopolitics include relations between the interests of international political actors, interests focused to an area, space, geographical element or ways, relations which create a geopolitical system. [5] "Critical geopolitics" deconstructs classical geopolitical theories, by showing their political / ideological functions for great powers during and after the age of imperialism. [6]» (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geopolitics). The Russian Wikipedia complements it with the important idea of "The newest geopolitics, in which is dominated the power of the spirit over the military and economic power, helps to overcome traditional geographical and economic determinism by expanding the basic factors determining the conduct of States in international relations.» (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Геополитика) . Therefore, I do not see any scientific reason for rejecting term "geopolitics" as o­ne of the synonyms of "foreign policy". But you can give your definition of "geopolitics". So we are waiting for your very valuable work to completion. o­nce again, thank you very much. Leo,

28/11/16

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo,

Thank you very much for your invitation.I will, however, pass o­n it.

While Trump certainly made more peaceful noises than Hillary did during the campaign, I am not convinced that he believes in peace.He does not seem opposed to the idea of “throwing America’s weight around”; he merely appears to think that he can throw it more smartly and cheaply than the neo-cons have done heretofore.He appears to believe that America is exceptional – just look at the way he has demonized Fidel and the Cuban revolution in the last 2 days.(I, o­n the other hand, do not believe there is anything exceptional about my home country, except perhaps the ignorance of its people….) In short I have no reason to think that Trump wants our help.Until he has the courage to make some unequivocal remarks asking for help in the cause of peace, I would rather remain his critic than become his friend. But again, thank you for reaching out. All best, Amy Baker Benjamin

AUT University Law School, Auckland, New Zealand

28/11/16

Dear Amy,

Many thanks for your thorough response. I understand you and I will exclude you from the article. But I very like the course of your thoughts. Therefore I would be happy to open your personal page o­n our web “Peace from Harmony” with your 2-3 articles, short bio, 2-3 photos and your short (1 page, no more) review/note about our Global Peace Science. Is it possible and OK for you? Thanks. Leo.
28/11/16

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo

Please delete my name from this document before publication.

My own view, clearly divergent from yours, is stated here: 'Election or Revolution? An Open Letter To The People Of The United States' http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45518.htm

'Information Clearing House', USA, 20 September 2016.

Warmest regards; Robert Burrowes flametree@riseup.net

28/11/16

Dear Robert,

OK, I will exclude you from the article. But I (and others) do not understand your “clearly divergent” – what is it? We both are the opponents of violence, war and militarism. We published in our Global Peace Science (GPS) your 3 or 4 wonderful articles about your nonviolence. GPS includes your nonviolence as the theory of global peace from social harmony, from its deep societal structure of SPHERONS. This science and all its theories work to and for nonviolence giving it fundamental scientific pillar and strengthening it in spiritual, scientific and political possibilities and perspectives.

Maybe you are against them? Against spiritual, scientific and political strengthening nonviolence??? But I cannot believe in it. Then I do not understand what prevents you to recognize and accept the scientific rationale and strengthening of nonviolence in GPS and develop it further in the name of victory of nonviolence? To take it out of the deadlock and the weakness, in which it is now and in it nonviolence was drove by the endless wars and militarism. Nonviolence as peace can defeat violence and war only through science, o­nly o­n the GPS basis and nothing else. All the rest is fancy, impotence and eternal defeat and humiliation of nonviolence and peace. Are you agree with me? Please, let us know your position here. I will be happy to publish it o­n your page of our website. Thank you. Leo.

28/11/16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo,

There are two issues: 1) problem of Palistine, 2) Muslims in USA, which need to be addressed.

Thanks. Dr Noor M. Larik

28/11/16

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello Leo,

I'm in the middle of writing a piece o­n perhaps the biggest scandal in modern history with the latest "Pizzagate" developments. In o­ne fell swoop it might bring down the international crime cabal that has engaged in unimpeded pedophilia and Satanic worship for centuries while destroying our planet with unending wars and needless human suffering. So I cannot at this moment devote time to your worthy project. However, perhaps next week I may be able to contribute. That's about all I can tell you at this time. Thanks for considering me a potential joint-author. Best Regards, Joachim Hagopian

28/11/16

Hello Joachim,

Thanks for your reply. I understand you and wait you “next week” as you will say me. You very interested me with your work about pedophilia. In general, I long time ago read and publish your wonderful articles (or their fragments) o­n the GHA web “Peace from Harmony” and in our unique book “Global Peace Science” (GPS). I would be happy to open your personal page on our web with your new 2 articles, short bio, 2-3 photos and your short (1 page, no more) review/note about our GPS during 1-2 months. Is it possible and OK for you? Thanks. Leo.

28/11/16

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo,

Unfortunately, my schedule prohibits me from being able to participate in this worthy project.

Please consider me for the next article. Thank You, Regards, Robert Bridge, Moscow, Russia

28/11/16

Dear Robert,
OK, I understand you. I will exclude you from this article. Best wishes, Leo

28/11/16

-----------------------------------------------------

Dear doctor Leo Semashko

Thank you for your invite to sign the article re trump but I do not wish to add my name and would

be grateful if you would not use it o­n this article. Thank you, Mairead Maguire

28/11/16

OK, thank you. I will exclude you from this article. Best wishes, Leo

28/11/16

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Prof. Semashko,

The text of your article needs be substantially edited to make it fully professional. I have made some suggestions in my earlier email. Please do not publish it with my name at this stage. Best regards,

W. Julian Korab-Karpowicz

28/11/16

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Bill,

How are you? I hope all is well with you. Yesterday I read your wonderful article“A Collection of Thoughts about American Foreign Policy” and opened your personal web page (http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=729) o­n the website "Peace from Harmony", o­n which it was published along with your bio and photo. I have included it, and your strong book “America’s Deadliest Export: Democracy” in our new article: “Trump: Peacemaking Revolution of the US Aggressive Geopolitics”. In this regard, we are happy to invite you to this article either as a coauthor (with your amendments, additions or changes) or adviser with your recommendations if you want to. I am also pleased to invite you to write 3-5 lines about our unique book "Global Peace Science" (http://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf) to publish your banner o­n the home page with these lines. This bannerwill be send the reader to your page. Let me remind you that the daily number of visits to the site varies from 5-10 thousand. Finally, your question “What will the American Empire need?” The history of America gave a simple but ingenious answer - Trump, who made a peacemaking revolution in US foreign policy, what we write in our article in the attachmentand we will be happy to see you among its authorsif you want and can. Bestwishesforyourhealth, Leo,

29/11/16

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo,

Thanks for the communications. It is not possible for me to express a word of approval for Trump, for many of the reasons already expressed by others.

I just came back from Mexico, where the uneasiness is great. Trump announced a tax of more than 30 % o­n the cars produced in Mexico, announced the expulsion of 3 millions migrants, the majority Mexicans and the construction of a wall all along the border, which should be paid by the Mexican Government. As this last o­ne is not able to do it, the Mexicans fear a war.

If his isolationist position can result in less wars in the Middle East, it is of course a very good thing. But he will do it for the wrong reasons and it does not mind the end of imperialism.

Very best regards. François, François Houtart

Profesor en el Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales (I.A.E.N.)

Tel: (593) (2) 382 99 00 Ext 272

Fundación Pueblo Indio del Ecuador

Calle Ruiz de Castilla N 26-92 y Sosaya - 170520 - Quito ECUADOR

29/11/16

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DearDr. Leo

The draft is ok. I would suggest following

1Pl change word Geopolitics toforeign policy at all places .

2Please addin redunderpara 3.3

"To this we must add o­nly o­ne suggestion for Mr. Trump as an innovator of peacemaking and brilliant businessman: to create the USA-Russiajoint Institute of Global Peace Science, with departments in every country, in order to develop this science as a "common ground" for a peaceful solution of the whole spectrum of discords between both sides, first and foremost nuclear disarmament as the most pressing problem. Joint development of this science would includea spiritual revolution by adoption of human development thruYoga as mind changer from violence to nonviolence and harmonizing all civilizations for peace and humanity. This science will be the soft intellectual force, with a position of nonviolence and harmony of which just might be improved relations between the two nuclear superpowers and also among all nations of the Earth

3Lot of typographical errors / small editing required .

4We should reduceall textto5 to 7 pages by removingpara 4,5 and 6 .

with best wishes RAMESHKUMAR

29/11/16

Dear Ramesh and dear GHA peacemakers,
Many thanks for your support and your amendments, which will be include.
Could we hope o­n the support of the Trump's peaceful program by our peacemakers? The first USA President created similar program - why we must ignore it as militarists? WHY???
Thanks for your support at all doubts.Leo,

29/11/16

---------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo

The divergence I mention is in relation to Trump, an insane and extremely violent man with a lengthy record to prove it (Just as Clinton is an insane and extremely violent woman with a lengthy record to prove it.)

Given the bulk of his public statements over the years (including throughout the election campaign), his many violent and exploitative actions, and his recent nominees for senior positions in his administration, there is no grounds for expecting anything remotely resembling a nonviolent outcome from his presidency. Quite the opposite, enormous violence will be done.

If you haven't been following Trump since his election, this article will give you a taste:

John M. Donnelly 'Under Trump, GOP to Give Space Weapons Close Look: Programs to account for a significant share of defense budget boost' 21 Nov 2016: http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/trump-gop-give-space-weapons-close-look?utm

Are you aware of his position o­n the climate and environment? How do you square this with anything to which we aspire? I briefly explain my own position in this article. Did you read it? 'Election or Revolution? An Open Letter To The People Of The United States'

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45518.htm

'Information Clearing House', USA, 20 September 2016.

For more o­n the insanity of these individuals and those like them, please see this article:

'The Global Elite is Insane' http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/06-02-2014/126767-global_elite-0/ 'Pravda', Russia, 6 February 2014.

Warmest regards Leo; Robert Burrowes,

29/11/16

Dear Leo,

I agree totally with Robert Burrowes about the dangers of a Trump presidency. He could move the US very much into a fascist country if we the people do not nonviolently resist him and his policies. If he does try to make peace with Russia, I and all the American people who desperately want peace will be delighted we will fully support that, but I am afraid that is NOT what Trump and his very hawkish advisors and cabinet members will be doing. We the people of the world need to keep up the pressure o­n all government leaders to give up wars as a means of resolving conflicts. See worldbeyondwar.org/AlGlobalsecurtiysystem: An aternative to war  for an alternative way to find security for all of the world's people. Sincerely with hopes and prayers for a world in peace.

David Hartsough, Peaceworkers, San Francisco, CA USA,

29/11/16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo,

As I told you before, Trump will not be a President for Peace. I agree with you that Hillary would have been bad. But most likely, Trump will be even worse. You are making your organization look bad by supporting Trump and claiming that he will be a Peace president. Most people in the United States are frightened to death about Trump being our president. I voted for Jill Stein. In Peace,Frank Dorrel, USA,
29/11/16

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Robert, David, their allies and adherents,

Your important in our discussion of Trump letter is structured in four parts:

1.Comparison of Trump and Clinton positions as "extremely violent" people.

2.Forecast/prediction: Trump will create “enormous violence" with the test- article.

3.Position Trump about the climate and environment you cannot identify.

4.Your appeal to the American people as a decisive argument.

Let me look at your parts by the critical scientific and philosophical eye. I beg your pardon for the impartial criticism because the truth, in contrast with the sweet lies, is bitter. My credo - from Aristotle: "Plato is my friend, but truth is more expensive."

1. Your thesis: Both (Trump and Clinton) are the villains, "extremely violent people." My antithesis. For Clinton the "lengthy record" of her real atrocities: wars, genocide and crimes against humanity is. It is recorded by the history of the last 16 years. For Trump the like, real "lengthy record" does not exist - no o­ne knows. Therefore, your accusation of Trump is slander. Please, write to us "lengthy record" of the facts, but not fakes, which really proves that Trump is "extremely violent man" Otherwise, your accusations Trump will be slander, and it is not good to lie o­n the person. It's immoral and not a Christian. We must defend the dignity of every innocent human being that I do.

2. Your forecast: Trump’s "enormous violence will be done." My antithesis: this is a slander and fake of mainstream media, which is proved by your recommended article. I met it and was convinced in the truth: "Tell me what you read and I'll tell you who you are." If we read the lies and fakes in our consciousness can be nothing but lies and fakes o­nly. This is the absolute truth, as the philosophers say, "Similia similibus". My anatomy of the fake article is briefly as follows.

You write: «this article will give you a taste» This article gave me a complete sample of 100% lies, fakes and fantasies of mainstream media because I did not find in it any fact! o­nly the subjective opinions porridge! I similar verbal garbage principally not read! I read it just for you to understand what you are reading, what intellectual poison you feed your thinking. Now I understand a lot at you (and Western peacemakers and scientists). I prefer the facts and ignore the lies and fakes. You prefer the lies and fakes and ignore the facts and documents. You ignored the Trump document (fact) - his foreign policy program (you have not read it) but you savor and advertise verbal garbage of opinions. What is it?

The article is devoted to the struggle for the expansion of the Pentagon's budget in the Republican Party with the retelling of dozens of experts from it. This struggle goes under the sauce, which is made of lies, fakes, imaginary threats, subjective desires, unfounded assumptions and similar intellectual garbage united by o­ne common desire to achieve the maximum increase in the military budget to feed it. In this article, we read: "One expert said,… another expert mentioned,… third suggests,… a fourth arguably, the fifth – likely, the sixth – rather, the seventh – recommend, the eighth - Trump said little, ninth – perhaps, ten - Trump may also consider” and so o­n-all the three pages! And what are the "experts and advisers"? All of them are the Republican hawks, with the top of which Trump is known, does not get along, but is forced to flirt, like the Pentagon, for obvious reasons. All of them are «legislators and experts, several of whom have consulted with President-elect Donald Trump's advisers», i.e. some small fry to the other small fry in Trump's environment but not of self-Trump! But all the militaristic devils hang o­n him!!! All of this is not a "test" and the pitiful emptiness and the surface o­n which it is known that floats. The sane person cannot and should not accept the rat race of fakes at its face value.

The author is a veteran of the security, the typical American journalist of mainstream media, who lead readers to the nose, brainwash, zombie, manipulate and holds for fools. He writes about his sources of information thoughtfully: some do not hide their names, “other aides and experts, who requested anonymity and who may have a role in - or influence o­n - the next administration”! When sources is anonymous from their name you can write any fictions do not hesitate! And no o­ne will catch a cheater's hand! Truth scientists cannot be in o­ne campaign with counterfeiters, cannot read and pay attention to this dirty rat race of militarists. And if they are at the same table in this campaign, it is not scientists but chefs of lies and fakes, "When War becomes Peace, When the Lie becomes the Truth" by the brilliant remark of Michel Chossudovsky. In general, it is necessary to recognize the fair about the public, eating this "food”: “Apparently, H.L. Mencken was correct, the vast majority of Americans are morons.” o­n words of Dr. Paul Craig Roberts (http://peacefromharmony.org/#USA-president-elections).

This is guesswork, or as they say in Russia - grandmother by forks o­n the water wrote. - They are not worth an empty eggshell for scientific thinking. They o­nly make sense for the zombie consciousness. This is pure lies and fabrications by 100%. Seriousscientific thinking cannotuse these sources of information. It is self-deception. This is a subjective mess in the head brainwashed, deprived of their own objective / scientific grounds. Western, especially American mainstream media are by 100% false and fake. Trump exactly qualified their journalists as "terrible people" and "a pack of liars and cheaters." Add to this there is nothing! This is a full sunset of western elite!

Trump has no defense program, which cannot make up his easy campaign remarks and a lot of speculations of different experts and advisers around him. Why do you attach importance to this verbal garbage and ignore its fundamental foreign policy program o­n April 27? Why do not you even read it (http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=685)?This speech will give you a taste! Why do not you see the difference between them? Or you do not want to see it? Whether or not you are capable of, as zombified media? What's right from it? A lot of debris in the article required long proceedings there. Excuse me. You dragged me into this thankless job.

3. Your thesis about climate and ecology Trump. My antithesis. You were not able to determine his position o­n this issue. Apart from a few rambling opinions, which can change tenfold, he does not have a balanced environmental program. Therefore, all that was attributed to him here - that is too fakes.

4. Your appeal to the American people about the second American revolution, which should eliminate the "two evil - Trump and Clinton" by an alternative of nonviolence in the spirit of Gandhi / Burrowes. This is your clincher. My antithesis. You're right that Trump began November 8, 2016 a second American revolution, which will put an end to US militarism and empire. But you did not see that its trigger, source and initiator was and could become o­nly Trump and no o­ne else with his historic program of peace (which you, as the vast majority do not read), which is the most complete but contradictory and inconsistent (that is natural for the historical origin) expresses your alternative of nonviolence. I analyzed in detail this program of Trump in our article: «Trump: Peacemaking Revolution of the US Aggressive Geopolitics»: (http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=685).Did you read it?Of course, two ways are opened before Trump: a) to be the greatest national hero, a global leader of peacebuilding and revolutionary, Fidel Castro similarly or b) go down to the level of extreme militarist and the Nazi. Time will tell what he and his destiny will choose. But his program of peace clearly and unambiguously shows today his preference. We wait and see what happens.

With the "Global Elite Insanity," I completely agree with you. It dies from recklessness, lack of scientific knowledge of harmony in its deep societal SPHERONS structure. Its o­nly alternative can be a new, harmonious and nonviolent elite armed by Global Peace Science (GPS), who is based o­n it and will create a non-violent harmonious, spheral democracy (democracy of SPHERONS) instead of violent "totalitarian democracy" of 1%.

The prosperity of wars, violence and "totalitarian democracy" (William Engdahl) is provided with military science, working o­n the invention of modern weapons as the principal source of enrichment of 1%. The prosperity of peace, nonviolence and the true (harmonious) democracy is possible o­nly o­n the GPS basis. This is their main resource and the source. And as long as we, the peacemakers do not understand this, until we were, we are and will be powerless in the face of war and violence, until peace and non-violence will remain ghosts, and peacemakers will remain "inverted militarists" (similar to "inverted totalitarianism" Sheldon Wolin) that nourish and mask militarism by their impotence. Sorry for the long response - it happened. Best harmony wishes, Leo Semashko,
30/11/16

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

DearFriends,

An article of a scholarly character should, first of all, be balanced and avoid any emotional statements that cannot be proven. An analysis of a speech can of course be presented in a balanced way.

I would now give to Mr. Trump at least 100 days of peace before making any judgements. Words of a politician are o­ne thing, but now we should see how these words work in action.

Best regards,

W. Julian Korab-Karpowicz,

30/11/16

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo Semashko and fellow seekers for world peace, 

I appreciate Leo's enthusiasm for a meeting between President-elect Trump and Mr. Putin.  Such a summit meeting could potentially be very positive, especially if Trump and Putin really did decide to work together against ISIS, brought peace to Syria, and ended the conflict over the Ukraine.   

But I fully understand my fellow Americans who distrust Trump.  He has said and done many bad things, and it is hard to believe that he will somehow rise above his sins and do what is right o­n behalf of the people. Trump, who advocates torture, would likely cry like a baby and pee his pants within two minutes if caught by a real enemy.  Cowards and bullies talk big until the shoe is o­n the other foot. 

NATO needs to back away from Russia's borders but Trump will be under strong pressure not to do something so positive since the US/NATO/Israeli military-industrial-security complex needs fake "enemies" to justify their military invasions and covert operations for regime change.  But perhaps Trump understands that a nuclear confrontation between US/NATO and Russia ends it for everybody, including him.

Trump and Putin need to get the nuclear weapons off hair trigger alert.  Immediately. 

I also strongly support the People's Lobby (directed by Dwayne Hunn) who advocates for a US-Russian partnership doing world service (World Service Authority).  As Dr. Hunn points out, such a partnership in positive service would create friendships as opposed to war which o­nly makes enemies. 

Returning to feedback o­n Leo's letter to Trump and to Putin:  As someone else noted, it is too long and needs to be shortened;  also try to improve the grammar (but I admire you for being willing to communicate in English!).  

Please don't tell Trump and Putin that, even with Global Peace Science,  it will take 50 years to disarm. That's too long; it's a death sentence.  And psychologically it can be a self-fulfilling prophecy.  

If world citizen activists succeed in getting the sought for United Nations Charter review, we could have the Constitution for the Federation of Earth ("Earth Constitution") in place to replace the failed UN Charter within ten years.  The UN is stuck in a deadly geopolitical war system it cannot control due to the flawed Charter.  The Earth Constitution would create a "new UN" -- a world federal union specifically designed to establish a geopolitical peace system with a fair and just world judiciary system...no o­ne, not even leaders of nations, should be above the law. 

We need to outlaw war, eliminate all weapons of mass destruction, deal responsibly with climate change, and bring prosperity to all, not just the 1%.  Activists are already calling for establishment of a World Parliament. 

System analysis teaches us that even if Trump and Putin manage to achieve peace between the US and Russia, that there would continue to be other conflicts and wars elsewhere.  This is the lesson from world federalists like Einstein (Einstein o­n Peace).

My thanks and respect to Leo, to those who support his letter, and to those who do not...only time will tell if it all bodes good or bad fortune for our beloved world community, Respectfully, Dr. Roger Kotila     

30/11/16

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo

I am content to concede our (vast) differences o­n this issue and, given your agreement to delete my name from this document, to stand aside from further discussion of it.

Warmest regards Leo; Robert Burrowes,

30/11/16

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Friends,

An article of a scholarly character should, first of all, be balanced and avoid any emotional statements that cannot be proven. An analysis of a speech can of course be presented in a balanced way.

I would now give to Mr. Trump at least 100 days of peace before making any judgements. Words of a politician are o­ne thing, but now we should see how these words work in action. Best regards,

W. Julian Korab-Karpowicz

30/11/16

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leo

your emails are quite entertaining, but...

You should never use my name o­n any article or in any other way unless in advance I have given express written permission to you to do so.  Any other approach is fraudulent. Ted McIntire

01/12/16

Comment. See my response below, o­n December 2. Leo

------------------------------------------------------------------------

DEAR ALL

If what Trump says is true and he follows up with his commitments then he will be a good President far superior to Obama or a proposed Clinton.

What stands out in this foreign policy speech - excerpts below - is that he sees the importance of the nation state. He questions rightly the political aspirations of Islamic fundamentalism.

HE IS NOT CLEAR o­n HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE

HE IS NOT CLEAR o­n HOW THE ORDINARY AMERICAN WILL PROSPER WHEN 2% OF AMERICANS HOLD 50% OF THE WEALTH

HE IS NOT CLEAR o­n ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE

However he wishes to create a peaceful world and work harmoniously with Russia and China.

He is most definitely aware of the threat of Iran and North Korea.

And acknowledges Israel as then o­nly democracy in the Middle East- 

HE DOES NOT KNOW THAT MEDICAL TREATMENT IN THE USA IS THE THIRD MOST COMMON CAUSE OF MORBIDITY AND DEATH IN THE USA

HE DOES NOT SAY THAT OBAMA IS UPGRADING THE US NUCLEAR ARSENAL OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS FOR COST OF TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS

TRUMP IS NOT FOR GLOBAL PEACE IN THE ACCEPTED TERMS (WHY??? – Leo)

WHILE WE HAVE NUCLEAR ARMS AND A GLOBAL MILITARY COMPLEX COSTING OVER 1 TRILLION DOLLARS A YEAR THERE CAN BE NO GLOBAL PEACE

WHILE THE BIOSPHERE IS BEING DESTROYED HUMANITY WILL NOT SURVIVE

WHILE BIG PHARMA RULES PEOPLE WILL GET SICKER NOT BETTER

HOWEVER IT WOULD SEEM TRUMP IS SUPERIOR TO CLINTON IMHO

WARM WISHES, MICHAEL, DR MICHAEL ELLIS, PRESIDENT CLUB OF BUDAPEST  AUSTRALIA http://www.clubofbudapestaustralia.com/

APRIL 27, 2016 - DONALD J. TRUMP FOREIGN POLICY SPEECH

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-foreign-policy-speech

QUOTES--------

-Our goal is peace and prosperity, not war and destruction.

-However, unlike other candidates for the presidency, war and aggression will not be my first instinct. You cannot have a foreign policy without diplomacy. A superpower understands that caution and restraint are signs of strength.

-Finally, I will work with our allies to reinvigorate Western values and institutions. Instead of trying to spread “universal values” that not everyone shares, we should understand that strengthening and promoting Western civilization and its accomplishments will do more to inspire positive reforms around the world than military interventions.

-Americans must know that we are putting the American people first again

-The nation-state remains the true foundation for happiness and harmony

-America will continually play the role of peacemaker.

-We will always help to save lives and, indeed, humanity itself. But to play that role, we must make America strong again.

-In the Middle East, our goals must be to defeat terrorists and promote regional stability, not radical change. We need to be clear-sighted about the groups that will never be anything other than enemies.

-And we must o­nly be generous to those that prove they are our friends.

-We desire to live peacefully and in friendship with Russia and China. 

We should seek common ground based o­n shared interests

-President Obama gutted our missile defense program, then abandoned our missile defense plans with Poland and the Czech Republic.

-He supported the ouster of a friendly regime in Egypt that had a longstanding peace treaty with Israel – and then helped bring the Muslim Brotherhood to power in its place.

Israel, our great friend and the o­ne true Democracy in the Middle East, has been snubbed and criticized by an Administration that lacks moral clarity. Just a few days ago, Vice President Biden again criticized Israel – a force for justice and peace – for acting as an impediment to peace in the region.

-President Obama has not been a friend to Israel. He has treated Iran with tender love and care and made it a great power in the Middle East – all at the expense of Israel, our other allies in the region and, critically, the United States.

-We’ve picked fights with our oldest friends, and now they’re starting to look elsewhere for help.

//////////////////////

Fourth, our rivals no longer respect us.

In fact, they are just as confused as our allies, but an even bigger problem is that they don’t take us seriously any more.

When President Obama landed in Cuba o­n Air Force o­ne, no leader was there to meet or greet him – perhaps an incident without precedent in the long and prestigious history of Air Force o­ne.

Then, amazingly, the same thing happened in Saudi Arabia -- it's called no respect.

///////.////////

President Obama watches helplessly as North Korea increases its aggression and expands even further with its nuclear reach.

Our president has allowed China to continue its economic assault o­n American jobs and wealth, refusing to enforce trade rules – or apply the leverage o­n China necessary to rein in North Korea.

He has even allowed China to steal government secrets with cyber attacks and engage in industrial espionage against the United States and its companies.////

///////\/////////

Since the end of the Cold War and the break-up of the Soviet Union, we’ve lacked a coherent foreign policy.

////////

We have made the Middle East more unstable and chaotic than ever before.

We left Christians subject to intense persecution and even genocide.

--/////-/-/-///-/-/--//

Our actions in Iraq, Libya and Syria have helped unleash ISIS.

////////:///////

Hillary Clinton also refuses to say the words “radical Islam,” even as she pushes for a massive increase in refugees.

///////////////

We’re going to finally have a coherent foreign policy based upon American interests, and the shared interests of our allies.

///////////////////////////

First, we need a long-term plan to halt the spread and reach of radical Islam.

/////////////////////

Secondly, we have to rebuild our military and our economy.

The Russians and Chinese have rapidly expanded their military capability, but look what’s happened to us!

/////////////

Finally, we must develop a foreign policy based o­n American interests.

+++++++++++++++++
Sent from my iPhone

“Apparently, H.L. Mencken was correct: the vast majority of Americans are morons.” o­n words of Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: (http://peacefromharmony.org/#USA-president-elections).

01/12/16

(Comment. Compare with structuring Trump’s quotes in our article. - Leo)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Согласна с Вами, Лев Михайлович в вашем послании Р.Берроузу. Конечно, все мы хотим видеть у власти созданные нашим воображением идеалы, но при этом живем в реальности. А в реальной расстановке сил Трамп представляет здоровые силы американского общества, пусть у его программы есть слабые стороны или неопределенности. Но есть и хорошие перспективы. Игнорировать демонизацию Трампа и создаваемую вокруг него истерию мы не должны. Спасибо за вашу работу. С уважением,Юлия Будникова,

президент ГСГ-Россия

01/12/16

Дорогая Юля!

Большое спасибо за Вашу честную, разумную и смелую позицию в поддержку программы миролюбия Трампа и нашей статьи о ней! Отношение к ней - это момент истины для миротворцев и их раздела на истинных, честных и смелых и фейковых, псевдо-миротворцев или инвертированных милитаристов, которые своей слабостью, нежеланием кардинально изменить свое видение мира и трусостью играют на руку ярым ястребам и милитаристам. Трамп и мы начали миротворческую революцию. Мы должны поддержать ее! Мы ждем подобных откликов от всех истинных миротворцев. Лучшие пожелания гармонии,

Лев Семашко

01/12/16

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Dr. Leo,

Better you continue with your proposal and ignore those who are against Trump. The negative people will never change their ideology because of their nature. With best regards, RAMESH  KUMAR 

01/12/16

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear AYO, Subhash and all true peacemakers of GHA!

Now we are very waiting your public support of our article «Trump: Peacemaking Revolution of the US Aggressive Geopolitics»: (http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=685). Did you read it? Is it possible for you? Could I hope o­n your public support of the Trump's peace program? Please, reply ASAP. Thank you.

This support is our honor as the true peacemakers as opposed to the fake peacemakers, who was afraidpeacefulness of Trump or neglects and ignores it. They are not even able to read his peace program o­n 27 April, which is analyzed in our article. Let us be true, honest and brave peacemakers unlike the cowardly and fake peacemakers. We and Trump began a peacemaking revolution. We must support it!

We wait your "YES". If "NO" - it is for the direct militarists or inverted militarist=fake peacemakers, who were frightened with revolution of peacemaking Trump and Global Peace Science . Are you with anyone? This is the moment of truth for the peacemakers. Bestwishesforpeacefromharmonyvia science (GPS), education, culture and SPHERONS' democracy, Leo

01/12/16

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not really answering as "me", but many New York City residents would say this:I have been a New York and NY City resident for 40 [or how many ever] years so I know Trump, and his surrogates like Giuliana, very well (Giuliana was entirely a self-promoter as Mayor and thereafter-- wanted to get rich and famous, and did-- and now wants to be Secretary of State-- more fame and fortune).

Thank goodness New Yorkers got someone, for a time, like Bloomberg who, although a billionaire too, actually cared about all aspects of the city and not just his own fame and fortune. Too bad Trump is not a Bloomberg (who himself called Trump a con-man) because we DID need an outsider.But Trump is not THAT outsider.Trump himself said of his win, simply "I know how to size up a market".

Those same New Yorkers might also say:I'm not big fan of Bloomberg but at least, as a billionaire himself, he really took some middle, centrist, grounds and points of view and policy.So, those New Yorkers would not agree with these, what they would see as "projections from afar" o­n who Trump and his surrogates actually are or what they stand for.To them, it's likely far simpler--- just part of the backlash (happening all over the world) as upper classes or formerly ruling races cannot adjust to a world going global and multicultural (albeit with all kinds of problems and very real downsides).... So they go back to simplistic nationalism and a nostalgia for "a world that was" back then they were in charge, etc. and everything seemed so good (at least for them).It's a pendulum swing and that same pendulum will likely keep swinging back and forth.One analyst today (actually the founder of Spiral Dynamics) said, and perhaps rightly, "Obama came too soon".

Just another point of view from some New Yorkers....Kurt Johnsonkurtjohnsonisd@yahoo.com,
01/12/16

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Ramesh

You propose that it is acceptable fraudulently use another person's name without their permission for any purpose and that person should remain silent to preserve peace and harmony?

Is the same true with using another land or property? Another wife or children? 

What kind of ignorant cult is this group that calls itself GHA? Ted McIntire

02/12/16

1. If you have read my first letter dated 27 November, where I wrote that in my coauthors list will remain o­nly those who have confirmed their participation in the proposed draft of the article, you can be quiet in this regard. But you don’t read it. When the debate will finish (1-2 days) I will send a new version of the article without your names. Your question and the request will be expired. Please, be patient and wait a bit and I'll exclude all of your - there are no problems, we need to be cleaned.

I repeat again: all who have asked WILL BE removed from our list within two days, please be assured

2. If you would give work to understand the GHA history, you could see that the GHA works the same way for 11 years. We cannot beforehand collect views of tens and hundreds of coauthors of our 52 collective projects during 11 years. Therefore, we first include the coauthors names in the project (so that they could see it and assess the true), then we exclude from it all who disagree with it. Likely, it is not available with your mind the procedure and technology.

3. Your ignorance is based o­n disregard of the facts and following for fakes and a lie. Just like you did not read the program of peace Trump, but you reject it, you also are not reading GPS and GHA history, preferring the fakes of any origin: own or the mainstream. Therefore, all of you together make "fake trend" in the movement of peacemaking and nonviolence. This trend can be determined, followed by Sheldon Wolin, “inverted militarism” because it is powerless before militarism more than 100 years, and in fact it contributes to the prosperity of militarism, does it not interfering and not resisting to it. The fake "peacemakers" like you and your campaign today is absolutely useless for global peace and o­nly hurt it, playing up militarism and suppressing the true peacemakers, like Trump, you were not able even to read, not to understand.

4. Sharon, I have not been successful after half a dozen requests to free me from your dispatches. Please, make it in the end. I do not want to waste my time for fake peacemaking and fake nonviolence.

Ted, I'm very sorry I hurried to introduce you (it was a test for you), as well as Sharon and David, etc. in the GHA circle and its projects, as well as about our contacts, which are meaningless now to me and I ask you to close them. From you do not have any good for peace o­nly fake noise of enmity and hatred around peacefulness of Trump, GHA, me and our friends. Farewell, Dr. Leo Semashko,

02/12/16

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Dr. Leo

Reading the comments of people ,I think it would be better to wait about o­ne year to see what Trump can offer with regard to peace and harmony in the world and especially in Muslim world. With regards, Dr Noor M Larik

02/12/16

Dear Noor,

Even better to wait and do nothing for four years, until the end of Trump time. Better yet, wait for the cruel America will kill him (as Kennedy and King) and Hilary will start a nuclear war, which hangs by a thread as a sword of Damocles over mankind. What then will be do useless fake peacemakers? Warming hands over nuclear fire? Or burn it with everyone? Do you agree to wait it? Leo

02/12/16

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Ted,

The first principle of Global Harmony is thru acceptance of each other's ideology. If we don’t agree o­n certain issue we should keep silent. All members are working for Global Harmony and Peace, may be thru different approaches. So let us respect each other and keep silent o­n issues we disagree. There is no end to confrontation. Consent should be in minimum words of Yes or No.

With regards for peace and harmony. Ramesh Kumar

02/12/16

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello.

To be honest, I am shocked that so many otherwise smart, intelligent people can talk about "how dangerous Trump can be" when he has already stated his intentions of 1. drawing back US military forces around the world, 2. reducing spending o­n military spending 3. reining in NATO to some degree and 4. work side-by-side with Russia in defeating Islamic State.

I am an American living in Russia long-term and I have witnessed first-hand the extremely toxic atmosphere that 16 years of George W. Bush and Barack (The 'Peace' President) Obama pugilism have created with their incessant and reckless 'war o­n terror'. Their so-called leadership has given us a planet that is far more dangerous than what we previously had.

Hillary Clinton was a big part of those plans, and was actively involved in the destruction of Libya, which was o­nce upon a time the most prosperous country in Africa with generous social services for their people, including free healthcare and education, among many others. We destroyed all of that in a month. For what? Before that we destroyed Iraq for no good reason at all. In fact, that war was built o­n a lie from day o­ne. And now we are attempting to destroy Syria, which already would be yet another terrorist-riddled basket case had the Russians not intervened.

Trump is dangerous??? We know NOTHING about Trump aside from what a severely manipulated, complicit and corrupt media is telling else. Anybody who says "Trump is dangerous" needs to provide more evidence than just empty slogans. What we do know, however, is that what we've been given for the last 16 years (and actually longer) has been absolutely detrimental to the hopes for world peace. Although I am disheartened by the US election system, that o­nly provides us with two real choices every election cycle, it seems the best candidate to fix the mess we are in is Donald Trump.

He may speak rough at times, but I believe his intentions are sincere and worthy of a chance. We are already know damn well where Clinton would have taken us (and actually she still might since there are great efforts going o­n to steal the presidency away from Trump, as Jill Stein's efforts prove).

Thank you, Leo, for your efforts at binging about world peace.

More people these days - which are 'interesting' to say the least - need your clarity of thought and wisdom. Please continue to send me information o­n your future projects. Sincerely, Robert Bridge

02/12/16

Well stated Robert, I am in agreement with your analysis, and I appreciate Leo’s instincts even though he gets quite far afield at times. Some of us have to watch carefully where our names show up due to the level of work we aspire to do. Please help Leo to understand the importance of respecting others’ wishes to remain off of his lists. I haven’t been successful after half a dozen requests.Thanks,Sharon Tennison

02/12/16

Comment. Robert writes about great things of global peace, his great supporter of Donald Trump and their treats from all sides and “peacemaker” Sharon cannot rise above her insignificant level of email. Leo Semashko,

02/12/16

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dearby Dr.Leo & Global Peace makers

Greetings from India

“Trump: Peacemaking Revolution of the US Aggressive Geopolitics".

Yes: I appreciate the project “Trump: Peacemaking Revolution of the US Aggressive Geopolitics”: initiated by Dr.Leo

I support and promote a Global Peace Science an alternative to war, which concentrates the Global Peace Science and scientific works of each of us complementing each other.

We live in the midst of o­ne of the greatest transitions in Earth's history. Humanity, having become a planetary force, is now shaping both its own future and the long-term future of millions of species of life.

The 21st century began with the United States world dominance as the sole superpower in the absence of the Soviet Union, with nuclear threat to humanity. We are living in an age of transition from the age of Terrorism & war to age of Peacemaking Revolution through peace from harmony & cooperation. The present situation calls for a drastic strengthening of Global peace revolutionmovement involving all the social, educational & political leaders of the world to create a global harmonious society.

The world of tomorrow cannot be tamed by the Axis of militarism & wari.e ‘Culture of violence & war’ but can be tamed o­nly through the Peace Axis : Axis of peace & harmony‘Culture of Peace from Harmony through Science.

Donald Trump & Putin: Trump would bring “peace o­n planet Earth”

World War III: Will Trump spark a new world order? Nov 9, 2016

Donald Trump warned there would be "World War III over Syria" if Hillary Clinton ended up in the White House, but now he has been elected as president, will the United States’ foreign relations get better or worse?

The president-elect has pledged to "achieve a stable, peaceful world with less conflict and more common ground". However, he also wants to rebuild the US military and has characterized his foreign policy as "America First". He has promised to build 'a stable, peaceful world', but the US president elect has experts worried

Vladimir Putin ally said: President Donald Trump would bring “peace o­n planet Earth”. Donald Trump says Hillary Clinton supporters are voting for nuclear war .

A senior Kremlin lawmaker and Vladimir Putin ally said in an interview that it would be “a gift to humanity” if Donald Trump were to be elected president of the United States.

Vladimir Zhirinovsky, the flamboyant leader of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR), told Reuters that Trump is the “candidate for peace” and the best choice to ease tensions between Moscow and Washington. President Donald Trump would bring “peace o­n planet Earth” http://www.salon.com/2016/10/13/vladimir-putin-ally-president-donald-trump-would-bring-peace-on-planet-earth/

Donald Trump called for unity of people election victory speech:

“Now it is time for America to bind the wounds of division, have to get together. To all Republicans and Democrats and independents across this nation, I say it is time for us to come together as o­ne united people. DONALD TRUMP’ election victory speech:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/donald-trumps-election-victory-speech-9224206

The program of peacefulness and peacemaking Trump proposed them to the US foreign policy for the next 4 years is the beginning of new era of global revolution of peace from harmony& creating a new world order of Vasudhaiva Kutumbkam –World as o­ne family.

See: “Key to Global Peace Science as Alternative to Nuclear War. Could be another alternative?” http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=624

Global Peace Science - Global Vision: Vasudhaiva Kutumbkam: Worldis o­ne Family

One Humanity, o­neness of People o­n o­ne Planet, o­ne Global Peace through Global Peace Science (GPS):Victory of Peace over war: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=609.

http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=635

Dr. Subhash Chandra, PresidentGHA

02/12/16

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo,

I have seen some of my friends asking to be removed from your email list re Donald Trump. I am NOT asking to be removed, but I do not share the belief that Trump offers the vision of peace that some think he does.

So far, there is nothing to indicate that anything will be different than previous US administrations...based upon his selection of advisors and cabinet positions. I also believe that American presidents are o­nly the face of the dark forces that have overtaken the entire U.S. government. It is they who decide foreign policy. "They" are the global elite who own most of the banks in the world, the major, multi-national corporations, the military industrial complex, the media and the politicians.  These dark forces also own and control most of Europe, Japan, S. Korea, Australia and Canada.

Personally, I am not very hopeful about the future. In my opinion, there is no fixing, no cure for what America is and has become. My country is morally and spiritually moribund and near collapse. Perhaps out of the ashes will arise something better, like the Phoenix. I can o­nly hope so.

I do want you to know that I will never forget meeting you and your wife in St. Petersburg and value our friendship and efforts to bring peace to the world.  For I believe that justice and peace begins with all of us who hope and work for it, and no matter some of our differences, we must stand together and not be divided. Citizen diplomacy is vitally important and I am not willing to abandon it. In Peace and Solidarity, Regis Tremblay, Independent Filmmaker

02/12/16

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DearDr. Leo & Global Peace makers

Greetings from India

INVITATION: Global Peace & Psycho-Social Science Conference (GPPSC2017) o­n 20-21 January, 2017 atGujarat Vidyapith, Ahmadabad India.

We are pleased to invite you to participate in the “Global Peace & Psycho-Social Science(GPPSC 2017)” o­n 20-21 January, 2017 to be held at Gujarat Vidyapith, Ahmadabad India. The conference is jointly organized by organized by GHA—Global Harmony Network Centre (GHNC), India and Gujarat Vidyapith, Ahmadabad in Association with National Association of Psychological Science (NAPS), INDIA & GHA Trust, Gurgaon, India o­n 20-21 January, 2017.

CALL FOR PAPERS

Scholars, faculty & organizational & management professionals intending to present papers at the Conference are requested to submit a soft copy of the Abstract (200 Words) to the Conference Secretariat. Sub themes:

1) Global Peace Sciences –conflicts, violence & Peace building in 21st century

2) Psycho-Social Science for Peace, Harmony & Development

3) Gandhian Peace, Philosophy& Development Studies

4) Harmony Education, Peace Education & Human Value Education and Global Ethics

5) Yoga & Meditation for Peace, Harmony including practical session.

CONFERENCE SUBMISSION DEADLINES

Last date for abstract Submission: 25th December, 2016

• Last date for submission of Full Paper: 5th January, 2016

• Notification of acceptance of paper: 10th January, 2017

• Last date for Registration: 15th January, 2017

For abstract and paper submissions and/other academic/scientific enquiries

1.Dr. Surendra Pathak, Conference Director, Vice president, GHA

E-mail: gppsc2017@gmail.com, ;Email: pathak06@gmail.comM: 85276 30124

2.For Registration: Ramesh Kumar, Conference Secretary,

Vice-President Global Harmony Association (GHA) Mob 9971001318;

Email: ngocosro@gmail.com, Conference Secretariat, GPPSC 2017

GHA India (Trust)

Mr.Ramesh Kumar, Conference Secretary , A 38, Rosewood City, Sector 49, Gurgaon 122018, India

Ph. 124 4266169, Mob 9971001318; E-mail: gppsc2017@gmail.com

Dr. Subhash Chandra, Conference Chair, PresidentGHA – Global harmony Association, India;

Email: schandra101@gmail.com M -09910241586, E-mail: gppsc2017@gmail.com

02/12/16

Dear Subhash and friends,

Excellent Conference! Congratulations! I will publish its o­n our web "Peace from Harmony"

Could you include in its Sub-themes two very important themes:

1. "Trump's Peacefulness Program o­n April 27, 2016 as the first in the USA history shift from aggressive politics to 'peace race' by M.L.King" and

2. "Trump's Peacefulness Program and Global Peace Science as Two Sides of o­ne Coin"?

Is it possible for your great Conference?

You could invite Mr. Trump to your Conference with these themes!!!

I will send my article for it. We could think about our joint article for it, maybe from our article of now. Bestwishesforpeacefromharmonyvia science (GPS), education, culture and SPHERONS' democracy, Leo

02/12/16

---------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo and Friends

It is interesting to me how reality is socially constructed depending o­n the political system you live in and the propaganda to which you are subjected.

Having now visited so many countries in the world I see how people's perceptions are manipulated by media, political ideology, religion and culture. For instance, I have observed how folk construct their view of reality depending o­n which newspaper that they read or TV program.  

I think that it is for each of us to open our minds to ensure that we are not being conditioned to see a view of a person or a country that is not true. When I was a child I was led to believe that the Russians were a threat to us in the UK and could drop a nuclear bomb o­n us.  My Russian friends had the same story told to them, o­nly it was the USA that was the threat.  Human nature so easily makes another person or group, or religion or county the perceived enemy.  

I believe that for real peace we have to help human consciousness transform so that we can be Self-led based o­n universal positive values.  I wrote an article recently which I hope helps the debate:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo,

………………………………………………………………………

Of course I shall send my contribution about Trump. I am too tired and full of sorrow. You understand me. Apostolos was a brother for me. With peace from harmony. Takis

03/12/16

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo,

You know the serious reason of my delay to answer. Please consider my answer as valid.

Donald Trump & Putin: Trump would bring “peace o­n planet Earth”

Yes: I do appreciate the project – “Trump: Peacemaking Revolution of the US Aggressive Geopolitics”: initiated by Dr. Leo Semashko

President Mr Donald Trump is a very successful businessman who created his financial empire during the great American economic crisis. That means that he knows very well how to govern successfully and confidently a colossal business organization. This ability can make maximum use of the great opportunity that the offered by GHA with our book GLOBAL PEACE SCIENCE and the new project for the cooperation between USA and Russia for the common peaceful benefit of planet Earth. He knows how to deal, and especially how to avoid anything dangerous about his business. He knows how to choose the right business partners. He knows that the benefit to the USA is the cooperation with Russia for the Global Peace. I do believe that he will do the right choices in this important area of our lives. With Peace from harmony. Panagiotis Takis D. Ioannides, Vice President of GHA

03/12/16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo and all,

      I do not know, and for sure nobody knows, how will be the presidency of Donald Trump.

I can said also that I did not liked the policy of the candidate Hilary Clinton.

In my opinion many people in Europe and USA are afraid of the wave of immigrants that affect the culture of the countries. Thus we will see in Europe, more support to the so called right parties, which are opposing immigration. In o­ne side this is very understandable, but in the other side migrants are poor and suffering people. We must also consider that they are many interested aspects supporting or opposing migration. Do not forget the issue of cost of labor power.

      Concerning the economic policy, everything is a big question. With respect and love

You can consider the publication of my opinion or to suppress my name in the article. Of course I prefer to publish my text. I respect very much our GHA, and I hope we are not committing a too fast position before the facts. Ernesto Kahan

03/12/16

Dear Ernesto,

Many thanks for your important opinion, which I was glad to publish o­n the discussion page: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=730

I fully share your opinion about militaristic policy of Hillary Clinton, who we, as the true peacemakers, cannot support in any case as with her connected nuclear war. It is proved fact, see the last evidence: Hagopian, Joachim (2016) Neocon Insanity and “Political Madness”: Hillary Clinton and the Dangers of Nuclear War. The Elite's Rush to Implant Hillary in Power: http://www.globalresearch.ca/neocon-insanity-and-political-madness-hillary-clinton-and-the-dangers-of-nuclear-war/5550172

Another proved fact is the Trump’s peaceful foreign policy program o­n April 27, which was ignore and perverted by the fake mainstream media and the fake journalists. The GHA presented the scientific analyse of this fact/program in many aspects in our collective (as always) article/project: “Trump: Peacemaking Revolution of the US Aggressive Geopolitics” (16 pages: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=685). Any truth peacemakers can support and sign it.
       Time will tell how Trump will fulfill his peaceful program and we will analyze, compare and evaluate the facts of his new foreign policy. Today we have, I repeat, only o­ne his fact of foreign policy and we should understand it and we appreciated it. Are you ready to support it and to sign our project / article? I misunderstood your phrase “You can consider the publication of my opinion or to suppress my name in the article”. Is this YES, or it is NOT for our article? Include your name in it or not? Thank you for your response YES or NO. Best wishes for peace from harmony through science (GPS), Leo

04/12/16

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DEAR LEO,

I have no idea about this article I was included.

I am far from home taking care of my brother illness an my own..not in internet attending emails.

Please delete my name of this signatures.

I do Literature for Peace not politics, yet it is soon to know how peaceful issues will transform Mr Trump of my admiration. Who knows. The best for him. To you and all.

LOVE and HARMONY always from my soul… Susana Roberts

04/12/16

Dear Susana,

I very long waited your reply. Now I understand your sorrow and care about your sick brother that did not allow you to read our article and responses to it in the discussion. You have always (11 years) supported the GHA projects and articles dedicated to global peace.

04/12/16

Dear Ernesto,

We all know that trump of your peace from harmony vision is tolerance, about what you have written many wonderful articles in the GHA recent books: The ABC of Harmony (2012) and the Global Peace Science (2016). Let us use the tolerance in this discussion. We call you, as an outstanding peacemaker, to tolerance with peacefulness program of Trump - another outstanding peacemaker. In his peace program, he declared:

"Our goal is peace and prosperity, not war and destruction. Unlike other candidates for the presidency, war and aggression will not be my first instinct.America will continually play the role of peacemaker. And we must make America great again. If we do that, perhaps this century can be the most peaceful and prosperous the world has ever known. We desire to live peacefully and in friendship with Russia and China. We have serious differences with these two nations, and must regard them with open eyes. But we are not bound to be adversaries. We should seek common ground based o­n shared interests. Russia, for instance, has also seen the horror of Islamic terrorism. I believe an easing of tensions and improved relations with Russia is possible. Common sense says this cycle of hostility must end."And etc. (http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=685)

As you can see, here there is nothing "dangerous" for peace and these remarkable peacemaking aspirations are completely tolerant to your peacemaking vision and vv. Do you agree with it? But in order to fully realize your mutual tolerance, you need to carefully read its foreign policy program of April 27 - o­nly 4-5 pages. Could you read them fully to realize your mutual tolerance? It would be the tolerance win for both of you. You could write about it in your new article “Tolerance to Trump” (for example), which we will be happy to publish. Is it OK for you? Best wishes for peace from harmony through science, Leo,
05/12/16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Leo and all,

I wish your article will be a great prognosis of the new reality in the world. We really need that! You Leo are a strong peace worker!

When President Obama assumed his presidency I was very optimistic and I was very happy for his Nobel Peace Prize. Today I think he did not merit that.

For the moment, I will be a good and positive observer of the developments, but I cannot be author of the article because I still have dough's or better said, I am waiting with some caution.

Next week I will travel to India to give 2 important conferences for spirituality and peace, in o­ne I will met the vice-president of India.

My way back will be o­n January two. Since I do not know how able I will be to work with the mail, I want to wish you a wonderful Christmas and a lovely and successful year 2017 of peace.

Receive a big huge perfumed by friendship and love, Ernesto

06/12/16

"Our goal is peace and prosperity, not war and destruction. America will continually play the role of peacemaker. We desire to live peacefully and in friendship with Russia and China. We are not bound to be adversaries. Common sense says this cycle of hostility must end."And etc. (http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=685)

This is the golden words of peace - I do not cease to admire them - they deserve the best poet and bard! But you're right - we have to be "good and positive observers" of their performance in the future.

We cordially wish you a successful trip, fruitful conferences in India and a useful meeting with the Vice-President of India, to whom you could gift our (and your) unique book "Global Peace Science" with a portrait of his coauthor, your friend and great poet of India, President Abdul Kalam. This book you could be ordered for $ 50 at Bruce within 3-5 days, or will get it for free in India at the GHA president Dr. Subhash Chandra if you're writing with him. If after the trip you send us your photos with the Vice President and our book, I'll be happy to publish them o­n our website with your short article about the trip. If you want.

We are happy to congratulate you with Merry Christmas and a happy peaceful New Year and wish you good health and a successful trip! About mail do not worry. With love and friendship, Leo
06/12/16 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello,

      For my part, I already exposed my opinion = I am admiring abnegation of Léo, of his undeniable theoretical contribution which gives undeniable tools by its creative scientific rigor which uses thorough of social sciences and human knowledge to guide our actions.

However, I understand the prudence of Ernesto, which, is based like other thinkers before him o­n the categories of the practice and it waits o­nce places from there as President: acts of Donald TRUMP, in harmony with our analyses.

      The Group must also take into account the different profiles in its center, and the creative capacities. For my part, poet, writer, I am also singer still for a time, and I put the voice at the service of peace and the harmony. Tomorrow, I will record 7 new titles before my last concerts. J ` would like to sing at the time of congress WCP in the Gobi Desert in Mongolia in August 2017

      I will dedicate my interpretations that I will address to you with 13 women = representative of the various continents, committed in a various way according to their talents for peace and the harmony, the respect of the human dignity of which of course the respect of their basic rights, and of which some are members of GHA.

      From here a few days, you will receive their name and my recordings.

Cordially. Guy CREQUIE
06/12/16