About Us


Harmony Forum

Peace from Harmony
Manlio Dinucci. USA: How to Destroy Russia

Rand Corporation: How to Destroy Russia

By Manlio Dinucci

Global Research, May 25, 2019

Theme: US NATO War Agenda


Force the adversary to expand recklessly in order to unbalance him, and then destroy him. This is not the description of a judo hold, but a plan against Russia elaborated by the Rand Corporation, the most influential think tank in the USA. With a staff of thousands of experts, Rand presents itself as the world’s most reliable source for Intelligence and political analysis for the leaders of the United States and their allies.


The Rand Corp prides itself o­n having contributed to the elaboration of the long-term strategy which enabled the United States to win the Cold War, by forcing the Soviet Union to consume its own economic resources in the strategic confrontation. It is this model which was the inspiration for the new plan, Overextending and Unbalancing Russia, published by Rand [1].



According to their analysts, Russia remains a powerful adversary for the United States in certain fundamental sectors. To handle this opposition, the USA and their allies will have to pursue a joint long-term strategy which exploits Russia’s vulnerabilities. So Rand analyses the various means with which to unbalance Russia, indicating for each the probabilities of success, the benefits, the cost, and the risks for the USA.


The US Wants to Sanction Away Russia’s “Great Society”

Rand analysts estimate that Russia’s greatest vulnerability is that of its economy, due to its heavy dependency o­n oil and gas exports. The income from these exports can be reduced by strengthening sanctions and increasing the energy exports of the United States. The goal is to oblige Europe to diminish its importation of Russian natural gas, and replace it by liquefied natural gas transported by sea from other countries.

Another way of destabilising the Russian economy in the long run is to encourage the emigration of qualified personnel, particularly young Russians with a high level of education.

In the ideological and information sectors, it would be necessary to encourage internal contestation and at the same time, to undermine Russia’s image o­n the exterior, by excluding it from international forums and boycotting the international sporting events that it organises.

In the geopolitical sector, arming Ukraine would enable the USA to exploit the central point of Russia’s exterior vulnerability, but this would have to be carefully calculated in order to hold Russia under pressure without slipping into a major conflict, which it would win.


In the military sector, the USA could enjoy high benefits, with low costs and risks, by increasing the number of land-based troops from the NATO countries working in an anti-Russian function.

The USA can enjoy high probabilities of success and high benefits, with moderate risks, especially by investing mainly in strategic bombers and long-range attack missiles directed against Russia.

Leaving the INF Treaty and deploying in Europe new intermediate-range nuclear missiles pointed at Russia would lead to high probabilities of success, but would also present high risks.

By calibrating each option to gain the desired effect – conclude the Rand analysts – Russia would end up by paying the hardest price in a confrontation, but the USA would also have to invest huge resources, which would therefore no longer be available for other objectives. This is also prior warning of a coming major increase in USA/NATO military spending, to the disadvantage of social budgets.


This is the future that is planned out for us by the Rand Corporation, the most influential think tank of the Deep State – in other words the underground centre of real power gripped by the economic, financial, and military oligarchies – which determines the strategic choices not o­nly of the USA, but all of the Western world.


The “options” set out by the plan are in reality no more than variants of the same war strategy, of which the price in sacrifices and risks is paid by us all.


Note to readers: please click the share buttons below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost o­n your blog site, internet forums. etc.


This article was originally published o­n Il Manifesto. Translated by Pete Kimberley.


Manlio Dinucci is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research o­n Globalization.

Featured image is from Zero Hedge

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © Manlio Dinucci, Global Research, 2019

Original: https://www.globalresearch.ca/rand-corp-how-destroy-russia/5678456


Manlio Dinucci

Geographer and geopolitical scientist. His latest books are Laboratorio di geografia, Zanichelli 2014 ; Diario di viaggio, Zanichelli 2017 ; L’arte della guerra / Annali della strategia Usa/Nato 1990-2016, Zambon 2016. Guerra nucleare. Il giorno prima. Da Hiroshima a oggi: chi e come ci porta alla catastrofe, Zambon 2017; Diario di guerra. Escalation verso la catastrofe (2016 - 2018), Asterios Editores 2018: https://www.voltairenet.org/auteur124610.html?lang=en



The “options” set out by the plan are in reality no more than variants of the same war strategy, of which the price in sacrifices and risks is paid by us all.



The monstrous plans of violence and destruction, cherished by the US global dictatorship in the Rand Corp, will also hacked up in the 21st century and be buried by Russian non-violence, as Gandhi's non-violence hacked up and buried British rule in India 70 years ago because non-violence is “mightier than the mightiest destructive weapons in the world”(Gandhi). From this weapon, the American militarist empire, "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world" (King), will not be saved by any of its weapons, any money, any aggression, no any hatred of Russia, and no o­ne God if it does not have time to unleash a global nuclear massacre that will be "the end of humanity"(Kennedy), its "fraternal American Auschwitz" o­n Earth.

An irrefutable argumentation of this forecast is presented in the GHA “Gandhi book” (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=848), against which thousands of the Rand Corp experts are powerless in their outdated traditional militaristic thinking. It can o­nly create the plans for American destruction and the humanity genocide; but it is completely impotent and bankrupt for 75 years in the salvation and survival of humanity, which Einstein foresaw: “traditional problems cannot be solved at the same level of thinking that created them.” The Rand Corp another thinking does not know, has not grown to it, therefore it is a “living corpse” of an endangered intellect.

Dr. Leo Semashko, GHA Founder and Honorary President,





Чудовищные планы насилия и разрушения, лелеемые мировой диктатурой США в RandCorp, также разобьются в 21 веке и будут похоронены ненасилием России, как ненасилие Ганди взорвало и похоронило Британское владычество в Индии 70 лет назад, потому что ненасилие «мощнее самого мощного деструктивного оружия в мире» (Ганди). От этого оружия Американскую милитаристскую империю, «главного поставщика насилия в мире» (Кинг) не спасет никакое ее оружие, никакие деньги, никакая агрессия, никакая ненависть к России и ни один Бог, если она не успеет развязать глобальную ядерную бойню, которая будет «концом человечества» (Кеннеди), его «братским Американским Освенцимом» на Земле.

Неопровержимая аргументация этого прогноза представлена в ГСГ «Ганди книге» (https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=848), против которой тысячи экспертов RandCorpбессильны в своем устаревшем традиционном милитаристском мышлении. Оно способно творить только планы Американского разрушения и геноцида человечества, но оно полный импотент и банкрот за 75 лет в спасении и выживании человечества, что предвидел еще Эйнштейн: «традиционные проблемы не могут быть решены на том же уровне мышления, которое создала ихRandCorp другого мышления не знает, не доросло до него, поэтому это «живой труп» вымирающего интеллекта.

Лев Семашко, ГСГ основатель и Почетный президент,





© Website author: Leo Semashko, 2005; © designed by Roman Snitko, 2005